>Tudors were the last native dynasty
>Anglos have been ruled by German and French royalty ever since
Why are Anglos such eager kucks?
>>392781
>Why are Anglos such eager kucks?
Whatever else would you expect when their legendary King, Arthur, is one?
>>392781
>and French
What French dynasties have ruled England since the Tudors?
>>392826
Welsh-Anglo mutt-breed
Actually, every ruling family since 1066 has been foreign.
>inb4 b-BUT THE NORMUNS WEREN'T FREEEEEEENCH!
Ithought the Tudors were Angevins?
>>392781
whats wrong with andorra
>>392846
Are Anglos the original WE WUZ KINGS N SHEET?
>>392853
They are the Jews of Spain.
>>392855
Normally it's WE WUZ CELTS N SHEET
>>392841
>Holy fuck this shit is hilarious
He's the king of the BRITONS. That is, the people who were in Briton before the Anglos. The only historical account of Arthur, literally the only action Arthur takes is killing Anglos.
And then the myth of him is that he will return in the hour of his (celtic) nations need, and remove crumpet.
And this is who the Anglos decided to make their cultural hero, because they are without the capacity to produce culture.
>>392864
>without the capacity to produce culture
That isn't German, at least.
>>392841
stupid cvckposter
>>392878
It's a Germanic trait
Just look at the >Holy >Roman >Empire
>>392781
>Anglos have been ruled by German and French royalty ever since
Anglos have been ruled by french vikings since 1066
>>392864
>anglos honor a legendary cluck whose prophecised messianic return would consist of leading their extermination
See, this is why history and mythology are the best thing ever.
You can't make this up.
Nobody would agree to publish any similar shit in a fiction book about any fictional people's own myths.
But it's there!
>>392864
>Anglos literally idolize Celtic Hitler
Jesus Christ my sides
>>392864
>WE WAS CELTIC KINGS AND QUEENS AND SHITS
>>392781
>anglos
>ruled by anything else than jewish bankers since late 1700s
>>392886
Actually that would be the Pope's fault. The fucker bestowed the dignity on Charlemagne as a reward for being a good catholic and not bending him over and anally ravaging the papacy when he had the chance. While the Pope had no real right to decide who the inheritor to the Roman Empire was, the transfer of said title he created was fairly legit.
>>392846
Goes further back if you include the Anglo-Saxon Kings as foreign too.
>>392968
Tbh if the Angles and Saxons are foreign too, then you could argue that the rulers of England have been Germanic for longer than they were Britons. And in that case, the Windsor dynasty aren't really all too foreign.
Tudors were some Welsh bastards or something.
After the Tudors England has been ruled by Scots, Dutch, and Germans. Before the Tudors it has been ruled by French since 1066. Before that, mostly by Danes, but occasionally also Anglo-Saxons (though at the time they were pretty much still recent invaders).
Is England majority ethnic Anglo or are they mutts?
The royal family are shitty inbred german garbage and we need to get rid of them.
>>393026
There was some well-publicised study recently suggesting most Brits are Britons and not Germanic, but my anglo-saxon history professor also told me about a recent Harvard genealogical study where it was shown the Germanic invaders(anglos/saxons/jutes etc) bred with Briton women and at some point stopped the Briton men from doing so, but there's a lack of written evidence in that period so it's anyones guess.
>>393026
arab
>>392864
Just a reminder that "Anglos" and "Celts" are now the same.
>>392864
>Germanics without the capacity to produce culture
>Culturally dominate all Britons in modern England
the logic
yes
Aren't most royal families German or French?
Austria - French (Lorraine-Habsburg)
France/Spain - German/French (the Capets spent the last thousand years in France, but were originally from Germany)
Sweden - French
Netherlands - German
Denmark and Norway - German
Italy - French/German
I can only think of Japan, that isn't.
>>392781
>I´m okay with being kucked by the upperclass as long as they share the same ethnicity as me
>>393145
France's nobility is French
Germany's nobility is German
>>393145
>I can only think of Japan, that isn't.
China?
Korea?
>>393262
The Manchus were actually Germanic immigrants to Korea.
[spoiler]Just kidding.[/spoiler]
>>392960
It was a move to secure his temporal power (if my memory is correct the king of the lombards had the intention to conquer papal territories) and free himself from any bizantine influence left
>>392781
>Stuarts
>Not native
The Stuarts are the most OG British dynasty since 1066.
>>393116
>Produce nothing of value
>Lose empire, source of Anglo 'culture'
>Introduce Mohammedans to provide to Britain so they can have a source of creativity and inspiration in their lives again.
>>393116
Everyone who produces anything of note in England is either of Irish, Scottish or French descent.
>>393354
They were Scots not Anglos
>>393356
WE CALIPHATE NAO
There are two doors. Choose whichever you may. Each with distinct queen, left or right.
>>393363
this is the same reasoning as niggers who claim white people just steal everyone else's culture and technology
what is it about sub-humans, ie non-Anglos, that makes them so desperate to discredit Anglos at every turn in order to make themselves feel superior?
>>393388
Still beats having to eat English food.
>>393579
I'm of Norman extraction and Anglo peasants can suck my dick.
>>392781
>British were kek'd so bad that their country is now England (Angoland)
>>392864
It's because the Normans destroyed much of Anglo-Saxon culture in the years following Hastings. To be an Englishmen from 1066 to 1453 was nothing but subjugation and humiliation.
A French guy in the 12th century wrote bullshit history from compiled mythos about a supposed Romano-Briton leader. Meanwhile actual Welsh heroes like the prince that thwarted Henry II's invasion is forgotten.
I'm glad that people are giving more attention to the Anglo-Saxon period and its kings. I love The Last Kingdom and Vikings shedding light on the Anglo-Saxon past.
>>393384
Scot don't even exist and the average English person is more Celtic than Scottish or Irish person.
>>393363
Only because those groups were part of English history for so long that almost everyone could find Irish, Scottish, or French ancestry if they really wanted to.
>>396222
>Scot don't even exist and the average English person is more Celtic than Scottish or Irish person.
So what makes up Scottish and Irish people, the people who were on the islands before the Celts? Vikings?
>>392781
Stop trying to make anglos happen
>>396530
Then what ethnic group are you faggots?
Arabs? Pakis? Poo In Da Loos?
