Who's your favorite contemporary philosopher?
And no, political "philosophers", and atheist "philosophers" don't count.
Pfft
Nobody here reads philosophy, apparently.
It was René Girard, but he died a couple of weeks ago ;_;
>>352543
>political "philosophers", and atheist "philosophers" don't count
Top lel senpai.
http://philpapers.org/surveys/results.pl
>atheist philosophers don't count
Do you have any idea how many contemporary philosophers this excludes? You're a fucking idiot.
>>352838
>>352852
>>352861
>act like a retard
>get called retard
>"lol, b-buthurt. U mad bro?"
Every time.
>>352861
Please tell me how Dennett's atheism is germane to his compatibalist model of free will, or what relevance Chalmers' atheism has to his work on language and verbal disputes. Disregarding every single atheist philosopher because of one position they hold is philistine as fuck.
>>352543
>and no, things i don't agree with don't count
>>352926
Political "philosophers", and atheist "philosophers", aren't actually philosophers, but sophistic intellectualoids.
>>352932
>Hume and Schopenhauer weren't philosophers
Confirmed for pleb.
>>352949
Schopenhauer was a philosopher, regardless of his atheism. He was a philosopher not an Atheist Philosopher.
>>352984
>he was an atheist and a philosopher but not an atheist philosopher
Well now you're just being silly.
>>352997
Is semantics too much for you?
>>352919
David Chalmers looks like an unwashed hippie.
>>352543
I was expecting some elitism in this thread but fuck me if you didn't started out strong.
John Searle, mainly for his work on social reality.
Saul Kripke POTY
Anita Saarkesian
>>352984
I'll take no true Scotsman for 200 Alex
>>352928
agreement at it's purest
Bernard Stiegler
Sam Harris
http://mundusmillennialis.com/
Truly, the best philosopher of our generation.
>>353435
That is awful
>>353435
Reads a tiny bit like Early Nietzsche, if he had been detached and lying to himself
