How do you think?
rules:
1. All images and discussion should pertain to the humanities: history, philosophy, religion, law, classical artwork, archeology, anthropology, ancient languages, etc.
2. Discussions about books, poetry, and other forms of literature should be posted on /lit/.
3. Discussions about politics and current events should be posted on /pol/. Global Rule #3 is in effect: blatantly racist posts may result in a ban.
4. Please do not start threads about events taking place less than 25 years ago.
delete 5
ban dubs
Hiro pls
>>3419
Please Hiro delete the flags.
>>3419
Allow humanities discussion on /lit/ when a relevant book is posted.
Also delete flags and IDs.
>>3419
Remove flags and IDs.
>>3419
are you fucking kidding me?
You are going ask the fucking rabble what the rules should be?
>>3419
Remove IDs
>>3474
flags will be disable by default.
>>3477
You don't need IDs?
Delete this board please, it's just been a disaster since the start.
>>3528
Thank you.
Why do people want flags and post ID's disabled? Especially ID's? What's wrong with ID's? It helps avoid samefagging.
This isn't /int/, Hiro.
Please remove flags and IDs.
/his/ hasn't done anything wrong, flags and IDs are only on /pol/ as punishment.
>>3419
Please delete flags, this will only detract from discussion and cause more shitposting.
>>3419
can we ban holocaust discussion or at least keep ww2 discussion to one thread because oh my god fuck /pol/
>>3542
Why do you think so?
>>3419
>religion
Does this mean religion won't be allowed on /pol/ any more? Please say that's how it is.
Hiro, why not 20 years as the cut-off?
That way we can talk about the fall of the Soviet Union and the Yugoslav war
>>3541
ID's will only cause trouble.
Delete them
>>3419
delete flags, IDs can stay
>>3541
Hiroyuki, there is no good argument against Posting ID's. I say you keep them.
>>3574
Don't listen to him. Boards are always low quality when they're first started. It settles itself out after a few days.
>>3542
Yeah, because it started less than an hour ago without rules. The mods are already starting to sort thing out, it will be fine.
>>3419
Hiroyuki, please remove flags from /his/. It adds nothing to discussion and blocks up threads with overused memes. Every time a user of a certain nationality posts, there'll always be a flood of tired stock responses from /pol/tards; shit like "INDIA? LOL POO IN THE LOO", "SWEDEN?? HAHA U LIKE BLACK MAN PENIS", "AMERICAN? MORE LIKE AMERIFAT", "HEHEH UR GREEK, PAY DEMBTS xd"
If you don't want /his/ to become /pol/ 2.0, get rid of flags.
>>3563
Why do you think ID as punishment?
Stop asking us for input about the rules. You should decide them. If you don't want to decide them, then let the mods decide them. Fuck.
>>3592
This, keep them.
Delete this board, the only people who actually wanted it are shitposters
>>3542
Boards will always get an immense amount of shitposting when they get created.
Are you new? Even if you're post-2012, there has been the creation of /biz/ and /s4s/.
>>3541
Make flags optional, delete ID's
>/lit/ is finally saved from Christposting
>>3419
Why 25 years? Why not 15?
Best board desu senpai.
No porn or nudity on this board.
>>3419
>blatantly racist posts may result in a ban
VERY bad idea, trying to make history not racist is just lying
>>3541
For now you can remove IDs, in the future we can decide if there's a need for them.
Pretty fucking good
>>3419
The rules look good but the flags and IDs really need to go
Please Hiro
Delete /pol/ now too
Have you seen the mass shootings/sword stabbings lately? All pure cancer toxic /pol/ scum spawn, delete the board for humanity's sake
>>3542
what does that accomplish?
There's no point in not keeping this place up.
Do not remove posting ID's, there is literally no reason for this.
If anything, Posting ID's is a great way to curbstomp /pol/-posting
Remove the 25 year thing
Make it more like 10 years
Also allow us for some citation shit, to cite our sources etc.
Also ban eternal anglo >>445
>>3541
Why should we have IDs on /his/ and not every single other board? Why does /his/ specifically need IDs?
This isn't what 4chan was originally about, no board should have IDs. Everyone should be completely anonymous (on the front-end at least).
>>3528
So no selectable historical flags?
>>3648
No, it's the perfect idea to keep /pol/ and stormfront out.
>>3643
What about nude historical artwork?
what the fuck is this shit?
Hiro did you even go over this with your mods? Why are you even listening to the users? This isn't japan, nobody here likes eachother and there are dedicated groups of people who just want to ruin the site for everybody else.
>>3419
ypu motherfucker why did you remove desu senpai
fucking japan hitler kek
i hope you burn in hell
>>3584
This
>>3541
Deleting flags are a good idea but for the sake of maintaining civility in serious threads, keep IDs to prevent samefagging and shitposting. You only need to go to /int/ or /pol/ to see how detrimental flags are to a discussion - thread IDs on the other hand are useful to filter out idiots who can't argue in a civilized manner.
>>3674
spooky skelly detected
I think generals should be allowed. This would prevent the whole board from turning into a cespool of "Why did Rome fall? Was Rome the perfect society? etc."
Other than that I'm really happy we finally have a /his/
Hiro can you ban the "We wuz kings and queens" threads and other /pol/ tier shit
>>3643
Except for art
SOMEONE PLEASE GIVE ME TWO GOOD REASONS ON WHY ID'S ARE BAD FOR THIS BOARD.
>>3419
>4. Please do not start threads about events taking place less than 25 years ago.
Meh. This will be like /vr/ when entire threads are just about banning/allowing certain things
Keep flags, get rid of IDs.
I don't want to be indoctrinated by some Iranian or Israeli or some uneducated American opinion. Flags are the best filter.
>>3670
IDs on more discussion-heavy boards prevent shitters from samefagging.
>>3648
there's "I can find limited success in countries in western africa"
and then there's "duhhh niggers xD"
one of which should be acceptable, the other can fuck off to /pol/
>Humanities
Is it really necessary?
>>3419
remove flags and IDs
Please for the love of god remove skeletons.
>>3705
Those threads are already getting taken care of, m8
>>3643
Where else will I get my vintage porn fix?
delet ID's
do not allow generals like /brit/
MAKE /2d/ - 2D/Random
MAKE /2d/ - 2D/Random
MAKE /2d/ - 2D/Random
MAKE /2d/ - 2D/Random
MAKE /2d/ - 2D/Random
>>3528
Will flags be selectable?
>>3739
It's just for Halloween anon.
>>3574
Hiro you created this board with no rules to start at all!
how do you see this is not a disaster?
>>3609
Other boards don't have them why does /his/ need them? /pol/ got theirs because of punishment and the idea of IDs on an anonymous image board is awful. Don't punish /his/ right from the start.
>>3659
you do realize if /pol/ is deleted they will just jump to other boards
/pol/ is a perfect containment board
Please don't delete flags, make the optional.
There have now been like 50 posts crying about ID's, yet no reasons as to WHY the ID's should be removed have been given.
Well?
>>3724
>omg the n-word
Holy shit, how new are you?
>>3419
Get rid of IP based flags and allow flags to be chosen / get rid of flags all together. In a perfect world I would like flags based on IP to exist but there is too much shitposting. Keep ID's though to prevent samefagging.
>>3667
20 years is a better cut-off, desu senpai. 10 years ago would mean that the Iraq war is up for discussion. 20 years ago gets rid of all that shit, and it also allows for discussion of the Yugoslav Wars and the fall of the Soviet Union.
>>3685
>croatia being a normalfag shitter
who could have guessed
>>3779
That's how all boards start.
>>3419
>2. Discussions about books, poetry, and other forms of literature should be posted on /lit/.
Can we share books with each other that are about history? I was going to start up a thread later today or tomorrow where I'll post a bunch of history-related books.
>>3718
That's literally like going to a normal forum. There is a reason posters should be anonymous: so that you dont know anything about them
>>3419
The whole "less than 25 years ago" thing makes sense, but things like Afghanistan/Iraq and Yugoslav Wars can produce decent historical discussion, even if many their effects can be considered "recent" or contemporary. I don't see why it should be against the rules to discuss them provided it's done as history and not politics.
Also, I don't think generals should be allowed unless they're broad subjects such as ancient/medieval/renaissance/modern or even centuries, things like WW2 and anything else are just really narrow and overstudied areas that very little actual decent discussion can take place on; it would at best be a bunch of amateur repeated opinions with the occasional decent discussion, and at worst it would be memes and histposting.
When the board is a bit less chaotic and people learn how to have normal debates with each-other the rules could perhaps be laxed even more, but for now I think aside from what I've said, the ones listed are okay.
>>3783
>/pol/ is a perfect containment board
Look at /int/ and this board. I don't want it to be banned, but it really is not
>>3791
They prioritize identity over content you filthy Portuguese shitskin.
>>3609
Hiro remove flags
Get some actual help and STOP LISTENING TO RANDOM POSTERS
GO GET REAL HELP FROM MODS
>>3648
>>3675
These kinds of things should be up to the discretion of rational mods. If something is an obvious shitpost and it violates a rule, then mods should delete it. But, if racism and historical nudity are used reasonably and relevantly, then they should be allowed to stay.
What do you think, Hiro?
>>3584
Excluding Persian gulf and Iraq war is better, I think.
It would become modern topics.
>>3745
Good
>>3792
Saying the word "nigger" over and over again is just childish and stupid. We don't need that here.
IMO obvious revisionist history threads, if they are not just deleted on-sight (they should be imo) should have multiple citations in the OP.
That would show whether the OP had interesting evidence to his claims, or is an idiot buying into fake sites / data thus could be debunked or safely ignored (preferably deleted), or is a kid/jokester who has no idea what he's doing.
Compared to the entire body of history, there are only a few events which get tons of revisionist attempts so I think it would not be that hard to control/enforce.
Hiro, I agree with everyone saying to remove flags altogether and making the cut off point 20 years instead of 10.
>>3755
/jp/ is the board you're looking for
>>3792
Nobody cares about saying niggers.
If "duhh niggers" is all you have to add to the conversation, you'd probably best fuck off to /pol/
no flags senpai
theyre funny on a shitposting board like int but flags guarentee 200% more shitposting
>>3528
Can we have the optional historical flags like in the other thread? /pol/ used to have an optional flag system, so it should be written down somewhere how to have it done
>>3798
>selectable flags
this, desu
/qa/ has been making some historcial flags over at >>/qa/314081
>>3849
>childish and stupid
Isn't reacting to it more childish and stupid?
I think you should more clearly define what is and isn't racism, Hiro. Historical discussions require peoples alternating viewpoints, and an outright general ban would lead to too much confusion.
>>3808
I would love that, please make that thread anon.
And Hiro don't ban history books on a history board.
We should have a sticky with books for news
>>3843
Persian Gulf and Iraq War are still excluded if you drop from it from 25 years to 20, Hiroyuki.
>>3419
>3. Discussions about politics and current events should be posted on /pol/. Global Rule #3 is in effect: blatantly racist posts may result in a ban.
I disagree with this. History can often be racist, from a certain point of view. The rule should be clarified to target posts of low quality rather than opinion.
I would prefer if we couldn't discuss after 1945. It's a better cut in history.
>>3843
Yeah but about topics which began ages ago but only ended recently, like Northern Ireland's troubles which lastest from 1960's to 1998? Are topics like that up for discussion?
>>3858
Fuck off.
>>3710
>they're an eyesore with their stupid colors
>old 4chan didn't need them, they're reserved for punishments for shit boards like /b/ and /pol/
Plus, I just generally don't like them
>>3791
Because this is an anonymous image board.
Because if we should not be punished on the outset for posting on this board even though the board culture has not formed yet.
Because intelligently-crafted arguments should be all that a post's quality is based on.
>>3858
there's nothing random about eternal generals and non-touhou threads outside of those getting deleted
>>3731
Yes
>>3584
>fall of the Soviet Union
I think it's okay.
deciding how to count is difficult.
>>3574
Hiro, could you please include selectable historical flags?
>>3722
Why not enable them on /vg/, /tg/, etc.?
They're discussion-heavy boards.
>>3609
moot enabled them to mess with /pol/ before he left.
A lot of people thought it had something to do with Ben Garrison and this caricature.
>>3574
chinkmoot you're a cute
>doesn't want us to be /pol/
>gives us IDs
I understand the flags but the IDs are a bit much
And yes, a flag "toggle" or something does definitely sound like a good idea, if possible.
>>3419
Good ideas, but philosophy should be allowed on both boards, as it's way more close to /lit/ than to history.
For instance, epistemology or psychoanalysis aren't really parts of the humanities.
>>3718
you do realize the hypocrisy in your post
anyways flags have to go, they're not suited for this board
>>3879
This is a serious board, not /pol/ or /b/. There is no reason for racism at all, now go back to /pol/.
>>3874
>>>/qa/314081
ftfy
Risk threads with historical content should be allowed on the board.
>>3879
No? Fuck off. Dumb /pol/-tier racism belongs exclusively on /pol/, don't drag us down too.
>>3843
EXCLUDE WWII
>>3893
Nah m8, the Cold War is a (more or less) closed chapter of history that deserves to be discussed.
>>3913
Hiro, what do you think you're going to do with IDs?
I think you said the flags would go away but what about IDs?
I've seen a lot of people saying they're not the way to go
>>3541
Keep ID's for now.
Remove flags, they will only encourage shitposting.
>>3915
This
>>3915
they're enabled on constructive discussion-heavy boards, not general discussion boards.
>>3843
I really don't think excluding recent events will work unless they're contemporary or VERY recent - and even so, there's not a /news/ to cover this instead.
So long as it's historical discussion and not political, I don't see why it's an issue other than that things like the September 11th attacks and various recent news events produce a lot of shitposting and discussion that has no value.
>>3843
But the Gulf war was 25 years ago. You can already talk about them
>>3614
why you don't want to decide?
>>3474
Flags are necessary, as they allow you to recognize someone's possible bias.
>>3791
Anti ID is pro shitpost, anyone anti ID hasn't thought about their position/doesn't understand they are on a per thread basis/wants samefagging.
Samefagging is ok in some contexts, but /his/ should be for actual discussion and not total funzies.
>>3913
No disadvantage to cutting to 20 years, Hiroyuki. It gets all the good subjects and no bad ones.
>>3913
I think for now we should set the collapse of the Soviet Union as the cut-off, so nothing later than 1991. Starting next year, set the cutoff to 25 years.
>>3638
excluding modern US wars
>>3893
I dunno, the Cold War, the Great Leap Forward, the end of colonial Africa, the fall of the wall etc are extremely fucking interesting topics.
>>3437
טוב אחי
>>3913
[spoiler]are spoilers enabled on this board because they should be if not.[/spoiler]
>>3975
>they're enabled on constructive discussion-heavy boards
The only board that asked for them for "Discussion" was /biz/. Before then it was a punishment - /b/, /q/, and /pol/, and threatened on /v/
should non-fiction books about history be ok? I have a lot of great non-fiction history books that discuss some oddball historical topics and I'd love to have suggestion type threads..
>>3887
>I would love that, please make that thread anon.
I will, look for it! I'll link you to it from this thread, if this thread is still up.
>>3419
Good rules, but we need just need a lot of mods to deal with the nazi posters. I don't know if you've noticed it, but there are a lot of them and they're very brash.
>>3913
IMO it should be like this: Threads can be started for anything that happened before 2000's. However, if there are modern day connections that can be made to the topic, allow those. Example: A thread talking about Islam and the Middle East should be able to cite modern Islam and terrorism.
>>3939
That stuff should be kept to /tg/ IMO
>>3980
Agreed with this.
Im okay with a 20 years rule, though, as long as janitor just uses discretion.
>remove flags
>Make post timer like 2 fucking minutes so people actually have to put in thought to their posts and dont spam ebun memes
Just remove flags but keep ID's.
Also, this board can't work without heavy moderation, because there will be thousands of threads daily made by /pol/tards about how Jews in camps died from flu or something.
I'd just ban Holocaust discussion altogether.
>>3985
Look at this thread in /qa/ >>>/qa/314081
Could you add these historical flags?
>>3915
/vg/ argues about video games - that's a hobby where subjective tastes rule rather than historical fact. The need for quality control isn't the same.
>>3996
That's how they're supposed to work but it will only end in shitposting.
>>3682
I asked mods, too.
I need information to choose something.
>>3913
How do you feel about limiting holocaust threads to 3? One for, one against, and one for debate.
Otherwise it's going to turn into a major board problem. It is history, and shouldn't be excluded, but we do need to limit it.
>>3541
Just keep both flags and ID's. Most importantly keep flags otherwise this board will be as boring as all the rest of them without flags.
>>3998
Wrong, it's about anonymity. Look at this thread and you can tell people will be ignored if they said "nigger" once half the thread ago. You don't want that.
>>4008
Discuss their effects on /pol/ or books covering them on /lit/.
>>4007
If you want to keep out the modern US wars we could just do anything before 9/11.
1. All stormfag/revisionist history needs to be cracked down upon hard.
2. Generals SHOULD be allowed to confine popular topics, such as Rome/Nazi Germany/etc.
3. Allow recommendations for nonfiction books on historical topics, or at least an essential reads containment thread.
>>3957
>/pol/-tier
You mean 4chan-tier?
>>3985
It's not about just me. I mean asking everybody to decide. People here don't know how to make good rules, and we're all anonymous and people just troll.
>>4007
what about other wars of significance? like the yugoslav shit?
>>4043
>muh freedom of speech
>>3985
Don't listen to him Hiro, it's good to ask for input. Just make sure not to follow random people's words blindly.
>>4042
>Make post timer like 2 fucking minutes so people actually have to put in thought to their posts and dont spam ebun memes
Reinforcing this.
Rule 4 is dumb. A lot of academic history articles are about shit that happened in the last 15 years
>>3985
Because so much opinions are being spewed in this thread.
You should make a Strawpoll or something to decide some things, for example flags/ids.
>>4016
It wasn't punishment, it was to enforce better discussion quality when the users clearly didn't want to cooperate.
>>3528
Thanks bhai.
>>4076
>1. All stormfag/revisionist history needs to be cracked down upon hard.
Why? Because you disagree with it?
>2. Generals SHOULD be allowed to confine popular topics, such as Rome/Nazi Germany/etc.
So a Nazi General will be allowed, but only anti-Nazis allowed to post, not pro-Nazi?
Hiro, I love you.
You are the saviour of 4chan.
>>4060
I think the rules are perfect, Hiro.
>>4108
DESIGNATED
>>4096
HOLY SHIT YOU AGAIN
>>3812
>Yugoslav war
this will just be endless shitposting, not enough time has passed by for a quality discussion
>>4096
>make a strawpoll
Francis please it's time for bed
>>4007
I think wars that are done with, for example Iraq war, should be allowed for discussion.
I understand banning wars that are currently going on, but things that already happened are interesting and a good topic for discussion.
9/11 changed the world as we know it and we should be allowed to talk about it.
>>4061
>One for, one against, and one for debate.
Why, we only need the latter one.
>>3419
What about political history? British political history for example? I can't discuss that on /pol/. It's a fucking shithole.
>>3913
ID's are no good, they prioritize identity over content, let them go.
>>4107
It was punishment for calling him a kek
>>3985
Because 90% of the people here are idiots!
To use popularity vote just means /pol/ 2.0
>>4096
>PK
fuck of you fucking faggot
>>4126
You can say that about any war.
>>3792
There's nothing wrong with saying "nigger", although the fact is that the majority of people who say it are uneducated degenerates (this applies to both the black people and the non-black people who say it).
>>4060
i think it should be 15 years, cause i cant see anyone shitposting about the persian gulf war
i think a lot of interesting stuff to discuss happened in the 90s that would suck to cut off
>>4043
Don't ban discussion on the Holocaust, just ban blatant /pol/shitters
>>3791
because this is an anonymous imageboard and I choose to be anonymous
/film/ should really be your next project emperor
>>3419
>politics and current events should be posted on /pol/
maybe this is the wrong place. But I never got this.
isn't /pol/ short for politically incorrect. Is this to contain threads during events to just one board and keep them off of /int/
>blatantly racist posts may result in a ban
in the spirit of this website, I gotta object to this.
who decides what is blatantly racist? please remove this line. this will actually encourage a lot of racist shitposting and passive aggressive awfulness.
Also, this is your website. Just make the rules, and they'll get followed or not. But thanks for making us feel like our input matters.
Important poll.
http://strawpoll.me/5886754
http://strawpoll.me/5886754
http://strawpoll.me/5886754
http://strawpoll.me/5886754
>>3963
or you could have a world war 2 general instead ;)
>>4144
>455
all you need to know about British political history
Remove flags. They're so fucking irrelevant to the discussion. Just adds a layer of ego.
>>4096
-Users may not Posts from VPN, Proxies or TOR exit nodes
HIRO BAN THIS FAGGOT
MAKE HIM WASTE MONEY ON A VPN
>>3985
Better to have a single admin being responsible for the rules than a chaotic mob.
You can listen to us, but in the end it's up to you to make the final decisions.
>>4167
If you ban Holocaust discussion it will just creep into World War II threads.
>>4077
No, If you've ever been to other 4chan boards, they're not racist like /pol/ and /b/. /pol/ tries to insist that racism is a 4chan thing but that simply isn't the case.
>>4126
But that's not true, even if you look at the history focusing on the UN it is fascinating and totally worthwhile for discusison and debate.
What we need is decent and discrete mods that will keep history discussion alive and political discussion out.
>>4007
Exclude all modern anything!
>>4177
Keep ID's remove flags
your poll lacks options
>>4060
Will you disallow religion threads on /pol/ now that we have a humanities board?
>>4177
Where's the option to remove just flags?
>>4096
http://strawpoll.me/5886914
http://strawpoll.me/5886914
http://strawpoll.me/5886914
STRAWPOLL REGARDING FLAGS AND IDS HERE PEEPS :^)
>>4077
No, I mean /pol/-tier. There's a reason why we're all trying to get rid of /pol/ faggots from /his/, including the moderators. We don't want to deal with their faggotry.
It's like /b/, keep that shit contained, no one else in this site wants it.
>>4087
That's a bullshit argument, I'm not a Jew, I'm not offended, I'm just tired of retards shitting up every historical discussion with their dumb uneducated opinions and theories.
Holocaust is probably the most researched event of 20th century. Thousands and thousands of real historians from various cultures agree on most of the facts.
You have thousands of testimonies from every side.
Denying it happened is as dumb as denying 100 Years War happened.
>Please do not start threads about events taking place less than 25 years ago.
9/11fags BTFO
>>3592
>there is no good argument against Posting ID's
How about anonymity?
The unique IP counter is enough to discourage samefagging.
>>4177
what about just flags and no ids? or you can select your own historical flag or something
>>4174
>who decides what is blatantly racist?
It's basically to prevent /pol/ from making "there was nothing wrong with the Holocaust" threads.
>>4177
http://strawpoll.me/5886928
http://strawpoll.me/5886928
http://strawpoll.me/5886928
this one got more options and is more detailed
>>4007
It's a really bad idea to cut off any period of history. There's a lot of interesting things that have happened in the past 25 years.
>>4134
this
also there's shit like the falling of the iron curtain, the rise of telecommunications, America's first black president, hurricane Katrina, Tiananmen Square, Rwandan Genocide, the release of Nelson Mandela, gay marriage...
>>4231
>no option for "no IDs, selectable historical flags"
>>4208
Nigger has been used as a catch-all term since the sites inception.
Its usage has literally nothing to do with /pol/
>>4240
>be american
>get their whitehouse burned down
What's wrong with IDs, anyways? They work really, really well on otherchan /v/
>>4134
9/11 being allowed would be absolute cancer
>>4269
Historical flags would be shitposting everywhere.
>>4269
My bad, let's assume it's part of the random historical flags option. Make them selectable rather than random.
>>4201
This.
Just keep asking and have conversations with the users. But at the end, it's just up to you
Also, I know it's not specifically related to the rule discussion, but
>hiro is actually creating threads and spending time in them regarding how things should be done
absolutely based, 10/10
>>4296
It would be less shitposting.
>>3710
Suppose someone says something exceptionally stupid, the sort of stupid that breeds screencaps that will be famous for years to come. If that person were to later post something unrelated, on a thread with reasonable discussion, there's a good chance the thread will devolve into shitposts as a result.
Now, that's a pretty specific example, but
>>4060
Selectable flags please
>>4177
Remove flags
Keep ids
>>3419
>ancient languages
1) Can discussion include languages that are not attested in Ancient Times (aka. pre 400 CE)?
2) Can we discuss etymology or the development of a language or the development of a linguistic feature or the development of language in general?
>>3419
Is nazi revisionism allowed?
>>4177
keep flag, remove IDs
>>4289
They're anti-anonymity. This is part of the reason why 8ch has a redditchan reputation, besides shitposting is because you don't seem to respect anonymity as much.
>>3541
Delete IDs, there is no argument for keeping them. Better yet, delete this entire board. History, religion, law, archeology, anthropology and ancient languages belong on /int/, philosophy goes on /lit/ and classical artwork goes on /ic/. There is no need for this board, it will just divide the community even more, just like moot said.
>>4236
Of course they'll agree when they are told to, denying the Holohoax is against the law in some countries. Watch/read the Leuchter report.
http://thegreateststorynevertold.tv/portfolio/part-21-the-leuchter-findings/
>>3419
looks like hiro! :D
Keep flags -
But make them optional that you can select to remove them. So you automatically post with a flag but you can choose to remove it.
http://strawpoll.me/5886956
http://strawpoll.me/5886956
http://strawpoll.me/5886956
http://strawpoll.me/5886956
http://strawpoll.me/5886956
vote on cutoff date for discussion
>>4332
It better not be. Holocaust deniers are the absolute worst to deal with and have no place in a history board.
>>4208
Saying "nigger" or believing there's differences between the racist isn't racist. It doesn't make sense for you to want to ban any history that can be considered racist.
Remove flags
Keep IDs
>>3419
>4. Please do not start threads about events taking place less than 25 years ago.
13th of January, 1991 @ TV Tower
never forget
>>4263
IDs, Selectable Historical Flags is the only true way
>>4289
>They work really, really well on otherchan /v/
LMAO
Go back to Reddit.
>>4144
bump
>>3419
Should probably get the mod to remove the picture of Sherman in the sticky post.
That was a bad call on his part.
>>4347
How does an ID counter anonymity? You're still on an anonymous imageboard, you just can't shitpost without people recognizing you.
>>4091
Could even be 5 minutes imo, especially if flags are kept so people don't waste their posting window on spamming pointless /pol/ or /int/ shit. If they can do that without abandon here anyway then why should this board even exist?
>>4338
>t. came in 2012
Ignorance is bliss.
At least it's easy to call you out on it, faggot.
>>4370
I don't think this can be addressed in a poll.
Having a cutoff date will always be arbitrary, what's important is making sure threads are historical and not political - which is a mod issue, not a rule one.
>>4060
Don't change how /lit/ is moderated, please. Just let us keep doing as we have been.
>>3419
Delete second half of 3
Somebody shouldn't be banned simply for expressing their opinion (or for memes)
Even if their opinion is considered racist
>>4339
Keeping flags just means that every post by an Indian is immediately suffocated by a wave of DESIGNATED.
