Could Hitler have achieved his Lebensraumy dreams if Poland was allied with the USSR instead of Britain and France?
>>324458
Churchill would have needed to have died before the invasion to prevent Britain from entering the war regardless. A strong Germany was a clear threat to the imperial England and Churchill never shied away from war.
>>324458
both ways it requires a tactically and statigically sound fuhrer, not some madcap fantacist like Hitler
>>324595
And you can't mobilize Germany without a leader who irrationally mythologizes Germany's destiny. There never would have been a perfect Reich.
>>324458
>if Poland was allied with the USSR
do you know anything about history?
>>324458
Now there are two
>hurr durr wat if nazi won xd
threads on /his/ really hope mods start deleting threads like this
>>324458
ironically, such an alliance might well have prevented a molotov-ribbentrop pact, and therefore the entire war.
thanks, poland.
>>324458
Poland wasn't allied to the UK, due to rising anti-german British nationalism (because of Hitlers Czech invasion) Parliament responded in April 1939 to guarantee Poland, so no in other words
>>325074
How about you bitch about actual troll threads instead of fun threads. Speculation can be a fun way of educating people.
>>324458
WIPE OUT ALL SLAVS
Poland should've been allied with Germany. It would probably happen if Pilsudski didn't die.
>>325177
Really fun when they come up 2 times a day and its always the same shit about what if Hitler won.
>>324628
Couldn't you have a puppet Fuhrer who essentially acted as Goebbels' voice box while the rest of the staff ran their departments efficiently?
What could have been?
>>324575
Greedy anglo scum
>>325256
Maybe there would have been a more effective middle ground. I guess my point is that the more you take away from Hitler to make up for his failings the more he fails in other regards. The man was obsessed with a strong mythologized Germany. That obsession is what allowed him to do the things that he did and inevitably led him to failure.
>>324458
No, because the Nazi regime would have collapsed even without outside intervention. The economy was a mess and the government rife with corruption.
>>325961
>government rife with corruption
Kek.
Spout more unfounded generalities
>>326090
You honestly think the Nazis weren't corrupt?
>>326125
Show me substantial proof.
Such a ridged buracracy and their governmental structure prevented a lot of "corruption".
>>326138
>a large bureaucracy prevents corruption
>>326150
No. Because then the US government would be the least corrupt on the planet.
But go ahead, ignore what I actually said and don't provide proof.
>>326194
http://www.homin.ca/news.php/news/12712/group/27
https://books.google.com/books?id=7Ll7Bo39TjMC&pg=PA6&lpg=PA6&dq=corruption+nazi+germany&source=bl&ots=nl1noRMgeg&sig=tNDTOZ6-laDf8mm6BNs5u7nfU3k&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwia_JiT0rbJAhXHKx4KHcLqDFc4FBDoAQg6MAc#v=onepage&q=corruption%20nazi%20germany&f=false
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v425/n6959/full/425650b.html
Tell me more about how a dictatorship that confiscated property and killed and censored its own citizens en masse was a shining paragon against corruption.
>>326194
You honestly think the US has the largest bureaucracy on the planet?
>>326672
You have to be 18 to post here
> 521 manpower left
I have to call bullshit on this pic
