>>1410054
even if the moose cavalry worked, its not like the swedes would even use them anyways

>>1410054
No. Moose are nasty, mean, cagey animals that no man has business riding.

no. there are two things:
1)moose can't be domesticated since it's not naturally hierarchic pack animal. same reason as with horse/zebra-case.
2)even if you could tame it you can't ride it since it's not physically capable of doing that. you'd just end up breaking it's legs.

what? but i thought mooses were highly aggressive animals.
Is that photoshop?

>>1412231
are you blind or retarded?

>>1412216
domestication = evolution
horses werent able to carry a grown man before they were domesticated either

Thanks for the you

>>1412216
>>1412244
>>1410940
These. A soviet scientist in siberia (aka real scientists, not lysenko type) domesticated a feral fox species into a creature as tame as a dog that waves its tail, barks and answer to names. To this day that farm exists and sell this dog-foxes.

If you dont trust soviets which is fine, take as an example the llamas of the incas which they bred and selected. To this day the guanaco (the wild type almost undomesticated animal) still exists and they fucking literally spit and bite people