Post stuff that triggers you
>unironically using terms like "Dark Ages"
>anachronisms like knights in full armor being a stereotypical representation of the whole medieval period
>categorizing historical events/persons as "good" and "evil"
>>1321899
>communism has never been tried
>>1321899
>>categorizing historical events/persons as "good" and "evil"
What's wrong about that? There are reasonable working definitions of good and evil in society, why should they not apply to history?
>>1321917
protip: there aren't
>>1321899
Dark ages is easier than "early medieval period" even though it does carry unpleasant connotations.
Plus it was genuinely a fall from the superior classical world so :^))))))
>>1321932
>fall
>superior
Just a rough transition into a properly religious world.
>>1321936
Hysterical jewish zealots not welcome.
>>1321899
Empires are evil.
>The Catholic Church was so meen and close minded :'(
>Muslims were always ebil expansionist fgts and Muhammad was a pedorapist satanist baby eating puppy kicking railroad tycoon who left the toilet seat up every night!
>Genghis Khan was literally S8tan incarnate senpai!
>Da Germans Started World War I AND II !
>Wow! Ninjas were so kewl!
Cancer.
>>1323676
Muhammad DIDN'T leave the toilet seat up every night? My entire worldview has been shattered.
Only knowing about The Assassins from Assassin's Creed.
>>1321917
because context is exceptionally important.
