How the fuck did they survive so long, between two large powers? Also, Brittany general
Celts getting BTFO as usual.
better is question is why Celts are such colossal failures.
>>1148351
What do you mean? There not independent and their language is only a zombie artificially kept alive by some enthusiasts
>>1148414
Cuckoldry.
>>1148414
They were the kings of Europe for about 600 years
Would you call Romans failures just because modern Italians suck?
>>1148351
I played as a Norse Viking in CK2 and ended up taking over the entire kingdom, introducing superior Norse (later Norman) culture that more or less completely wiped out native Celt traditions
>>1148414
They were caught between the Romans and later Germans. It's no wonder that the only Celts left are on a couple of islands and a small peninsula on the fringes of Europe.
>>1148536
>kings
They were a bunch of tribes and minor kingdoms. It would be downright embarrassing for a culture of tribes to not rule such an empty area for 600 years.
>>1148536
we wuz celts n shit
>>1148536
well Roman culture is pervasive throughout Europe. Nigga you don't understand, Rome was a political body. Latins, and their culture, still dominate a good chunk of Europe.
>>1148536
We wuz kings and shiet
>>1148624
that's only an idea by modern results. What if it were that Germans were caught between Slavs and Celts? Latins caught between Hellenes and Celts?
Is there any sense of nationalism among them today? Do they feel at all apart from France?
>>1148702
Then those people would also be fucked. Places like Austria and France aren't good places to be when there's Rome to the south and Germans to the Northeast, at least during that time period.
