Is it bullshit? How do you even go about arguing against this?
>Where is the ‘emptiness’ which precedes this empty cup?
Theory of Evolution sent the theory of forms straight to the trash can.
If rabbits are not static, then there is no rabbit-ness form from which they are derived.
Accept Aristotle as the one true philosophy and Aquinas as his messenger
>>1091163
I heard that Aristotle talks more shit than Plato does. When reading the Greeks, what should I take from them? The reasoning etc. Even if their arguments and up being proven wrong by history?
>>1091180
I would fucking love to hear what you think is shit about Aristotle mate
>>1091189
I haven't read him but I consistently see people shitting on him on this board
>>1091180
Don't focus on what their conclusions are but how they come to the conclusion that something is truth or not.
>I don't know anything about philosophy but I'm talking about it online
Read a book.
>>1091163
WEW LAD
Theory of Forms is definitely shit, but that is some grade A not understanding it at all. Like, holy fuck, that doesn't address it at all.
>>1091351
Not an argument
>>1091163
>Theory of Evolution sent the theory of forms straight to the trash can.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carcinisation
>>1091180
Pre-socratics>Plato and his shitty follwoers
>>1091371
Based Form of Crab
Check-mate anti-Platonists!
