>Germany was so technologically advanced it took the entire world to beat them
>>1060731
>implying that's not true
So why did it take the world to beat them TWICE then huh genius?
> Germany never won a war
> Israel never lost a war
>>1060731
Russia, Britain or the US alone could have beat them. each of them outpaced Germany's war economy often by several times. but the war would have lasted a long ass time without multiple fronts due to Hitler forcing the country to fight down to the last man and refusing to surrender
>>1060749
Master race confirmed
>>1060770
hans pls leave
>>1060780
not even german or a wehraboo
Thats a bit of international comedy for everyone except Pierre. Even the polish can point at that and say "well, at least be didn't fuck up that badly!".
>>1060756
If I remember the numbers correctly the Soviets did not outpace them in production in terms of GDP.
The British Empire did however, as obviously did the Americans.
>>1060780
French World War narratives are hilarious
French historiography is practically Korea-tier
>>1060756
t.american historian
>Revolutionary France was so ideologically advanced it beat entire world
>>1060859
>Waterloo happened
I don't think that ideology was as advanced as you think it was
>>1060864
>>Waterloo happened
This is like an American saying "lol the Battle of the Bulge" happened. It just wasn't as signifcant as we'd like to think.
It's awfully impressive that Napoleon can come back from exile and again create the finest army in Europe even when the manpower of France is so depleted.
>>1060873
>It's awfully impressive that Napoleon can come back from exile and again create the finest army in Europe even when the manpower of France is so depleted.
Blucher's army was finer.
>>1060749
Germany has never been in a war.
>>1060878
what the fuck am I reading
>>1060877
The Battle of Ligny tells otherwise
>>1060878
t. Hans
>>1060883
Waterloo doesn't
>>1060883
It doesn't.
PRUSSIA PRO
>>1060886
But Waterloo was Wellington, not Blucher
>>1060892
Wellington would have been pic related if the Prussians hadn't shown up
>>1060859
Kingdom of Mysore? More like Kingdom of Eyesore!
Just look at that flag!
>>1060859
Why Denmark?
>>1060932
They were initially neutral but then Britain attacked them so they sided with France
>>1060940
Around the Anglo, never be slow
>>1060737
>the world
So "the world" means either France and Britain or the USSR, glad to know.
>>1060982
East Asia just didn't even give a fuck.
>>1060731
It could be argued that the war on the Eastern Front was a war in it's own right and that Russia alone beat Germany.
>>1061414
For fuck sake.
>>1060770
HAHA
DAS IST WHY IT TOOK ALL YOU TO KILL ME
>>1061414
>Russia alone beat Germany
I do agree that the Germans could not have won on the eastern front, no matter how much lend-lease the Soviet Union received.
But going full retard and claiming that all the high-octane fuel, locomotives, ball bearings and boots didn't help is pretty damn stupid.
>>1060749
>what is the Franco-Prussian War
>>1060881
Germany is only 25 years old.
>>1061866
Surely the Allies deserved a notable slice of the pie too. Glantz claimed the USSR would've won 12-18 months later without Western aid and that seems accurate.
>>1062205
A war Prussia won
>>1060793
But the Poles didn't fuck up. They didn't have anything to work with.
>>1060731
To be fair, the Germans had a shit nuclear program and no scientists worth a damn working on the project.
So if the Germans had by chance defeated the Soviets, the US would just have nuked Hamburg, Berlin, and any other city until the German surrendered after August of 1945.
>>1062714
Say what you will, I'm not certain they would have been as quick to nuke mainland Europe.
It doesn't have the "foreignness" and distance that likely helped the decision to use it on Japan.
>>1060731
>tfw I created this image.
Pretty happy about it desu, only took me like five minutes in paint.
>>1062772
They wouldn't nuke Paris, but considering all the civilians they killed during the firebombing of Dresden, the Allies wouldn't blink about nuking another German city.
>>1060864
That ideology being prevalent across the world is why mos of you amerikafags drive on the wrong side of the road
>>1060982
>France
>>1062804
They tried to distance themselves from Dresden after the fact.
The nuke obviously wasn't quite the same, no one really knew what it would do in the long term. Japan was an enemy nation extremely far away from anything else anyone vaguely cared about.
Again, I'm not saying they wouldn't do it, I just couldn't see them being quick to.
More like germany throws everything it has on a war and gets treated like a little bitxh for the next 50 years.
>its another 'Germany starts a world war' episode
>>1062468
What you did there, I see it.
>>1061414
>Russia alone beat Germany
With, American grain, trucks, and boots, British bullets and petrol.
The Riskies were fed, moved and armed by the west
>>1064671
>knock the British out of the war after defeating the Soviets
Filthy Aryan bloody slime can't beat Anglo steel or Slavic snow.
>>1064673
Excuse my ignorance, but did the Russians get armed by American manufactured Russian designed weapons, or have i been thinking of Russians armaments entirely incorrectly and they'd been fighting with rations stamped USA, springfields, tommy guns, and garands alongside their home produced armaments?
>>1060802
Correct. Problem was of course that the german GDP still contained lots of unnecessary luxury items, something that didn't change until the instatement of a war economy in 44, while the Soviet economy was almost wholly devoted to arms industry.
>>1064688
I know Springfield Armory manufactured Mosin Nagants under contract for the Russians, but the vsst majority was cartridges. Tons and tons of bullets.
>>1063134
He's talking about WWI.
>>1064704
>Tons and tons of bullets.
Alright. This makes sense. Thank you.
