I am sorry OP, but this is something that's so really easy to google, why can't you just do that?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biblical_apocrypha

>>1037083
Because its apocrypha.

That's like asking why the color Red isn't Blue?

>>1037090
Because the matter that the light is reflected at attracts all wave-lengths that isn't red.
It's a rather complicated question, really.

>>1037100
Okay Mr smarty-pants

>>1037083
The Oxford Press King James Bible comes with the Apocyrpha

>>1037140
So, both of them are more complicated than it looks like.

>>1037090
>Because its apocrypha.

That's a tautology.

Apocryphal texts are apocryphal simply because they are excluded from the canon, not conversely.

File: pope francis book heavy.jpg (52 KB, 480x320) Image search: [Google]

52 KB, 480x320

It is in the Bible, Anon. It's in the REAL Bible.

>>1037083
Don't Catholics have this?

File: thomas more.jpg (3 MB, 2472x3126) Image search: [Google]

3 MB, 2472x3126

>>1037083
The KJV you posted is in the Vulgate, aka the Bible.

>>1037083

The so-called "apocryphal" books are in the Bible, and are just as valid as the rest of the Old Testament.