Is pic related proof enough to say that a Sengoku Jidai army would get rekt if it ever faced an european tercio?
Why are japs so characteristically bad at warfare?
>>1193408
Also, before you start retorting with muh citations needed, note that firstly, most of those edits were made by mad weeaboos, as demonstrated by pic related (also the spanish article is far better written and researched).
Also, here is the primary source, although I don't think it'll be very useful for most of you as it is written in XVII century spanish caligraphy
http://pares.mcu.es/ParesBusquedas/servlets/ImageServlet?accion=41&txt_id_imagen=1&txt_rotar=0&txt_contraste=0&txt_zoom=10&appOrigen=&cabecera=N
>>1193408
>Wokou
>Sengoku Jidai army
pick one
"Japanese pirates" were most of the time not even Japanese.
And there is a whole lot of difference between a pirate crew and... for example, Shimazu Yoshihisa's army.
>>1193455
Azuchi-momoyama then, battle took place a mere twenty years after the end of Sengoku jidai so there isn't really a distinction in military terms
>>1193473
I believe he is saying the Wokou pirates were very different from an actual army.
>>1193506
so were 40 marines and probably a few hundred filipino auxiliaries
