[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
What on earth sort of obscure situation would I be in that I
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /gd/ - Graphic Design

Thread replies: 18
Thread images: 1
File: 5965.jpg (22 KB, 640x480) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
22 KB, 640x480
What on earth sort of obscure situation would I be in that I could say "font" instead of "typeface", and the person I'm talking with not know what I mean?
The person would have to have to have some knowledge of typography. The distinction between both is one of the first anyone reading about the topic learns.
Knowing that fonts are files and typefaces are the actual letter forms is useful, but Joe Schmoe doesn't give a damn...and there are designers with their pretentious heads so far up their ass that they don't grasp they need to dumb it down for Joe Schmoe...and they think of Joe Schmoe as the only retard when they're acting autistic about the whole thing themselves.
Nice trips and good point. The pretentious turboautism in designers is a defence mechanism to validate their expertise. They are out to prove to their client they know what they're talking about and can take care of it. While I hate it, i have sympathy because it prevents clients interfering because they become subordinate in knowledge.
I cant imagine such a situation, the person youre talking to would have to not know or heard of a font before.
>fonts are files
That's..incorrect. Just google yourself.
What is the difference between fonts and type faces?
no one really knows, its just an interchangeable term that doesnt matter what you call it
Doesnt matter anymore*

Typeface is reffering to the family/weight
55,65,53,63 etc etc
Roman, bold, oblique, italic, what have you.

Font is the output.
I.e. this typeface works well as a computer font(digital output/font)

This typeface works well as a wood block font(physical output/font)

Basically say font, everyone will get what you mean.
but when you speak to someone who is a type designer thats porbably the only time youll have to make an effort.
I thought the actual distinction was this-

A typeface is the general letter shape, including family and weight.

A font is the specific size and style of that typeface, ala Times New Roman size 12.

Saying that Times New Roman is a font is technically incorrect, as you're referring to a typeface as a font.

Whelp, this is the second time that things I have learned from one of the core design professors at my university has been called out as bullshit. :^D Thank you anon, for reaffirming my right to mock this professor all of the time.

But my statement about autistic designers who can't seem to function around design-illiterate Joe Schmoes still stands.
"Oh yeah my cousin can do that with MS paint"
This is correct.

Times New Roman 12pt Bold is a different font to Tines New Roman 6pt Italic but they are of the same typeface.

Time New Roman 12pt Bold is a different typeface to Helvetica 12pt Bold.

The clue is in the name type-face, it is the face of the type.

Nowadays with everything being digitised I doubt it really matters.

my ass. Not just you but to others who think there is any sort of distinction.

This isn't even really related to graphic design; this debate is more about linguistics and etymology.
(im the guy above)

absolutely fucking not.

This doesn't even really make sense.

The words for the 'shape' of the font are classified through things like the Vox-ATypI classification.

Size is absolutely irrelevant. There are however fonts(oh god) typefaces designed to be used at larger sizes, but still, irrellevant.

Though, I suppose, font could refer to the software, but the problem is that typeface can refer to that as well.

face/font can be used interchangeably, until it is defined otherwise.
Get out.
Adobe Garamond Premier Pro = typeface = a family of fonts with a coherent style
Adobe Garamond Premier Pro Subhead Italic = font = the single font file

if you have >70 iq you should be able to understand this
Thread replies: 18
Thread images: 1

[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at imagescucc@gmail.com with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.