Literally why?
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /g/ - Technology
You are currently reading a thread in /g/ - Technology
Literally why?
>>55256258
Because.
Why you posted such a low quality image?
>>55256258
autism
![1020px-UbuntuFamilyTree1210.svg[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/4DK2Mqa.png "1020px-UbuntuFamilyTree1210.svg[1].png")
>>55256294
>>55256318
>only ubuntu
>>55256258
Because if they made a minimal install and you got to choose whatever desktop you wanted to build on it, fucktards would take over, because installing it's too hard, and instead of lubuntu and kubuntu, you'd have buntjaro and buntergos
>>55256258
Freedom
>>55256258
Freedom
>>55256258
Ubuntu is a Debian fork
Because Debian just wekrz
>>55256258
I think most of them are meme distros no one actually uses but are "officially maintained"
Everything about Linux is backwards
>OP image that small
>>55257586
Haha mice neem my man. How did you like microsoft banglblows 2016 edition?
>>55256399
There's a muslim edition of Ubuntu? I need to try this immediately
>>55257729
But I use Linux.
>>55257586
Actually the / (forward slash) is used by Linux while \ (backward slash) is used by Windows
>>55256318
>christian edition
>>55256399
DEBIAN
EBIAN
BIAN
IAN
AN
N
Ubuntu Christian edition
Ubuntu satanic edition
Ubuntu Arabian
What's next? Ubuntu nigger?
>>55256258
There is only one Linux and Ian is his prophet.
and yet no reason to use anything other than arch or gentoo
>>55256258
Special snowflakes thinking they'll get it right when what they do is literally change a few of the preloaded packages, AS IF IT WAS SO HARD TO CHANGE YOUR GODDAMN PACKAGES.
If all those autismos focused their efforts on making one distribution of GNU/Linux usable, it would be fantastic.
>a tree of all the various kinds of automobiles over the years
Literally why?
>choice confuses the microsoft shill
>>55258901
Different needs, and different standards, organised by different people operating within different constraints.
>>55258952
That's why you install the packages you need. Running a distribution is a very serious business. You don't pull one out of your ass just because you feel like the original one could use some tweaks.
>>55256258
>>55257403
>>55257441
>>55258946
Literally because of freedom.
>The freedom to run the program as you wish, for any purpose (freedom 0).
>The freedom to study how the program works, and change it so it does your computing as you wish (freedom 1). Access to the source code is a precondition for this.
>The freedom to redistribute copies so you can help your neighbor (freedom 2).
>The freedom to distribute copies of your modified versions to others (freedom 3). By doing this you can give the whole community a chance to benefit from your changes. Access to the source code is a precondition for this.
>>55256258
Why not?
>>55258984
Did you even read the response?
Even the bare minimum must remain safe, efficient, versatile, and stable, as things progress. The definition of an acceptable bare minimum even varies.
These factors aren't all unilaterally agreed upon so we have forks.
Trust is also a factor. You must bear in mind that those responsible for this are all subject to both the errors and virtues associated with human nature. Pride perhaps being the most obvious on this board.
The only way to avoid this is to have a fairly intractable AI manage all of this. But we want freedom.
The compromises you see as technological are actually the results of SOCIAL compromises.
>>55256318
>satanic Edition
Do want.
>>55259085
Shut up. We do not need a hundred fucking Linux distributions. You enabling this kind of bullshit is the problem with GNU/Linux. It will remain poorly supported by manufacturers and software companies as long as it remains so fractally complicated.
>can emulate every ubuntu flavor with regular ubuntu and ppas
what's the point? every flavor you see is a simple reconfiguration
>>55259108
You're hilarious.
You haven't shared a substantial argument (if at all), certainly not one with any relevance to my writings, and had no idea about my personal values, actions, or needs with which to base one on. For the majority of the time I spoke hypothetically. Stop projecting.
I am interested in a single distro. Its core values serve as justification for others to be created and maintained, but also to become defunct.
I also never said what anyone needs. All I did was acknowledge that other people form standards on different criteria with differing competence involved in the decision-making process.
Posts made semi-anonymously on a Malaysian prison scratching board have nothing to do with support.
Who is enabling? I stated that these decisions are subject to and implied that they are possibly the result of human error. Nothing stated explicitly supports the notion that I would in practice encourage any divergence. Actively, or otherwise.
>>55258504
Be careful man. My computer blew up when I tried it.
>>55256258
Diversity - just like in real life - is a good thing.
>>55258869
>Ubuntu nigger
That's just simply Ubuntu. Literally.
>>55256399
>only through 2012
>>55258869
Linux For Niggers was already a thing
>>55256399
>literally throw shit at a wall until something sticks: the OS family
when there's no monetary incentive to make devs target the average computer user, devs target themselves and try to satisfy their own autistic needs instead.
>>55256258
"humanity towards others"
>>55258882
Was*
>>55258578
>christian edition
>muslim edition
>satanic edition
>>55259487
>in real life
Nope
>>55259487
>>55259783
Diversity is inevitable. The question should be how to value the degree of present or possible diversity.
>>55259815
>diversity
>value
Pick one.
>>55259837
>Literacy
>That post
Pick one.
>>55259763
>tfw sudo systemctl poweroff
>>55259934
;_;7
>>55256258
Autism Speaks
>>55256258
Let me tell you how Linux users think:
Basically everything has to be them. They have to FEEL like it's 100% theres. That no one else has control over it. Linux users are the biggest control freaks possible. They all think that if they don't know what is going on in it, they don't want it cause it's "bot net" and someone else is doing it. Put it like this, linux users want to play god. They want to create and be there, but in reality, they are basement dwellers trying to be different, trying to act cool when in reality no one fucking cares.
There's nothing ever fuckin good on linux machines
"GUYS I BUILT A LINUX MACHINE!"
"cool steve"
"IM GONNA MAKE A SERVER! AND HOST FILES AND STUFF!"
"why not use windows?"
"OMG IT'S PROPRITARY! YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND! I CAN'T GET INTO THE CODING! I DON'T WANT IT!"
If you're a REAL coder, a REAL hacker, that shit is nothing but a game to you. It's nothing more than you finding out how it works, you can LITERALLY do the same shit on windows you can on linux. Sure, it's simple, it's great for android, handheld devices, game systems and smaller laptops like Thinkpads, chrome books and netbooks, but ask yourself this,"Is it worth it? Is it worth going thru all the trouble to just have something that works vs having to code everything?"
Sure, I agree, Ubuntu, Mint and like 3 others are tight to use but aside from that, there's no real functionality to a common user. All those branches there are nothing more than whiny bitches who couldn't make something work and wanted contol.
>>55260385
Your points are demonstrably false and technically no hobby is essential to human survival.
>>55260427
That's what I've watched on /g/
>>55257473
Enjoy your SJW OS loser
>>55256258
Who the fuck?
>>55260385
How about not using Windows because it's a bloated piece of shit that you have to pay out the ass for?
You can install Ubuntu or Manjaro faster than Windows.
>>55260528
>not uninstalling anything you don't need
>Installing those 2 linux's with their bloatware as well
Dude, both of those are the "Windows" of linux and you know it. They may not take as long but they still have the same concept. You can get "Windows vanilla" where it's the base but people these days are too simple to do that. Do you know how many people I've suggested switching to linux cause they are simple people? too many and none do it cause they hear "linux" and think it's too complicated, even tho you and I know how damn easy it is to run.
why do you think no devs really make a lot of software for it? Tho it is getting more it's never going to be"the year of the desktop"
LOL
>>55256290
first post best post
>>55256318
someone should make a fork out of ultimate edition and call ultima ultimate edition, then again a fork of it and call it ultima ultimate edition excelsior and so on....
>>55258882
so this guy like kill himself or what? all the detail were fuzzy as fuck. this seemed like some Orwellian shit...
I want Thony Starks OS :(
Can we make this?
>>55260385
>They all think that if they don't know what is going on in it
The problem is with people who changed to Linux as a desktop OS it is usually because they do know what's going on with it. They don't think Windows is botnet because they don't know what's going on. They think it's botnet because the botnet is literally spelled out in the EULA.
It's not a secret anymore. It's not something that the company sneaks in there and doesn't tell you about. Since the success of GMail and Facebook companies have realized that they don't have to hide it anymore or be low key. It's not a matter of sneaking a few kB in with network traffic to get a general idea what your software is running on anymore. They're sending continuous streams of data containing your keystrokes, running processes, screen captures, and info about your stored files. That used to be called a trojan horse. Now it's called an operating system.
>>55260570
Your post doesn't even make sense. If certain Linux distributions are simpler, more customizable, smaller, and faster than Windows for the grand cost of nothing, how is Windows better?
>>55260655
>If certain Linux distributions are simpler, more customizable, smaller, and faster than
Such a thing does not exist.
>>55258869
https://web.archive.org/web/20121103194213/http://linuxforniggers.us/download
>>55260674
Ubuntu, Mint, Manjaro, etc.
>>55260610
He was an "AM I BEING DETAINED?"fag, got hammered, police arrested him for acting an ass and roughed him up (arguably deservedly) and then killed himself after he got out when people LOLd about him screaming about bolis brudalidy :DDD.
At least that was my understanding of it.
>>55260639
then by your def no one should be on a computer, but you forget that even if this is happening, they aren't going to target some random dumbass on /g/ unless he's targetting the pentegon or the president, some shit, unless he's drug trafficking or cheese pizza to tor, you get the point, YOU'RE NOT IMPORTANT HOMIE
Don't worry.
>>55260655
Think of it like this:
why do you think white blonde girls with starbucks xDDD OMG BECKY! go and get an iPhone and a mac with daddies credit card?
It's fucking handfed to them! They open it and it's there.
Most linux shit you have to install it. If Linux was introduced first, then by all means, I would get it. But it wasn't. Linux has always been seen as "complicated" and people in the world see this word, even if we know it's literally not, they will think this. My dad thought torrenting was complicated, I taught him how, and showed him easy it was, now he fuckin does it. With a simple phrase of "you pay your taxes, you see these movies, people will see them 6 times over, you downloading it once isn't hurting them that much. I mean most famous movies will quaddropple their profit. you're fine"
He understood, I understand, and so on.
>>55260695
LOL
>>55260884
So to you, Windows is better because people are scared of change?
>>55260884
>then by your def
>should
There was no definition in that post or a suggestion of what behavior is correct. If you don't mind Prajeet knowing everything that happens on your computer go run a keylogger as your OS. If you're not there are alternatives.
>>55256318
I was told Chromium OS was a Gentoo fork
>>55260932
I'm not saying linux isn't useful but essentially to the common man yes, they aren't going to use what they don't understand and don't want to understand
>>55261018
I like being able to run games on my computer, that's my main reason, that and FL studio
>>55261052
it is. It literally is, ctrl alt T will open terminal, try and typing in a gentoo based command, and I bet it will work.
>>55261202
>I like being able to run games on my computer, that's my main reason, that and FL studio
May Windows always work the best for that. The less people in my distros irc who installed outdated steam packages from fourth party repos and then asking why it crashes without any output useful for debugging, the better in my opinion.
>>55260782
He claimed to have been raped. Who really knows, though? He could've been making shit up for attention.
I like windows 10. No complains.
>>55261316
The biggest problem with linux all together is that it's done "for free" as in"I'll get to it when I get to it" unless you have devotees on it doing it all the time. You will never see a good linux that will have them all the time like windows. It's sad but its the way it works. Again, they aren't being paid, why care?
>>55261356
I have nothing to hide. Linux is confusing as shit and your average joe doesn't give a fuck about Linux scum.
>>55261331
Rape or "rape"? I guess we'll never know the truth.
>>55261202
If your main reason for owning a computer is playing games, why are you on this board?
>>55261358
Except that Canonical and RedHat employees are being paid, so this isn't the case. Regardless, if it were true that developers didn't care, GNU/Linux would not exist in the first place.
>>55261467
I like to see other things too, this board is not only meant for computers and software, it is called "technology" in the first place, and I do appreciate the idea of linux, even if it will never really be used by locals kinda idea
of course and even if that is true, then the statement reflexs on the concept that the linux users do not care about games in a general sense.
>>55261424
>Keylogger is off
I don't know anon, that looks like you're hiding something...
>>55261424
Give me your facebook id
I just imagine most linux users to be virgin NEETS.
>>55261569
he doesn't want us to know those naughty school girl chats he has with his cousin
>>55261424
>tfw you realize this is not bait
>>55261581
Why would anyone not want to share this stuff with us? Don't be greedy. Don't be an incest scrooge.
>>55261580
I just image most windows users are either /v/irgins or computer illiterate. Which is actually true, considering the people who use it are not much of a computer savvy.
>>55261358
>The biggest problem with linux all together is that it's done "for free" as in"I'll get to it when I get to it"
The funny part is the post you replied to mentions steam which is paid software. Meanwhile I've reported 3 bugs this year involving free as in beer and freedom software and one was fixed the same day and the other two within a week.
If linux can get it's shit together and create an operating system that doesn't require a PHD in computer science to use then more people would get on the linux train. As of now I like windows no complaints.
>>55261603
Does it ever occur to you libtards that some of us require Adobe software to enjoy our pastime and/or earn a living?
>>55261506
I'd like to see other things too, but /g/ is literally only 3 things.
- AMD vs NVIDIA shit flinging
- Wandoos vs Loonups shit flinging
- Hey guys, look, another coding thread
/g/ is oversaturated with low-tier CS majors.
>>55261624
Doesn't negate the fact that people who use windows are not very computer illiterate. Most of them don't belong to /g/ anyways.
/g/ people are usually not as retard as you think, they probably won't let OS to get in their way. But first you have to know what Vt-d passthrough means
>>55261597
RIGHT?!
>>55261606
some will some wont, but it's not as common is all
>>55261621
again, Linux, like ubuntu and mint, are not complicated, it's not even hard to install shit, it's just different. People are afriad of different.
My mom is that way, she would rather flip channels than get on Roku. I think she's slowly coming over to the Roku/hulu/netflix side but it's taking time
>>55261630
you forgot
>"STOP LIKING THINGS I DON'T LIKE!"
>"NO! I WANT THAT AND I LIKE IT!"
>"YOU'RE BIG FAT MEANIE FACE!"
>>55261621
If anything the Linux evangelists and the command line is too hard for average users crowd is going to be what kills Linux. Look at Ubuntu. They're all about it just werks and no learning curve and what happened? They implemented Amazon botnet.
>>55261630
Don't forget
>Here is the new discovery that proves we are being cucked by botnets!!!!!
>Maki
>Is <new technology that is about to hit its market peak> a meme?
>Mechanical keyboards and headset-free zone headphone jerk-off circles
>Chinkshit
>Crossdressing makes you code better
>>55261672
>Amazon botnet
That's just one thing that went wrong one time with one specific GNU/Linux development organization. It's been resolved now, the enhancements to make GNU/Linux more accessible are still out there. Don't be such a shithead.
If there's anything that makes Linux suck, it's its lack of popularity. Nobody bothers coding drivers and applications for GNU/Linux because nobody uses them even though nowadays branching is almost all taken care of by your development environment. It's not worth the cost for businesses. So, nobody wants to make a complete switch to Linux unless they only use their computer as a Facebook machine. Fuck, if Adobe software was officially released for Linux, I'd probably never use Windows again myself. But alas.
And when it comes to drivers, everything has to be complicated. I mean Linux distros aren't even bundled with their kernel headers and commonly used compilers for kernel modules. What the fuck is up with that? Why package Linux with gygabites of desktop shit and not the most basic tools to install drivers?
Why is changing barely any of an OS considered an entirely new version?
>>55259041
This, so much true.
>>55261794
MUH CONTROL!
>>55256258
I can not speak for any other distros, but I use Ubuntu Mate. Because Gnome 2 was discontinued by Ubuntu and I really like it. Also Ubuntu Mate is a fork of the Gnome 2 distro.
>>55261684
> headset-free zone headphone jerk-off circles
How is headset free a bad thing?
Unless you're a helicopter pilot you don't want a headset, unless you want to pay more for less like a giant retard
If having choices is too confusing, then I have the perfect OS for you.
>>55256318
>muslim edition
>>55262121
Fucking hell. Get back to your containment thread you autist. I got so sick of your elitist bullshit back when I hung out in that thread, you're not gonna spread it in other threads. Fuck off. I'm sure you have a FLAC collection to masturbate to.
>>55262157
FLAC is a meme and only good for archiving and preserving purposes.
From all the butthurt you're suffering I'm guessing you bought a gaymer headset. What model did you get and how badly did /hpg/ laugh at you?
>>55261757
>It's been resolved now
After years. Amazon probably quit paying them. African niggers who can't afford Windows don't generally buy stuff from Amazon.
>Nobody bothers coding drivers and applications
find /usr/lib/modules/4.5.5-300.fc24.x86_64/kernel/drivers -name '*' -print | wc
2581 2581 206864
sudo dnf list '*' | wc
51479 149980 4147726
Nope no drivers or applications. None at all.
>I mean Linux distros aren't even bundled with their kernel headers and commonly used compilers for kernel modules.
Are you retarded? I didn't compile one of those drivers. But if I wanted to command would automatically install everything I needed to compile the kernel and modules. If you're too stupid to figure this out then you'll probably do something like pick a distro that bundles Amazon advertisements.
>>55261794
Things branch off because some guy really likes distro x but wants it with option y. So either distro x doesn't want to exert the effort required to support that feature on top off all their other shit or the guy wants to be a special snowflake. So he chooses to support x with y.
>>55262482
*But if I wanted to, one command
>>55262482
>After years. Amazon probably quit paying them. African niggers who can't afford Windows don't generally buy stuff from Amazon.
That doesn't make the user-friendly improvements on modern distributions less relevant.
>Nope no drivers or applications. None at all.
It was a figure of speech. Just because some drivers exist doesn't make it less frustrating when you bought a $50-$500 piece of hardware that is not supported and is unlikely to ever get supported. You're doing special pleading. Also, your tone is starting to get on my nerves. Mellow out or I'm reporting you.
Have you ever installed a driver for an Epson scanner on a RHEL-based distribution? It's quite a rollercoaster.
> But if I wanted to command would automatically install everything I needed to compile the kernel and modules. If you're too stupid to figure this out bla bla bla jacking off to how smart I am.
What do you mean, "one command"? As one example, installing the official nvidia driver requires you to install the following:
kernel-devel-(version of your kernel)
yasm
gcc
That's on top of having to disable nouveau if it's running. That requires entering run level 3 if not restarting. Installing the driver itself also requires run level 3.
Why are those very basic dependencies not packaged with distros? Unless you are using Ubuntu/all the drivers you need are prepackaged with your distro, then you'll need to actually figure this shit out on your own. It seems easy to experienced people like you and I, but it's a big step up from everyday Windows maintenance.
Plus, why doesn't Linux allow to install a video driver without entering run level 3? That is also frightening to an unexperienced user. Windows will allow you to install a driver that requires resources being used at any moment, it will just require you to restart to finish the job.
Now follow with your next sad attempt at keeping your head in the sand about the challenge that GNU/Linux represents to the average user.
>>55262780
>Just because some drivers exist doesn't mean you shouldn't check to see if something is compatible with your system before buying it.
I couldn't agree more.
>installing the official nvidia driver requires you to install the following
Building the nvidia driver requires you to install that.
sudo dnf --enablerepo='*fusion*' list '*nvidia*' | wc
83 203 5948
it's not like they're prebuilt and packaged for you or anything.
> Words on a screen frightens idiots.
Good. Software is produced to fill a demand. Less idiots means less demand for software for idiots. Less demand for software for idiots the less idiotic software. Like was said earlier that Ubuntu Amazon malware died out because there was no demand for it. Amazon realized paying Canonical to shit up their version of Linux had little return.
>keeping your head in the sand about the challenge that GNU/Linux represents to the average user
I'm embracing that challenge not ignoring it. The average user is okay with a keylogger as an OS. I encourage them to install the OS that is right for them.
>>55263109
>sudo dnf --enablerepo='*fusion*' list '*nvidia*' | wc
>83 203 5948
Congrations. Babby is able to use Fedora. Big boy. Try doing that in CentOS now and see where it takes you.
> Words on a screen frightens idiots.
>Good. Software is produced to fill a demand. Less idiots means less demand for software for idiots. Less demand for software for idiots the less idiotic software. Like was said earlier that Ubuntu Amazon malware died out because there was no demand for it. Amazon realized paying Canonical to shit up their version of Linux had little return.
>keeping your head in the sand about the challenge that GNU/Linux represents to the average user
>I'm embracing that challenge not ignoring it. The average user is okay with a keylogger as an OS. I encourage them to install the OS that is right for them.
And you're the very reason I can't depend on Linux. I need to use software that is only supported for Windows/Mac and it will remain that way as long as manchildren like you enable that culture of "GNU/Linux is a super secret haxer club normyfags get out." You are literally the cause of GNU/Linux's neverending agony. You are a cancer to the free software initiative. But hey, at least you get to feel smug about being able to configure an operating system using shell commands and get angry at people on the internet when they don't "get it".
>>55261569
I form example can't enable the keylogger because my locale is not US English nor is my layout.
literally op cock sucker
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/79/UbuntuFamilyTree1210.svg/2000px-UbuntuFamilyTree1210.svg.png
>>55263316
>tfw you will never be an open-source pinguin pregnant with an adult sophisticated gnu
I can only masturbate the pain away.
>>55263109
>Less idiots means less demand for software for idiots. Less demand for software for idiots the less idiotic software.
Are you genuinely this stupid, or do you simply not understand how the world actually works?
>>55263212
>Try doing that in CentOS now and see where it takes you
>Using CentOS
>To play video games
>Using the free version of RHEL, a distro that deliberately uses old free software to keep a stable environment
>to install the latest proprietary software to play video games on a system with few games
>And you're the very reason I can't depend on Linux.
>I need to use software that is only supported for Windows/Mac
Yes it was me the whole time. I have the rights to Photoshop and Call of Duty: Black Cocks and I'm not compiling them for Linux just so you can't depend on it. I have to perpetuate my secret club by preventing you from pwning noobs and making rare pepes on my secret OS.
Picture related: This smug angry fuck has all of the rights to candcrush and friends and bejeweled. He also has your Bonzi Buddy.
>>55263519
Either you're missing the point, or deliberately misunderstanding.
He's saying that because freetards have an aversion to accessibility as if it were the sun or something, that Linux will never get enough market share to actually get proper support from hardware and software vendors, and he's fucking right.
>>55263519
>linux needs to deliberately use old free software to keep a stable environment
baka desu senpai
This is why no one uses them for anything but servers and other single task chores. :^)
>>55260385
>If you're a REAL coder, a REAL hacker, that shit is nothing but a game to you. It's nothing more than you finding out how it works, you can LITERALLY do the same shit on windows you can on linux.
You're saying you can easily reverse engineer windows and change whatever you want?
>>55263628
People have been hacking apart the registry and decoding what each key controls since 95. Really no different than linux config files once you get used to each.
Only difference is with linux on rare occasion the documentation is contained inside the config file. Usually you need to google to edit either.
>>55263551
>hardware
Yeah like playing video games on a super stable server OS. There's almost always compatible hardware to do what you want with Linux. You should always check to see if hardware is compatible with your system no matter what you run.
>software vendors
There's no shortage of software on Linux almost to a fault.
>>55263705
I meant hardware vendors like nvidia and ati. Yes they support linux, but their shit is weak as fuck compared to the effort put into their windows drivers.
Also there isn't enough good software to replace actual quality software on mac + windows.
There is nothing on linux as good as illustrator, photoshop, or premiere/sony vegas/avid.
>>55263751
>I meant hardware vendors like nvidia and ati.
Yeah video gamer shit.
>There is nothing on linux as good as illustrator, photoshop, or premiere/sony vegas/avid.
You know what I don't hear in Linux communication channels? Linux users saying I wish there was software for editing pictures and videos.
I've never read anything by professional movie studios saying boy I wish I could run my shit on Linux. I've never heard any kids saying I wish I could pwn noobs on Linux.
Maybe it has been said before but the fact that I've never run across it makes me think that the market isn't there.
Say there were tons of professional photo editors who wanted to do it on Linux but found gimp lacking in one way or another. Well 95% of the work is already done for you. Pitch in and hire one Prajeet to make it more user friendly or whatever.
All of these editors are just UIs to digital signal processing libraries. There are tons of these libraries being used to handle scientific data. FFTW, Lapack, Atlas, Blas, Qhull, tons of codecs, matrix math suites, etc.
So if such low hanging fruit has yet to be picked, then what should we determine about the demand for it?
>>55256258
because linux fucking hates us....
im being serious i cannot actually think of any good reason for the distro madness aside from spite.
>>55256258
Because FOSS is like that. If you don't like something, fork it and do it your way.
>>55257729
well nobody has to wade through 500+ distros of utter bullshit to install wangblows, so in that regard its working pretty fucking well thx for asking.
god if linux could get its shit together windows would be loong dead by now...
>>55259487
diversity in real life is terrible and bring nothing but conflict. the fuck is wrong with your brain anon?
>>55261428
according to him, a female officer shoved a large flashlight up his ass.
If that is true, I would call that rape.
Someone whistle at you on the street or regret the next day is not rape, but that is not what this was.
