Jason taught us that basically no one is natural in the fitness industry.
How can ever thank him enough for that?
What a based man.
>>37753656
>MY BOY HEMMINGWAY
>>37753656
Say what you want about him but if he wasn't such an autistic chronic liar he'd be a pretty informative dude.
Richard had already exposed the supplement industry Jason acts like he has done anything new
>>37753686
no
there are dozens are serious lifting channel with better advices.
His only contribution to the lifting community was putting out a retarded 2 hours workout done 3 times a week.
Most of his opinions are based on single studies, he's persuaded that lifting prevents cancer cells from growing
INNNERRRR CITTTYYYYYY
>>37753656
What a load of bullshit
And he is wrong about the fitness industry too
>>37754031
He said that it decreases the cancer risk significantly. Which we all know is true
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/health/news/5371468/Men-with-big-muscles-cut-cancer-risk-by-40-per-cent.html
His program is actually pretty good if you can recover from it. Izzy from powerliftingtowin even says so.
>>37754363
You'd be surprised how many people are on gear. I have a guy at my gym who i know is on test and tren and he deadlifts around 230 kg for reps and yet he still looks way worse than ogus and jeff seid.
>>37754343
Fair enough.
>>37754465
>He said that it decreases the cancer risk significantly.
No, he went further than that. While in the mean time promoting keto diets consisting of pretty much only meat and eggs and calling you a weak little bitch if you didn't eat beacon
the guy is legit retarded and only autist haven't noticed it in 2016. There's a reason why he was respected in 2013 on /fit/ but everyone is laughing at him now
>>37754465
>You'd be surprised how many people are on gear. I have a guy at my gym who i know is on test and tren and he deadlifts around 230 kg for reps and yet he still looks way worse than ogus and jeff seid.
Yes there are a lot on gear I'm not retarded but there are also a lot that arent. Steroids aren't magic you don't look good just because you inject bathtub chemicals in to your butt
>>37754512
They actually are magic. You gain more muscle on test without lifting weights than you do natty with lifting weights.
>>37754500
Oh you're a vegan. Then it makes sense why you think he's retarded. But then again you pretty much find anybody other than vegan gainz and the light twins retarded
>>37754570
>They actually are magic. You gain more muscle on test without lifting weights than you do natty with lifting weights.
False. The study you are thinking of showed
Lifting and gear > Lifting with no gear > couch potatoe and taking gear > couch potatoe
There are also a ton of other variables that weren't accounted for that makes that sturdy bs
>>37754570
Wew i'm vegan, i was sure i was eating fish and cheese this dinner but you must know better
That's what i mean, only fucking retards like yourself would go out of their way to defend jason
either that or you're his troll gf, wich really wouldn't be surprising
hopefully the hemmingway helicopter copypasta will be here any minute now, i ordered from the waiter a good 10 minutes ago, i expect it fresh and hot
>>37754606
What study are you talking about? There was one done where people on gear didn't lift and gained more mass than natural lifters. The study controlled for diet, exercise routine, and everything basically. The only difference was the treatment to each group.
Group 1: no lifting, no gear
Group 2: lifting, no gear
Group 3: no lifting, gear
Group 4: lifting, gear
The study revealed: 4<3<2<1 in terms of lean muscle mass gained. I can't remember the time period, however.
>>37754719
Those signs are facing the wrong way. I'm autistic.
4>3>2>1
>>37753656
MYB
Y--O
BOY
>HEMMINGWAY
>>37754719
The no lifting and gear group stopped gaining muscle during the study and the non gear lifters were only just below them. In other words the couch potatoe gear users had reached their peak whereas the lifters without gear were still gaining muscle.
If you looked at only the last several weeks of the study 4>1>3>2. That shows that in the long term lifting without gear is better for muscle growth than not lifting but taking gear
To add to that the diets and routines were not controlled. So there are more variables that could have influenced the results making the study unreliable
>>37754805
http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM199607043350101#abstract
baby carrot cock
