Been looking into this recently and it seems too good to be true. Enhanced recovery+ a bunch of other positive side effects with hardly and negatives. I wanna get some opinions of people who I know arent paid shills
>TLDR Thoughts on deer antler spray?
>>37433668
It's shit.
>>37433668
About as effective as witchcraft and homeopathy
>>37433689
>>37433706
This fag said he gained 20 something lbs of muscle in 6 months on it tho?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ncynnf1sfNA
Anyone try this shit at all?
There's this really cool thing called testosterone enanthate. It's cheap and works really really well.
Supplement industry scam #4225256
>>37433794
>testosterone enanthate
Couldnt this mess up your hormones though? Its said the deer antler spray has no long lasting affects on hormones
>>37433668
http://www.pga.com/news/pga-tour/vijay-singh-admits-using-deer-antler-spray-says-he-unaware-it-banned
if they ban it, it's probably effective in SOME way.
MUH pryons
>>37433743
Believe eberytging you hear on the internet, especially ad videos trying to sell you a product, they cant POSSIBLY be lying
>>37433823
That's how you know it doesn't work
>>37433743
No he didn't, 20lbs of solid muscle would be a lot more noticeable than that, and there is no way he is 7.5% bf, 10% at the absolute lowest. He could've taken those pics the same day with increasing pumps and lifting up his arms to reveal more obliques. I will say that shaving his goatee and changing his pants to give the impression of passing time shows brains and commitment though. He's just shilling product with his half-decent natty body.
>>37433843
The man has a point.
>>37433936
I dont think some random pgajeet is enough evidence that the supplement is any good
>>37433843
>>37433936
It is possible that there are some sprays that contain growth-hormone mimickers(or actual growth hormone) that you can "special order", or that someone is taking GH and blames it on deer antler spray. It is also possible that a substance similar to growth hormone is present but causes no physiological effects in humans but is banned anyway.
Bureaucracy is notoriously bad at listening to science or acting in a sensible manner.
Is the IGF enough to make a difference?
it has small amounts of igf-1
not worth the cost
>>37433843
Just like corking bats. (Corking bats actually does nothing)
