>Why do you do squats anon? Are you gay and want a nice butt?
>>36777811
>HeyAnonYouHaveNoLife.jpg
who is this boner condoner
>>36777811
holy fucking face to boobs ratio
>>36777811
I only want those titties.
>Are you gay and want a nice butt?
>Are you gay
>and
>Are you want a nice butt
dumb bitch
M I L K
I
L
K
>>36777811
why is one so much lower than the other? her shoulders aren't torqued enough to justify it
>>36778216
You messed up, kiddo.
Home gym here.
One of my female cousins was over one time and she saw me squatting and said
>*teehee* U LOOK SO HOMO WITH HOW YOUR ASS LOOKS WHEN YOU SQUAT *teehee*
Not sure if this was a insult, compliment or what....
>>36778233
no, she did
i mean op did
>>36778216
American education, ladies and gentlemen.
>>36778216
>>36778233
>>36778245
>>36778257
do you honestly think i'm wrong? lol
>>36778237
What a fuckin' biatch.
Because i want a symetric body you stupid hoe
>>36778322
those stick arms
>>36778369
>notices arms instead of butt
What are you, a heterosexual?
>>36777811
I don't visit often, but I'm always impressed that you guys have the best taste in women.
I'm also desperately searching for anything on her because holy fuck.
>>36777811
Uh yes and yes
>>36777811
>Sure, put this bag over your head.
>>36777811
God, imagine if she was lactating
BREHS
>>36778452
>thinking she's ugly
wew
>>36777811
>caught you 'mirin babe
>>36778198
same i wish she was a witch and she caught me staring at her breasts and she zaps me and all the sudden i have huge tits like that too
>>36777811
Yes
>>36778483
That's still less gay than squating
>>36777811
>tfw have the ass of a black stripper
I have to avoid working glutes at all times.
>>36777811
sauce fucking please
>>36778710
Natalie Dwyer.
>>36777811
When's your cute brother gonna be here?
>>36777811
Big legs are gross. The only reason I train them is for the calorie benefits.
>>36777811
If all butts had nipples, would squats make still make a man "gay"?
>>36778800
>let's just
>put this feminine face
>and girly figure
>and add a penis to it
Why not just make it a girl
Fucking mentally damaged fudgepackers
>>36778477
Her face is busted as fuck. The only reason she's half bearable to look at is because her cow titties are spilling out of her shirt.
>>36778452
She's not ugly at all. You must have really high standards.
>>36777811
>on /fit/
>asking if gay
welcome to /fit/
>>36777811
>those fucking tits
>>36778237
>get called a faggot
>was that a compliment?
>>36777811
Literally no girl ever says this, not even lesbos
>>36777811
Women want a fit butt and legs. No woman wants her man to have a hank hill ass.
It isnt like us that want to bury ourselves into femal anal cavities.
They like men to have butts to fill in jeans and actually look like alphas.
>>36778466
BREH
RR
E E
H H
>>36777811
god damn thems tittays
>>36777811
I...I'm not gay hehe...I mean...just look at your boobies hehe...
>>36778889
Yes goyim, you aren't gay if you're aroused by a drawing of a feminine man.
>>36779065
>2/10 pointy elbows
stop watching porn, that's what an attractive girl looks like
Yeah let me smack those titties around with my front squat glutes.
>tfw people comment on my butt
>tfw I can glute bounce
lemme suck on dem titz
>>36777811
Women are so beautiful.
>>36779568
...so no glutes?
>>36777811
at what point do tits become so amazing that even as a relative it's ok to pop a boner? Op's size?
>>36778483
Fucking kek
fun fact: all of the guys in this thread have mommy issues.
>>36780002
Amen.
>>36780361
>breasts are for breast-feeding
>>36777811
Who is this semen demon?
who is this bradley cooper with rad boobs and a comely pooper?
>>36780553
Kek
>>36777811
Yes your daddy don't want none unless I got buns hun
>>36777811
still waiting on sauce op
>>36779089
P-post more? Asking for a friend
>>36777811
>why dont you squat femanon? Are you lesbian and want a flat ass?
>>36780960
>hurr durr I'm retarded
Girls like j00cy gl00ts to be quite frank with you familia
>>36777811
This looks like the girls from gdp ep 273
>>36777811
Yes, yes i am and i do.
>>36778483
wat
>>36780898
jesus christ why do people say shit like "asking for a friend" or "post more...for science!!1!1!1" dude it's fucking 4chan it's ok to say you're tortured by your repressed homosexuality or you want more pictures to masturbate to, nobody's judging you
>>36781386
Redditor.
>>36777811
Nice
>>36781386
Autism
>>36781386
It's anons humor coming out. People have personalities anon.
>>36777811
Holy fuck.
>>36777811
I want you, baby.
>>36781471
>calves as big as thighs
>>36781386
>>36780430
(large) breasts are for imitating the look of a butt so that while you have sex in missionary you have a butt infront of you
>>36777811
>implying you arent halfway to snap city with those tits
>>36781902
That's what I read also; it makes sense to me. As far as I'm aware no other animals have breasts (other apes definitely don't).
I really need big legs. It will solve all my life problems.
>>36781386
There correct answer here is
"wanna see it?"
>>36781902
>>36781973
Oh yeah, let's go with that retarded theory instead of assuming it's more likely related to fertility
>>36777811
Holy fucking tits, Batman
>>36781386
hes not doing it to lie to you. hes doing it to lie to himself. He can pretend its all a joke. Hes not really gay that way... no homo you know
>>36778483
>>36778800
More arslan pls
How heavy a man can squat is a decent indicator at how good he thrusts during sex.
TMYK
>>36784573
its all about them powercleans man. but for real, thats why girls like guys with a nice ass
>>36784320
large mammaries (out of the breast feeding period) have zero sexual value in literally all mammals
fertility my ass
hip:waist ratio (and therefore, ass) are the only fertility indicators (alongside with other health factor like youth, symmetry and proportions)
>>36784320
It's related to fertility in the sense that breasts mimic the buttocks.
>>36784572
More, anon? Do you perhaps like boys?
>tfw a girl slaps your ass
>>36778483
Corruption of Champions
>>36777811
>Implying women don't like men with nice butts
>>36784714
>tfw a guy slaps your ass
>>36784714
thats how i met my most recent gf.
>Wearing work clothes
>good fitting khakis that made my ass look great
>leave straight from work to go to nieces bday party
>sisters friend is there
>slaps my ass
>felt slightly awkward but laughed it off and talked to her
>ran into her a week later
>got number cause i knew she was interested
>hang out a few times
>fucked her in my pool
>dated her for a year and a half before we split
>>36784615
>>36784664
That's bullshit. Big boobs are supposed to entice a man. It's an evolutionary advantage. Subconsciously it makes you crave sex with the woman. Just like a V-taper is a sign of testosterone in men. Bigger antlers on moose don't make the moose any better, but that's how evolution works. Traits that get you laid more often are emphasized over time. Bigger boobs are certain to make the caveman find a woman sexier.
>>36777811
SAUCE PLEASE
>>36785097
>V-taper is a sign of testosterone in men
Is that true? How important are v-tapers in general?
I've noticed that even though my bff has much bigger arms than me (which he brags about constantly), i still get way more attention than he does when we're out. My shoulders are wayyy broader. Being 5" taller probably helps too
>>36785213
>my bff
I hope that contraction is for best funny friend
>>36785097
>That's bullshit
Literally any scientific literature disagrees with you. Sure, big boobs are supposed to entice men! Because they resemble a buttock. It's not an "evolutionary advantage", more like an evolutionary preference due to human specific-- ah, fuck it, try to educate yourself.
>>36777811
Literally said no woman ever.
>>36785213
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secondary_sex_characteristic#Males
Of course it's true. Good features and developed physiques are a sign of good, healthy genes. That's a vast oversimplification, but it's a strong driving force when it comes to picking partners.
>>36785267
Scientific literature hasn't come to a conclusion set in stone. It's nothing more than a theory. Listen to your own advice before arguing.
>>36778418
It's because we have, on average, healthier test levels compared to the cuck, porn-addicts on other boards.
>>36785389
>muh relativism
Scientific literature is a better option than broscience.
>Listen to your own advice
said the man who called scientific theories "bullshit" for no reason at all because those didn't match with his nonsensical, illogical theory. Science (various fields of science actually, from medicine to ethology, from sociology to psychology) gives an explanation you didn't even attempt to give.
>>36784718
oh, come on
I don't wanna remember
>Not squatting to have a better ass than your girlfriend?
You're never gonna make it OP. Girls love booty too. Every time I'm undressing to take a shower, she gropes the booty. Wear well fitting boxer briefs. I was once going to shower after legs day. Take gym pants off. Boxer breifs have ridden up cupping the booty and hugging the dick. Her eyes went wide and she said "DAMN."
feelsgoodman
>>36784672
N..No anon!
>>36787694
It's ok anon, there's nothing wrong with it.
>>36787705
Going to need source :^) familia
>>36781386
>>36786433
Why so mad. You're wrong and he's right. You cannot just take a hypothesis and present it as fact because "some dude in a lab coat" said it. Are you stupid?
>>36779089
Nice ass senpai no homo tho
>>36778483
wait
>>36784714
Girls did this to me in middle school during PE.
glutes for sloots, hoe
>>36787804
>he's right because his opinion is better than "some dude in a lab coat"
>his hypothesis is a fact
Do you have brain damage?
>>36780139
>not popping boners thinking about your hot relatives
>>36777811
Because I want to be able to snatch my bodyweight.
>>36778233
>>36778245
>>36778257
>>36778855
He's not wrong though.
You shouldn't shorten a sentence like that. The proper sentence would be "Are you gay and do you want a nice butt?". You simply can't just remove the "do you" part for the reasons mentioned in his post.
>>36785097
>Big boobs are supposed to entice a man. It's an evolutionary advantage. Subconsciously it makes you crave sex with the woman.
So you 100% agree with the guys you're disagreeing with. You only fall short in a logical loop:
> Traits that get you laid more often are emphasized over time
the guys you're "disagreeing" this explain why this happens. You don't attempt to pose the question. You just say "Subconsciously it makes you crave sex with the woman" - they tell you why, you just suggest that "it entice sex because it entice sex"
>Bigger antlers on moose don't make the moose any better
Wrong. Only males have them and they use them to compete for females (and to fight in general).
3/10 made me respond
If serious, never consider STEM
>>36788825
That isn't right either - that separates it into two questions, when she's only asking one.
This is right:
> Is it that you're gay and want a nice butt?
>>36777811
It's not gay if the girl fucking your ass has a feminine penis
>implying girls talk to me
>>36777811
y-you got me, I'm turbogay
maybe you w-wanna try to convert me?
>>36788789
>dream about banging my sister once a month
>>36788855
How exactly do you know whether she's asking one question? As far as I know she wants to know if I'm gay and if I want a nice butt.
>>36784910
Things that didn't happen for 100, Arnold
>>36778627
just accept it bro.
>>36781386
I'm judging you, faggot.
>>36777811
I want to motorboat those tits
>>36778483
Umm
>>36781455
can you outgrow autism?
I remember being that guy in highschool all the fucking time.
>>36778322
Dubs.
Check'd.
Never thought I'd ever say I wanted to eat an ass until now. Just look at it. I want to slap it so bad.
>>36778237
15?
Solid?
>>36779364
nothing wrong with a beautiful man.
>>36789307
It isn't wrong if she doesn't get pregnant.
>>36786433
>boobs are used for feeding, not sex, and it's nonsensical and illogical to think they're signs of fertility
Are you one of those stoners who try to convince other stoners of "scientific facts" because they read two articles on NCBI's website? It's still a theory, and not something widely accepted. And imitating buttocks sounds far more retarded than big breasts making the woman appear more capable of nurturing progeny.
>>36788842
Did you actually read all posts or just chimed in to try and look smart? Because you really aren't looking smart. I could give peacocks as an example, males with better coloration get laid more often which leads to their ridiculous tails. And no shit only male moose have antlers. Wow. Who woulda thought. Perhaps you could go as far as saying only female homo sapiens have breasts? I'm smitten.
>>36777811
Yes
>>36793932
>more capable of nurturing progeny
Breasts have nothing to do with nurturing progeny, though; a woman who is flat-chested is as capable of breast-feeding a child as a woman who isn't.
>sounds far more retarded
It might sound less outlandish if you understood human history and how important it was to reorient sexual attention onto the front of the body. We needed to reorient that way to make sex an effective bonding experience (to encourage strong pair-bonding which in turn was crucial for successfully raising a child for ~12 years), anything reinforcing that would be selected for.
>>36793932
>Are you one of those stoners who try to convince other stoners of "scientific facts" because they read two articles on NCBI's website?
Are you a stoner who hasn't ever read a scientific publication?
> Perhaps you could go as far as saying only female homo sapiens have breasts? I'm smitten
Are you twelve?
>>36793932
>And no shit only male moose have antlers. Wow. Who woulda thought. Perhaps you could go as far as saying only female homo sapiens have breasts? I'm smitten.
Your next line will be "I was only pretending to be retarded"
>>36794139
Fuck, dude, symmetry theory. Put your mind in the role of distant ancestors, who would you rather fuck?
Potential mate with nicely aligned teeth and a strong jaw.
Or, potential mate with yuck mouth and a broke ass jaw.
Both mouths are functional for all intents and purposes, but you're going to choose the mate with the nice looking jaw and mouth. Again, because we're stupid when it comes to animalistic senses and go mostly off of visual cues.
Granted, it's an overly simplified form, but this shit was actually important for our ancestors. With the advent of technology thanks to the industrial revolution, it's trivialized the majority of our mating habits for survival purposes. Medical technology, such as dentistry and the recent use of plastic surgery, capitalizes on that basic concept of attraction.
Asymmetry = disease, problems, or genetic issues.
Now, I'm not saying small tits are an aberration, disease, or anything of the such, but if we were thrown back in time to cavemen shit, it would matter to us because our faulty and flawed reasoning as base animals.
It's one reason why we should be grateful for living in an age of modern technology and medicine, it leveled the playing field for the majority of the population so we technically don't have to mate for simple survival.
I love squats and have quite a nice butt. U MIRIN BRAH?
>>36794139
Nor does the peacock's tail mean he's a better partner (although there's a theory about the validity of that that as well). It's a plausible theory, but it's, again, just that. Breast development is caused by estrogen and growth hormone during puberty, when a girl transitions to a fertile age. You can see how breast growth would be related to femininity and attract a caveman. It's an important, unique secondary sex characteristic.
>>36794167
>>36794187
>hey guys I read this thing on 9gag, let me share :^)
>>36781902
>>36784320
>>36784615
>>36785267
>>36793932
>>36794139
>>36794343
I have read that breasts are unusually susceptible to asymmetry - however, that doesn't explain why they are a source of intense sexual interest: exactly the type of interest usually reserved for what you would expect it to be reserved for, the "ass" ie. the site of where sex takes place.
>>36794449
The ones claiming boobs imitate buttocks disregard the fact that MOST breasts have nothing to do with the shape of an ass. They're too small. Some are saggy, others are asymmetrical and so on. Even today, with breasts bigger than ever. With girls reaching puberty faster and food being an easily accessible commodity. You know bigger breasts don't mean more milk, but a caveman didn't. And he knew breasts were what grew on women's chests when they could procreate. It has been hypothesized that a peacock with a bigger tail was a better survivor since he could manage to grow up while carrying such an ungainly feathering. Staying alive with a disadvantage. It's a dead-end argument, though. No one knows for certain.
AUTISTIS PLS LEAVE
>>36794425
> (although there's a theory about the validity of that that as well). It's a plausible theory
uh-oh! All of sudden it's a "plausible theory", not "bullshit". Unsurprisingly, you're not-so-slowly back-pedalling.
>Breast development is caused by estrogen and growth hormone
wew, take a breath or your head could explode.
Nothing in your "explanation" actually addresses why females (only in humans) evolved this way. Pick any field of science, and you'll find a consistent explanation. You aren't formulating any theory, you're simply refusing to explain why breasts have been selected and why they entice sex to begin with. You have been told on the direct association between fertility and breast size (the association is only indirect: they mimic the buttocks). You have been told on the precious role of antlers (with a pathetic attempt at sarcasm as reprisal on your side). You don't have a theory at all.
Any scientific theory is an explanation of a phenomenon, and it gets updated as science evolves. Some theories are valid in some contexts because they are "good enough" to explain a phenomenon even when they are dis-proven (e.g. Newton's Laws vs Einstein's relativity - recently revamped). It's never "something set in stone". But goddamn you're pretty pathetic with the "everything is a theory" attitutude.
>>36794604
>You know bigger breasts don't mean more milk, but a caveman didn't
>cavemen wanted to milk their partners
this is the more retarded evolutionist theory I've seen in a while
>saggy
What's important is the display of fatty deposit and the "hourglass" figure (the hip:waist mirrored in breast:hip)
>>36794755
>(the hip:waist mirrored in breast:hip)
*mirrored in breast:waist
>>36794604
>peacock with a bigger tail was a better survivor since he could manage to grow up while carrying such an ungainly feathering. Staying alive with a disadvantage
More likely, it's a display of health, symmetry and creativity. Females prefer healthy and creative males. Sure you have to be creative to stay alive with all that bargain
>https://answersingenesis.org/natural-selection/peacock-tail-beauty-and-problems-theory-of-sexual-selection/
>http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/psp/91/1/63/
>>36794604
>most breasts have nothing to do with the shape of an ass
it still seems like the most plausible explanation to me although that does need explaining.
one thing to remember is that our population now does not necessarily represent visually/genetically etc. the population which was alive then - we have protected weak members of our species who would never have survived in the wild or in a competition for resources and I think it's possible the ones who wouldn't have survived are reproducing more.
The other side of it is that the average level of health of a hunter-gatherer is way above the average westerner when it comes to things like hormones, I'd say. Hormonal disruption will lead to smaller breasts among other things.
Saggy is not such an issue because women tend to gather their breasts up in their arms during missionary if they're big and they look round then (which is the only time they need to). Asymmetrical doesn't seem like an issue to me.
>cavemen were trying to work out who had more milk for their child
that seems implausible to me, I'm not sure why.
>breasts are a sign of being ready to procreate
there's no need for that, though - pubic hair already worked that way.
>>36794755
Is this the first time someone said "bullshit" when you presented a theory as a solid fact? What's more retarded, presenting hypotheticals as an empirically proven phemonen, or saying something that doesn't completely show my stance on the matter (on a fitness forum)? I'm not doing a peer reviewed study to have a theory. Scientists, while figuring out why breasts are so abnormally large in humans, have had theories. The buttocks one isn't the only one.
And your analogy is not too hot because Newton's idea is good for basic everyday calculations, but fundamentally wrong at explaining gravity. Just like the ass imitation theory might, or might not be, wrong at explaining breast size. Do you think you're actually explaining anything with your statement?
You even somehow decided I implied cavemen wanted to milk women... I don't even know where to go with this. No milk = dead babies. I shouldn't have to go to the basics to state what's already a fact: early humans picked their partners in accord with physical cues. If broad shoulders are a sign of elevated testosterone and thus subconsciously attractive to women, how is it far fetched to think bigger breasts wouldn't do the same? Why only humans? That's a very broad subject to tackle.
>>36777811
The fucking tits on that. Jesus.
>>36778237
Did she later put her hand on your butt and say "abs"?
>>36777811
The more I look at this picture the more I want to know what it's like to be born insanely beautiful with a massive pair of tits. Life must be so easy but you probably get tired of the constant attention really quickly. Like you go out and you get checked out by 50 guys a day and hit on by 5 and all you wanted to do was buy your groceries.
>>36795043
>I don't even know where to go with this. No milk = dead babies. I shouldn't have to go to the basics to state what's already a fact
Cavemen selected their partners thinking about their future babies? Such caring parents... so conscious..
Unbelievable.
>broad shoulders are a sign of elevated testosterone
Do you actually believe that females picked V-taper capemen thinking "mmmh he shall have high quantities of test"? or maybe they perceived a v-taper as a display of health and power (universal mating preference indicators)? Even with the V-taper you refuse to explain ***why*** such a characteristic entice sex. You just keep repeating that it's subconsciously attractive - sure it is, capt. Obvious.
>>36795043
>Is this the first time someone said "bullshit" when you presented a theory as a solid fact?
No, in middle school people shouting "bullshit" for no reason at all were pretty common. It's a solid scientific theory, cross-validates through various science fields.
>Scientists, while figuring out why breasts are so abnormally large in humans, have had theories. The buttocks one isn't the only one.
You didn't present any other.
>And your analogy is not too hot because Newton's idea is good for basic everyday calculations, but fundamentally wrong at explaining gravity
That's exactly what I meant.
>Do you think you're actually explaining anything with your statement?
Memeing and whining about "everything is a theory" (and presenting zero alternative explanation) holds no value in a rational argument. Sure nothing is set in stone; even great theories aren't "set in stone" and "universally valid". But they cede only when confronted with a valid, coherent alternative; a different attempt to explain a more complex phenomenon. Clear now? I guess not, you're more interested in back-pedalling.
>>36795252
What a fucking dumbass.
>>36795252
Nitpicking arguments with greentext sure is convincing. I don't think it's impossible for you to grasp how finding a partner who can take care of offspring (due to increased food reserves or else) is not beyond early humans. Childbearing and raising is, after all, their mission in life. Whether they realized it or not.
Using the verb "memeing" is even less sound than calling someone's statement bullshit. Here, I'll present another theory.
>https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/head-games/201305/what-is-it-about-men-and-breast-size
People have been looking that way for a very long time. Before the buttocks theory came along, probably. All I'm interested in is making it clear there isn't a consensus. Or something even close to it. I personally think it's "bullshit", or wrong, either works. But there is a consensus that we're made of atoms whose baryons are made of quarks. This, though, is a pointless argument.
>>36777811
My fwb (female) has recently been gushing over my ass.
Keeps talking about how good it looks and feels.
Yes I want a nice butt.
>>36795749
>Nitpicking
Nitpicking? Me? Really? You're the one who's constantly back-pedalling.
> I don't think it's impossible for you to grasp how finding a partner who can take care of offspring (due to increased food reserves or else) is not beyond early humans.
I don't think it's *possible* for you to realize that we already covered this 2934 posts ago. Sure, deposit of fats are good! Guess which display of fat a feminine figure holds (in all mammals): right, buttocks. That's where the "food reserves" / "childbearing capabilities" are covered. Having a good "food reserve" doesn't explain, per se, the unique, peculiar human deviation from mammals and even our closest primate cousins. Why our females do not store all the fat in the buttocks? Wouldn't it be convenient? Why this differentiation? Because >>36794139
> it was important to reorient sexual attention onto the front of the body.
You still continue to purport inconsistent "theories".. the breast-feeding theory is unpalatable, the differentiation of fat deposits for no reason at all is not convincing too. We clearly chose that for a reason, a reason that consistently differentiate our species.
>Using the verb "memeing"
Oh, fuck off already, I'm such a >>36795282
>dumbass
since I'm replying to your fucking shitposts already.
>I meant "bullshit" just to say that there isn't clear consensus.
No. There *is* a clear consensus across all relevant scientific fields (and there's nothing in that blog article to support anything. Did she cross-check for buttocks? No. Would the same men have hold different views on buttocks too? It wasn't even considered)
>It's pointless
your posting is pointless.
>>36796329
Holy shit, do I love conceited online strangers. Didn't it cross your mind there was no point in me calling you a dumbass in two separate posts? That wasn't me. You skim read a "blog article". Which has cited sources. It goes like this
> Vinita Mehta Ph.D., Ed.M. vs Anonymous
And she didn't do the research, she's presenting it in the article. Those are academic sources of studying *why* might evolution have bigger than needed breasts. That's another theory. And that's a ten second google search. There's many of them. Good thing you listed all those relevant scientific fields where people have declared abnormal breast growth is DEFINITELY related to buttock mimicking. Good job, very scientific and credible. I'll take my Ph.D. psychologist reviewing the work of academic researchers over antropologist anynomous. You're only arguing for the sake of arguing. Just so you can use your favorite excuse of "back-pedalling" because you're not really correct.
WTF happened in this thread? all I see is walls of text. tldr LUL dont care about some triggered autists.
>>36796614
All me
>>36795084
a friend of my wife has huge tits and an amazingly gorgeous face, and trust me it would fucking suck. she is hassled everywhere she goes. imagine going to the store and having smelly hambeasts constantly follow you around trying to talk to you, then calling you a faggot for not wanting their phone number.
>>36796649
>a friend of my wife
how fucking normie are you
get out
>>36796548
>That's another theory. And that's a ten second google search. There's many of them
It's not a theory about buttock/breast relation, none of your Google searches. Yes, she is presenting someone else's researches in a blog post, I didn't skim that. It was never challenged that breasts are secondary sexual traits!
>I'll take my Ph.D blogging on something completely unrelated and I'll completely disregard the solid, scientific evidence DEFINITIVELY pointing at buttock mimicking
Whatever, retard.
>You're arguing for the sake of arguing
>You are not correct!111!
Stop looking at the mirror.
>>36796694
u jelly i get spanky on my hangdown every night for free?
>>36796709
no i mean why would you marry someone in 2016 you fucking retard lmao
>>36796548
>That's another theory. And that's a ten second google search. There's many of them
Funny how your google searches can't find an alternative theory to buttock mimicking. Enough theories on the preference of large breasts across the poor and the hungry, no theories about preferences of the same group for dat ass (wild guess: ghetto poor niggers crave dat ass). No alternatives theories explaining the existence of something similar as per size, ratio and fat to dat glorious ass. None of the studies she presents in that 10 seconds google search explained how those faggots reacted to a true high test black woman ass.
>>36795749
>But there is a consensus that we're made of atoms whose baryons are made of quarks.
Fuck you, my baryons are made of low fat greek yogurt
>>36795838
big ass on man = good thrust
bitches love it
>>36796757
Not him, I'm 35 and I asked a week ago to my (25 yo) fiancé to marry me
No, she's not pregnant
I hope you'll experience my joy first or later in your life
>>36796895
Let me know how the divorce goes. Or, if not that, then the slow, inevitable growth of hatred between you two as bland year after year rolls by.
>>36796928
How sad and deluded can you be, poor man? You'll never truly live with that attitude. You need faith, trust and love in your life. There's no other meaning to be alive.
You're still in the "I'm a badass and I need no lifelong companion" phase - or maybe you live in some third world feminist shit hole country like merrica where all women are disgusting corrupted gold diggers who chocked on double digits cocks by the age of 18. Sucks to be you
>>36797029
Looks like someone's a little unsure of themselves :^)
>>36796757
why wouldnt you?
>>36777811
>I may look like a gay squatting faggot now, but at least i dont bleed out of my uterus monthly because no one wanted to have sex with me at the time u stupid bitch lol
>>36780002
her tits are beautiful, too bad about her face
>>36788825
>>36788855
>>36789320
I'd go with "are you gay and in want of a nice butt?".
>tfw every girl with huge tits is a massive slut with countless loads busted in her since puberty since every guy wants to get at them titties
Will I ever find a nice, down to earth titty monster?
>>36801074
I'll take the bait. You don't think she's conventionally beautiful? She has such safe features for a woman, she looks like a perfect example of objectively good looking. Maybe a bit plain for some, but I can't imagine anyone thinking she isn't pretty.
>>36801074
here's your reply, virgin
>>36801348
>>36801423
I'm not baiting, you're being distracted by her big fat tits so you're not noticing her bad hairline, ugly nose and annoying smile that needs a good slap. She's average, but not "beautiful", obviously great body though, would berry etc.
>>36801441
or maybe you're anglos so that's considered beautiful in your countries, in which case I apologize
>>36801302
When will you faggots understand that girls and boys have sex with others before they decide to talk to your autistic asses.
>>36801441
she's objectively 'cute' by the standards of any country expect perhaps sub-saharan africa
Squats are beneficial for sports and general athleticism
>>36801464
Yes but only because of her great body
>>36801302
the cute, smart pure girls always get them cut off ;-;
>>36801523
'no'
>>36781386
its a meme you dip
Humans like tits and have them because God made us like that.
>>36787705
I firmly beleive this isn't gay, this drawing has distinct feminine features and aside from the flat chest and the knowledge that its meant to be a man, its a woman
>>36801542
forever lmaoing at americans
>>36801613
What country are you from that's full of supermodels?
>>36801635
>anyone more attractive than that is a supermodel
lmao, im done with you good b8 tho
>>36801531
I have a cousin who did the frumpy sweater thing, she eventually got so frustrated for not being taken seriously by any men that she just got a breast reduction. To top it all off, she was ultimately pushed towards getting the surgery once she got into university, mostly because she followed her desired field which is a literal men only field (engineering).
I feel really sorry for her.
>>36801690
Literally a crime against humanity.
>>36777811
Those tits will look horribly once she hits 30 (maybe even before)
Also, white girls with borderline gigantomastia have no ass at all. Ass > Fake Ass any day of the year
Reply:
>Hips are an important function for your entire body. Not everyone lifts for looks. Enjoy your imbalances you vain bitch.
>>36802023
>Not everyone lifts for looks
>I spend countless hours in the gym for fixing non-existent imbalances no one (not even my body) cares about
>>36802094
I have MS.
NICE GYNO FAGGOT LOL
>>36778322
>tfw will never be genetic butt freak, and all the low bars, hip thrusts and deadlifts will only make my pancake ass look weirder
>>36777811
is no one gonna comment on that freakishly small and fat thumb?
>>36802195
share your unaesthetic ass with us.
>>36802221
looks aesthetic to me.
>>36778483
You have strayed too far from God's path
>>36802226
I like it too. Would look great around my balls crushing then
>>36801441
>annoying smile that needs a good slap
kill yourself, that smile is cute as shit
>>36778322
>6 months on SS
>>36778483
TOP FUCKING KEK
