>anon describes in detail a diet that should result in weight loss but apparently doesn't in their case
>"you're lying because the first law of thermodynamics"
Ah yes, thermodynamics, the science of dietary calories.
We all know it's impossible to power a car with gasoline because gasoline isn't food, so there is zero energy in it.
Humans cannot digest cellulose, therefore any grazing animal must be violating conservation of energy.
Dynamite? No fat, no carbs, no protein. It can't exist. It's a hoax.
Any source of energy besides dietary calories is creating energy from nothing. That's precisely what the first law of thermodynamics means.
[spoiler]I'm not saying they weren't miscounting calories, but bringing up a law of physics in the context of a biological problem is not very relevant.[/spoiler]
>>36532423
fatty detected
>>36532423
You can't create energy from nothing.
>>36532423
Fattie detected
>>36532423
When people say first law they basically just mean CICO. Stop being autistic.
>>36532423
Retard detected
>>36532423
Lol stop drinking gasoline then fattie. If that's where you're getting your energy from you've got bigger problem than your fatness.
>>36532423
Kill yourself you fat moron.
>>36532423
>bringing up a law of physics in the context of a biological problem is not very relevant.
Don't be silly, take some graduate bio-physics courses and you'll understand how the entire field of biology is watered down physics with it's own nomenclature. It's all physics, mang.
if someone expends lets say 1000 calories a day just to live and eats 900 calories a day and puts on weight they are violating the laws of thermodynamics as they are creating energy from nothing. so stop making shit up about my laws you fat fuck
>>36532423
[spoiler]you're a faggot[/spoiler]
>>36532423
kill you are self
>>36532423
Man all that writing and none of it was good. It sucks that someone can be so incorrect
>>36532423
>there is plenty of energy in gasoline. That energy can be measured in calories but gasoline is poison so it's irrelevent to diet discussion.
>humans can't digest cellulose but it still contains energy which can be measured in calories and is available for other creatures that can digest it.
>dynamite contains energy that can be measured in calories but it is poisonous so is irrelevent to discussion of diet.
Tldr. Op doesn't know what a calorie is. Op is a dumbass.
>>36532514
this
tho it's kinda impressive
>>36532490
No, they are not creating energy from nothing.
You haven't ruled out the possibility that they are getting energy from an unknown source, or that they use less energy than normal.
Stop jumping to conclusions.
>>36532487
>>36532490
There is also the SECOND law of thermodynamics. Too bad you dont understand it.
![[HorribleSubs] Gochuumon wa Usagi Desu ka S2 - 03 [1080p].mkv_snapshot_17.08_[2015.10.31_19.47.41].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/hkWn9QF.jpg "[HorribleSubs] Gochuumon wa Usagi Desu ka S2 - 03 [1080p].mkv_snapshot_17.08_[2015.10.31_19.47.41].jpg")
>>36532423
Biology is based on chemistry, which is based on physics. There are a lot of factors that go into weight loss and the second law of thermodynamics and energy conservation is definitely one of them.
In fact those false analogies you drew shows how little you understand the matter. The reason why /fit/ even allows a non-lifting fatty retard like you to post is beyond me.
>itt: fucks who quote first law but forget the second law and neglect the fact human bodies need more than calories to power itself
Even cars require more than gasoline to run (e.g. coolant, engine oil, brake fluid, etc), yet dumb fuck fitizens constantly say "hurr, you can eat whatever you want". No you can't, you future fat fucks, you have to watch your macros, sleep habits, stress levels, etc.
>>36532587
The extra 100 cal comes from the potential energy they have stored as fat (sometimes muscle if they are already extremely lean). They will get skinnier over time because E=MC^2 bitch.
>>36532423
Biology does not supercede physics.
>>36532598
Is the number of calories written on the box of food necessarily the total amount of energy in all the molecular bonds in the food, or is it merely an estimate of how much energy it gives to a healthy human's digestive system? Context matters.
>>36532487
>reductionism
kys hambeast
>>36532774
The laws of physics apply equally to either case you stupid retard.
>>36532423
Breakfast: eggs 200g
Lunch: vegetable soup 300g
Dinner: chicken 200g, vegetables 100g, no oil, no sauce
drink only water
absolutely nothing else
I'm locked in my house and someone else brings me this food. I couldn't eat more if I tried.
I still haven't lost any weight.
>>36532924
You are a skinny manlet. Maybe even a midget.
go back to /lit
>>36532423
Fuck off fatty
>>36532587
ya every person in this thread is ignoring natural human photosynthesis, fucking idiots
>>36532924
it is worth noting if you are just lazing around your tdee goes down. tdee basically is what normies call their metabolism
>>36532423
GET A WARRANT YOU FAT FUCK
>>36532587
>getting energy from an unknown source
Like all the snack cakes they eat?
>>36533166
Only if they don't know they're eating snack cakes, possibly due to a split personality.
>>36532423
you are pathetic for making this thread
you are fat without the motivation or intelligence to improve
leave this board
>>36532423
first law of thermodynamics is only applicable within a closed system. A CLOSED SYSTEM. Go back go reddit you god damn psuedointellectual 15 year old.
I'm not disagreeing about less calories in meaning weight loss but the first law of thermodynamics does not apply.
>>36532423
Nice spoiler you fucking newfag. Get the fuck out.
Lurk more before making threads you fucking asswipes.
