81g of PROTEIN
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /fit/ - Fitness
You are currently reading a thread in /fit/ - Fitness
What will this do to my stomach? Can you actually digest 81g of protein in one shake and not stink up a whole city?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vTdUWF89K4s
That's a big shake
>>35655166
My lunch typically consists of around 80g protein. no worries m8
>>35655184
for you
>>35655184
For you
>>35655166
Was eating 103g of carbs part of your plan?
You can digest it but you won't use most of it for muscle synthesis. Anything more than 30g every 3 hours or so is superfluous fort muscle growth. But protein is used for other stuff too.
>>35655211
It says in the sticky that's a myth though and there is no science behind it!
>>35655184
Was stinking up the room part of your master plan?
>>35655228
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/10/091026125543.htm
Sry. The sticky also says eat 1g to 1.5g per lb which is shill nonsense. Save your money retard.
>>35655333
Thanks anon most of my shakes always had around 60g of protein. I'll tone it down now
>>35655333
Any source as to how much protein to consume per day? I normally do about 0.8g per lb of lean body mass
>>35655333
You are stupid.
This is the exact reason people like you shouldnt just blindly read studies.
That study is done on untrained individuals and its about synthesis over a given window. No shit retard, stimulation of MPS via the MTOR pathway caps out around 30grams, but your body slows digestion down.
See http://www.biolayne.com/wp-content/uploads/Norton-J-Ag-Food-Ind-Hi-Tech-2008.pdf
And watch https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mjmV8BlsJTQ
do not fucking respond to me until you at least watch the video.
And yes, you should be eating 1g per lb, not necessarily because you need it to actually build muscle, but because every meal should be accompanied by 30-40 grams of protein to take advantage of MTOR signaling.
>>35655310
yes
with no survivors
>>35655333
Wow bad study anon please stay in school retard
>>35655166
If you aren't leaving the house today then 81 grams is fine
>>35655211
>>35655228
>>35655333
>>35655457
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26500462
your kidneys have to process that and you can essentially od on protein which makes you feel shit
>>35655614
see >>35655470
and shut up.
>>35655470
Let go of your hate.
http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fphys.2015.00245/full
For all of you fucktards who can't do your own research but instead just bro on with your others retard bros on a bromigo website full of weeaboos and fucktoys like you are.
Faggots.
>>35655470
Hi, thanks for posting a video. That's science.
Read this, done by scientists and numerious citations in other scientific work.
>>35655749
And then please go fuck your self with your 1 year lifting knowledge and fuck all nutritional information.
>>35655769
>http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fphys.2015.00245/full
You are conflating absorption with MPS stimulation.
I literally explained it to you.
Yes around 30-40 grams caps out stimulation of MPS which occurs via MTOR, the guy whose video is sent you DISCOVERED THIS, that's over a given window.
But absorption and even utilization of protein is different than stimulation of MPS via mtor. Stimulation of MPS is actually reliant on serum leucine levels(if you had actually read the paper I discovered) not overall protein count, it just so happens that 30-40 grams of common complete proteins provides that enough leucine.
So yes, eating more than 30-40 grams of protein will not stimulate MPS beyond its threshold BUT you still use that protein to build muscle, you just slow digestion of it.
Layne explains that very clearly in the video.
Providing further evidence(like what you just sent me) which simply explains how MPS stimulation caps out doesn't mean anything, I know this, I explained it to you in my initial post.
>>35655614
That is such crap. Otherwise how could you eat an entire 16 oz steak without dying? You're dumb.
>>35655851
lol I quoted the wrong one
on my phone sorry bro, it was meant to the dude you where quoting
Protein bb
>skim milk
Fat did nothing wrong faggot
>>35655969
>36 nuggets
>18 carbs
NIGGA WHAT
>>35655166
Google flatulence underwear. You can fart and no one will smell it
>>35655969
What in the fuck. How much is that per gram of protein?
>>35656709
Too expensive mate I only make £30k a year!
>>35656782
And that's before her fucking majesty the great thief taxes the shit out of it!
>>35655851
>you still use that protein to build muscle, you just slow digestion of it
Well with high enough doses of protein not really. Prolonged, constant aminoacidemia is counterproductive because it induces a refractory period which shuts off MPS -- the "muscle full" effect. If such feedback regulation didn't exist you could could just eat protein all day long without doing anything else and make serious gains. Restricting the duration of aminoacidemia and allowing enough time for the muscle to recover before dosing again would then maximize net protein accrual. Same kind of cycling one would do to get around drug tolerance.
The amount of dietary protein used to actually "build" muscle (i.e. for structural purposes) is very small btw it's in the single digit grams even in heavy roiders. aaRS isn't the rate limiting step here instead it's the various intracellular nutrient sensors that high levels of amino acids like leucine activate.
>>35655211
protein synthesis is not just building muscle its literally how your mRNA is converted into peptides from your ribosomes
>>35655333
Post body
>>35655470
Yeah nobody is going to watch that. You're clearly an imbecile.
>800
>big shake
I wash my mouth out with 1200cal shakes before tea in the morning, followed by 2k breakfast kek nignog full kek stay small KILL YOURSELF kek kek kek KEKAWWW IMA CROW BITCH
>>35655600
>2015 article
>Consuming a high protein diet (3.4 g/kg/d) in conjunction with a heavy resistance-training program may confer benefits with regards to body composition
so 1.54 g/lb bw - just like we've always done. Good to know.
>>35658394
Dis nigga high yall
>>35655166
>Can you actually digest 81g of protein in one shake
Yes.
>and not stink up a whole city
No.
>>35655166
>>35655470
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mjmV8BlsJTQ
>He claims exactly what the study claims, about 30g is the maximum anabolic response
Anon giving himself some BTFO
>>35655969
>tfw not american
>>35655969
holy fuck are they really that good? chik fil a is god tier to begin with but i didn't know anything about their nutrition.
Wait, thats a lot? My usual post-workout is two scoops (50g of prot), I thought its pretty much the default
So I can down a shake of 64g of protein and let it all get put to use over night?
>>35655969
1200 cal
123 prots
45 carb
57 fat
You lying to yourself pham?
>>35659539
Wait my b you're using grilled nuggers
>>35659539
Aren't those fried?
>>35659394
It's literally just lightly fried chicken. There's not much to explain
>>35659539
Holy shit senpai, this is bullshit. all you need is chicken, a little oil, and salt. don't fuck yourself with maltodextrin, cornstarch, dextrose and gums
Grilled chicken (whole breast filet, seasoning [water, apple cider vinegar, soybean oil, yeast extract, salt, modified corn starch, palm oil, dehydrated garlic, dehydrated onion, corn maltodextrin, sea salt, flavor, sugar, chicken stock, cane molasses, chicken fat, spice, natural flavor {including smoke}, dextrose, lemon peel, citric acid, red bell pepper, orange juice concentrate, grape juice concentrate, natural flavor, paprika, vinegar, xanthan gum, ascorbic acid, and spices]).
>>35655969
motherfucker, it's Sunday
>>35659539
idiot
the post you're responding to specifies three servings, or 36 grilled nuggets
>>35655190
>>35655191
Can someone explain this bane meme?
In the movie bane responses to the guy saying it will be painful for the guy if he takes of his mask. So why does everyone say it after someone says someone is a big guy. Makes no sense.
>>35660277
/tv/ is the worst board on 4chan. They haven't had any good jokes since TDKR, so they continue to spam that shit because they think it's hilarious.
>>35660277
no, he's saying he's a big guy for him
>>35660333
He's not though. The other guy says he's a big guy, implying it won't hurt to take of the mask. Then bane says "for you" implying he actually meant the guy would experience pain if he took of banes mask.
>>35660373
>>35660277
Don't do this anon. Don't bait the memeing retards.
>>35660373
>1)how would it feel if i took off that mask
>2)it would be very painful
>3)you're a big guy
>4)for you
please senpai
conversations have a flow and order to them
you can't just say um hurr line 4) is a response to line 1) because that makes sense
it's obviously a response to line 3) because it came after line 3)
>>35659149
>>Can you actually digest 81g of protein in one shake
>Yes.
Relatively.
Your body absorbs a certain amount given delivery/time.
>>35655166
>879 calories
>13.2g of fat
You better be getting prepared to bench a forklift or have sex with a BMW.
>>35660416
I'm sorry but I keep reading this shit and its time to take a stand
>>35660438
Bro watch the scene again. Why would he say he's a big guy for someone.
He says it will be very painful... For you.
In between the pause is when the guy makes his comment.
Even when you search it up on Google it comes up like that.
