I think I've discovered why women dob't take lifting as seriously as we do.
Have you ever noticed how in any given guys-only group, men will single out and mock the shortest member? Usually refered to as "manlets", these smaller individuals will be pelted with banter, ofter aimed at their learning disability.
Well, it turns out women do the same thing in their on girls-only groups, and in their case based on breast size. These "chestlets" or "booblets" recieve the same kind of abuse, without the friendly nature behind it.
>Cardio kills gains
>Lifting kills boobs
Can you imagine a world where lifting made you shorter?
>>35536719
>current year
>not realizing its all about ass gains nowadays
nigga its not the 90s anymore where your boobs matter
Its all about the asslets now
>>35536738
Are you even old enough to remember the 90s
>>35536719
I thought I recognised those tits...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nZl165WDjDA
>>35536738
>nigga its not the 90s anymore where your boobs matter
>Its all about the asslets now
Fuck off. Tits > Ass
If all you care about is the ass you may as well go gay and find yourself a twinky fuccboi. It's all the same.
>>35536914
Fuck off you twat.
Ass is where it's at, a good ass shows the grills ability to sculpt their bodies, it shows dedication and hard work.
tits are just sacks of fat
>>35536957
Go beat off to your twink trap porn you gay faggot. Larger tits on a slim frame showcases superior genetics, us men are drawn to them because they make a woman appear more fertile.
>Wanting an ass that's all muscle
Fucking disgusting. Confirmed faggot.
>>35536914
There's a huge difference between male and female ass, which show up in natural size, shape, width, and fat distribution.
>back2basicanatomy.jpg
>>35537017
Go look at any trap/twink thread and I guarantee you there isn't a difference.
>>35536719
More than that, if your tits are too big, they're impossible to control while doing cardio.
>>35537028
>What is a sports bra
>What is binding
>>35537045
>implying there isn't a limit to what bras can do
>implying binding isn't unhealthy and if you do it wrong it won't literally kill your tits
>>35537027
>look at a thread full of narrow waists and block-like butts
I don't think so
>>35537066
If it's good enough for soldiers it's good enough for cardio bunnies.
>if you do it wrong
So don't fucking do it wrong? Jesus Christ.
>Can you imagine a world where lifting made you shorter?
But it already does. Squats fuck up your height.
>>35537028
>going out for a jog
>your swinging tits constantly throw you off-balance
>>35537118
Why is my dick hard?
>>35536914
Tits are for children, cause they remind them of their mothers. Don't get me wrong- they're a nice bonus, but not necessary if a girl has a nice ass and legs.
>>35537109
don't worry lad, just do the second half of the lift and everything will be all better
>>35537122
>>35537028
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=diNnZJkQ2-I
>>35536719
>Have you ever noticed how in any given guys-only group, men will single out and mock the shortest member? Usually refered to as "manlets", these smaller individuals will be pelted with banter, ofter aimed at their learning disability.
i have never in my life experienced anyone irl talking down (lol) at someone short for being short
>>35536738
>>35536914
>not liking both
but to be fair I'd take smaller tits and a big arse than the other way around
>>35536764
yes i am
>>35537220
this
what kind of person actually mocks manlets IRL apart from obvious cunts and 4chan memers
I've never seen it.
>>35537179
HNNNNNNNNFGHFFFFFF
>>35537225
And I would personally take it the other way around. But I respect your tastes my friend.
I can appreciate a nice ass. But an amazing rack gets me leaking like a fucking faucet.
>>35536957
>tits are just sacks of fat
fundamental misunderstanding of biology right here desu
>>35537519
they're like, 75% fat.
>>35537149
underrated
>>35537220
>>35537239
The blond guy in the pic is the shortest of them all and he was constantly mocked in every group he was in.
>>35536738
>Tits
>Give love, health, and nourishment
>Ass
>Shit comes out of it
>>35536719
>Have you ever noticed how in any given guys-only group, men will single out and mock the shortest member? Usually refered to as "manlets"
>normies bring obscure internet memes they probably wouldn't know about into real life
holy kek do you even go outsidee
this never happens in real life unless if you're a fucking midget and when that happens it's usually done jokingly
groups of guys stay strong together and just get smashed in bars, it's like dragonball except they're fusing their alphaness instead of some powerlevel shit
only groups of women make catty remarks at eachother
and fall apart
don't be a fucking woman
fucking hell, it's a shame that /fit/ went from banter and we're all gonna make its to full on panties wet mode
>>35537525
No. They're mostly made of mammal glands which is epithelial tissue.
>>35537700
>don't be a fucking woman
Kind of hard unless you were born a guy.
Trans don't count
>>35536764
I read about it on tumblr
>>35537149
Laughed so hard my dog things I'm retarded
>>35537700
>it's like dragonball except they're fusing their alphaness instead of some powerlevel shit
He says as he points his chubby weeb fingers
"The high amount of Omega 3 storage could be the reason why fat-bottomed women seem attractive to men, because it becomes an evolutionary way of ensuring successful children."
http://www.sciencetimes.com/articles/3507/20150303/scientists-say-that-women-with-bigger-butts-give-birth-to-smarter-kids.htm
>>35536914
BLOWN
>>35537004
THE
>>35537027
FUCK
>>35537694
OUT
Grow the fuck up. You just proved beyond a shadow of a doubt you have inferior judgment as far as selecting a mate capable of producing healthy kids.
Go back to 3rd grade with that "OMG BOOOOOBEEEEZZZZZZ" bullshit and get over yourself.
/fit/ - Intelligent Males
I am the shortest guy in pretty much any group I'm in. I'm fucking 5'5~. No on ever makes fun of me because you know we're all adults (20s-30) and bullying others for things they have no control over is pretty gay
Maybe you should hang out with more mature people Op.
>>35536914
Tits are literally just a copy of asses fucking retard.
>>35536914
>Tits > Ass
Underage detected.
We all love tits at some point, but then we grow into men and realize that ass is better.
>>35536719
Wtf? No. I'm flat chested as they come and I've never had any girlfriend of mine say anything about my boobs. If they did, even playfully, it would be weird.
We don't rib on each other like guys do.
>Finding a literal shit hole sexually attractive
Fucking gross.
>>35537828
Mother fucker I am 25. I just never saw the appeal in ass. Shit comes out of it and it doesn't look like anything special.
I find hips attractive as fuck, but the ass itself just never appealed to me. It's just kind of there.
>>35537843
>We don't rib on each other like guys do.
No you just act like best friends and the second you're away from each other all you can do is talk about how much you fucking hate one another.
Women are fucking bizarre.
No. We don't talk about each others bodies or looks like at all. We don't do any comparison, maybe just complain about our own problematic body parts, was it thick thighs or what ever. I got pretty big boobies given my bf% but honestly I can't name my friends' cupsizes. I honestly got no idea how small or big their tits must be cause I haven't payed much attention.
It more about hair, but if someone bald we don't point it out. It's against the girl code.
And the answer why most women aren't into lifting that it's pretty masculine interest and hobby. It's just not as natural interest for women as some girly shit like dancing or yoga. Just like most men aren't very into girly stuff, was it about purses or what ever. Lifting is associated with masculinity and it' not something you'd probably like if you are a feminine typical girly girl. Be a bearmode dude and chances are that you don't care about makeup and hair extensions either.
Also, the results of lifting are positive in men where as most women and men too thinks that being too muscular and a woman is tranny tier. Ofc they don't know that you don't just turn into a man if you lift every now and then, but still.
I'm into lifting, but I must have fucked up test levels for a woman cause I'm also into cars, guns and boxing. I like dressing up and doing my makeup and I got long hair and I always do my nails, but my masculine traits are pretty damn strong, I got a strong jaw and wide shoulders but also personality wise I'm quite dominating and masculine too. Probably the result of growing with brothers. Maybe I got some kind of a testosterone dominance already in my mother's womb since she had several boys before me. And my dad is pretty alpha so I got the genetic potential from his side too.
Gonna run my first cycle later this year actually.
>>35537977
>I got pretty big boobies given my bf%
How big? Pics?
>>35537990
I'm an adult woman and not going to post pics of my chest gains to this fucken Mongolian church art discussion board. Go to /b/, little man.
>>35537659
Not for his height you Mongoloid because he was a goof, class clown and all around shot head till he matured
>>35537977
>It more about hair
What's with your gender's fucking fixation with hair?
>>35538074
You know the saying, hair is the crown of a woman.
And hair is an extremely feminine thing. rly important.
>>35537765
>http://www.sciencetimes.com/articles/3507/20150303/scientists-say-that-women-with-bigger-butts-give-birth-to-smarter-kids.htm
Kim Kardashian is gonna give birth to a smart kid?
Dude, I'm all for butt but that article's conclusion seems to be unlikely to me.
>>35536738
That vulva... The tasteful thickness of it..
>>35536719
This might be true about 10 years ago. But now with instagram and just general western pop culture, asses are in. God fucking bless, nicki minaj!
What a time to be black, too. Space travel can wait tbhfam
>>35537808
And yet tits are superior.
>>35537808
Tits have nipples. Checkmate.
>>35537525
Humans are like 70% water. Guess you just like fucking lakes, huh?
>>35537345
I wish I could appreciate tits as much as you do. For some reason, only huge racks get me- and only when I see them irl.
>>35538081
Is that why you cunts bully and make girls with long curly hair and girls with big fluffy afros cry?
Fuck you, those two hairstyles are GOAT, give them back
>>35538171
how did you know?
>>35537977
>Gonna run my first cycle later this year actually.
Don't do it, bish. Unless you're a dyke. Don't do it even though. You're gonna regret it.
>>35538092
her butt is implants, not genetics
>>35538092
Black women have gigantic asses, but that doesn't seem to have helped them much
>>35537765
If that was true niggers would be the smartest race
>>35538735
Just a reminder there's no such thing as genetic race.
>>35538029
Found the fraud
>>35538770
sure thing Goldberg
>>35538840
>arbitrary groupings
As usual, non-evidence from racists.
>>35538861
>arbitrary
>>35538882
>cherrypicked evidence
>one trait = a whole race
>green eyed people are a different race from brown eyed people
More non-evidence from racists.
>>35538770
Let me guess, you believe animals evolved but humans didn't because
>we're special and all equal and the same! <3
>>35538910
Nope, but there's no such thing as genetic race. Sorry that all of molecular genetics disagrees with you.
>muh academic conspiracy
Yeah I'm sure that's what's going on. I bet you totally don't misunderstand evolution at all.
>>35538899
>conflating genotype and phenotype
>what is genetic proximity
It's like sjws have to be intentionally retarded to not understand simple biology
>>35538943
>conflating genotype and phenotype
Never did that, but you did.
>what is genetic proximity
Using genetic linkage to say that race exists demonstrates you don't understand the first thing about molecular genetics, which is what I have my Master's in.
>>35538940
>Animals evolved
>Humans didn't because that would mean there's differences between us!! :(
>>/trash/
>>35538967
>racists literally can't even try to win an argument without putting words in people's mouths
>>35538976
>thinking a buzzword means you are superior
Notice which narrative fits evidence presented and easily verifiable reality if you've taken highschool biology
>>35539017
The one that says there's no such thing as genetic race, which geneticists have agreed upon for years.
But I guess YOU know better than all those useless jews with their PhDs, right?
>>35537977
W-will you be my waifu? I've always wanted a tough masculine gf to beat me up and rape me with a strap on
>>35539038
If genetics don't determine race, why do you only give birth to children of your own race?
>m-muh highschool biology
>>35539038
It doesn't take my Evolutionary Biology degree to know that if you really say that all of molecular genetics agrees that humans aren't biologically diverse with vastly different phenotype based on genetic proximity than you are full of shit. The man who found DNA in the first place has researched the topic himself but anti-science progressives such as yourself raise humanity above inspection in your crusade to pretend differences in physical and mental biology don't exist among humans
>>35539038
>Unironically claiming this
You know how I know you aren't a scientist?
>>35539077
Genetics determine melanosome structure and clustering, but "race" is not a genetically discrete thing. I bet you don't even know what a melanosome is. Now run off to wikipedia so you can pretend you knew what it was all along.
>>35539081
>The man who found DNA in the first place
Not "the man" but one of the men. You don't even know that because it doesn't suit your narrative. He didn't base his ideas on DNA evidence, but on some hypothesis of neurology, which was not his field.
Populations across Africa have more genetic diversity than the rest of the world combined, even though you'd probably call them all just "black." But I guess that's just an inconvenient truth for you.
>>35538144
CHECKED AND MATE
>>35538770
>>35538861
>>35538899
Lol race is a heuristic dweeb. "Race" as we define it might not exist but it is Occam's razor for how similar groups of people's dna is based on observable traits
>>35539104
What's your degree in?
>>35539177
>Lol race is a heuristic dweeb. "Race" as we define it might not exist but it is Occam's razor for how similar groups of people's dna is based on observable traits
Yet African populations are more genetically diverse than the rest of the world so your entire premise is nonsense.
>>35539167
>Admitting that the opposition is right and that there's genetic diversity among human populations
>He wouldn't describe Sub-Saharan Africans as black
How is it in your denial cube? Do they allow you to have an independent thought in there, or only cognitive dissonance?
>>35539184
Crashing this plane
>>35537977
L O N D O N
O
N
D
O
N
>>35539215
>Admitting that the opposition is right and that there's genetic diversity among human populations
The opposition says that genetic traits are confined to races when that's simply not true, but I guess your reading comprehension isn't good enough to understand that.
>>He wouldn't describe Sub-Saharan Africans as black
Nice non-sequitur. I guess you tend to free-associate when your reality is shattered.
>>35539235
So not a science degree, then?
>>35539038
http://time.com/91081/what-science-says-about-race-and-genetics/
>A longstanding orthodoxy among social scientists holds that human races are a social construct and have no biological basis. A related assumption is that human evolution halted in the distant past, so long ago that evolutionary explanations need never be considered by historians or economists.
>In the decade since the decoding of the human genome, a growing wealth of data has made clear that these two positions, never at all likely to begin with, are simply incorrect. There is indeed a biological basis for race. And it is now beyond doubt that human evolution is a continuous process that has proceeded vigorously within the last 30,000 years and almost certainly — though very recent evolution is hard to measure — throughout the historical period and up until the present day.
>New analyses of the human genome have established that human evolution has been recent, copious, and regional.
It seems their position has changed. Such is the way of science.
>>35539332
>an opinion piece by some journalism cuck
>this is the best evidence racists can muster
>>35539332
Cool article. Here's how actual biologists feel about it.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/10/books/review/letters-a-troublesome-inheritance.html?_r=1
>As scientists dedicated to studying genetic variation, we thank David Dobbs for his review of Nicholas Wade’s “A Troublesome Inheritance: Genes, Race and Human History” (July 13), and for his description of Wade’s misappropriation of research from our field to support arguments about differences among human societies.
>As discussed by Dobbs and many others, Wade juxtaposes an incomplete and inaccurate account of our research on human genetic differences with speculation that recent natural selection has led to worldwide differences in I.Q. test results, political institutions and economic development. We reject Wade’s implication that our findings substantiate his guesswork. They do not.
>We are in full agreement that there is no support from the field of population genetics for Wade’s conjectures.
>>35538092
Her ass is as fake as her personality.
>>35536719
I do take it as serious as probably most of the people who are serious here. I take it way more serious than my bf. But then again I go to 4chan. I'm not very sociable and I don't like wearing yoga pants so I'm already wired differently. I probably literally am on the mild side of autism spectrum, aspbergers is no longer an acutal diagnosis but basically I have that.
>>35539432
Not even gonna read the article bc its liberal trash
>Ny time not even once
>>35537225
>The cellulose
disgusting
>>35539540
Thanks for conceding defeat and thus admitting that there's no such thing as genetic race.
>>35538735
>>35538770
>>35538840
>>35538861
>>35538882
>>35538899
>>35538910
>>35538940
>>35538943
>>35538959
>>35538967
>>35538976
>>35539017
>>35539038
>>35539077
>>35539081
>>35539104
>>35539167
>>35539177
>>35539184
>>35539194
>>35539215
>>35539235
>>35539267
>>35539332
>>35539359
>>35539432
>>35539540
>>35539576
Now if only we had boards for people that post off topic.
Oh wait
>>>/trash/
>>35539432
>one paper refuting one other paper
I guess that settles the issue boys, evidence says that this poster is a retard
>>35538325
I definitely will. Been building up my body for years and the time to leave the humanity behind are coming, I can sense it and I can't wait for it.
>>35539072
Sure if you can deal with the fact that atm I'm pretty much a mix of a weightlifter and a high test. Bulking you see, so I'm like 5'7 and 149lbs. So pretty chunky, luckily not too much on the waistline though. Feels gross man, but could prob crush some poor dude's crush with these powerlevels and thighs. If you are into that kind of shite.
>>35539908
is* coming, not sure what I was thinking there.
>>35536719
>Have you ever noticed how in any given guys-only group, men will single out and mock the shortest member? Usually refered to as "manlets", these smaller individuals will be pelted with banter, ofter aimed at their learning disability.
No. Usually my friends "pick on" whoever reacts the most. But usually we give everyone in the group an equal amount of shit. Nobody is safe.
>>35539888
>an opinion piece by a "science editor" is as valid as a paper agreed upon by multiple PhD biologists
This is how desperate racists are.
>>35540556
>Not responding to the myriad of other papers or evidence referenced before
>Claiming that one paper cited >25 times refutes what even the simplest dullard knows by adulthood
This is how desperate SJWs are
>>35539908
>if you can deal with the fact that atm I'm pretty much a mix of a weightlifter and a high test
You say it like it's a bad thing u sound fine af desu I would love to leave humanity behind with you :33333
>>35541021
Bro you shoulda known you would get meme'd by someone claiming to be a 'molecular biologist' who doesn't believe traits are tied to (human) populations
>>35540556
damn girl, this is some masterful trolling
but let's be real for a second
I know everyone in your camp is eager to call everyone who disagrees a racist, but do you think we could leave that sort of inflammatory language out of it for a second?
the spot you all disagree on is probably evident in this post here >>35539267 where you mention that your opposition says that genetic traits are confined to races. This is just silly, nobody thinks this.
But to say that there are not clear differences in groups that were separated for many generations is just silly
>what is allopatric speciation
>what is genetic drift
>what is the founder effect
honestly you only have to look at a group of caucasians to see that they are quite different to a group of africans
I did have to look up melanosomes, i thought they must have something to do with melanin, but i honestly couldnt work out why you thought they were relevant, so off to wikipedia i went. Do you think everyone is just talking about skin colour? Is that why you brought it up?
yes populations acros africa have more genetic diversity than the rest of the world combined, they are also very different from the rest of the world because of many generations of isolation. given the history of homo sapiens this is hardly surprising
i dont really believe that you studied molecular genetics up to a masters, im sorry to say, i kinda think you might intend to study it, but i think you are just bringing it up to try to win an internet argument by authority.
>>35541207
>I know everyone in your camp is eager to call everyone who disagrees a racist
By everyone in my camp, you mean experts in the field, right?
>But to say that there are not clear differences in groups that were separated for many generations is just silly
That's not what "race" is though. There is no such thing as genetic race.
>honestly you only have to look at a group of caucasians to see that they are quite different to a group of africans
Yes, confirm your biases.
>i dont really believe that you studied molecular genetics up to a masters, im sorry to say, i kinda think you might intend to study it, but i think you are just bringing it up to try to win an internet argument by authority.
You don't have to believe me for me to be right. What's your highest degree, if you know so much?
>>35537096
Good enough for soldiers? You do realise soldiers are treat like shit right? I speak from first hand experience.
It's literally someones job to make sure the cost of keeping you alive is less than the cost of training your replacement. If there's a way they can cheap out on you they'll do it, no regard for your well being or health beyond a number on a spreadsheet.
>>35541021
I don't have to respond, the experts in the field did it for me.
GRAHAM COOP
DAVIS, CALIF.
The writer is a professor of evolution and ecology at the University of California, Davis.
MICHAEL B. EISEN
BERKELEY, CALIF.
The writer is a professor of molecular and cell biology at the University of California, Berkeley, and investigator, Howard Hughes Medical Institute.
RASMUS NIELSEN
BERKELEY, CALIF.
The writer is a professor of computational biology at the University of California, Berkeley.
MOLLY PRZEWORSKI
NEW YORK
The writer is a professor of biology at Columbia University.
NOAH ROSENBERG
STANFORD, CALIF.
The writer is a professor of biology at Stanford University.
This letter was submitted on behalf of more than 100 faculty members in population genetics and evolutionary biology; their names and affiliations are available at cehg.stanford.edu/letter-from-population-geneticists/.
>>35537149
YOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
>>35539576
>Someone posts something from Time magazine, a relatively unbiased source
>you post an article from the NY Times to try to debate it
You do realize you're taking a step DOWN from that posters citation right? If you wanted to actually prove your point you'd link to an independent study or something of the like, not a newspaper with a journalist that clearly has an agenda
>>35536719
I can't believe a thread about lifting and boob loss has gone this far off topic.
BOOBS NOT RACE WARS
>>35541989
>journalist
>literally over 100 population geneticists and evolutionary biologist
>nicholas wade
>not a journalist with a clear agenda
shiggy diggy anon, you didn't even read it
I would rather have a flat chested girl with cute nips than a big titted girl with saggy pancake nips ANY DAY. It's all about the ass tho.
>2016
>Being a titsman
>>35541989
If you're getting so triggered by the NYT, have this:
https://cehg.stanford.edu/letter-from-population-geneticists
Now go on and tell me that these scientists are just in a liberal conspiracy against muh freedoms.
>>35537149
Unoriginal
>>35542001
BOOB WAR NOW
>>35541943
I'm pretty sure you just want to put words in my mouth now
As anon has already pointed out, "race" is pretty much meaningless, it's a heuristic. Nobody here is making claims like "Africans have lower IQs" or "Asians can't drive" or any someshit like that.
I'm going to ignore your attempts to get me riled up.
If we look at human diversity in general, we have very little, iirc this is because of a few population bottlenecks from our evolutionary history. But to say that there are not clear ethnic groups, I believe this is the correct term, is just bonkers. There is definitely such a thing as "white people" and "black people" and "Asian people" etc...
As for my highest degree, that'll be my masters in biostatistics. My most relevant degree will be my bachelor's with honours in zoology, my thesis was in behavioural ecology.
>>35539566
I also hate beta 1,4 linkages. If I'm ingesting any carbs, they better be alpha, like me.
>>35542111
Trips of truth.
>*boob pops out*
en garde bitch
>>35542005
>>35542026
But the whole point is they can just cherry pick the studies to fit their journalistic opinion. Do you even into journalism?
>>35537977
B-but I dance and I'm a guy. Everyone thinks I'm gay when they first meet me, so I get your point. But taking up a masculine hobby is a great way for girls to become attractive and vica versa for guys, which isn't a bad thing. Just like the way /fit/ boys love
>toned
women, dance girls spill their spaghetti when they talk to me.
And I haven't even made it [yet].
>>35536719
>Have you ever noticed how in any given guys-only group, men will single out and mock the shortest member?
>Usually refered to as "manlets", these smaller individuals will be pelted with banter, ofter aimed at their learning disability.
Why would the shortest guy get mocked for having a learning disability and not for being really short?
What if the shortest guy doesn't have a mental disability?
Why would he be friends with them if they mocked him for being disabled?
Why have these stupid troll threads been allowed on /fit/ for so long?
>>35536764
>>35536764
1991 master race, where my niggas at?
>>35536719
>Have you ever noticed how in any given guys-only group, men will single out and mock the shortest member?
No, because I hang out with normal people.
>>35538899
How long have you been using the internet? Seems like you're new, because claiming you know X because your degree is in X is about as evidentially substantiated as me being claiming to be the reincarnation of Jesus Christ (which I am, BTW).
Races in humans exist the same way breeds in dogs and fish do. Whether they exist to the same degree is debatable. Now if you got counter evidence for that, please show it and save the SJW-esque labeling and shit-flinging for your Tumblr safe-spaces.
>>35539566
>That
>Disgusting
Either gay or a salty low test skeleton
>>35536738
I'd take a bottom heavy girl any day of the week over a top heavy one, but if someone goes for boobs, that's just as fine by me.
>>35542349
It's not a study that is linked. It is the combined opinion of 143 experts in biology. You don't understand what is being conveyed because you clearly didn't read.
>>35542937
>In the United States both scholars and the general public have been conditioned to viewing human races as natural and separate divisions within the human species based on visible physical differences. With the vast expansion of scientific knowledge in this century, however, it has become clear that human populations are not unambiguous, clearly demarcated, biologically distinct groups. Evidence from the analysis of genetics (e.g., DNA) indicates that most physical variation, about 94%, lies within so-called racial groups. Conventional geographic "racial" groupings differ from one another only in about 6% of their genes. This means that there is greater variation within "racial" groups than between them. In neighboring populations there is much overlapping of genes and their phenotypic (physical) expressions. Throughout history whenever different groups have come into contact, they have interbred. The continued sharing of genetic materials has maintained all of humankind as a single species. [...]
>With the vast expansion of scientific knowledge in this century, ... it has become clear that human populations are not unambiguous, clearly demarcated, biologically distinct groups. [...] Given what we know about the capacity of normal humans to achieve and function within any culture, we conclude that present-day inequalities between so-called "racial" groups are not consequences of their biological inheritance but products of historical and contemporary social, economic, educational, and political circumstances.
-The American Anthropology Association
>>35537017
>tfw this is true ;_;
>tfw you'll never have female hips for the best butt gains.
>>35544101
Jesus Christ if I could only pull her out of the computer screen.
>>35539566
Virgin detected. Pretty much all grills over 22 years old have some level of cellulite.
>>35544855
let it lie anonette, just let it be, nobody thinks that wade is anything other than a complete nutjob pushing an agenda
hell, i think you were the person who brought his article up in the first place, you are just hoping to push words into the mouths of those who disagree with your sjw bullshit so that you can call them all racists, because everyone knows that as soon as you can call someone a racist, they are wrong and bad, thus immediately ending any conversation or debate
the fact of the matter is that you can still do pic related
read this
Genetic Similarities Within and Between Human Populations
D. J. Witherspoon, S. Wooding, A. R. Rogers, E. E. Marchani, W. S. Watkins, M. A. Batzer, L. B. Jorde
GENETICS May 20 , 2007 vol. 176 no. 1, 351-359 (Early Online May 1 , 2007); DOI: 10.1534/genetics.106.067355
race exists
stop pretending
stop plugging your ears and screaming when presented with this sort of thing
stop calling everyone racist for using the word race
just stop it
>>35544163
That just looks disgusting though
>>35542344
But that makes no sense. I'd prefer a woman with a squat butt and flat tits over some skinnyfat slut with cow tits.
Women don't know what men want just like we don't know what they want. Difference is we know what we want.
>>35537147
and ass if for adults when you learn everything is shit
>>35537808
Tits don't shoot feces
>>35545200
>race exists
But it doesn't. It's a social construct.
>>35545540
>>35545540
So are numbers, but we still get a lot done with them.
>>35537828
>>35537880
yeah man i dunno, i mostly like pussy
>>35538029
>this fucken Mongolian church art discussion board
Women don't talk like this.
You're a man. Possibly a tranny.
>>35537004
Ass > tits/thighs/hips is the biggest nigger meme ever.
>>35536719
Holy shit OP you are fucking retarded
>>35536719
none of that is true
the only place where people use autistic terms like that is in this autistic and insecure board
>>35546830
Cool nonsequitur.
>>35544101
W-Who is that?
>>35537716
>Mammal glands
>Mammal
Fuckin retard
>>35544101
>>35549547
reddit.com/r/iskralawrence/
Also: read the filename of the one posted before it you idiot.
>>35536719
lifting if anything will make boobs bigger, it's cutting fat that makes boobs smaller.
>>35537004
>lel skellington meme
Confirmed middleschooler
>>35545318
It's okay low test beta male, I got you covered.
>>35547982
That makes sense if only black people like ass, which is a moronic implication.
>>35555062
thanks ms skeltal
>>35555062
>>35555772
It's funny because the woman aroound 0:11 got a way better shape than what skelly-obsessed Hollyweird deems hot.
>>35555914
>It's funny because the woman aroound 0:11 got a way better shape
TOP COCK M8. you enjoy yourself some fatties u faggot? do u even lift? jesus u might as well go eat a box of twinkies and some swedish fish while eating the nutella straight off ur nut sack u fat turd
>>35555062
>no ass
>sagging tits
>2sp00ky4me
>>35542642
1991 here also.
Most importantly, were you born before or after the collapse of the USSR?
Cold War baby, reporting in. Fuggin' gommies
>>35536719
Lifting does not kill boobs. Being fat is just fat.
>>35555914
Lol most of the other women in the scene had better bodies t.b.h. f.a.m. (disagree personally with your taste though...fag)
>>35545200
>talks of race
>posts pic of ethnic groups
do you even know what 'race' is, anon?
>>35536738
Yeah maybe if you live in the Congo
Guys.
We can have both nice firm boobies and nice squat asses. All ladies should lift. Pic related. Look up info somewhere else, this board is for 98% shitposting only.
>>35556413
Did you even read the thread faggot?
>>35555957
Hahaha a faggot who wants his women to look like litlle boys acts this salty
>>35545347
>>35537109
Miring perfect pepe snatch form
>>35557025
the "what really happens" should show a woman that quit after a week
>>35556413
kek, do you?
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=difference+between+race+and+ethnicity
>>35557025
Jamie Eason looks like she's never done a squat in her life, would not want my gf to aspire to/10
>>35561172
I'd still fug her to pieces, though.
>>35536719
>Can you imagine a world where lifting made you shorter?
Implying it doesn't make you shorter
