what's better sumo or conventional DL's for aesthetics?
>>35280158
>"wow anon thats a sexy lower back you have there"
DLs are for strength and so you don't fuck your shit up doing other lifts. Nobody but /fit/ fags gives a shit about how buff your lower back is.
>>35280158
Conventional; sumo will blow up your hamstrings a bit more.
>>35280177
>he doesn't lift with his hips and glutes
>implying DL's arn't a overall mass builder nonetheless
>>35280185
isn't it better to target legs more?
I think sumo doesn't hit upper back more too
>>35280177
what about them forearm gains? and obliques for that fridge mode
>>35280206
Backs are highly overlooked; women care more about back than legs and about as much as arms. Honestly, shitty arms can be made up for with a wide as fuck back. Sumo does hit legs
a bit more than back, but the benefits of huge legs vs. a huge back are preference; most will prefer a more developed back considering most who do deadlifts already hit legs with squats.
>>35280207
discipline son!
>>35280207
all overrated and all can be done through other exercices. You think Olympia winners give a shit about deadlifts ?
>>35280280
Many of them have been prodigious deadlifters, as it happens.
>>35280280
Yup. Ronnie never pulled a single plate. Nor did Cutler. Nor did Yates. Or Arnold. Or... Oh wait, this sarcasm is too obvious.
>>35280259
girls don't care about lower back though even the grabbers
if I can hit the lower back less so I can hit upper back and legs more I'd be pretty happy, Gives better aesthetics while still allowing me to deadlift
>>35280335
>giving a shit what girls think
whatever makes you happy anon
>>35280352
>implying I care about my lower back
I just wanna be good looking as fuck while still deadliftan
>>35280280
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oFmW_TUWK40
If you do sumo your a bitch