![hqdefault[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/NMgS2gD.jpg "hqdefault[1].jpg")
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VEl1m9nNXz4
How does she do it, /fit/? How is she not obese? She posts this shit every day.
>calories in, calories out
>He's so naive he doesn't know about purging
>>34994136
RIP teeth
hmm i dunno maybe by not eating 8 pizzas every fucking day you retard?
>>34994107
pretty sure most of it doesn't even get absorbed
>>34994209
How does that work?
>>34994107
>>34994209
>>34994235
Calories in, calories out is pretty much a meme. It's a good rule of thumb, but the real big player is the BMR (Basal Metabolic Rate). The BMR is dependant upon
- genetics (yes, your heard me: genetics)
- physical activity
- meal rates & calories in them
The body is cynically lazy. If you "educated" your body for years to ingest 6k cal/day, it will expect such amount every day. To body needs to waste 10% of your caloric intake to break foods down to calories. Actually, the body uses ~25% of the daily cals to break down proteins, ~7% to break down cals, ~3% to break down fats. It should be noted that whole, unrefined food takes ~50% more energy to digest, one more reason why calories aren't all created equal.
So, the body will "expect" to use 600 cals each day, and it's ready to use them even if you fast for one day or two. If a fatty, or an athlete, skip his meals even for a prolonged period of time, the body "keeps itself ready" for a 6k meal and in the meanwhile slows down BMR to cope with the sudden deficit (ex multis: http://www.jissn.com/content/11/1/7 ). As soon as the meal arrives, it's digested in toto.
On the other side, if the body "expects" 2k, it allots 200cal for digestion and regulate BMR accordingly. If a 6k meal arrives, only 2k are readily digested, with the exception of mere lipids (it takes little to zero energy to absorb them). If the remaining 4k is, for example, proteins, it's likely discarded.
You need time to "tune" the BMR. It's not a case that mere short dieting won't help in the obese population; they have to start exercising as well to make the BMR change appreciably fast.
>>34994471
BMR affecting calories out is the thing that makes the difference, dumbass
>>34994471
Interesting theory for people who suddenly up their intake, but what about someone who constantly hovers at 3.5k cals a day and then cuts down to 2k?
>>34994488
>you are right
thank you
>>34994493
It will take a while to cut; the body will try to lower the BMR before attacking its fat storage. Forcing the body to use more energy to break down food (e.g. switching from a fat-rich diet to a whole-grain & protein-rich diet) could force the body to invest all the energy allotted it expects to waste for the meals; this could prevent a slow down in BMR. Obviously increased physical activity speeds up the process
TL;DR replace fats with proteins
A quick check shows that most of the shit she eats is closer to 2.5-3k kcal than the 8k in that vid, which isn't an insane amount to work off for an active person.
Of course this is all irrelevant, because the minute the shooting ends, she pukes it out.
>>34994555
>8 pizzas are 2.5-3k cal
The pizza aren't large, but those are at least 4500 cals
>>34994471
that's broscience but i believe it
>>34994471
found the triggered feminist
She shits it out mostly whole. There was a Q&A video she did where she said when she looks in the toilet it almost looks the same as when she eats it
>>34994107
Calories in = calories out is only true for measures of energy, but fat is mass... And you can defeat it in the following three ways
1. Purge it
2. Take a laxative and diarrhea it out
3. Shorten your colon via surgery, and shit most of it out automatically
>>34994617
Or you can take Orlistat and literally leak oil out of your anus. For your health.
>>34994617
>Calories in = calories out is only true for measures of energy, but fat is mass
What the fuck does that even mean.
>>34994471
this post is an ironic joke of fat logic right?
>>34994581
The 8 pizzas are 8800kcal, it says so in the vid and I mentioned it too in the post you quoted. Her other vids are mostly 2.5-3k kcal, which is what I said right before.
>>34994209
>>34994235
Almost all competitive throw that shit up right after the event. It's actually a struggle for them to avoid chucking all over the award presenters
>>34994107
Cause she lifts more than you
>>34994107
>freaky koreans like to watch cute girls stuff themselves and pay for that
>thus she makes a living out of it
>a lot of those calories won't even get absorbed by the organism due to the sheer amount
>probably fasts the day before and the day after plus cardio or some shit
wala
>>34994714
God I hope so.
>>34994471
>To body needs to waste 10% of your caloric intake to break foods down to calories. Actually, the body uses ~25% of the daily cals to break down proteins, ~7% to break down cals, ~3% to break down fats
>wastes 10% of your caloric intake to break foods down to calories
>breaking down calories into calories
Forgot the actual scientific reason, but someone on /ck/ posted this video and an explanation was given about how she has a stomach lower than most people. It's the same reason kobayashi and all those competitive eaters are able to cram so much food.
>>34997206
Not that guy but I know my shit about starch.
Starch can't be absorbed as it is, so the body has to produce enzymes to break it down into glucose. Production of enzymes takes energy. Dunno if it's anywhere near what the other dude claims though.
This slow destruction of starch into glucose is also the reason you don't get a massive insulin spike when you eat starchy foods.
>>34997286
>This slow destruction of starch into glucose
its actually fucking fast since starch consists only of glucose, plus its similiar to glycogen
starch is like glycogen made to be broken down fast for energy. Starches spike insulin even harder than table sugar
>>34994471
This post is correct.
Why are you edgy teenage niggers literally denying the role of genetics in food digestion? Are you really stupid enough to fall for the "everything fat people say must be false" meme?
Metabolism speed is a real, proven thing.
>mfw people actually use /fit/ fat hate threads to "educate" themselves on food
>>34997206
you don't absorbe food in the form you swallow it do you
digestion etc takes energy
>>34994471
So much brocience it's unbelievable.
It is possibile that part of what she eats doesnt get absorbed for the simple fact that, after being digested, food moves through the intestine and if there is physically too much stuff, some of it wont get in contact with the intestinal villi (which absorb digested food) before leaving the intestine, hence part of the food will not get absorbed and generate no calories.
...or she just sticks 2 fingers in her throat after binging everyday
>>34997361
Calories necessary for the breaking down of macronutrients are already accounted for in the measurements used to count calories
