![waist-management-man-with-tape-measure[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/QK2fmpu.jpg "waist-management-man-with-tape-measure[1].jpg")
What waist size is an indication you should stop bulking?
I measured mine at 37 inches, but it doesn't look big at all
>>34552484
well measures are important but the body fat % should be the real indicator. just look at your abs, or your collarbones, or your face
>>34552501
I can see my collarbones
m8, i'm 6'2'' 185lbs, my waste is 35.5 inches. I'm fat as fuck.
>>34552509
yeah I mean choose one and keep track of how you view it. everyone should see the collarbones, if they are covered you are like on the track of obesity
My pcp told me that smaller waist sizes typically means a healthier individual
>>34552519
I'm 5'10 190 m80
Still feel skelly as fuck though
>>34552531
iktf
I measured my legs at 27 inches circumference and they still look small
>>34552527
might be referencing to pressure on the abdominal cavity, over time that can fuck your organs up. if your heavy enough you can even push on your inferior vena cava.
>>34552531
I'm 5'10 and went from 148 to 177 and I feel smaller now that I did before.
>>34552587
Same as you, except I started at 120lbs 2 years ago
29 inch waist at 10%bf
Can I realistically get down to 28?
>>34552555
Are you me? My quads and neck are gonna be the main focus of my next bulk- they're the two parts I feel are lagging behind the rest.
>>34552871
LONDON
O
N
D
O
N
>>34552871
That's an interesting belt, you wouldn't be an archaeologist by chance?
>>34552519
The fuck, I'm 6'2 and 185lbs, waist has always been 32
