Let's put it to rest /fit/. Are most of us lifting for strength or for aesthetics?
http://strawpoll.me/4152790
>But I do both.
Of course you do. A powerlifter's physique will improve and a bodybuilder will naturally get stronger, but both lift with completely different goals.
The point is to check what goal the majority of /fit/ has.
>>31969724
>Not lifting for strength
Then why?
Let's put it to rest /fit/. Is op a faggot?
http://strawpoll.me/4152875
>>31969813
Go back to /b/, DYEL.
>>31969724
For me, both strength and aesthetics take a back seat to health.
>>31969824
poll isnt looking good for you, op
>>31969828
Couldn't increasing strength of your muscles count as lifting for health?
>>31969724
There's no point to lift for strenght unless you're an actual powerlifter or your work requires you to be strong. Aesthetics will make it easier to get grills and dyels will respect you.
As it stands now:
2/3rds go for aesthetics over strength.
While 24 isn't a very big reference, /fit/ is not a very big board and this does show a trend.
>>31969929
At 40 votes nearly 70% of /fit/ prefers Zyzz over Klokov.
>>31970294
Klokov doesn't lift for strength, he lifts for technique.
Savickas can push press Klokov's max jerk and strict press Klokov's max push press.
You should have included a "I don't lift" option. The results would have been hilarious.
>>31970602
Not meant to be taken that literally broseph. Just a comparison for cheap laughs.
>>31970626
But then most of /fit/ would take that to troll.
On that note, we have a clear trend.
2/3rds of /fit/ lifts for aesthetics and 1/3rd for strength. That's pretty interesting considering the prevalence of SS and /plg/.
