>>84459287
>CGI That Aged VERY Poorly
That'd be MOST of it if you go back more than 5 years or so.
I'm not quite sure if Hoodwinked counts because even by 2005 standards the animation was pretty shit.
>>84459472
Holy fuck I forgot this movie even existed. I can't remember if it was good, I'm gonna go out on a limb and say 'no'
>>84459538
It actually wasn't bad. The animation is a huge turnoff but the script and voice acting is mostly decent.
i tried rewatching it but i couldn't get around the garbage animation
>>84459287
god damn, i can barely watch this show anymore.
>>84459287
>implying Scary Godmother's CGI was good to begin with
>>84461641
That was my first reaction when I saw the thread. I remember when it first premiered on Cartoon Network and was advertised all the time it still looked weird. I think in general they chose a weird ass style and even if it had a blockbuster budget whoever designed them would ultimately make that not matter. The girls eyes for instance just looks creepy and those huge eyes always look creepy.
I remember the intro sounding a lot better than it really was
https://youtu.be/_wrepi85BmY
Reboot of course, but it's so old and retro tech-centric it borders on vaporwave.