When will we get a Finding Nemo sequel with an actual villain /co/?
Does neopixar even care about having good villains anymore?
It didn't need a villain.
>>84200336
Did Finding Nemo have any villain?
I don't remember.
But these movies really don't need villains. They hold up pretty well with the story they try to tell.
>>84200544
>>84200505
This. Movies don't need a villain.
Pixar has always focused in delivering good climax rather than good villains
Along with what everybody said, I think they are doing fine enough with having the environment be enough of an obstacle than needing a villain.
There aren't usually clear cut villains in the real world, so this is probably moving the medium forward.
Remain upset, manchild.
>>84201054
>What is ISIS
>>84201127
> Pixar putting ISIS in a movie
>>84201178
>Cars 3 centered around zealot radicars in the Middle-East
>They need oil but the other wealthy Middle-Eastern cars won't give it to them
>>84201127
>ISIS
It looks like you don't know a lot about the real world
>>84201127
> ISIS are the bad guys
lol
>>84200544
>Finding Nemo
Darla. (the only built-up baddie, really)
Bloodlusted sharks.
Jellyfish. (also sort of built-up)
Seagulls.
>Finding Dory
Crippling short-term memory loss.
Kids in the "touch and feel" aquarium.
The squid.
>>84201275
we need thisitll be better then cars 2
>>84201275
>implying disney won't cuck the shit out of Cars 3 by adding some forced Planes crossover
>>84201376
I wouldn't call any of them villains. Just threats.
None of them, baring the squid and seagulls intended to cause harm. Darla and the kids are just stupid and Bruce only attacked because of the blood.
>>84200336
never
