This is real.
http://www.ign.com/articles/2016/03/19/the-powerpuff-girls-man-up-review
>new PPG
>Great
>8.0
>ign
>>84154353
>NICE VISUALS
WHAT?!
Cant spell ignorant withought IGN
>>84154353
What the fuck is this shit?
>>84154353
>nice visuals
Who had to fuck five guys to get this review?
>>84154507
Your mom.
>>84154353
>captures fun Powerpuff Girls attitude
>nice visuals
>voice actors do a great job
>8.0(EIGHT)
It's paid you dips.
Daily reminder some of Kotaku's journalists were bought out by IGN after the Hulkster took them down
>>84154353
OH
LOOK
IGN HAS AN OPINION ON SOMETHING
GREEEEEEEAAAT
Paid review. It's CN damage control.
Love it
>>84154584
The show is great
>>84154616
No! It's awful!
>>84154353
Does IGN belong to the same corporation that owns CN?
>>84154584
>>84154616
At least Buttercup gets some nice poon
>Someone doesn't hate something that I hate
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
>>84154748
>the tripfag has a shitty opinion
Color me suprised
>>84154353
>8.0
>good
but that mediocre as fuck
>>84154655
Isn't Buttercup supposed to be, anatomicly, a 5 year old?
>more homosexual propaganda and brainwashing in PPG 2016.
>>84154862
But the edit doesn't change her body, she's still as flat as ever.
>>84154353
how
>>84154353
>IGN reviews
Didn't they once say Godhand sucked and some shitty Babyz game was a masterpiece?
>all you people acting like IGN is some bastion of standards or integrity
Come on, it's crap reviewing crap. You know this. You don't have to make a fuss about it.
>>84154697
I don't think you'll like what you see.
>IGN IS ONLY RELEVANT WHEN IT MAKES A GOOD REVIEW ON SOMETHING ON LIKE
Hi, /v/. How's it hanging?
>>84154353
Did Cartoon Network bribe IGN or something?
>>84154353
>IGN
Sage. IGNoramus isn't worth shilling (You)s for.
>>84154353
>Captures Powerpuff Girls attitude
>Nice visuals
How in the fuck
>>84155366
>Captures Powerpuff Girls attitude
>They are hardly, if ever, allowed to punch or kick anything anymore.
>spend more time doing everything besides being super heroes.
Yeah really captures the Powerpuff Girls attitude.
>>84155143
That gif can't be real
>>84154507
WHO ELSE BUT ZOE?
>>84154353
> all these nostalgiafags
time to grow up guys. Its not your childhoods PPG
>>84154567
Literally no source.
>>84154703
Now that is something we can all agree with.
>>84155613
I wanna thighfuck that princess
Is this show really as bad as it looks? Because it doesn't look very good.
>>84154353
I wonder if the comment section will be filled with posts akin to "go fuck yourself", will he get fired?
>>84155714
It's a complete atrocity.
>>84155613
>those tits
>them thighs
I'm gonna make a wild guess and say she was the villain of her episode.
>>84155605
you're right. It's shit.
>>84155061
And gave Double Dragon Neon a 3/10 because the review didn't like beat'em ups.
>>84155639
You and me both brother.http://the-collection.booru.org/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=39743
>IGN reviewing anything
>>84155925
Didn't they also praise DMC?
>>84155879
not exactly. she was annoying the girls as a happy go lucky princess looking for a man but they helped her become a strong independent woman who don't need no man
eck
>>84155879
Actually she ends up saving the girls ass. Which seems to be a recurring theme throughout the reboot.
>>84155613
>>84155639
>>84155879
>>84156044
You aren't fooling anyone, stop trying to pretend to be one of us and shill elsewhere.
>>84156203
>>84156044 here
i aint some fucking shill you dip
>>84154911
He's saying that this adult woman is making out with a child.
>>84154353
PAID REVIEW
A
I
D
R
E
V
I
E
W
>>84156203
I'm not saying she singlehandly redeems this mistake of a cartoon. Those thick thighs of hers are just a little eyecandy for us perverts.
>>84154353
IGN sucks at reviews. News at 11.
>>84154616
>>84154584
>>84154911
>>84155714
I'm convinced that the people responsible for this are pedophiles.
>>84154353
At LEAST post an archive, pastebin, or anything that doesn't give them clicks!
This is clickbait. do not link to it ever.
You guys know better
>>84154353
I don't understand why IGN thinks they can review everything. I get trying to reach a wider audience but cartoon shows? Movies? I barely even care about their video game reviews for fuck's sake. Like hell I care about how they feel about the recent ID4 sequel let alone the PPG reboot.
>>84156571
>pedophiles.
>in the animation industry
Don't be silly, Anon.
Neros got a job at IGN?
>>84156706
>You guys know better
>Implying
>>84156571
They're trying to push homosexual/transgender/feminist views onto children. They forget that the characters are supposed to be 5-10 years old.
The show is literally full of enemies that represent masculinity, males in dresses and wishing the were girls, and there was an episode about transgender identification.(the unicorn one)
They also got rid of Miss Bellum, the most sensible, wisest and intelligent woman on the show, because she was too attractive and was working under an incompetent man.
>>84156828
Since I'm all ready in that folder...
>8.0
>IGN
that's a pretty low score
>>84156828
I thought they got rid of Bellum because the writers felt like they couldn't do her character justice.
>>84156847
Seeing as this was a scene literally ripped from The Big Lebowsky, I don't think that it's a good one to use.
>>84156974
it's was a subtle reference not a rip off
>>84156940
I don't think they can make justice to any character, 2bh
>>84155639
Who wouldn't?
>>84155613
>THICC
But I thought this show was sjw
>>84154353
Do you know IGN is know have shit taste and sometimes give better grade for chanels that pay
>>84157214
>>84155605
> It's another "It's a kids show, it's suppose to be shit" episode, isn't it?
>>84156235
Proof? That thread that shit shilled the shit Star ripoff showed less than 100 different ips, so it's either that editfag or all the shit taste anons from that thread shilling this bitch.
>>84154353
It's nothing new when IGN gives something shit a good review.
What's big news is when they review something and actually get the rating right.
>>84156940
Nope they said Ms.Bellum was a problem with the message they were trying to give they also remove ms. keane boobs
>>84157356
They break away from the sjw agenda occasionally.
>>84157882
How was the dash system a fucking plus? The dash completely broke the game.
>>84157882
IGN is the number one example of a broken clock being right twice a day. That mighty number 9 review was spot on, but everything else from them is pure shit.
>>84155847
suck it Pan. Nero was right.
>>84154788
gb2 /v/
Since when did ign review cartoons?
>>84158624
Like, forever?
IGN has had a TV section for as long as I can remember.
>>84158382
It seems mostly like a pity "at least this way it's over quicker" plus.
Cartoon Network Studios is like a foam wall safety scissors enclosure. Nothing can have sharp edges or else they'll cut themselves.
If you think this show looks the same, you haven't been watching the show outside of the girls themselves.
Literally the only thing that remains unchanged.
reminder gamergate was correct
>IGNs cute little anime club
>Watches exactly 3 MINUTES of a show
>"Its not really my thing, so Im giving the entire series a thumbs down"
>>84155613
>no pelvis
>>84155879
wheres the gif from?
>>84154353
>>84159968
To be fair this is probably accurate.
>>84154353
who cares IGN said anyway? They might just find one random person and did the review, and somehow, this person is a suck up or an idiot.
>>84156828
Can you just shut the fuck up?
>>84160012
they give a negative for the Great White Savior but a final episode of GoT with pic related gets glowing praise? Give me a break!
>>84160088
Im not saying IGN is good at what they do, but the new Tarzan looks bland as fuck
>>84160128
fair enough.
>>84160039
Upboated
remember, this happened
Ok then that's cool.
>>84160039
>hating x makes you y
no
>>84154353
Its not that bad of a show guyd
>>84155847
You can sew your dick to your forehead but iit will not make you a unicorn.
>>84160252
>Implying "not muh PPG" doesn't make you a nostalgia faggot
>being this delusional
>mfw
You know what bugs me the most about the reboot? Its like the people making it completely missed the point Powerpuff Girls as a premise is a parody of old super hero shows and serials.
The new hotline phone is the most jarring
>its a smart phone fucking millennials REEEEE
That's not the problem. The original hotline phone is a parody of old super heroes like Adam West Batman or the Green Hornet, where the mayor of the town had a giant red phone that he could use to call up the hero whenever he wanted.
The joke in PPG is that they're little girls and the hotline phone is this cutesy kid play phone. That's the joke. There's no joke when its just a smart phone.
The humor is also this modern abstract humor that I'm getting sick of.
>>84160369
Know what bugs ME the most? That we got a reboot of this thoroughly mediocre show in the first place. It was only ever decent, if it aspired to be anything at all. The animation was very solid for its time, the voice acting too, but nothing ever really stood out. It never excelled at anything. I've never once felt compelled to watch it again, and it's not a series I'd recommend to anyone. Seeing people actually give a shit, to this extent, about such a show just annoys the fuck out of me, like it's some perennial classic that we should all be educating our fucking children with.
>>84155613
this is an edit
please stop trying to fool people
>>84154414
>trusting "critics"
>ever
lol
After the BvS fiasco, I thought the public was through listening to those retards.
>>84160525
Original PPG was slightly above Johnny Test for me. Sometimes Johnny Test was even able to go above it.
>>84160357
>If the show gets a revival under a different studio and you don't like it, then you obviously are a nostalgiafag who cannot embrace the change
wouldyoulikemetoputsomepoopinit.jpg
>>84154666
I thought they were in Fox's camp, but I'm not sure.
>>84160039
I read the "not mug PPG" part, looked again at your reaction image, rolled my eyes and didn't bother reading the rest of your post.
>>84160525
>>84161273
whoa ridiculous bait levels detected.
>>84161111
>he doesn't reference rotten tomatoes for good films to watch
I agree random individual critics, especially on IGN, are fucking retarded. But when there's a strong consensus among critics the movie is probably pretty good.
>>84160160
These are fair complaints though. Too much water means you're spending a lot of the game encountering the same 3 pokemon and the same 2 pokemon trainers. Also, Black/White showed us how much better the game is when you make HMs just hide optional and secret areas and make the main path not be burdened with having to have HM slaves.
Don't you guys know what an 8/10 means?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V90vdClMs3U
>>84162330
Surf is actually a good move though
>>84154353
You forget that there's actually people who like this. And, apparently, people who are paid to like it.
>>84161111
>DCuck finds a way to bring his butthurt over BvS into a completely unrelated topic
You gotta love it.
>>84154353
>>84162505
I WILL FLAY THE VERY FLESH FROM THEIR BONES AND SLURP THEIR MARROW LIKE CHEAP DORM ROOM RAMEN
>nuPPG has a higher score than God Hand
What a time to be alive
>>84160525
>>84161273
0/10, not even trying.
>>84160128
>their review is wrong BUT it follows my opinion so it's still right!
no. Fuck you and your brain poison. you are dangerous for free speech.
>>84162633
>higher score than God Hand
God Hand was considered thoroughly mediocre at the time of release by pretty much everybody. It was relegated to the bargain bin shortly after. It only went up in reputation because it was a Clover-developed, stylized throwback to old beatemups as well as a late-era PS2 game, which made it look more novel after the fact.
What point are you trying to make by choosing God Hand in particular for your comparison?
>>84158776
About video game journalism being complete shit? Well, duh. They were still a bunch of faggots.
>>84160357
Like how you either got your first post pruned by the mods for being a faggot shill or you deleted your shitty bait because you got called out being a faggot shill regardless, because that's who you are, summerfag. Are you really that fucking newfag to not tell you're baiting with bait 5 months old after this shit show started?
TL;DR: Fucking fuck yourself and fuck off with your nostalgiabaiting. And defending IGN in anyway proves how stupid you are in the first place, they are always wrong.
>>84160525
>like it's some perennial classic that we should all be educating our fucking children with.
And Twerking, rapping, and other things nuPPG does isn't anything worse for the children when the show's original premise was "little girls saving the day before bed time"? You don't need Shakespeare levels of muh story and depth just to make a show "educational", it was meant to parody that superheroes aren't always just mighty men, that females, even little girls, can be heroes in their own special way, WHICH, was literally the point made TWICE and then some with that one Justice Friends episode and how each girl (to the extent of Buttercup) all have unique powers to save the day with, but in the end, them all working together was the bigger valuer learned for kids.
Regardless if you think it's shit, mediocre, or good, your opinion doesn't matter, the show gained it's respects as a show that was good for kids to learn from, and adults to appreciate teaching "little girls can be heroes too". That was the entire point, and that's all the show ever fucking needed. That's way mostly all cartoon shows are failing today (not all, I said) is because there aren't any morals and virtues being taught anymore to help children learn, instead now you got nothing but comedy and Twerking in a kids parody show about little girls being superheroes.
tldr; The original show wasn't anything revolutionary, perhaps, but you can't tell me it's not something that changed people's views on "female leads, and that women can't be heroes and girls could never do what men could", again there were episodes focused just on that point. The professor's point of being "the mom and the dad" proves that point as well. But the point is this, what other "girl show" made a bigger impact on society then the "Whoopass Stew" has done for 20+ years? And that's why the PPG is something more than "mediocre".
>>84154353
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>nice visuals
BRAVO IGN
SIMPLY BRAVISSIMO!
>>84162505
What the FUCK
>>84162505
That's... not wrong, really. The weird part about Kirby Air Ride is that the actual racing will entertain for maybe five minutes (seriously there's what, five or six races?) but City Trial is endless fun, yet the former was advertised as the main game. So you end up with a game that has a lameass main campaign and but a really fun minigame.
>>84154353
>http://www.ign.com/articles/2016/03/19/the-powerpuff-girls-man-up-review
>the-powerpuff-girls-man-up-review
>man-up-review
>not reading the actual article
Guys, its a review written in March, when only the first episode was available.
So, literally, this whole thread is pointless. For what it was, the first episode was at the very least decent. Not sure if an 8, but that score is not for the show as a whole.
So, gr8 b8 m8...
>>84164065
Kirby games are mini game collections you dunce, you don't buy just the Great Cave Adventure. The point is the more you play the more you unlock and from the sounds of it you only got about halfway through. Main point here: Anyone who thinks Kirby Air Ride deserves a 5.2 should be shot in the gut and raped through the hole by rabid pitbulls
>>84154353
>2010+6
>Caring about IGN's opinions
>>84164545
>For what it was, the first episode was at the very least decent.
Oh fucking please, you must be joking.
>>84165682
I said "at the very least decent", not good.
>>84154353
Why are you posting a review from three months ago as if it's breaking news, dude? It's a shit show that the network is trying to push; everyone knows. Also,
>(((Yehl)))