SPIDER-MAN HOMECOMING (2017) cast
>Confirmed
- Tom Holland as Peter Parker/Spider-Man
- Marisa Tomei as May Parker
- Robert Downey Jr. as Tony Stark/Iron Man
- Zendaya Coleman as "Michelle"
- Michael Keaton as the villain of the movie
>Unconfirmed
- Michael Barbieri in an unspecified role
- Tony Revolori as "Manuel"
- Laura Harrier in an unspecified role
- Kenneth Choi as the principal of Midtown High School
>Disconfirmed
- Liza Soberano as Mary Jane Watson
>Rumors
- There will be two villains. The first is Adrian Toomes/the Vulture while the second tends to vary (Norman Osborn or Phineas Mason/the Tinkerer) according to various sources.
- Michael Keaton was in negotiations back in March but supposedly dropped out due to Keaton not wanting to commit to a multi-picture contract. It has since been reported that Keaton is in final negotiations for the film's villain. Keaton is rumored to play either the Vulture or Norman Osborn.
- Harrier is rumored to play Liz Allen, the film's main love interest.
- Barbieri is rumored to play a character that is inspired by Ganke Lee.
- Zendaya's character "Michelle" is actually Michele Gonzales.
>>83746503
At the same time I want something different, I don't want to pass up on the chance of getting Keaton playing Norman.
>>83746503
Am I in it, yet?
>>83746503
>It has since been reported that Keaton is in final negotiations for the film's villain. Keaton is rumored to play either the Vulture or Norman Osborn.
I think Vulture would make more sense. He's supposed to be old, right? That and I think Norman aught to be significantly younger than Keaton.
>>83746575
There's no way Keaton is playing Stormin' Norman. The only way the MCU will have an actual villain after Thanos is to go all the way into Dark Reign/Siege etc, and Keaton is too old to play that version of Norman.
They're going to want someone younger for the role. Not a teenager or anything, but someone who can age pretty gracefully as they put that character on a shelf for a while and pull him out after Infinity Wars.
>>83746503
>Robert Downey Jr. as Tony Stark/Iron Man
This already can't get any worse
>>83747178
>WAAH I DONT WANT SPIDER-MAN TO INTERACT WITH OTHER SUPERHEROES EVEN THOUGH WE JUST HAD HIM IN A CINEMATIC UNIVERSE
kys
>>83746600
Bob Odenkirki hope
>>83747254
>autism
>>83747178
It's literally the best thing that can happen for the movie, considering spidey's role in Civil War.
>>83747546
>le götüm yanıyo faec
>>83746503
>Tinkerer
>not Fixer
SOILED IT
>>83747576
fucking how?
the only one who benefits from it is the manlet who'll get top billing for just showing up to quip and get sucked by Peter again
>>83747898
RDJ is a huge draw for casual audiences, granted, Spider-Man will get tons of cash by sheer virtue of being Spider-Man, but it's not exactly hard to explain why Marvel would want Tony there. Also, he needs some redeeming to get ready for Avengers 3, mentoring a young hero to some capacity is just the ticket.
>>83747546
I agree, that's what >>83747178 is
>>83748033
>y-you can't talk shit about my husbando
I bet Fox is waiting the result of this film and how it goes before seal a partnership with Marvel in movies.
>respect the producers, writers and directors from Fox: OK
>push their deadlines and subjugate the studio: let's wait X-Men don't be profitable anymore.
Netflix and Marvel are doing good until now because it has little interference from both sides.
>>83747996
>RDJ is a huge draw for casual audiences
>it's not exactly hard to explain why Marvel would want Tony there
Would make sense in a movie like Ant-Man, but this is a movie already expected to do great with Spidey alone
Having a smaller hero get a chance to shine along with spidey would be much more appreciated
>>83746503
>Vulture
>Tinkerer
