>Civil War -1bn
>Jungle Book -861m
>Zootopia -983m
And 2016 isn't even over yet!
>>83177470
You act surprised
>still forgetting Star Wars profits
>>83177470
>>83177610
I think it's telling that just like Disney, the drones here only care about how much a movie makes.
And yet, the blackhole that is ESPN makes all those profits not matter. Poor Disney.
>>83177470
What about Warner Bros, Disney natural rivals? What have they been doing?
>>83177627
Sounds like the Sony threads on /v/.
>>83177693
So far in 2016
>BVS - 871m
>How to be single -111m
>Barbershop: The Next Cut -55m
every other movie they released is sub 20m
>>83177682
That's just corporate accounting lad.
>>83177627
>Zootopia
>98% RT score
>Jungle Book
>95%
>Civil War
>90%
Seems like they're all good movies, bro.
Alice, BFG and pete's dragon will flop hard
>>83178030
Don't forget Moana.
>>83177610
How could I?
http://www.wired.com/2016/02/star-wars-gives-disney-its-best-quarter-in-company-history/
>>83177682
It's not that ESPN isn't making a profit it's that it's not making as much as it used to or as much as Disney investors want, hence the drag on stock price. It's the same thing that killed Disney Infinity. It was making a profit just not as much as they felt it should have been or as much as theoretically they could make from just doing more licensing.
>>83177627
>Talk about the critics' receptions
>"critics don't matter/were paid off!"
>Talk about the general audience's reception
>"they're all plebs"
>Talkg about the box office results
>"so you don't care about quality, only money!"
???
>>83177831
And only one of those movies was good. Best Barbershop of the series.
>>83178030
>Alice
It's gonna do great. It wouldn't surprise me if it outdoes Xmen Apocalypse this weekend. Maybe not a billion like the first one but I could see it pulling in around 750 Million.
>The BFG
It might flop. It's a movie no one but Spielberg was asking for. Still, it will serve it's purpose, mainly improving the relationship between Steven and Disney in time for Indiana Jones 5. 100-125 million dollar budget, little to no merchandise, this'll need to pull in roughly 250 million or more to break even. it'll be tough but it's not impossible.
>Pete's Dragon
Yeah, that shit's gonna bomb.
>>83177907
>Seems like they're all good movies, bro.
Already seen Zootopia when it was called Cat's Don't Dance. Already got the gist of the whole anthropomorphic cast overcoming big city racism. already seen the first Jungle Book many times with my Grandma (RIP) many times as a kid. Not really interested in seeing Civil Bore.
Also SuperGirl Season 1 has a 97% RT Score & TFA was A Renewed Hope.
>>83178153
>Michael Bay makes a billion
>"What a hack! Ruining muh childhood!"
>Disney makes a billion
>"Praise Mickey!"
???
>>83178040
>A Dwayne Johnson movie in 2016
>Flopping
>>83178267
>RT is just full of shills and disneyfags!
Look, it's too late to get a refund for BvS, just get over it.
>>83178267
Put some effort, at least
>>83177831
How the hell did How to be Single do that well?
>>83178267
>>83177907
>mistaking RT score and quality
every time
>>83177596
There was a time, in the post Remember The Titans/Mulan era where Disney was in desperate need of a monster hit. Pirates was the saviour though.
And soon a new empire will rise, not through force, but through the economy it was raised in, and through the wallets of the people it entertains.
>83178345
It's okay to admit that you have pleb taste in movies Anon.
>>83177470
fuck off back to /tv/ and stay there
I kinda have to doubt those numbers. Aside from Zootopia I haven't seen such a hulabaloo about the other movies here. So call me skeptical OP.
Heck, I genuinely didn't even care to go see Civil War.
>>83178563
>none of those films are quality
>being THIS mad that BvS was awful
...what kind of a fucked up person praises the profits of corporations?
>>83178687
Then google it, they are all true
>>83178705
BvS was great though, I'm sorry you suck.
>>83178727
Eh, you can't trust box office reports in this day and age.
And, again, as I have yet to see either film, I highly doubt their relevance. And entertainment value.
>>83178747
May I ask what you enjoyed about it?
>>83178345
>literally putting words in my mouth
see pic.
>>83178560
Holy shit! Marvel actually did it! Captain America is doing the nazi salute! Disney you absolute mad man! Heroically sacrificing himself for his boyfriend!
>>83178267
>marveldrones will pretend this is wrong
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/beauty-beast-teaser-tops-star-897032
>The first teaser trailer for Disney's live-action Beauty and the Beast was viewed a record 91.8 million times in its first 24 hours — besting previous champ Star Wars: The Force Awakens, as well as Captain America: Civil War and Avengers: Age of Ultron (each of them Disney films as well).
Next year is looking good, too.
>>83178560
>HAHA HAIL HYDRA!
>>83178935
Depends if it will be like Maleficent.
Otherwise if it's like Cinderella, nobody will care.
>>83178788
>I'm going to need proof
>That's not my standard of proof, you need to physically count out the hard receipts of every ticket sold
>that matches? Looks like youre a Disney drone and faked the evidence.
>>83179048
NO LOGIC! THIS THREAD IS A MARVELDRONE SAFE SPACE! NO LOGIC!
>>83179048
B-But Marvel friends on /co/ told me if a movie doesn't make a billion, it's shit!
>>83178935
Not a fan of some of the casting. Josh Gad as Lefou, Ian Mckellen as Cogsworth and Gugu Mbatha-Raw as Featherduster seem to be great choices and for what it's worth our two main leads should be fine as well. But Ewan McGregor as Lumiere sounded terrible in the teaser and Luke Evans is way too tiny for Gaston. Terry Crews would have been a better Gaston than him if the very least because I know he's big, funny and can sing.
>>83179080
It's posts like these that make it hard for me to decide wether the people posting here are merely Disney-funded or ACTUAL retards.
>>83179088
WB needs to get out of the cinematic universe scene and start their own DC video game tied universe. It makes more money.
& while they're at it, WB also needs a Kingdom Hearts of their own to cross over with their stuff. WB x ATLUS when?
>>83179101
No but it is a shit business venture, which 99% of movies are, if it fails to make a profit. Also, who cares about Dredd when The Raid: Redemption exists?
>>83179150
>A Persona/ DC Comics crossover Action RPG
>>83177470
I was surprised that the actual benefit percentage they make out of those are pretty low.
>>83179101
Trust me, in the marveldrone's mind, that movie IS shit.
They are marveldrones, after all.
>>83177907
>RT
>reliable
More like gg shills like you that convince normies to eat your boss shit.
>>83179150
Why stop? They make the better movies!
Heck,they haven't even introduced their best character yet! Why stop making movies when they can beat Disney in both films AND video games!
>>83179153
>who cares about Dredd when The Raid: Redemption exists?
Who cares about The Raid: Redemption when Die Hard exists? Dredd & Raid were both similar because of them had to work on a budget. The Raid 2 was literally suppose to be the first Raid movie you saw until he had to rework it all for the budget he was allowed. Are you a Disney shill or just retarded?
>>83179397
What compels people to write posts like this?
>>83179397
>Dredd & Raid were both similar because of them had to work on a budget
Right. One used it's budget well and was a financial success that spawned a sequel and the other didn't.
>>83179497
Okay, now this is trolling.
>>83177470
Hmm, I'm kinda' thinking of steering clear of Disney at this point.
Or at least being vigilant in not letting them have my money.
>mfw when local companies buy yelp reviews off craiglist but multi-billion disney isn't paying off critics
>>83178153
It's called Damage Control. They don't call it "DC" for nothing.
>>83179590
>this is what marveldrones actually believe
>>83179568
What's the matter, you don't like quality and success?
>>83179497
& also like Dredd, it didn't make billion, The Raid Redemption, is also shit. If you're going to bait, atleast stay on topic.
>>83177470
>Buys out rights to things you love
>Ruins them
>Tells you to like it even if it's ruined
>It just works
Fucking genius business model.
>>83179621
I do, but what do either of those things have to do with Disney?
>>83179590
You'd hear about it. Some critics would scream far and wide that they'd been paid off. Besides, what's the use in wasting money paying off critics to give good reviews to good movies?
If anything, it's WB paying people to shill for them on social media.
>>83177907
>98%
What the fuck? How? I mean it's not a bad movie but what exactly does that movie do to be held at such unreasonably high standards?
>>83179662
it appealed to every political agenda
seriously /pol/ used to have threads about how redpilled it was
>>83179655
CAUTION: HEAVY-DUTY MARVELDRONING IN PROGRESS!
>>83179662
Film critics are not the best people to trust with opinions.
>>83179662
Dude, that 98% only means 98% of the critics liked the movie, it doesn't mean it's a 9.8/10
The actual average rating is 8.1/10, seems pretty fair, no?
>>83179662
Fuck you is the best modern Disney film by far. And I'm sure it can compite with the Disney classics.
And no I'm not a furry. Well I ship for judyxnick so I don't know anymore.
>>83179723
Yeah, I'm sure it is...
>>83178267
>Didn't see any of the movies mentioned
>STILL complains about their quality/originality
Whew
>>83179721
How is an 8.1/10 supposed to mean anything more?
"I'm sure glad it's 0.1 points better than those movies that averaged just an 8, those piles of shit."
>>83178725
>>83178725
I don't see a problem as long as that corporation produces quality content. If they start making Bay-tier garbage and are still making that kind of profit then there is definitely room for complaint.
>>83179772
bro its just the average score, calm down
>>83179742
>I have to eat shit to know what shit taste like.
Whew doggie!
>>83179742
Well they can't be good movies if they failed to even catch her attention.
>>83179772
...what?
It's an average score that accounts for 200 reviews, the numbers aren't going to be "clean" or precise
>>83179784
There is so much fucking wrong with your post...
>>83178267
Why are you comparing a director to an entire company?
It must be sad, being a marveldrone, you know?
Being fed trash and feeling the urge to praise your master for feeding you trash out of some misplaced sense of loyalty.
And next, they've got Finding Dory. Although it does have some steep competition.
>>83179856
>Her
Do you know that person anon?
>>83179909
...Becuse Disney is creatively bankrupt? Maybe?
>>83179937
Everyone else would always use "his". You gotta' mix things up a little.
>>83179791
Same thing my mother does. Eats the same 5-6 things and refuses to try new things because they 'smell icky'.
>>83179856
>Some retard makes retard judgments about movie they haven't seen
>Movie must be shit!
Fer sure, pal.
For the record-
>Zootopia
Saw it twice, loved it.
>Civil War
Saw it 3 times, once because I wanted to, 2 times because of filial/friend obligation. It was great the first time I saw it, fell asleep the other times
>Jungle Book
Wasn't interested in seeing it. Doesn't mean it's a bad movie.
>>83179874
Like?
>>83179723
>I ship for nick x judy but I'm not a furryfag
Fuck anon same here... I love that couple. Can someone explain why this is happening?
>>83177470
That's pretty sad. Zootopia is overblown, the jungle book is retarded movie for retards and Civil War fucking sucked.
Man, there sure is a lot of salt in this thread.
I'm noticing that the Marvel vs DC shitposting has quadrupled lately. What happened to this board?
>>83181530
Movies
>>83181530
The quality of the posts has gotten even worse too. /tv/ must be flooded with autists, foreigners, or children, because a lot of this shit is painful to read.
>>83180524
>the jungle book is retarded movie for retards
If you don't like Christopher Walken singing I wanna be like you then you don't like anything
>>83181530
Rebirth and the new Cap broke people
>>83178560
>>83177470
realistically, how much money will star wars make?
>>83177470
I don't know if Doctor Strange will manage to hit as well
>>83182115
A lot. Probably not TFA levels. I'm seeing a lot of people pissed off at it being another Death Star plot
>>83179590
why would they do that when they can get good reviews for free
>>83178282
Dwayne "The Dosh" Johnson
>>83182115
woops wrong image
>>83182207
It probably won't make half as much money as TFA, but it might do pretty good as a standalone movie. .
>>83179972
That's tumblr-grade baloney, besides there are no girls on the internet.
>>83179972
Then use "their," really it's your own fault for not thinking of that.
Source: I took a communication course once in college and therefore understand the complete ins and outs of our language
>>83178560
I love this man's laughter
But seriously, even though BvS had shitty plot points and should have made so much more money with the titular names involved, $850+ million still isn't bad at all.
You cant fault Disney for having a golden goose of Walt's vision of making products for people to enjoy.
Warners Bros has so many advantages in cape films over Disney such as having all its characters at Warner Brothers Pictures and such but it scrapped its animation dept (only makes animated films for Bat man it seems) and sold Six Flags. Its only the dollar for them.
Not saying its not that way for Disney they are greedy fucks but at least the drugs they sell does affect the pleasure centers
