Why do so many people on /co/ call The Incredible Hulk (2008) not canon to the MCU?
>>82807024
Same reason so many people on /co/ say Agents of SHIELD is not canon to the MCU.
Because they're retarded.
>>82807075
>Same reason so many people on /co/ say Agents of SHIELD is not canon to the MCU.
I think that's bullshit too but at least there is more reason to believe that than there is for believing The Incredible Hulk is non-canon.
Literally the only thing I can think of is the fact that Banner is played by a different actor, but it's not like the MCU has never had recasts before.
>>82807024
Either they're meaning (Ang Lee's) Hulk or unknowingly don't understand the difference and assume both are not canon.
What's weird is how I still see people say this despite Ross being in Civil War.
Fuck off this thread was already made and discussed.
Honestly I didn't see it and I kinda have no interest in seeing it. So it (the movie) is pretty much irrelevant.
>>82809541
Good to know that the MCU revolves entirely around you and what you deem worthwhile.
>>82809541
How I feel about Thor 2.
Actor swap.
Also it's probably the least impactful of the Phase One solo films. You won't miss out on much if you skip it.
>>82807075
You got to admit the Inhuman shit doesnt really fit with the rest of the MCU. You would think someone would mention the random powered people showing up
>>82807075
Iron Man 2 had a scene where the news was playing footage of Hulk fighting Abomination.
Captain America: Winter Soldier had a scene where Black Widow released all of SHIELD's secrets onto the internet, and not once in that or any subsequent movie did anyone say "Oh wow, Coulson's still alive."
>>82810326
I think they're going to just ignore AoS after it gets canceled next year. They didn't pick up Most Wanted, I doubt they'll have that clean-up crew series. They still want to do an Inhuman movie, but AoS fucked it up, only way is for people to forget it then make it somewhere in Phase 5 or 6.
>>82807425
A lot of people specify this one in particular, the Norton one, and then continue to say it never gets referenced at all. I really just think they are in some massive denial at this point.
>>82808213
>RDJ in character during the end credits scene.
The incredible Hulk literally launched the Avenger initiative. Everything thing fell on that movie. If it bombed they would've started over no matter how well Iron Man did.
>>82807024
It's a new meme or they are so retarded that they are incapable of looking up the canon.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marvel_Cinematic_Universe
>>82807075
Pretty much this, people are either retarded or ironically shitposting because they think it's funny.
>>82811102
Already confirmed for season four
>>82807024
the right is still with universal, and the movie itself wasn't made under marvel studio.
I alway assume MCU is kind of "it sort of happened" but leave out the details.
>>82810326
>You would think someone would mention the random powered people showing up
Vision and Ross did. AoU implies the Avengers had seen other enhanced people working for Hydra.
>>82810410
>and not once in that or any subsequent movie did anyone say "Oh wow, Coulson's still alive."
>implying BW had access to Fury's secret shit
It's even better how people think any Lee's hulk is canon.
>different origin, betty doesn't know banner is the hulk, reasoning for gamma experimentation is different.
"B.b.but south America"
>>82812045
Yes I know. But hopefully it's a short season and gets dropped.
>>82812432
Why? If you don't like it then just don't watch it. Why would you wish for the people who do enjoy it to not be able to enjoy it
>>82812290
Not to mention Talbot died in the 2003 Hulk but is alive and looks completely different in Agents of SHIELD.
>>82812163
Yeah but that was supposed to be the result of Hydra.
>>82807024
what I don't get is how people don't like The Incredible Hulk when it's literally no different from other Marvel films like Iron Man, Thor, or Captain America. Hell, I'd even say it's better than Thor or Captain America.
>>82810410
>>82812234
It's confirmed she knows in the tie-in novel and keeps it secret for the same reason Fury does.
FUCK OFF
WE JUST HAD THIS THREAD
Because internet memers/shitposters like to try and imply certain things aren't canon, purely to rustle jimmies
Nerds on Chinese imageboards don't get to decide canon, only the people who create and own this content do.
>>82812804
Because it's really boring and none of the characters are very interesting. It just sort of happens.
>>82812804
Dogshit getting heated in a microwave is better than Thor.
>>82807075
I just read an interview where the actress that plays Daisy complains about AOS not being recognized by anyone doing the movies.
>>82814423
Thor 1 is fine.
Thor 2 is dog shit.
>>82814496
Thor 1 made me never want to ever watch Thor 2.
Isn't Thor (2008) a sequel of sorts to Ang Lee's Hulk? This implies that the MCU was born in fucking 2003 and we've had 13 years of capeshit thus far.
>>82814599
Well that's your opinion but I think Thor 1 is perfectly watchable, but unremarkable. Has some fun moments, Loki and Heimdall are cool, more Coulson is always good
Thor 2 has 2 funny jokes and the rest is garbage
>>82814635
>Well that's your opinion
No shit.
>>82809541
So Thor 2, Iron Man 3, and Civil War are non-canon as well because I have no interest in seeing them.
>>82807024
>>82807075
>>82811942
>>82807357
I say it's a fucking meme. I don't trust this site to have genuine opinions anymore, just "say words that upset others" is how a huge chunk of this place runs now.
The actor swap is the problem, it shouldn't be consider Rhodey was swapped and that's never been a problem. So they have trouble showing footage from the old film with a different actor. I didn't see Civil War yet but they brought Ross back right? Same actor too so that obviously makes it as canon as anything else.
Ed Norton just fucked the whole thing up.
>>82814653
Well that's your opinion
>>82812696
Because the sooner a shitty Inhuman tv-universe is dead the sooner Marvel can put Inhumans back into their movie line-up.
>>82814632
No. What the hell gives you that idea?
>>82814632
>Isn't Thor (2008) a sequel of sorts to Ang Lee's Hulk?
How in the fuck did you come to that conclusion?
>>82809598
Thor 2 set up the whole Infinity Stone thing, even if the movie was shit it was kind of important
>>82812806
There's a tie-in novel? The fuck?
Also there's a fuckton of both Hydra and SHIELD shit that comes out in the show that can't possibly have been in those files. Coulson being alive not being mentioned doesn't change anything.
>>82814632
no. All they did was have Banner start out in South America as a little nod of the head.
>>82817270
The inclusion of Inhumans in AoS had nothing to do with the movie being dropped/pushed back.
>>82812142
>I alway assume MCU is kind of "it sort of happened" but leave out the details.
>>82807075
>tv shit
>canon ever
>>82807075
I think AoS is something along the lines of Clone Wars or Rebels. It exists within the "confirmed canon", but will never under any circumstance be relevant to the movies.
>>82817734
>>82817720
Banner references it himself in the first Avengers.
>>82817762
>mad
lol
>>82812142
no it happened norton was just recast. they tried reaching out to roth in the past, if they use abomination again they probably will again.
fuckng retards jesus christ
>>82817818
Abomination was originally planned for the first Avengers, but the idea was scrapped.
>>82817816
>>82817857
why would they planned that?
>>82819410
Because he's an already introduced heavy hitter
>>82807024
Why do so many people on /co/ thinking that The Incredible Hulk (2008) is better than Hulk (2003)
>>82819773
Cause it doesn't have that dumb comic panel shit
>>82817771
>The last time i was in new york I kinda.. broke harlem
>>82817749
Force Awakens has Clone Wars references
>>82820813
Seriously? Like, explicitly Clone Wars references and not just to the prequels as a whole?
>>82820868
It's subtle, but yes
>>82821028
So, basically, plot-irrelevant easter eggs that might become relevant to the shows or to a book or something, but never to the films.
>>82821308
Still there, just like how Bucky is controlled with the Faustus method from the TV shows
I want this thread to be honest right now: 2008 Hulk is a stupid stupid movie.
Does anyone REMEMBER what they saw?
It is one of the worst movies I've ever seen that people said was good.
>>82820250
But that was the best aspect of the Lee movie.
>>82811478
>I really just think they are in some massive denial at this point.
They are. They show literal footage of that movie in the first Avengers movie, when Tony Stark is looking at the footage Coulson gives him. Among plenty of other references throughout the MCU.
>>82819773
The true capekino
