So Michael Keaton as Norman and Jack as Carnage
admit it /co/ this is some pretty gud casting
>>81847011
Sauce?
>>81847197
>>81847216
Lmfao
>>81847011
>implying that PG-13 MCU will do him justice.
>>81847011
Who cares when he's playing THE TERROR IN PETER SERAFINOWICZ'S THE TICK
>>81847011
>Michael Keaton as Norman
I can dig it. He had the weird-ass hair. I doubt they'd cast Bat/Birdman though,
>>81847011
This would actually be pretty cool to see.
http://variety.com/2016/film/news/michael-keaton-spider-man-villain-homecoming-2-1201752759/
>>81847331
>>81847355
He's Vulture. MCU digs younger actors so they could be set them up for new movies years in advance, thus they wouldn't cast almost-70-year-old Keaton for Norman, needless to say that he's not in right physical shape. I bet they'd cast someone in their 40-50s.
>>81847450
This. Normans going to be taking on a role bigger than just Spideys villain most likely
>>81847496
I seriously expect him to be the main villain for Phase 5.
>>81847496
Why did the Sony Spidermans have suck a boner for killing Stormin' Norman?
>>81847568
>>81849721
I hope not, I'm sick of Norman/Goblin especially on screen. I hope they push a new one instead.
>>81847252
my introduction to carnage was in the amazing spiderman
if you think you need to have extreme violence to properly portray that character you dont. there is more weight with things you dont see sometimes. as long as they have a good writer they dont have to do cheap "oh murder, blood and guts is the only way to sell carnage". that said yeah, id rather see him in a R rated film. but im old enough to accept not everything should be tailor made for me and my age. and id love to see carnage on screen and have venom turn from darkness to light stopping him.
I wish he was in more stuff, I've only seen him in a few things but whenever he turns up he's great fun.
>I have zero range: the actor
No.
>>81849721
>suck a boner
>>81847450
hes gonna be JJJ
