The official title of the movie is reportedly SPIDER-MAN: HOMECOMING and the Vulture will be in it, but won't be the main villain.
http://www.comicbookmovie.com/spider-man/the-vulture-rumored-to-be-villain-in-spider-man-reboot-final-title-a137470
Fucking vulture? Really?
DROPPED
R
O
P
P
E
D
>>81747429
They've literally used all of Spidey's A-list villains in past movies. It was inevitable.
I'm crossing my legs for Kraven.
>>81747429
did you want the geen globin again?
Oh sweet I hope Vulture has ties to Falcon
>Not "Spectacular Spider-Man"
>Not "Web of Spider-Man"
>Not "Spider-Man Unlimited"
>>81746954
Eh, Vulture always had an interesting concept but every execution I've seen so far has been really stale and dull.
If he's not the main villain though, that's OK.
>>81746954
>Multiple villains
Because that worked sssoooooo well for The Amazing Spider-Man 2! (That's sarcasm btw).
And let me guess, Marvel Studios is trying to form the Sinister Six again after Sony failed? Why is everyone obsessed with the Sinister Six? The Sinister Six sucks! Why do they keep trying to do them?
What a dumb fucking name
>>81746954
Well, there's only only major villain left, Hobgoblin. And seriously, they don't want to do yet another Goblin, especially after Sony shit the bed with ASM2.
Now its time for the B-list guys. Chameleon, Mysterio, Scorpion, Vulture, etc. Maybe Mister Negative as a crimeboss if they wanted to go that angle.
Personally I thought Scorpion would be the best way to go, but whatever.
Not shittily done Venom would also be a good way to go to appeal to casuals too.
>>81747679
>sssoooooo
>(That's sarcasm btw)
McFucking kill yourself.
>>81747429
He was Spidey's first villain, so makes senses.
Also like to see them playing safe with continuity, instead of, i dunno, make Spidey fight Carnage already, or some autistic shit like that.
>>81747571
There's already cartoons of the first and last names so logically they'd be out.
I want Nathan Fillion as the Scorpion.
http://www.comicbookmovie.com/spider-man/nathan-fillion-says-hed-play-the-scorpion-if-he-had-his-pick-of-a77745
>>81747690
It's poetic; Spidey is literally coming home.
>>81747679
>Because that worked sssoooooo well for The Amazing Spider-Man 2!
Just because previous attempts got the execution wrong doesn't mean this one will.
Anyway, the issue with ASM2 wasn't multiple villains, it was that it was a very directionless film. There's an hour and a half in the middle where almost nothing notable happens.
Throw in the attachment to the 'what REALLY happened to my parents?' plot which was just misguided and you have a film with very little cohesion.
Weird thing is, it's not the worst possible cut of the film. One deleted scene had Peter's Dad turn out to have been alive the whole time.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xvNLiwXIKos
>>81747571
>>81747690
>>81747753
It's because he's coming back to Marvel from Fox!
>>81747571
Peter Parker: Spider-Man, so the sequel could be inevitably called Miles Morales: Spider-Man.
>>81747679
>(That's sarcasm btw)
i hope you die in a car crash
>>81747753
There's a comic series called Ultimate Spider-Man that has a cartoon called Ultimate Spider-Man. And subsequently a spinoff comic based on the cartoon ALSO called Ultimate Spider-Man.
There's an Ultimate series comic called Ultimates that began in the early 2000s, and there's currently a new series published under the main Marvel line ALSO called Ultimates.
>>81746954
>Spidey
>multiple villians
When will they learn? Are movie studios actually fucking retarded?
>>81746954
So it's gonna be a shitty Silent Hill game, but with Spider-Man?
>>81747859
For minute, I thought that was Stan Lee in the thumbnail.
>Vulture is in the film
>A Marvel Studios character will appear in the film
Fuck, I wanted Daredevil but I guess itll be Falcon
>>81747868
>he thinks they'll introduce Miles before milking a minimum 15 years out of Holland
Holy kek anon, you'll get your Miles film in 2030 if youre lucky
>>81747679
It's likely going to be closer to Crossbones being in Winter Soldier or Hydra being in Avengers 2 rather than some ASM2 shit.
>>81747927
Captain America TWS and TDK had several villains. Fuck off.
>>81747961
He didn't say which sequel.
>>81747912
Fair point.
I want more unused villains but I also wouldn't mind seeing a comic-accurate Green Goblin and Ock.
>>81747747
Wasn't Chameleon his first villain?
>>81747429
Wasn't there an interesting story line around spidey's parents that vulture was the villain in?
>>81746954
>Vulture
>Favorite villain
>Finally gets a chance to shine
Today is a good day.
Just keep him as the old man, that's all I ask.
I’m coming home
I’m coming home
tell the World I’m coming home
Let the rain wash away all the pain of yesterday
I know my kingdom awaits and they’ve forgiven my mistakes
I’m coming home, I’m coming home
tell the World I’m coming
HOME
>>81747990
Captain America wasn't in The Dark Knight
>>81748057
>Chameleon and Vulture team-up
I'd be down.
>>81747980
ASM2 didn't do that bad with the villains. Rhino was just a cameo; his issue was over-advertising.
The film's flaws lay elsewhere.
Now, Spider-Man 3 is a film that tried to make each of its villains too prominent, and suffered for it.
>>81748014
Obviously, they're saving them for the inevitable sequels. Got oust some distance from the older films.
I wont accept anyone else in the role.
>>81747859
So, you don't like pottery?
>>81748066
Vulture played by Pete Postlethwaite
>>81747831
>Just because previous attempts got the execution wrong doesn't mean this one will.
It sure as hell makes me worried about this one.
In stead of using multiple villains to build up the Sinister Sic (AGAIN!) they should be focusing on less villains a more character driven Spidey.
>>81748152
Fuuuuck dude, you didn't need to remind me that will never happen. He even voiced Vulture in Spectacular, I really wanted another payday for Englund.
>>81746954
>Spiderman: Homecoming
Ah... Shit name, to be honest.
>>81747990
There's a difference between villains and henchmen, dumdum
>>81748201
All the information you have so far is that Vulture will appear. As far as we know, he might get punched in the middle of a montage of Spidey learning the hero ropes. Chill, mang.
>>81748104
The Gwen/Goblin subplot should've been its own movie.
TASM2 should have focused on Electro and Norman fuckery to build up Harry more since he didn't fucking exist in the last one.
Rhino, ehh, the mecha is alright but don't make it Oscorp-made, just have him in it from the start.
>>81748225
Bruh, it's meant to be poetic. It's a literal homecoming. It wouldn't surprise me if this song was in all the advertising.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vCbQ_4PxM0E
>>81748104
>ASM2 didn't do that bad with the villains.
holy fucking what
They wasted Electro's one story Light The Night as if they quickly read a wikipedia summary of it. His motivation is literally Spider-man talked to me once for 20 seconds, now I hate him.
Then he fucks off for a hour so Harry can somehow run a company at 18 with a blood disease so he injects himself with spider venom that fucks up his face and puts on a robo suit that will somehow cure it and he murders Gwen for reasons.
Then we see him in prison in a not Goblin state and he gives Rhino a rhino mech that he would have absolute no idea how to control because he's functionally retarded.
Fuck off, ASM2 was an absolute shitpile.
>>81748162
Pete Postlethwaite is dead
>>81748318
Ohhh.... ohh nooo... no....
>>81748284
>The Gwen/Goblin subplot should've been its own movie.
Yes, save it for the porn parody.
>>81748312
>>81748284
I'm not saying it was a good film, but the number of villains wasn't a flaw in itself.
It's when you try to make multiple villains major villains that it suffers.
Who could the main villain be? Doc? cause I can see how vulture and him could be written together easily
I think the cgi spidey was a missed opportunity for good costuming.
>>81746954
I found the perfect Vulture
>>81748267
>villains can't be henchmen
>>81747798
So you're saying he's coming back to Earth?
>>81748450
kek, it's perfect
>>81747990
Yes they did, but neither of those heroes need half of the screentime to develop an emotional connection to Peter, his friends/family and the villain. The joker is the easiest comic character to have explained, besides there is a distinct difference between having all of the villains work under the same main villain vs. having 2 or three separate storylines.
Also TDK and WS are the two best capeshit movies ever so to compare Spiderman's 6th try on a decent movie to them is kind of insulting.
>>81748285
I know it's poetic but I still don't like it. Hopefully the movie will be good, though. Pretty hyped
>>81748620
>Vulture
>needing that much set-up
Falcon exists now.
He's old, wants to be younger, got the wings. He doesn't need an emotional connection to Peter.
>>81746954
>Multiple villains
>probably trying to do Sinister Six again
NOPE
O
P
E
>>81748717
>Guy wants to steal youth because he is old
>Spider-Man is young
IT MAKES NO SENSE, ANON. We will need at least a half hour flashback to cover this.
>>81747770
That'd be so good. I could se him being a great sleazy Gargan.
>>81746954
>HOMECOMING
pls pls pls
>>81747512
MOTHER FUCKING MYSTERIO!!!! EVERYONE WANTS HIM!!!
>>81746954
They couldn't use another villain like maybe kraven or fucking shocker?
>>81748962
I really want Bruce Campbell playing Mysterio, you guys.
>>81748758
Why are people automatically assuming Sinister Six?
>>81748798
>>81748717
OK. All I'm saying is multiple villains is hit or miss, even for the MCU, and spells certain doom for Spider-man movies. I'll never understand why /co/mrades put so much faith in a franchise that has produced one (1) movie that wasn't tremendously mediocre or flat out shit in the last 20 years. If you don't take every piece of news you hear from now to release with a grain of salt you are setting yourself up for disappointment.
Again.
>>81747679
If Suicide Squad can be a successful movie, then the Sinister Six can. Sony wanted to do a Sinister Six movie (and a Venom movie as well, I guess) because they wanted to milk the shit out of Spider-Man, they still do. Spider-Man is their only comic book character they have access to so they're going to squeeze as many movies out as possible.
>>81747679
Can you imagine if Batman villains teamed up and tried to kill him?
That's a great idea but the idea has zero legs as a movie
>>81749034
>If Suicide Squad can be a successful movie,
>>81747429
>but won't be the main villain.
you fucking autist
he'll probably have the same role Rhino did in ASM2
>>81746954
Vulture seems kinda lame on his own. I kinda wonder why they don't just give Otto another shot. Molina wasn't exactly iconic to begin with.
>>81748983
>>81747429
A flying villain would be something more new
Also he was supposed to be a villain in Spiderman 4, they'll rhyme with Raimi
>>81749028
There are two non-bad Spider-Man movies, anon. C'mon.
>>81749051
Smug face is an understandable reaction. The success (or lack of it) will probably be a big decider on whether or not Sony actually goes through with it.
>>81748911
Mary Jane turned into a Mary Sue.
I don't get it, she's supposed to be the heartbreaker, not heartbroken.
How did the writers get a character so wrong? She acts nothing like Mary Jane.
>>81749016
Because studios are obsessed with Spidey fighting them. The Sinister Six are like the Avengers of super villains. Every excec wants to see them.
![DIG007059_1._SX640_QL80_TTD_[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/qk6dBaK.jpg "DIG007059_1._SX640_QL80_TTD_[1].jpg")
Wait. Does this mean MORLUN?
>>81748911
Fuck off.
MCU is for Felicia only!
>>81747990
In TDK the joker barely had 15 minutes of screentime and that's a credit to how easily they introduced him.
Don't expect movies with a bunch of villains to play by those rules though
Which means the movie is gonna have to juggle a lot and character development for villains always suffers in marvel films
>>81749083
He was supposed to be the villain of Spider-Man 3, he and Sandman. He got bumped off by the studio insistence on Venom, also the New Goblin happened.
>>81749125
>Mary Jane turned into a Mary Sue.
>blatantly flawed
>mary sue
>>81749130
Sony is not every studio anon.
>>81749137
I really fucking doubt it. They won't go full magic.
People who don't read comics bitch about Daredevil going full ninjas as it is.
>>81747831
>Just because previous attempts got the execution wrong doesn't mean this one will.
Thank you! Honestly, the Vulture really does feel like a good fit for an eilite mook working under a bigger villain. Maybe they'll use one of Spidey's newer enemies. I think Mister Negative would make a great movie villain.
>>81746954
Sony bought the domains for:
Spiderman Homecoming
Spiderman Suspended
Spiderman Coming of Age
Seems like a neat tongue in cheek trilogy of titles to me, with the second one being the darker storyline.
>>81749137
>pic related, happening never
I just want something different that the previous movies
>>81749079
>Molina wasn't exactly iconic to begin with
Excuse me
>>81749236
>Spider-Man Suspended
This might be kind of a tall order, but I'd make the new movie a full on creature feature. Imagine a "breakout at Ravencroft" situation.
I mean, Spider Man has all of Marvel's best villains, so let's fucking see some of them.
>>81749179
>what is a self-insert
>>81749246
I don't think Man-Spider is interesting enough to make a whole movie.
>>81749256
He was good, yeah, but he wasn't so amazing that nobody could top it.
>>81749146
If i'm not mistaken after 3 Raimi was initially supposed to continue with the Vulture plot in 4, but then gave up because he didn't like how things were going
>>81749289
So all of Spider-Man enemies were already at large BEFORE Spider-Man?
>>81749236
>Spiderman Coming of Age
>Sex-Ed Spidey movie
hue
>>81749333
Maybe, maybe not. What matters is that we get to see them in action.
>>81749236
>Spiderman Suspended
YOU ARE BOTH SUSPENDED
>>81749217
With Doctor Strange, T'Challa, Wanda, and Thor in the universe? We're getting there. If they do it the way JMS did, having Peter be skeptical and not really confirming it one way or another (until The Other), it might work.
>>81749332
For Spider-Man 4 the following were bounced around:
>John Malkovich as Vulture
>Dylan Baker finally becoming the Lizard
>Anne Hathaway as Felicia Hardy, who would become a female Vulture instead of Black Cat
>A non-cameo role for Bruce Campbell
Yes, sounds awful.
>>81748152
>right age
>intimating
>can play convincing villains
Perfect.
>>81749094
>mediocre
>>81749137
>No Ezekiel as a mentor figure
>No Morlun
>No Shathra
>No betrayal as Ezekiel comes to sacrifice Peter in his place
>No Ezekiel vs. Peter symmetrical combat
Goddamn it. Actually, now that I think about it, Morlun->Shathra->Ezekiel would make a good trilogy of villains.
>>81749326
>whole movie
I agree that feeling 120 minutes of screen with T rated monster would suck but I still think that a final fight (15m or so) of a scenario where Peter was temporally transformed in to half monster by one of his dozen science villains would be neat.
>>81749137
Exactly what i was thinking. Maybe it would be their way to diffeentiate the new movies/origins from the previous two series? I can't really see it happening, but maybe if they do it like >>81749444 suggested...
>>81749330
Yeah, i guess
I would just crib right from Spectacular Spider-Man and make it about Tombstone, Hammerhead, and the Enforcers.
>>81749476
>Anne Hathaway as Felicia Hardy, who would become a female Vulture instead of Black Cat
Hmm
>>81748285
>It wouldn't surprise me if this song was in all the advertising.
That song seems to be about dying.
>too many villains makes a movie shit
>not, yknow, shit writing
dumbfuks
>>81749628
Why hasn't this set-up been used in a Netflix show yet? I want Iron Fist to fight Fancy Dan for a whole episode.
>>81747512
Mysterio
Kraven
Hobgoblin
>>81748083
>>81748285
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LQ488QrqGE4
This is gonna be the advert song
>>81749743
But who could you buy as Tombstone? Ron Perlman would have been good, but he's getting a bit too old.
>>81749792
Keith David
>>81747512
MISTER NEGATIVE
HE'S NEW, WHO THE FUCK CARES, HE'S JUST AS GOOD AS THE OTHER A-LIST VILLAINS
>>81747571
The Spectacular Spider-Man would remind audiences too much of The Amazing Spider-Man.
I like Web of Spider-Man, but I honestly don't mind Spider-Man: Subtitle like all the other Marvel movies.
>>81749815
If only for the voice.
>>81749848
>Konnichiwa
>>81749137
Isn't this run were Aunt may also found out Pete was Spidey? on the moment that Kevin Feige said was "his personal mission" to put in a movie someday?
I could see it working Eotem Spidey would be a a breath of fresh air.
>>81749824
Fuck off Slott
>>81746954
>the Vulture will be in it, but won't be the main villain.
DOA
Please, capeshit with one villain is superior. Especially when Spidey is involved.
>>81747990
TDK and TWS has one main Villian others are just sub.
>>81749824
>Chinese villain
>In a Disney movie
Yeah, no.
>>81746954
>SPIDER-MAN: HOMECOMING
S M H
I'm hoping for Chameleon.Mysterio for a sequel.
>>81749718
Too many villains is shit writing. Especially when you give each villain backstories and storylines that make the movie bloated.
>>81749792
Tombstone is an albino black man.
>>People saying there can't be more than one villain.
Just group the lower tier villains together as petty crooks.
Vulture, Shocker and Rhino could work as a group. The reason the other multiple villains things failed is because the villains were so radically unconnected.
>>81749078
>he'll probably have the same role Rhino did in ASM2
You mean he'll be a completely pointless character (whose scenes could be removed and replaced with scenes that actually progress and enhance tge story) that only exists to set up th Sinister Six?
Oh Joy!
>>81750262
There is a way to fix this, make the villains part of a group. Venom, Harry and Sandman all had their own goals and plots. Electro and Harry in AMS2 were completely different plots.
Do this >>81750303
Will it be the Vulture we all know and love or will it be the Red Vulture from The Gauntlet run? I can see them having both in with Red Vulture being an apprentice of the previous Vulture.
>>81749824
>>81749218
I too would like Mister Negative, The Spot even, but I imagine the choreography for his fights would look weird. Freak could be cool but his powers often make writers run into corners and they don't really know what to do with him.
You know what I would have liked for this new Spider-Man film? Have it be a "A day in the life of Peter Parker". Just have Peter try to survive the day, and show his interactions with his friends, enemies, and have him have to blow peopel off to stop a crime in progress. Don't make it a build up to her vs. villain, but Peter vs. the day. Fight Shocker in a scene, which causes trouble cause he missed class. Have him try to get to date Mary Jane, only to get ambushed by the Vulture along the way. That would make for a very fun and different flick.
>>81749824
Plz leave Slott. No one cares about your OCs.
Hopefully it's the sinster six and antman and wasp helps him take them down
>>81750303
Or you could not use a billion villains to set up a shitty team of villains and instead focus on Peter Parker an his personal life while dealing with Spider-Man. Spider-Man punching Shocker and le explosions isn't what makes him Spider-Man, anon. Sigh, at least it use to.
>>81750564
Sinister Six is the worst thing to happen to Spider-Man.
>>81747734
>Mister Negative as crime boss
>before Kingpin, The Rose, Hammerhead, Tombstone, Silvermane or Crime-Master
Fuck off you filthy casual.
http://collider.com/spider-man-reboot-marvel-sony-kevin-feige/
Marvel are basically in control of the movie before anyone worries
>“We’re working very much [together]. It is a— I don’t know exactly what the credits will be, but it is a Sony Pictures production of a Marvel Studios film. The agreement was that it is very much a Sony Pictures movie. Amy Pascal is co-producing it with us and [Sony Chairman] Tom Rothman is leading the charge for Sony and that we are the creative producers. We are the ones hiring the actor, introducing him in this film, and then working right now on the script and soon to be shooting the actual Spidey film.”
>>81750633
look if we do it now we don't have to do it ever again
>>81747856
>Fox
First off, the Spider-Man movie rights are owned by Sony, dumbass. Second off, he isn't coming back to Marvel. Sony allowed Marvel to use him in other MCU movies. Sony is still making the solo Spider-Man films.
>>81747868
No.
>Homecoming was the title of the post-SW issue when Spidey first has the black suit
>>81750566
>instead focus on Peter Parker an his personal life while dealing with Spider-Man.
We've seen that in five fucking fims.
>>81750684
>Tom Rothman is leading the charge
PANIC!
>>81750808
We saw it in 3. SPM1,2, and ASM.
ASM2 was about MUH PARENTS and building up the Sinister Six. SPM3 was about Harry, the Symbiote, and the Sandman killing Uncle Ben.
>>81750804
It's just to denote that he's in high school now, don't get your hopes up, anon.
>>81748267
There literally is not.
>>81748446
pizza time?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8r592lVqCDA&nohtml5=False
>>81748911
>Director loves "Spider-Man Loves Mary Jane"
It's happening
>>81750684
>Amy Pascal is co-producing it with us
I swear, hollywood has got to be one of the most backwards and idiotic places to work in. Ignoring all the covered up sex scandals and blatant money laundering which do happen and are way more serious than what I'm about to point out, how is a dumb incompetent fuck like Pascal still working at Sony after the emails got leaked? Seriously the woman is beyond fucking retarded. In a regular work environment she'd be fired on the spot and would be blacklisted for life.
Really, how do they do it? I don't wanna say jews, but fucking hell, it's them isn't it.
>>81750684
>Amy Pascal
>Tom Rothman
Fuck. No one at Sony knows what they're doing, especially these fucks. But Feige loves Spider-Man, and the director wants to go for a John Hughes style movie, so I'm still excited.
>>81750968
I would love it if they hook Peter and MJ together.
Just for the sheer amount of Butthurt on Marvel and on Quesada, Slott, and Brevoort.
>>81750262
>Too many villains is shit writing.
For a shitty writer maybe.
>>81750653
>Not saving Kingpin for a crossover with Daredevil
Just rehash the story from TAS with some minor tweaks.
>>81750968
Wasn't the exact same thing said about Marc Webb?
>>81751158
>Just for the sheer amount of Butthurt on Marvel and on Quesada, Slott, and Brevoort.
That is reason enough to do it.
>>81751088
nah, just good old fashioned ' I kept receipts for every dodgy favor I did for you, and will expose it all if you fire me'
>>81747429
I want fake spider-man fans to fuck off
Let me guess, you're mad it's not Venom?
>>81749333
basically imply that 'Spider-Man: Year One' already happened before Civil War
>>81751504
I think people (wrongly) assume that Vulture is some geriatric fucker with wings and that's it
>>81746954
Michael Keaton for Norman Osborn
>>81750633
no, that's joining The Avengers
what are the chances she'll ever be introduced in a movie?
>>81751158
yeah but on the other hand what about Al Milgrim, Bill Mantlo, Mark Miller, Kevin Smith, and Jen Van Meter?
Give SpideyCat a chance! It's our best chance to have the current Slott nonesense with her swept under the rug
>>81751982
She's really the pure no-man's land.
>>Mutant
>>Introduced through Spider-Man cartoon
>>Avenger
>>81752063
New Warriors!
>>81750725
>Second off, he isn't coming back to Marvel. Sony allowed Marvel to use him in other MCU movies.
Yeah right, sony didnt fucked up nor keeps fucking with the snowflakebusters.
>>81752012
>It's our best chance to have the current Slott nonesense with her swept under the rug
That's a good argument for this, not gonna lie. Id be happy with either Peter/MJ or Peter/Felicia. They both would fix stupid shit in the current comics.
>>81752121
>Yeah right
>being this out of the loop
Did you just wake up from a coma? You know Spider-Man is in fucking Civil War, right?
That fucking name is awful. Like I'm about to read a fucking trade paperback of issues 937-941.
>>81752440
>I'm about to read a fucking trade paperback of issues 937-941.
...what the hell are you even talking about?
>>81752537
That's a shitty subtitle you'd see arbitrarily given to 4 issues in the middle of a series.
>>81747429
We've known this for a while.
>>81747927
2 is a couple 3 is a crowd
2 villains works very well a lot of the time
No movie has done 3 villains right
>>81752629
As opposed to any other subtitle?
>>81751731
No, he's an OLD MAN with wings and that's it.
>>81752763
Yeah, you're right. There's no reason for the first film in a series to have a second, completely unnecessary title. But Homecoming is especially bad. Like Spider-Man: Sadie Hawkins Dance or Spider-Man: Algebra II.
>>81752750
Kill Bill pt.1
>>81752750
Princess Bride
>>81752629
they were gonna call it Spider-Man: Silent Hill but it turns out that's trademarked
I feel like they could go a team-villain approach. Do Vulture, Chameleon, and Mysterio. Call them the Enforcers and have them hired to fuck Spider-Man's shit up. Hired by who?Kraven. To test Spider-Man's abilities before going in for the kill
>>81752769
It could be Jimmy Natale (pic related).
Or adapt one of the times Adrian Tooms stole people's youth.
But you're probably some shitty casual who had no idea either of these things happened.
>>81748379
Why does he look like Tommy Lee Jones?
>>81753018
if you're gonna have Kraven be behind it then you really gotta have all the midbosses be animal themed
>>81753058
>What is a photo reference?
>>81752769
he's an electric superhuman known for running gangs of children and sending money to his daughter and grandson
>>81753018
>Call them the Enforcers
And do a disservice to the actual Enforcers? Get the fuck outta here, faggot.
>>81748991
Raimi would have done it for SM4 if he had the chance I bet. He even had Campbell play the Bouncer for the theatre for one of his cameos, so a bit of set-up was there
>>81753078
He just hires them he doesn't name them and sew their costumes.
>>81753200
The real Enforcers could never work on film. I hate to be the one to have to break it to you.
God, I would really love a Scott Pilgrim vibe from the movie. It obviously doesn't need all the video game shit or as many visual gags, but that tone would fit Spider-man perfectly.
>>81753402
>The real Enforcers could never work on film.
Yes they could.
Especially if its an organized crime oriented story. They obviously wouldn't be the central villains, but henchmen. You know, just like they are in the comics.
>>81753466
>Scott Pilgrim without the video game stuff
Speed Racer?
>>81753466
>I would really love a Scott Pilgrim vibe from the movie
So you want it to be like the Ultimate Spider-Man cartoon?
>>81751310
This, you have to realize all these people are just as stupid and inept, and they know it could have happened to any of them.
>>81749034
>implying any of the planned Sony movies are still a go
>>81746954
>Spider-man: Homecoming
>vulture is in it
>but won't be the main villain
This already has red flags and they've only announced the title.
BRING BACK RAIMI
THIS FUCKER AS MYSTERIO
>>81753705
>This already has red flags and they've only announced the title.
They haven't even done that.
Everything in OP is 100% rumor. Keep up.
>>81753579
Yeah, except not nearly as reliant on cut away gags, better written, more character focused, and not afraid to go in an interesting direction with its morals.
Like Scott Pilgrim.
>>81753931
>Yeah
...so you want it to be shit?
Even when cutting down the cut away gags (or none at all), if its anything like that show, it'll be utter garbage.
>>81747679
>isn't familiar with the clusterfuck of villains in Raimi's third film
Spotted the underage.
