This was a good story
>>80995477
yeah, Johns' Aquaman was pretty great
yeah it was nice
John's Aquaman was great. I'm glad we agree.
>>80995505
>>80996063
>>80995477
Yes it was, art and plot were good. I really enjoyed the first 20 or so issues, it started to fizzle a bit after that
>>80995477
Aquadog: Best new character of the decade?
>>80995477
I'm surprised it took this long for a self-conscious Aquaman run.
>>81000982
they had this urge to make him look badass.
he grew his hair out, cut off his hand and killed Aqua baby.
Is new 52 Aquaman worth buying?
>>81002060
yes
>>81002084
Should I stop after Johns' run?
>>81002486
Yes, but then pick it up again at 49 when Abnett takes over.
I liked how the guy right after Johns got the tone right in his too.
It was also good, and honestly if I didn't know I prolly would have guessed the same guy was still going.
Especially the highschool reunion issue. Fucking awesome
>>80995477
No it wasn't. It was nothing but jokes about "DUR HUR HUR AQUAMAN IS COOL NOW NOT LAME!"
I swear /co/ sucks off Geoff Johns even harder than Bruce Timm and Jonathon Hickman
Anyone else a fan of bearded, harpoon hand, 90s, peter david aquaman.
I feel like im in the minority on this one maybe but I always assumed it was shit cos 90s edgier bullshit. But then i went back and read it after i wanted to get into DC shit and saw peter david (yeah marvel fan, sue me its peter david) and holy shit i really liked it.
I'm only up to the conclusion of the Others/Black Manta arc but I'm really enjoying it
Vostok ;_;
>>81005623
You didn't like any issue between Johns and Abnett? Not even fight with Heracle and tiny crossover with Swamp Thing?
>>81005623
Fuck no, Abnett is doing a horrible job.
>>81014174
Lemme guess, you hate Mera taking title of Aquawoman?
