>At today's Women of Marvel panel for C2E2, Marvel announced its "Mighty Men of Marvel" variant theme for July, unveiling several of the heroically hunky covers we can expect.
kek
>Henderson
JUST
>>80892377
Did Dr. Strange magic his nipples away?
>>80892377
>Objectifying is okay as long as it's not women
>>80892526
>bitching about beefcake
Someone get this faggot outta here.
>>80892520
and his naval. and all his muscle definition
>>80892520
>>80893317
Its the artist for squirrel girl
its why he also has down syndrome
lol take notes Marvel
None of the covers I've seen have been nearly sexy enough. Especially that Captain America one which just has his nipple hanging out for some reason. I like All-American nipples but I hate being short changed even more.
http://www.newsarama.com/28472-mighty-men-of-marvel-variant-covers-gallery.html
Pretty shitty all around
Marvel Swimsuit Special was way better than this
>>80892377
henderson sucks and it's a wonder people actually say the art for squirrel girl is good with a straight face.
>>80893371
that was too lewd for publication though
>>80893531
They published it
>>80893265
thats not even a beefcake, he has no definition and the vaguest masculine shape. maybe that would be an attractive torso in the 30's, but these days? just no.
Is that really what girls are into these days? guys with no definition, overgroomed facial hair, ungroomed body hair, and Downe's Syndrome?
>>80893553
talkin' balls
>>80893531
They published it, they just had to tone down the bulge since it was basically an outline of his cock
Just give me stupid sexy Venom.
What i hate about this is that you just know that these same people probably bitched about that Spider-woman cover and the "objectification" of women in pin-up pieces period, yet when they do it (for male or female characters) it's perfectly fine.
>>80893371
But where's Killer Queen?
>>80892377
>announce Mighty Men of Marvel at the Women of Marvel panel
Huh
>>80893853
Clearly you haven't seen them cry about Grayson then
>>80893573
>guys with no definition, overgroomed facial hair, ungroomed body hair, and Downe's Syndrome?I wish ;_;
>>80893573
This is not what the girls are into, this is just the best a hack artist can draw.
>>80893996
That's like a dozen people who are mad about their husbando not doing what they want
>looked at a response from an individual condemning Grayson for its objectification
>accidentally clicked on their main page
>mfw one of the first posts was sexy fanart of Dick
>mfw they had an entire tag for beefcake
>mfw most of it was actual panels
Going through the gallery it's less beefcake and more "there should be a Men's History Month too!" Did they forget to tell half the artists what the theme was?
>>80894178
I know it's hilarious, I remember clicking through the notes on that stupid blog post and stumbling through blog after blog full of shirtless Dick fanart.
Also I think this board tends to assume any criticism is a dedicated crusade, when usually it's just someone offhand bitching about being sick of a consistent trend on their blog or making fun of how stupid they think something is.
>>80894222
It's suddenly like comic book artists forgot all the sexy poses they draw women in because no homo. At least I got Steve nipple. Hopefully there's a nice beefy Cap Sam cover too.
>>80894222
that one's actually pretty good, look how well defined the chest and stomach are compared to henderson's.
>>80894375
Oh the Grayson IS a dedicated crusade. It's just not as big as people here think. It's like 2-3 bigger blogs with some followers who eat up what they say. And barely any of them have the balls to really say anything to Seeley or make posts so they just reblog or like things at most. And most people just ignore them anyway to look at the pretty pictures and jokes.
>>80894666
It's well drawn but it's not really sexy except in that inherent way that all athletic stuff is. Certainly not beefcake at least.
>>80894753
no, I mean that's hot. you could bounce a penis off of that six pack.
>>80893745
>FEELS LIKE I'M WEARIN'
>NOTHIN' AT ALL
>NOTHIN' AT ALL
>NOTHIN' AT ALL
>>80892377
Disgusting this is everything wrong with comic books today...
Captain America cover when?
>>80894222
>Fiona Staples
>No skin
I feel like she didn't get the memo on what this variant was supposed to be. I like the cover though.
>>80894873
>>Fiona Staples
>>No skin
...
Man, and it's not like she's even averse to drawing male nudity.
>>80894863
the rest are posted here >>80892587
>>80893745
>mfw the Spider-Family's asses
>mfw the symbiotes' asses
>mfw most of the Avenger's asses
Marvel is truly a proprietor of top notch rear ends
>>80893966
Lol, Marvel, the House of........ Ideas!
>>80893573
>ungroomed body hair
>Man
Faggot.
>>80895031
>>80892377
It always gets me that she blatantly copied Adam Hughes' signature.
>>80893530
>Marvel when Trump becomes prez
>>80894222
>people who aren't attracted to dudes telling people who are that dudes aren't attractive
It's a crazy world.
>>80893573
>grooming your body hair
The fuck do you do, shave it in the shape of a penis?
Natural chest hair is sexy as all hell. Overly muscled men can have their day but a trim body is nice, too.
>>80897054
do you think none of us are faggots? really?
https://twitter.com/EricaFails/status/711280222134530048
>I tried submitting two different versions of naked ribbon Sailor Moon transformation homages. No dice.
I guess Marvel didn't want these to be TOO fun or sexy
Did these covers backfire already? They aren't good beefcake so nobody is impressed there, and they rustled a lot of jimmies by announcing them during the Women of Marvel panel
>>80898456
>depriving us of manmeat
holy shit, fuck Marvel
>>80895031
ive all ways thaught marvel for arses and dc for tits
>>80898671
DC has Dick though, they win on the ass front by default
>>80898456
>no swimsuit issue
>no beefcake covers
What will my dick do now that marvel is depriving it of beefcake?
>>80898896
pray that DC put Clay Mann on a male lead title
It's weird how prudish Marvel has become since yesteryear.
>>80898924
>>80898896
You switch to DC and read Grayson and Midnighter.
>>80898924
>this fucking picture
DIAMONDS
>>80898969
They desperately need to put Mann on a male title
>>80898924
>>80899025
why does he never wear tight boxerbriefs and daisy dukes in the comics? Its so fucking perfect. we really do need more sexy boys like that :(
>>80893573
Someone is projecting.
>>80899086
King/Mann on Nightwing would probably be pretty sexy, King works in beefcake intentionally and Mann is good at drawing fine dudes
then again Dick hogs all the sexiness, I wouldn't mind seeing Mann on Aquaman or GL or something
>bathing in black warrior creek
>waiting for black warriors
>hairy cove
>>80899086
Now that he's DC exclusive he'll surely get an ongoing with Rebirth.
Hopefully Nightwing. I'd be fine with Red Hood too, on the condition that it has a good writer and not Lobdell again.
Luke Cage, Power Top.
>>80899205
Red Hood will mostly certainly be the Lobdell containment book
>>80893371
He looks like a JoJo
>>80899025
This picture as in your picture or the other guys picture
>>80898456
>>80898589
on the brightside it's Henderson. is it really something we wanted to see?
This is Bullseye.
>>80899283
But if they rejected hers it means they likely rejected sexy covers from the other artists too. It's a damn shame.
>>80899236
>Red Hood by Steve Orlando with art by Clay Mann, moved under Mark Doyle editorial
Hire me DC, I know how to save your shitty character.
>>80899283
Well she clearly can't draw straight up beefcake, drawing something sillier would have suited her better but I guess Marvel went nofunallowed.jpg on these
>>80899268
Other guy's, I'm not into shota. Makes for funny reaction images though.
And here's an even more provocative one from Wildstorm's swimsuit issue.
I am for the most part completely straight, but I have almost every comic from the Big 2 in digital form and I love corny things like these.
So, are we ever going to get some cheesecake variants? I miss swimsuit covers
>>80899371
>for the most part completely straight
lol
>>80899371
Winter is my underrated husbando, thank you for this.
>>80899435
They did two rounds of DC Bombshells variants.
>>80899441
I've seen enough hentai that if a suitably effeminate sissy was to exist I'd probably go all the way.
>>80899485
Glad to provide.
>>80899510
fair enough
>>80892377
That is really hypocritical. Don't even mind this but you know Marvel wouldn't allow the version for women and even if they did it'd a whole lot tamer.
>>80899505
Oddly I didn't see any of them. What has Marvel given us in the way of cheesecake recently?
>>80899632
>it'd a whole lot tamer
How could they possibly be any tamer than this?
>>80899644
>What has Marvel given us in the way of cheesecake recently?
After all the fuss about the Manara Spider-Woman cover? nothing comes to mind
>>80899644
Totally Awesome Hulk by Cho?
I demand more sexy Frank.
>>80899289
>Not having the bullseye be his asshole or cock
>>80899686
good point
>>80899789
>Marvel depriving us of sexy Frank by putting Dillon on the new ongoing
Why is Marvel so shit bros?
>>80899920
why does Dillon have a job? he has no artistic ability, and has already shown everyone that people do in fact have lis.
>>80899205
>>80899236
>>80899323
>Lobdell
>bad
RHatO was fun, you eejits.
>>80900117
Dark Tzitzimine pls go
>>80898924
Man whenever I find some Terese Nielsen in the wild, it's always fantastic
>>80899840
It's actually the head of his junk, it just curves a bit to the right.
>>80899982
I can only assume Ennis likes working with him.
