Which one is better?
>>78590557
I'll say space jam, but only for nostalgia because on their own their both terrible movies.
I'll take shit with Michael Jordan over shit without Michael Jordan.
>>78590599
>their
they're
Space Jam, but I still love Brendan
>>78590557
Space Jam, Back in Action should have been a animated feature but execs kept holding it back and shoving live action into the movie because of Space Jam doing so well in the 90s.
Poor Joe Dante got blamed for it flopping when he just wanted to make a proper Looney Tunes movie but WB wouldn't let him.
The space Jam Soundtrack automatically makes it better. It made me believe I could fly.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yukp49fI8Uk
Space Jam has the Daffy Doc so it wins
>>78590557
space jam. at least it was funny
it wasn't looney tunes at all, but.. looney tunes kinda sucks. kinda. it's not something youd wanna make into a movie.
space jam is a movie ABOUT the looney tunes, from an external standpoint. That makes it okay.
and while sports is fuckin gay, this movie also seems to have made fun of sports (the people in charge are just exploiting the players, if you lose your talent your life is fucking over, etc)
>>78590557
As a Looney Tunes movie, Back in Action was definitely better. But Space Jam was still decent for what that was trying to do.
>>78590557
The one on the right.Just because you hate an actor does not make a movie he's in "bad".
Back in action had tons of pretty good Meta humor, while space Jam was a long commercial.
that said, nostalgia says Space jam, because BiA doesnt have good enough quality to override nostalgia.
Back in Action was an actual Looney Tunes movie. Space Jam's just a Michael Jordan biofilm that happens to have Looney Tunes in it.
>>78590557
You mean which one is more of a tumblr meme? Nobody gave a shit until some cumstain wrote a piece about how AMAZING their mere existance was because MUH STARS and Metashit. Its the same with Nicholas Cage, someone wrote some shit and then half the people on my dash were all over his dick.
>>78596163
>Implying Moonstruck, Leaving Las Vegas, and Bad Lieutenant aren't legitimately good.
>>78596163
>admitting to having a tumblr
wew
>>78590557
Space jam was a hell of a lot more memorable and had a good soundtrack
>>78596163
I enjoyed space jam when i saw it as a kid and continued to enjoy it till now
nothing what you say makes any sense
>>78590557
A perfectly good Prequel thread died so this thread could live.
Think on that.
>>78590557
Is this even a question? Am I this old?
Space Jam of course.
The one with Bill Murray playing himself.
>>78598078
no one cares
>>78590557
I liked the characterizations of the toons better in Back in Action than in Space Jam, but Space Jam had a better Live Action cast. The Villains were on the same level of quality, and were both good performances. The Monstars aren't something you forget, and the choice to make ACME evil was great.
Space Jam because of the lore it provides for Barkley Shut Up and Jam: Gaiden.
>What are you doing?
>I'm uh, fixing a divot
>Oh. He's fixing a divot!
Space Jam
>>78590557
I haven been up to date with Brendan Frazier after this movie. How's he doing?
>>78599919
He's JUST fine.
Space Jam had a better cast for the characters
BIA had a better story.
I fucking hate brendan fraiser.
>>78598078
no one gives a fuck about your obese furfaggot zoophile shit
>>78590557
They're both awful but Space Jam came out at just the right time. If it came out earlier or later it would've flopped
BiA just sucks
>>78599997
Oh of course not, instead lets talk about the movie that brought this into the world.
Yes... yes... I see what you mean... this is clearly better.
On topic, the second movie doesn't exist. Don't try and convince me otherwise.
>>78601101
Side note do you think Michael Jordan fucked Lola in the showers after the game? Bugs could sit there next to them only being allowed to watch. Stan Podolak is also there.. but he's not watching Michael and Lola.. he's watching Bugs, and his hand is wandering up Bugs' thigh.
As Lola screams for more in the background, Stan leans over and whispers in bugs' long ear "Its you and me next, and I expect you to last longer than the rest"
>>78590557
Jam.
Nice little time capsule as well.
>>78591111
I think this is possibly the most wrong post I have ever read on this board. Congratulations on being such a person with shitty opinions and punctuation.
>>78598078
So a literally constant front page thread with literally nothing but shitposting died so a thread that gets used somewhat uncommonly and provokes something of minor interest lives. Stay in your thread please.
>>78593039
Nobody hates Brendan
>>78601382
VS a thread about such a Non-debate its like asking what is better, Hitler inserting splinters in your dick or an ice cream sundae,
>>78601403
Brendan Frasier is a fantastic actor who tried his best but not even the Frasier could save such a crap film.
Looney Toons Back in Action is prophetic in that it was the first film to start mining the 90s for nostalgic content in order to sell tickets, but not actually caring about having a good film to begin with.
>>78601418
There's been dissenting opinion but this thread mostly leave room for shitting on both movies and good memories as opposed to 24/7 Prequel shitposting of which there will be another thread within the day. I would really hate for Prequel to become another one of the hated fanbases because of faggots like you. Also not very fond of the Captcha which I'm blaming you for..
Back in Action had the better jokes IMO
>"Nice of Wal-Mart to give us these Wal-Mart beverages in return for us saying Wal-Mart so many times."
>>78601523
Honestly when I posted it I was shitposting for the sake of shitposting, Prequel was the topic cause it was the last thread I was on But then people started responding and, well, with those responses I couldn't resist continuing.
You are right to blame me for your Captcha troubles though, also you know how nobody can pull the wrapper off the reeses peanut butter cup cleanly? That's me too. I get around.
>>78601612
>you know how nobody can pull the wrapper off the reeses peanut butter cup cleanly
I can do it sometimes. Really good at a clean orange peel if I try as well. I eat like two oranges a day on average though so that's a lot of practice.
>>78590557
the one that helped inspire a cult post-modern rpg about post-apocalyptic basketball
>>78601649
Back to the drawing board with those then.
>>78590557
Space Jam off course!
Based Jordan, and first appearance of Lola Bunny.
>>78597982
>tripfag thinking he's better than anyone else
wew
>>78601196
Lola isn't real. She's a cartoon character.
Space Jam
Back in action was fucking dogshit
Space Jam, though I hated the idea of Bugs having a love interest. He's always been a lone wolf.
Steve Martin made Back In Action unwatchable
>>78590625
But Jordan was in Back in Action!
JUST
>>78590557
I never had nostalgia for Space Jam so Back in Action is the better for simply having the characters act more in line with their actual characters.
>>78607662
>more in line with their actual characters.
>Daffy and Bugs' characteristics for the movie were based on one fucking short
Back in Action
Anyone who prefers Space Jam pretty much a nostalgia-blind faggot that hates LTs.
>>78607933
>that hates LTs
Are you serious?
Kinda pissed that they scrapped the Pepe and Penelope scene in Back in Action.
>>78590557
Space Jam.
>>78590557
Back in Action has Brendan Frasier Punching Brendan Frasier in the face, so that automatically makes it better.
>>78609349
Space Jam is a legitimately bad film. Michael Jordan couldn't act his way out of a paper bag. Back In Action felt like a higher budget AVGN movie and was actually aokmovie if you don't watch it more than once.
Space Jam because of this scene.
>>78590557
Back in Action is the reason Loonatics exists
I pick Space Jam
>>78608090
Say wot
>>78611582
There was a scene they animated where Pepe and his assistant Penelope was supposed to be the secret agent representative that gave the team the mission and the gadgets.
You can see snippets of the scrapped scenes in the credits.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U0LoJp1mNOY
>>78608090
>>78611730
there also should have been a completely different opening scene with superheroes and shit, shame about that one too
I don't remember anything about Back in Action.
>>78590557
Back in Action, I don't like crossovers that don't make sense
