>so much power I became bald
what the fuck
That's how psychic powers work you idiot.
He looks better bald then I was expecting.
Better Lex Luthor than the bun we have right now.
isn't it ironic that it's the Magneto actor who is balding as fuckalso the superman actor
>>78150729
>Names are for friends, so I don't need one.
>>78150764
*bum
>>78150729
Really, this is what seems dumb from the xmen franchise?
Not the fact that we see wolverine in the end of dofp and everyone else all alive and well in the present , and returning to the 80s for the sequel?
Or that we have angel/archangel in a pivotal role, despite he was 20 years old in last stand?
>>78150779
Time travel i aint gotta explain shit
>>78150779
Time travel causes strange problems.
>>78150779
First Class was such and embarassing wreck of a pile of plot holes.
Hair acts as a poor transceiver and receiver of physic transmissions. Jean is actually wearing a wig while Emma's wig relating to her prostituting still amounts to the same function
>>78150729
>>so much power I became based
fix'd
>>78150779
They would never make a movie without McAvoy, Fassbender and J. Lawrence after they got 'em once.
It's Hollywood.
>>78150792
First Class was first decent X-men movie ever. Not Wolverine and Some People in Background, just X-men.
And it's his movie was so bad that they needed canonical explanation as to why it never happened.
>>78150803
Lawrence is leaving after this one. Hoult might be leaving as well.
>>78150842
Ratner did X3
>>78150765
>Eisenberg and McAvoy have plenty of hair and their characters are bald.
>Cavill and Fassbender are supposed to have plenty of hair and they are balding.
>>78150850
X3 at least had god tier casting on Beast. X3 has something nice I can say about it.
>>78150842
>Not Wolverine and Some People in Background
This complaint has always been stupid. The first one focuses on Logan, Xavier, Magneto and Rogue. X2 is mostly about Wolverine, but it at least has a plot reason why and JEANNNNNN is a large focus as well. X3 is The Wolverine Show but that movie is also a steaming pile of shit from a different director.
The Wolverine Series meme doesn't have the basis in reality most shitposters seem to think ti does.
Too many baldies ITT
>>78150779
Alternate timelines mofo
>>78150856
You went through the trouble of typing in long form exactly what the post you quoted said, then added an image - just to make it "yours".
How gauche.
>>78150875
>X3 has something nice I can say about it.
You're a disgusting person
>>78150889
>X2 is mostly about Wolverine
>X3 is The Wolverine Show
>X-Men Origins Wolverine
>The Wolverine
>Another Wolverine movie planned
>DofP is more Wolverine
>B-BUT X1 CARED ABOUT ROGUE TOO!!
You got First Class, that's 1 movie out of 7
>>78150764
Just because he's bald? Omg you are fucking a idiot
>>78150779
>Not the fact that we see wolverine in the end of dofp and everyone else all alive and well in the present
This is the stupidiest thing. There's absolutely no interest in seeing this movie as we know all characters survive. Only ones we don't see are Nightcrawler, Angel, Jubilee and Psylocke but who cares about them. The main cast is completely safe.
>>78150779
Time travel changed the timeline you fucking retarded. The Last Stand never happened. In fact, the first two x-men movies problably got retconned too.
>>78150956
No, because McAvoy is playing the character and Eisenberg is playing Max Landis.
>>78150962
>There's absolutely no interest in seeing this movie as we know all characters survive.
The only characters we know survive are Charles, Scott, Jean. Storm, and Hank.
Everyone else can die.
what kinda timeline you want senpai
>>78150772
I still have most of the Swing-King dialogue memorised, that was such a good game.
>>78150962
>Nightcrawler, Angel, Jubilee and Psylocke
You're forgetting about Mystique, Magneto, and Quicksilver and Havok
>>78150889
You just explained how Wolverine is the focus in the old trilogy and then goes to say how Wolverine and Some People doesn't make sense.
You are truly one of a kind.
>>78150979
So Apocalypse are the Adventures of Lawrence and Fassbender?
>>78150992
Kinberg has said he thinks of FC, DOFP, and Apocalypse as a trilogy about them
>>78150962
The events of the other movies never happened.
How many times will this have to be explained? It's not even the same actors, nor the same characters. Deal with it.
Isn't this Angel X3 Angel's Father?
>>78150992
...And Professor X. Yes.
>>78150997
Oh fuck I thought Prof. X's actor was named Lawrence
>>78151010
No and you're retarded.
The amount of /tv/fags here is reaching high levels
>>78150986
Just fuck my shit up
>>78151022
It would make sense though.
>>78150729
>big epic reveal at the end of the trailer is that Prof X is bald
it's not like everyone had been waiting for this for years and this is going to get the normies hype
So absolutely no one in this thread watched First Class when Beast said that he should shave his head before using Cerebro because hair can mess with it?
I bet that he is only bald at the end of the movie.
X-men movies are just promises and cock-teases. It's been two movies without a proper beast and professor X, despite them being the main characters from the hero side.
>FC
No furry beast until third act
No paraplegic X until third act, no bald
>DoFP
Beast is on/off
No paraplegic X until third act, no bald
And still no fucknig proper X-men movie where there's an actual team with the actual characters. These are a huge waste of source material. Not that they're bad movies, really, but such a waste.
>>78151036
Guess what, it did.
>>78151019
Is that even a man's name?
And how could you forget Jennifer Lawrence?
Stay pleb
>>78151033
Oh, totally.
His father used to be Angel and then he grows up to lose his wings and hate mutants because everybody thought his "power" was stupid as fuck.
If you just stopped to think for a little moment, you would see it doesn't make sense in the slightest.
>>78151201
>two movies without a proper beast
Beast has been in all the movies in proeminent roles. It's faggots like you who keeps complaining that we never get to see, you know, other x-men characters in important roles. I'm sick of Beast already.
>>78151292
>His father used to be Angel and then he grows up to lose his wings and hate mutants because everybody thought his "power" was stupid as fuck.
>If you just stopped to think for a little moment, you would see it doesn't make sense in the slightest.
No you dolt, I mean that the different environmental changes due to changing the timeline activated HIS X-Gene. Since it's carried by the father/
>>78151292
>thinking that X-3 still happens
Did DOFP not spell it out enough for you?
>>78151315
>Beast
>in X1 and X2
Did you even watch them or are your vocal chords located next to your colon?
>>78151316
Oh my god, you're even more autistic that I ever gave you credit for.
And how the hell did he LOST his wings, forgot everything about Xavier's, and hates mutants?
Or your headcanon didn't go that far?
>>78151315
I agree that Hank is there too much, but he is never really the beast, which is even more annoying. He's stealing precious screentime doing fuck all, at least make him look/do something interesting.
DALE
>>78151342
>And how the hell did he LOST his wings, forgot everything about Xavier's, and hates mutants?
Why are you bringing up X3? New timeline.
>>78151330
I'm not the one who thinks that X3 happened here. Read the fucking posts.
>>78151340
It's official. You're all retarded.
So because he wasn't in X1 and X2, his important roles in all other subsequent movies don't count? Okay.
>>78150765
Superman has always had a high hairline.
>>78151357
I'm that anon, and I don't think X-3 happened.
I just said that due to the timeline changes, it makes sense to have his father activate as Angel.
You're the one who's bringing up X3
>>78151348
Why are YOU bringing X3 talking about the old Angel and Angel's father? Fucking autist.
>Guy says something that doesn't make sense
>Explains to him why that would never work, even though i'm entering autistic territory arguing with a retarded
>Realizes his bullshit and goes "why are you bringing that up?" when it was the retarded who brought it up
10/10 made me reply
>>78151370
If the timeline changed.... why.... the fuck..... do you have to connect this Angel to the old Angel.... if the old one never existed........
High levels of autism. I recommend you take your pills.
>>78151387
Because X3 "happened" and Angel had a father in it.
It's not like Angel just poofed into existence.
Mentioning Angel's father doesn't mean I'm talking about "lol how does he lose wings and make cure" that's the plot of X3. I'm merely talking about taking an element and making it work in the past.
>>78151401
>if the old one never existed
So you DO think Angel poofed into existence?
>>78151401
Like.... woah... dude...
>>78151357
What the fuck are you talking about?
You said Beast is in all the movies in prominent roles. He was never in the first or second. Put the pot down and think very carefully about the conversation transpiring here.
I love that at any given time on /co/ you can find someone getting btfo and arguing with everyone else in the thread about it. If everyone else is telling you you're wrong, maybe think about what you're saying instead of replying to each individual post.
>>78151455
We're onto you anon
>>78150970
It's kind of amazing how Fox managed to turn the movie continuity into just as much a mess as the comics in less than a quarter of the time.
>>78150962
>whether people die is the only thing that matters
I don't understand your mentality. It's about showing some of the adventures that got them to the future scene. The "how" not the "what"
>>78150741
Well in Akira, the more power you have the whiter your hair gets
>>78152108
Same thing in dragonball, until it goes dark again, and then white. Never mind, convoluted example
>>78150973
go to bed max landis
>>78151280
Laurence Fishburne. Granted that's with a u and not a w.
>>78150889
You must be a really stubborn bastard. All those times you typed the word Wolverine should've made you rethink your stance, yet you still refuse to concede.
>>78151656
But the movie continuity is actually quite clean. Considering it involved time travel, DOFP managed to keep everything surprisingly consistent.
Old timeline:
>X-Men: First Class
>X-Men
>X2: X-Men United
>X-Men: The Last Stand
>Future Parts of DOFP
New Timeline:
>X-Men: First Class
>Past Parts of DOFP
>X-Men: Apocalypse
>>78152341
Eh, there's a lot of convolution because of Origins/First class, since DoFP only changed history from the 70's on, but I guess no one really cares.
Isn't he bald because the kryptonite he always carries around gave him cancer?
>>78152341
A bunch of black guys asked me and my friends how the new timeline works after the movie.
>>78150962
So what, you go into an Iron Man film expecting Iron Man to die? Are you going to refuse to see BvS because you know that Superman, Batman, and Wonder Woman are going to be fine?
>>78152341
>Future Parts of DOFP
Does this include the epilogue where Wolverine wakes up and everything is perfect? Because that seems to take place in the New Timeline.
>>78152341
Where will Deadpool fit in?
>>78153094
I want to call you stupid for not watching the movie, but to be honest I don't think they are going in that direction anymore, no, if only because Colossus looks so different in Deadpool.
But who the fuck knows, FOX doesn't really give a shit about continuity.
>>78150779
>>78150962
>>78151004
In which /co/ doesn't understand the scene at the end of DoFP is explicitly meant to retcon X3 out of existence.
>>78153138
>I want to call you stupid for not watching the movie
Then tell me where I went wrong, please. I don't know about Apocalypse but it's pretty obvious going by DoFP that the future Wolverine wakes up in at the end is supposed to be the new one created by preventing the murder of midget Ron Burgundy.
>>78153440
Ignoring Apocalypse for now, DoFP established a new timeline with the FC cast that would eventually end up to a day where the wolverine from X1/2 would wake up with the memories from the future sentinel times (which are the consequence of the X3 timeline).
So the 'good future' part of DoFP would be canon in the FC timeline, and not the X3 timeline (it would be it's alternative).
That's what the whole movie is for (erasing X3, W:O and the future sentinels), hence why calling you stupid for not getting it.
That being said, Deadpool throws this into the cabbages since, assuming it takes place in the new continuity, Colossus in the new continuity is shown to be the same actor from the old one in DoFP, but there's a new one in Deadpool who is much bigger and comic-like.
So either a) it's the same colossus and just looks diferent because the actor/contract expired (think Hulk in the MCU) b) it's actually three timelines (X3/Bad FutureDoFP being one, FC/Past DoFP/Apocalypse/Deafpool another and the split Good Future from DoFP being another one created just to epilogue the movie).
But honestly this is giving it a lot more though than they gave it, so just go with it. There's also two Emma Frosts that the time jump ignores, same for Sabretooth.
>>78150729
>>78153094
This part was fucking horrifying.
The wolverine who had been living in this reset timeline is effectively dead, replaced by the consciousness of original timeline wolverine. Now he has to live with all these people who like his loved one's but share a past with him that he can't remember.
Shit's fucked.
>>78153299
Yes, but it also gives Apocalypse's failure before we even see the movie.
MR. MISTER WORLD WIDE
>>78151346
top lel
>>78153680
>That's what the whole movie is for (erasing X3, W:O and the future sentinels), hence why calling you stupid for not getting it.
You're mistaking me for someone else.
All I'm saying is that the ending of DoFP takes place in the new timeline.
>>78153094
That does indeed take place in the new timeline. I should've specified that the "bad future" scenes are the old timeline.
>>78150729
I originally thought it was Grant Morrison based off the catalog thumb nail. And you know, I don't feel bad for thinking that. He also probably became so powerful that he became bald. And this applies to the first reply too.
>>78154686
I knew that young bald Xavier reminded me of someone!
>>78150729
Well he's gotta become bald somehow.
>>78151201
oh no, movie Beast is going through his comic traumatic arc of transformation. It's so terrible!
>>78155273
I'm not sure if you're mocking me, but he's been going into transformation for 2 movies now, and it'll be the same with apocalypse. Just fucking turn into Frasier already.
>>78152377
You are right, no one cares about Origins, not even Fox
>>78153680
>Deadpool throws this into the cabbages
This is movies, not comics. They don't share 'timelines' or 'universes' they exist independently, as far away as Batman and Ironman and The Sopranos.
>>78153856
underrated post
>>78155486
I thought that Deadpool was the post-DoFP retcon story of the guy from Origins. Also I thought that cinematic Universes were all the rage now, so that we can avoid having an introduction every movie for the weird repeated concepts like 'mutants' and 'healing factor' for the average soccer mom forced to take her 14yo son for a deadpool movie.
>>78151656
I know! That's why I don't even have a problem with the congratulated plot lines. That's the most well adapted part of the series.
>>78151280
>>78152205
Lawrence of Arabia.
>>78155607
That was his last name. But there was Lawrence Welk.
>>78153903
That's the exact situation of Back to the Future's ending too
>>78155544
Fox seperates all their IP because if one reverts it CAN pull other properties with it. Thus FF and X-men are seperate
>>78150729
CHARLES GET OUT IF MY HEAD CHARLES
If the x-men movies feel like badly written fanfiction from somebody who watched the cartoon but didn't read the comics, you're right.
>>78156653
Yeah, but deadpool is part of the X-package contract. Otherwise they'd already lost the rights. They only have two contracts.
>>78156770
Makes sense, if you read the average X-Men thread you'll realize the vast majority only know things based on the cartoons
>>78152295
I am stubborn, one time I corrected my teacher and he didn't want to admit his mistake so I went to the principal and he got fired because I said he touched me in my private parts.
Do you really want to argue about your stupid Wolverine critic with me?
>>78156653
Deadpool and Gambit movies will be part of the XM Universe, also Bryan Singer wanted FF to join, but Fox (wisely) refused.
>>78150729
So what is their excuse for not having Patrick Stewart play Xavier again?
>>78157026
They had DD as well, that got negotiated back, even though it was reverting.
>>78157296
IF deadpool does well they MAY consider making it part of their universe, but I doubt it.
>>78157247
Based on that post? Yeah, I kinda do, just to see what kind of threat you imagine would work on an anonymous imageboard.
>>78157303
It was during 80s so he was still young, unless you want some freaky shit like this. I agree 100% with McAvocado for replaying the role.
>>78150904
>Dragonball Super
>>78157453
Colossus already confirmed, and apparently there will be a another cameo (Wolverine most likely)
>>78157540
They could have just applied some makup on him
His face still looks like he is young.
Eary grey is key to immortality
>>78157545
I thought Gohan lost alot of his strength from focusing on school and his career over training. It's why he's Krillin-tier now.
>>78150945
Honestly Cykefag, you don't have a leg to stand on. You're just going "not muh Fraction/Whedon X-Men" and no one gives a shit.
"WHY IS WOLVERINE IN THE X-MEN MOVIE SERIES???? REEEEEE!"
>>78150849
Good.
I don't hate her but compared to McAvoy and Fassbender she is a fucking terrible actress.
>>78157585
They did it pretty good in Antman, but I guess the budget was bigger too
>>78150849
Fassbender will leave too, unless Fox get a big check for him.
>>78150945
I hate Wolverine too, but honestly DoFP was more focused on Mystique than in Wolvie
>>78157562
could have same character in totally seperate movies. Just cause the same character exists in those two doesn't mean they are connected
100 Push-ups,
100 Sit-ups,
100 Squats
And 10km Running.
EVERY. SINGLE. DAY.
>>78157675
ant man had the lowest budget of all MCU movies
>>78151428
He was on TV in the second movie.
>>78157916
And that was like 20M more than First Class budget, actually all XM has been pretty cheap except for DoFP
>>78157916
Yeah, but I'm sure it was still higher budget than origins. Origins was either done on TV-budget or there was money stealing involved. It looked like shit, even then.
>>78150962
So you're saying that all you care about is the ending, not the journey?
>>78156890
There will never be a good Hitman movie.
:(
>>78150904
Is that actually in a show? If so, what's it called? You got my interest
>>78150729
Why so bald?
>>78152108
The whiteness is your hair dying at the root.
>>78157993
>>78157994
Ant Man looked better through and through, wasn't anything that looked cheep. So, Fox just fucked up. Sure, maybe it has less a budget but they still fucked it up either by bad CGI companies or by not giving enough of a budget
>>78150962
>not caring about nightcrawler
>>78158544
Ant-Man had the benefit of modern ILM. They have also been updating the face compositing from Cap1 and Cap2 (Old Peggy) and that kind of thing for other effects.
Still, Origins is inexcusable.
>>78150729
People often shave their heads as a symbol of transition. Xavier is clearly in a new chapter of his life so he is outwardly displaying that
>>78158649
I'm honestly amazed at how good the effects were for the budget in Ant Man. Especially with the macro photography and 3D and everything. They managed to get Douglas and do all those effects on a really small budget. It still surprises me
>>78158803
While impressive, I don't think that the shrinking effects would be very expensive. All you really need to do is a lot of planing and shoot simple stuff with a macro lens. Hard, sure, but since everything is a bit slowed down it could always be shot again to better match. Everything else it's just a big green screen.
The ANTS did look amazing, though, and so did little things like the mouse in the sewers and shooting the paper building. Those are considerably more expensive.
If anything it was very very very well managed. And to think it was a salvage mission after Edgar Wright, too. From what I've read about his script it wasn't even as good as it turned out to be, he wanted a lot of weird things.and reduce a lot of the character's parts.
>>78158986
Macrophotography can be expensive, but maybe not in the realm of things of this movie. shrinking effects are not expensive, it was the stuff like bathtub scene that would have been.
But you are right, I think they threw all the best people at this movie to salvage it after Wright left. Wrights script would have really raped the characters, in not in a Joro way, in a bad way. It was a muricule it turned out so well
