>>78123962
That is some awful taste in titles.

>>78123993
then give a better example, shitter

I remember this shit list from yesterday. It's still shit.

>>78123962
Man that is a huge list. Do you really pick up all of these comics monthly?

>>78124970
I like you.

>>78124970
I've downloaded them when they first came out. if it was not good i did not return for the next issue

>>78124866
Yesterday's list was similar.

>>78123962

> Amazing ... Hulk

Dude what a terrible taste.

>>78126169
its great so far desu

>>78126117
No, it was exactly the same. I know this because I'm the one that corrected it

>>78123962
>Great
Vision

>Mediocre to bad
Everything else

There, fixed your list.

Haven't read as much as you OP but here goes

>amazing
Vision

>good enough to follow
Hulk
Karnak
Hawkeye
Daredevil
Extraordinary and all new
Carnage
Herc
Deadpool
Ms marvel
New avengers
Illuminati
Ultimates
Inhumans books
Venom
Silk
Wolverine

Probably gonna drop Howard. Considering dropping extraordinary, but I'll probably stick around through apoc wars. Wolverine is on the bubble as well

>>78130857
Throw uncanny avengers under good as well

Is Silk's book still going? I can't find anything of her after the issue in September

>>78131101
yeah, the first issue of the new (same) volume is already out. second one is coming out on wednesday

>>78131160
I just looked at the Win'O
Why did they set it back to #1?

>>78123962
Karnak has only had one issue and nothing really even happened. What about that could have possibly popped that much?

Howling Commandos might be the stealth great book,

>>78131184
Because they set everything back to #1. When they did the Marvel NOW relaunch which had almost everything get set back to #1 with a handful that didn't, the handful that didn't plummeted in sales numbers fast. Most of them, at least.

>>78131184
>>78131294
what he said. just checked amazon and the trades of silk's and gwen's first series are published as volume 0. that's kinda dumb