Is she a furry?
>>77734776
No, she's a rabbitsexual
>>77734776
Yep, but do you really want to have this thread again and so soon?
>>77734776
No, I said she was fucking Goofy
No she's into bestiality.
>>77734776
Her husband is a fucking rabbit. What do you think?
>>77735690
human cocks just weren't doing it for her anymore
>>77735424
When the character is sapient, it's not bestality. The word you are looking for is xenophile. Which also doesn't really count since both of them are living cartoon characters.
>>77734776
zoophile
>>77735708
Being a rabbit Roger probably can fuck like 9 times a day with little effort. No human can keep up with that.
>>77735744
being a rabbit he'd probably impregnate her 9 times more than a human too
Jessica Rabbit thread?
>>77734776
The better question is "Is she yiffy?"
>>77735804
yeah, just post it.
Okay what I really meant was "Jessica Rabbit cheesecake thread?"
>>77735719
Captain Kirk is a xenophile. Jes is a zoophile. Although maybe she is also a xenophile.
>>77734776
No, Roger was a furry. You could say that Jessica was into furry stuff but it was clearly that she had a fetish for humor.
>>77734776
She would be way sexier if she was actually a rabbit
>>77734776
is she human? or is she dancer?
>>77735910
In a cartoon world it shouldn't be a problem to find someone else with a good sense of humor
>>77735719
>this is what bronies actually believe
>>77735744
>>77735801
Toons don't have sex only kiss like you see in the movie. That is canon. Jessica is in a nearly alone in the hot girl toon world. Only the Disney princesses and Betty book. Toons are drawn.
honestly does it really matter if she was a furry
They're both sentient cartoons, shouldn't that be a new category all on it's own
>>77736044
they could just draw those parts
>>77736044
But surely she COULD fuck. She knew what she was doing to Eddy.
>>77736163
... Go on...
>>77736204
Well, I think I can only post this one with some sidebutt in it here. Worksafe board.
If I'm remembering Cool World correctly, cartoons can and do have lots of perverted id-inspired sex with each other, but their vaginas are like, cursed by god or something? So they only do anal and oral, but even objects like toasters can consent.
I think that was the moral of that movie anyway...
>>77736324
That movie didn't have a moral or make a damn bit of sense and you know it.
>>77736257
Copy all the nsfw gifs on your smartphone. Disable wifi from the phone. Open this thread in private mode. Post the gifs. Get your phone's ip banned. Activate airplane mode for a minute or so, then deactivate it to get a new ip.
>>77736364
Or I could NOT be a rules-breaking asshole and just post all four in /r/ and link that.
>>>/r/13977590
>>77736000
I think that the problem for her was that for cartoon standards she was the undesirable one. For humans it was "what does she sees on Roger" while for cartoons it was the other way around.
>>77736389
Holy disappointment Batman.
>>77736434
Well, he's REALLY funny, or at least in-universe he is. She only gets the occasional laugh through awkward sex situations, like when she had that trap in her cleavage.
>>77736324
>Cool World
Saxy Ship of Saxy.
>>77736434
so what does HE see in her? she has no personality at all
>>77736606
The inherent comedy of a doofy rabbit being with a sexy beautiful woman?
Also, she's a good singer. His ears are huge.
>>77736389
>Or I could NOT be a rules-breaking asshole
Pfft, I guess
>>77736665
She's insanely good at patty cake
>>77736721
Lewd!
>>77736044
Funny thing that it the book it's heavily implied (if not confirmed) that Jessica did do some porn in her younger days.
>>77736606
She makes him carrot cakes and seems to be a very loyal, loving waifu.
>>77737027
Like, posing naked porn, or porn porn?
>>77738016
She was in Tijuana Bibles so porn porn.
>>77738771
That's stupid as shit.
The movie all but outright says that Patty-cake is the toon version of sex
>>77739053
>taking a joke literally
Also the book and the movie are very different. They're comic strip characters and not cartoons, for one.
>>77739053
>this autism
Chris-chan, is that you?
>>77739053
Which would probably mean something if I were talking about the film and not the book that came out about seven or eight years earlier.
>>77734776
she would fuck anything that had the ability to make people laugh. she more than likely was depressed and therefore sought out men who were humorous
>>77739539
the original book which came out before the movie is different it was dark shit.
>>77739609
Exactly, Roger was actually a terrible person in the book.
>>77736700
Huh... I like these
>>77735882
Zoophile are people into animals. Anthro animals are not the same thing. Mind you humans are technically animals. But what separates us is the fact we are sapient.
>>77736097
But they never were drawn, and therefore never had those parts to begin with. It's a common Toon trope.
