>My editor-in-chief, Hannah Means-Shannon, pointed out to me that the Gwen Stacy of the title Spider-Gwen was a teenager, rather than the twenty-something character we had left back in the seventies, something I think I’d failed to pick up on.
Remember when people used to read comics before making up facts and assuming?
http://www.bleedingcool.com/2015/04/09/robbi-rodriguez-on-frank-chos-spider-gwen/
A women with a hyphenated name is upset. Shocking.
>>71120844
Don't like three people from /co/ post on Bleeding Cool boards? Xenos, El Poocho Magnifico, and I think someone else?
Maybe one of them can point that page out to Rich and Hannah
Spider-Gwen is less than 90 pages long so far. Can none of these writers for news stories bother to read it in 15 minutes?
>>71120844
So if she is underage and this is supposed to be a title geared towards younger audience then why is she at a bar and being offered a drink by Spider-Pig?Could it be that she is of age and people are just trying to find an excuse to call sexism, no shock there
>>71121004
anon you presume that journalists of this day and age actually do their own research when they can just tweet someone else for questions
>>71121007
>then why is she at a bar and being offered a drink by Spider-Pig?
Because men are pigs.
>>71121007
A. People don't bother reading the comic, they just assume I BET SHE'S LIKE 16
B. People are making the readers of these articles think that Gwen is a young teen by lying and hoping to drum up hate.
>>71121033
The fact still stands she was allowed in a bar without being carded. If this book is trying to appeal to a younger female audience then alcohol may be something to stay away from
Wait, so "Hannah" means "Shannon" now?
Fuck, and I thought Hannah not being a boy's name was confusing enough.
>>71121071
This book is for teenage girls. Who need to be treated like infants until you tell them not to do something, at which point they're totally adult.
So she's a teen in Spider-Gwen?
>>71121055
>Ladies and Gentlement the wonderful world of feminism
skewing the facts to make it so you can never be the villain
>>71121092
If it's for teenage girls, then there is no problem. If it's for young children then I would blame the writer and artist for having a bar scene. I still wouldn't blame Cho because Cho wasn't even distributing the art for sale it was a fan drawn piece
>>71120844
Isn't she in high school though? The comic wasn't super clear about this, but I guess Peter dying happened years before the story?
Let's assume Gwen got into the bar without being card (something in NYC that never happens), Gwen is in college as Captain Stacy said so she at least 19-20. Sure 19 years old is a teenager but she's older than 18 so she's legally an adult. Gwen could be a porn star or stripper if she wanted at 18.
My point is 19 is an adult. So why are all these sites acting like Gwen is 15 years old?
>>71121130
I think people assume she's a teen because of the first Spider-Gwen comic where the recap took place in high school, I think.
Also isn't Randy Robertson in this universe the same age as Gwen, MJ, Glory, and Sha Shan? Why is he in a bar if people think Gwen's a teen?
The best part of this is that the Bleeding Cool guy comes here so maybe he'll add a correction note at the bottom about her being 21+ when he sees this thread (without actually crediting us, as usual).
![XS5LK[1].gif](https://i.imgur.com/45V2Oe5.gif "XS5LK[1].gif")
>>71121090
>Fuck, and I thought Hannah not being a boy's name was confusing enough.
>>71121214
Because she not a teen and every bar in NYC cards at the door.
>>71120844
>"Em Jay"
Well, I'm out. That's fucking retarded.
Also, is it just me, or was no one actually acknowledging Spider-Ham?
>>71121179
Because Gwen is a white woman.
>>71121236
Not if you're a whore, which Gwen Stacy is.
>>71121246
>Also, is it just me, or was no one actually acknowledging Spider-Ham?
it's in Gwen's head
see? /co/ doesn't read comics either
>>71121246
She was hallucinating Spider-Ham
>>71121246
I've never read it, and I figured thats what he was.
Cause a pig in a spider costume seems dumb as fuck.
>>71120844
Is she hallucinating spider-pig
>>71121273
This one is a hallucination, but there's a real Spider-Ham, and he played an important role in Spider-Verse, which is where Gwen met him.
>>71121214
Honestly, I assumed that she was meant to be a teen as well. I thought the band breaking up, that we saw in her original comic, was during an audition for some school dance. Which Back to the Future has led me to believe is a thing in America.
>>71121090
>and I thought Hannah not being a boy's name was confusing enough
I GET IT
>>71121264
Sorry, I haven't picked this up at my local store. This is literally the first page I've read of it, and OPs comment about the article was what drew me in.
![3e3[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/pbV0yH1.jpg "3e3[1].jpg")
>>71121273
>Cause a pig in a spider costume seems dumb as fuck.
>>71121297
In the first comic we're told she's been in college and her Dad keeps asking her to finish.
If writers would just even read the first couple pages. FUCK.
>>71121297
It's not a real thing in real life. Some schools get DJs but others just get someone to put a mix together on their iPod and let it play (though usually a teacher combs through to make sure it's the radio versions). But it is a thing on TV.
HERE, CAPTAIN STACY SAYS THAT GWEN ISN'T IN HIGH SCHOOL ANYMORE AND SHOULD FOCUS ON COLLEGE
SOURCE: EDGE OF SPIDER-VERSE #2
>>71121315
OOPSE MY BAD. Robbi. Deleting tweet and remaking
>>71121317
It's been storytimed here at least 2 a week in full.
>>71120844
>Linking Bleeding Cool
Stop
https://archive.today/V7jmk
Anyways, Robbi is a drama whore looking for attention once he realized how stupid he looked. News at 11
>>71121365
Oh good, I went and deleted my post because you did as well.
>>71120844
>clickbait site clickbaiting
I, for one, am shocked and appalled that this could possibly happen. Next you'll be telling me that the X-Men were going to be put in a different universe.
>>71121282
>stupid
How?
![brainproblems[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/jMQCptE.png "brainproblems[1].png")
>>71121340
>>71121362
Whelp, I guess I was misremembering. Although I don't understand how the American education system works anyway. You go to college, without choosing what you want to study...and then you just not say what you're studying for a while until your parents complain that you haven't 'declared'?
>>71121340
It doesn't matter because they aren't writing for people that read comics. They want to make up what they need to be true, just to drum up support for their "progressive" movement and will never back down when facts are revealed.
Because even if they are 100% wrong, it's important someone brings attention to these imaginary crimes.
>>71121424
>Whelp, I guess I was misremembering.
That's okay, so did the people who complained about Cho's cover by claiming Gwen was underage
>>71120844
Sound like an excuse to get mad. There's no real meat to this controversy (just like there was nothing to the original Spider-Woman cover) so Rodriguez is just insinuating that Cho's a pedo (even though 16 is legal in some states).
But hey, we've must be careful never to laugh at ourselves lest we have a sense of humility. We must be as uptight as possible at all time.
>>71121282
>Anyways, Cho is a drama whore looking for attention once he realized how stupid he looked. News at 11
Frank Cho came out of this looking golden. He gave no fucks which is the only way to defeat a SJW.
Robbi Rodriguez on the other hand came out looking like a fool. His threat to Cho and his comparison of Gwen to his daughter made it clear that he is the worst type of SJW/fanboy.
He sounded like Chris Chan.
>>71121443
But it is perfectly fine for high school cheerleading uniforms and competitions and car washes
>>71121470
>>71121400
That anon named the wrong person, as you can see in >>71121365
>>71121424
You have 2 years to decide your major. So Gwen could be 20 or 21.
>>71121236
Maybe they just carded Spider-Ham.
>>71121424
The way it works is that there are general classes you have to take for every major anyway (things like 2 semesters of a lab science, 2 semesters of a history class, etc) and then you begin to take the specialized ones once you pick a major.
>>71121179
>My point is 19 is an adult.
Sexist pig! 19 is an impressionable and innocent age. She probably doesn't even know about the birds and the bees yet. And that sexist monster Frank Cho is *choke* drawing lewd pictures of her but.
>>71121479
Oh fuck. Good post. Why doesn't anyone ever complain about this? Instead America complains about comic covers.
![protectedimage[1].php.jpg](https://i.imgur.com/MgOQ4Ya.jpg "protectedimage[1].php.jpg")
>>71121479
Hey, those girls worked very hard on their car washing. Now I for one am going to be a gentleman about it, and go over there and congratulate each of them personally.
The writer himself already gave an approximate age for her.
Dunno why no one...I dunno...asked?
>>71120908
>Xenos
>post on Bleeding Cool boards
Why am I not surprised?
>>71121362
Here, just send this panel to anyone who has been claiming that Gwen is underage in the last week. Unless she's a teen prodigy I think we can safely say that she's college student age.
>>71121581
Why clarify when you can feign anger for no reason?
>>71121479
Why do we care how old Gwen is in the comic?
If she was underage does it magically mean that Cho is a pedo or something? It is obvious Cho was drawing an adult.
I think this is just a typical SJW debating tactic, attacking the character of the person by implying he is a member of an unsavory group.
I'm suprised none of the usual suspects have tried to claim that Cho is a Conservative, Libertarian, Egalitarian, Athiest, Nazi, MRA, Red Piller, Gamer Gater, Sad Puppy yet.
>>71121519
>Sir. Sir. Sir! I need to see some form of identification.
>I can't do that.
>Oh, just because you're some kind of superhero, you think you can hide behind that mask?
>No it-
>Look buddy. For all I know you're a thirteen year old kid under there.
>Yeah I ge-
>And I don't wanna be losing my job by letting a minor in here. Even if they are a masked superhero.
>Okay I unde-
>So either you gotta show me an ID, or I can't let you in
>Just wai-
>Look, I'll even let you pass with an Avengers card. That usually has your age on it. It'll do.
>Yeah oka-
>Come on man, don't make me throw you out. So you gonna give me your ID or what?
>I'm a fucking pig you moron.
>>71121581
>>71121608
Here's all the proof anyone needs that she is of age, however it shouldn't be required as it is a standard Spider-Man pose she is in to begin with
So how old IS she?
She's ATLEAST 17 unless she graduated High School under 17. I don't buy the bar as indicative of much since it could've been a restaurant with a bar.
>>71121424
I think the idea is you go with a vague idea of what you want and then things become concrete usually by Sophmore Year
>>71121365
>Deleting tweet
>>71121470
>Looking Golden
Nah, SJWs still think he's a dick and anyone who hated them was probably going to like him to begin with.
Robbi sounds like an uptight prude to me but there are apparently people that agree that Comic men have to be on their best behavior not to alienate ladies or kids in comics even if it's a private sketch on their own site.
Like the dude who drew this needs to reign it in or he might seriously scare off prospective women readers.
>>71121581
There we go.
Thanks Jay, you've been a saint in all this.
So...whats happened exactly?
>>71121581
Fucking disgusting. Having a 19 year old in skin tight pants. SHES JUST A KID.
On a serious note, Latour gives no fucks about any of this. Why Robbi is making it into a big deal in beyond me.
>>71121650
>Why do we care how old Gwen is in the comic?
Because some people bring it up as a reason to take a shot at Cho. And that Bleeding Cool article brought it up as well. If they didn't like the cover it's one thing. Creating fake reasons to complain is another.
>>71121674
>SJWs still think he's a dick
1) No surprise
2) That's sexist
![original[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/hPMquPQ.jpg "original[1].jpg")
>>71121674
>SJWs still think he's a dick
>>71121685
An artist who draws sexy women drew Gwen in the pose of the Spiderwoman cover for a fan and people got mad. Then he told them to fuck off and drew Harley too in that pose. Some mad people tried to claim he was wrong for the Gwen thing for incorrectly saying that she was a teenager and arguing that teenage girls shouldn't be overly sexualized.
>>71121650
Cho draws sexy women and there is nothing SJW's hate more then a beautiful woman. They must all be fat legbeards like them or its sexist.
I wish I was lying.
>>71121674
>Nah, SJWs still think he's a dick and anyone who hated them was probably going to like him to begin with.
>Robbi sounds like an uptight prude to me but there are apparently people that agree that Comic men have to be on their best behavior not to alienate ladies or kids in comics even if it's a private sketch on their own site.
>Like the dude who drew this needs to reign it in or he might seriously scare off prospective women readers.
I don't understand asking people to reign in their personal art, it's theirs to do with as they please and it isn't like it's being sold as an alternative cover. The worst case scenarios is the artist chooses to sell it as a print on their website or at a con and even then it's not like you have to buy it
>>71121236
>every bar in NYC cards at the door.
I have never been carded at a bar in NYC
Anyone know what part of the story Gwen goes and kills The Lizard Peter? It was shown in "previously" on Spider-Gwen #1 but I can't find it
![65402-dear-god-its-beautiful-mugatu-Zmxe[1].gif](https://i.imgur.com/RaHQA9o.gif "65402-dear-god-its-beautiful-mugatu-Zmxe[1].gif")
>>71121754
>Then he told them to fuck off and drew Harley too in that pose.
Holy shit, this is some Bendis level trolling right here.
>>71121688
Because Robbi is drinking the Cam Stew kool-aid.
>>71121806
Edge of Spider-Verse #2.
It's not a big deal. It's one panel really
>>71121801
Are you above age, and look it?
>>71121650
>Why do we care how old Gwen is in the comic?
Part of it is that, yes, it does have to do with how "old" she is meant to be. That is something people still care about greatly. I agree it's functionally pointless in this kind of thing, but there we are.
It's mostly being jumped on here on /co/, though, is because it is, in fact, more useless than usual. Even by the standards being used to criticize the fake cover, those critics are wrong. She is not "an underage teenager." She is a woman in college. It's about people getting worked up about an issue without even having the decency to know basic facts about the issue.
A large part of this seems to be the way we portray ages and so on in art. If a character doesn't look "old enough," they're immediately decried as being underage. Which is silly, because one look at the real world will show you that you get all sorts of body types, sizes, and appearances that make simply telling age from physical appearance a suckers game. I knew an 18 year old in highschool who could've easily passed as a middle schooler, and probably even younger than that too. She looked the same when I met her in college. It was pretty uncanny, I'll admit, and she had crazy asian tiny girl genes, but still.
>>71121779
This is essentially what most level headed people (including other industry artists) have been saying, but of course people actually involved with the argument don't care about being sensible at this point. They just want to be "right"
>>71121806
It was never made, they just made it up for that issue to set stuff up. Maybe at some point they might go back to it.
>>71121843
23, and depends on if I have shaved or not. Even with the fresh shaved baby face I haven't been carded anywhere outside chain restaurants and liquor stores
>>71121806
It never happened yet. There was a 2 page spread about it in Edge of Spiderverse 2.
Spider-verse 2 was just suppose to be 1 comic so they didn't have time to explain her origins. Then Gwen got popular and Marvel gave her a book. Now they have time to explain.
Next issue we find out about the day Peter died.
>>71121801
You have to go to a bar in NYC first.
>>71121650
>It is obvious Cho was drawing an adult.
You blind son! It's obviously an underage girl. Just look at her slender hips and childlike face.
>>71121685
Frank Cho drew a sketch of Spider-Gwen in the Manara pose for fun.
The next day people started bitching on twitter, the Mary Sue wrote an article on it, the artist of Spider-Gwen made a tweet saying "Be lucky you're never around me" and then later went on to say he meant he'd rant at him and went onto rant that Comics are in a boom with women and kids and feels artists like Cho and Campbellwho has actually done real variants for Gwen multiple onesrisk that by keeping in their old cheesecakey ways. He also said he just recently got over being embarrassed to admit he worked in comics.
>>71121806
It doesn't exist we entered mid story.
>>71121742
I'm just saying nothing really changed.
>>71121674
>SJWs still think he's a dick and anyone who hated them was probably going to like him to begin with.
SJW's think every who isn't a member of their clique is a dick. They are a tiny (if very vocal) group and the vast majority of the population either doesn't know who they are or absolutely hates them.
Conservatives hate them, Libertarians hate them, Liberals hate them and Socialists hate them. (actual left wingers really REALLY hate them)
>>71121922
I went to college there. I've been in a lot of places in NYC and bought alcohol without showing my ID
>>71121852
It's sad that they do more generally have reason to complain about female teenage leads being drawn too sexy, but they ruin it by lumping in stuff like this that doesn't even apply and weakens their argument.
>>71121923
Looks kinda like Emma Stone to me.
>>71121923
You know that cheek bone structure and body type I would say she looks about 22-24 in that picture.
However how much you want to bet that Robbi will find a way to de-age Gwen in the comics so he can be right?
>>71122008
Looks like every other Frank Cho woman to me.
I think the real question here is: does Gwen put out easy?
>>71121951
Isn't it massively sexist to assume that cheesecake exists for the guys?
You know, the character is going to be drawn the same anyway. You can call them underaged or you can call them fifty billion years old, it doesn't really make any difference. Pretty silly to get upset on that basis.
Even if she was underaged in the series you could just say that that cover is set in the future in the setting, it would be drawn the same way. Getting upset over that is like people who watch an animated movie and complain that it's unrealistic. Yes, fish can't actually talk, but this is a movie about talking fish. Ya know?
>>71121960
SJWs have a strict ruling list they like to follow
>>71121951
>the artist of Spider-Gwen made a tweet saying "Be lucky you're never around me"
I wouldn't want to be near the Joker either.
PLEASE STOP SEXUALIZING MARVEL FEMALES
![DeFloweringGwen1[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/iRrG5dJ.jpg "DeFloweringGwen1[1].jpg")
>>71122038
I think we all know the answer to that.
>>71122118
Oh man, what a faggot.
>>71122052
The people who get mad at this stuff won't agree with you because they extrapolate things into real life. You can't go around talking about how pre-college aged girls "look old enough" for obvious reasons.
>>71121688
Because Robbi is an effeminate gay man which is one step away from being a woman.
>>71122132
That's not canon.
>>71122043
Honestly, while women might enjoy it, since many actually do cheesecake, let's face the facts: It's mostly made for men, and you know what? So what? Why would we have to be ashamed of that shit? Girls schlick all the time to Dr Who or the Supernatural guys or whatever, and many female artists love to draw some yaoi stuff and beefcake and such and no one shames them for it because there's no reason. Shaming people for their sexualities is fucking stupid. Might as well start stoning the gays if we go for that route again.
>>71122118
The dumbass said "your" in that tweet twice. Not sure why I expect decent grammar on twitter of all places.
>>71121951
>rant at him
Is that a threat? Is this what white Americans consider a threat?
what the fuck?
>>71122124
yes, I mean men get all the powerful poses right?
![goblin-gwen_480x480[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/4791nHg.jpg "goblin-gwen_480x480[1].jpg")
>>71122169
Oh but it is.
>>71121951
>He also said he just recently got over being embarrassed to admit he worked in comics.
What a fucking asshole. He has way too much pride for a guy who looks like a literal clown.
>>71122181
No it's just him backpeddling when people started giving him shit for threatening someone with physical violence
>>71122195
>bringing Dick into this
Okay, you've gone nuclear when there's only been a volley of insults so far. You can't just pull out Dick that early on.
>>71122202
Come on anon, I love Spider-man but this was such a forced plot mechanic and I would like to move past it
>>71122177
I'm almost entirely certain it was due to the character limit.
Which is really just another example of how, out of all the fucking terrible ways there is to argue about shit on the internet, Twitter is the worst.
>>71122195
Now this thread is going places
>>71122038
>>71121674
>Like the dude who drew this needs to reign it in or he might seriously scare off prospective women readers.
>dude
That's based Sara Pichelli.
>>71120844
HAH!
He said nom nom nom! He's so like us.
>>71122268
I love that Grayson having the most beautiful man ass is canon in universe too
>>71120844
Wasn't MJ a supermodel and an actress?
![jackal3[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/V7mEh0R.jpg "jackal3[1].jpg")
>>71122249
I'm just saying, she does have a thing for older men. Much older men.
>>71122327
Not in the Spider-Gwen universe
>>71122285
I think that's the point, friend
>>71122240
Better to pull Dick out early and silence everyone than letting things escalate.
>>71122263
>Here's my take on the frank cho sketch cover. Your drawing dirty pics of one of my kids. Be lucky your never around me. #spidergwen
131 chars, guy's lazy, like most of twitter. Agreed about the arguing though, you can't say shit in 140 chars.
>>71122195
Why are female heroes always in those slutty poses while guys aren't? Sexist men!
>>71122249
It's still canon. They had a chance to make it noncanon after OMD, but chose not to and used the Goblin Twins in the American Son arc.
>>71120844
Well his editor should have caught up to this before it was published, since she had to OK this before it saw print.
Proof that Marvel editors don't do shit.
>>71121650
>Why do we care how old Gwen is in the comic?
Because of tweets like this in the past week.
https://twitter.com/xCriFlorx/status/585457277026467841
https://twitter.com/akhirschy/status/585152265192923137
https://twitter.com/TheRealChoch/status/585122629889236992
https://twitter.com/Ceilidhann/status/585104330858098689
https://twitter.com/gregthelen/status/585144863563223040
https://twitter.com/gregthelen/status/586192890625335297
I'm pretty sure there were others.
>>71122181
Every ones gotten super touchy.
Personally, no I don't think it was a threat.
I didn't think it was anything but empty posturing just Robbi being an internet tough guy and didn't have any plans to hurt or even talk to Cho if he really met him.
>>71122175
I guess so but at the same time it's not as if men and women can't appreciate well executed Beef or Cheese cake for reasons other than "I jerk/schlick off to this"
Or atleast I used to think that but I'm starting to think I'm started to get legit turned on by this stuff.
>Saw Twitter fight saying there are a lot of cheesecake artists but few notable beefcake artists
>The only one named was some crappy porn guy
>Wanted desperately to log in and name off a few I think are goodand say if Cho applied himself he could be a really good beefcake artist too he's got the human anatomy down he could make a hot dude if he bothered to make their faces more handsome
>>71122285
>They put this on an all ages book
>>71122406
But what if it does. Then Dick is already exposed, you've got other options but none of it really compares to some good Dick.
>>71122528
Yeah I know, I am more than willing to accept her death on the bridge, even if it was very hurtful but the rape/not rape thing really still irks me to this day
>>71122544
It doesn't matter how old Gwen is in the comic. These people see what they want to see. Like how they saw Falcon forcing himself on an eight year old in based Remender Cap.
>>71122467
>no bulge
Did they even try?
>>71122538
Hannah is editor of Bleeding Cool, not Marvel. Op was quoting Rich Johnston, who usually goes to /co/.
>>71122342
Really? It's a different universe? What is she in this one?
>>71122544
Do you think they care that she's about 19 or is it still too gross? I mean Cho is still in his 40s.
>>71122611
College Student and Gwen's bandmate
>>71122544
Research in the modern day internet, ladies and Gentlemen!
>>71122552
>Then Dick is already exposed, you've got other options but none of it really compares to some good Dick.
If it's a good Dick then you don't need other options.
>>71121553
Kek.
>>71121688
Because he's a beta faggot.
>>71122552
She has freakishly big hand.
Both Coipel and Romita have done some of their most rushed work for this mini.
>>71122637
I would've been okay with them not liking the cover. I just think it's bullshit they didn't bother to look it up and started making up accusations.
>>71122637
>I mean Cho is still in his 40s.
So Dean Yeagle is in his 60s. Making pretty ladies has no age limit
>>71122070
Northern Ireland fag here. This is pretty much spot on; it's how kids are/were pulled into the paramilitary groups, on both sides.
Obviously some (actually quite a few considering) people would have a genuine grievance with 'the other side', but quite often it was/is a case of 'Here, you don't want your wee ol' mam to be beaten up by those bastards, do you? And did you hear about the bombing/shooting last week? Killed two kids, the bastards'.
They reinforce the idea that there's some innate, deep down in the bones difference between 'us' and 'them', and to be friends, or even kind to 'them' would be cats and dogs living together. 'They' are the enemy. 'They' want to kill your mum. 'They' killed some of 'us' the other day.
That's nailed into you day after day, until finally, you believe it, and you're the one telling some kid that their next door neighbour, some ninety year old man who never hurt a fly, is the enemy, and should be shot.
Showing a sign of weakness, of doubt, is like blood in shark infested water. After all, you're either with us, or you're against us. So eventually you'll be turning on your best friend, just because they're not as stanche in their belief as you, even if you don't believe it yourself. It's all about keeping up appearances. You might think it's all nonsense, but you can't let on, because then you'll be the one on the chopping block.
The IRA and UVF and everything in between may be bastards, and believe me, they were, but at least they were out in the open. I dunno how else to put it; you knew it was out there, and you knew it was happening around you, but you wouldn't realise it was working on you. With the SJW crowd, it's all done in the shadows. It's not obvious, and it's all lies and half truths, and you're told that it's good, because hey, you don't want to be a racist do you?
You're not an oppressor, are you? You're not one of them, are you?
>>71121674
>Like the dude who drew this needs to reign it in or he might seriously scare off prospective women readers.
They can fuck off then? Any woman who gets offended by Cho's art or that pose isn't really worth their weight in ham.
>>71122195
>>71122467
>Jim or Juan co/ ?
>>71122763
>Making pretty ladies has no age limit
it is when you are 24 and want to draw 15 yea olds
I wish I lived in grorious nippon
>>71121674
>>71122285
Can we just get Robbi off the book and replace him with Sara or the girl from DC drawing Supergirl?
>>71122818
I meant for the artist.
>>71122814
>jim or juan?
>>71122820
>the girl from DC drawing Supergirl
She's on Starfire after Convergence.
>>71122859
I am hoping that book will be at least deent
>>71122774
>Northern Ireland fag here
Go home, you're drunk.
>>71122859
Damnit. Can Marvel borrow her?
>>71122658
Yeah good Dick usually does the trick but sometimes they want more than just Dick. And if you start off with Dick then you've got nothing to build to. Building up to Dick is usually the way to go
>>71122820
I'd love if Sara took over but it's Robbi's book even if he's a shitty person he shouldn't be booted off the book.
Let him get kicked off on his own.
Then ask for Pichelli.
>>71122845
>I meant for the artist.
my point still applies
>>71120844
age of consent in new york is 17, with special stipulations that 14 year olds can have sex with people no more than 4 years older than they are. so i don't really see what the big fuss is about.
>>71122820
No. I'd rather have Sara be in better projects than the blandness that is Spider-Gwen.
>>71122915
>that art
Holy fuck. Who is that artist.
![HatB_-_Wade_Boggs'_misfortune[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/pvFTCUD.png "HatB_-_Wade_Boggs'_misfortune[1].png")
>>71122908
Don't tell me how to live my life dad!
>>71122763
>>71122845
no making pretty ladies doesn't but I can see SJWs arguing it as a reason why these men aren't allowed to draw woman of specific age range
>>71122915
Anon you can't forget we have Dick and we have Delicious Spider-Butt
>>71122954
You can still do it anon, unless you live in a country that literally will arrest you for doing so.
Websites simply are not obligated to host it, though.
>>71122942
Someone's researched this huh?
>>71122954
Pichelli
>>71122989
Yeah, I googled "age of consent in new york" and it was the first thing to pop up. That was very tiring research.
>>71122954
Thats the artist from Ultimate Comics Spider-Man her name is Pichelli. Her art is quite awesome when she puts the effort into it
>>71122954
Sara Pichelli
>>71122989
>not having near-encyclopedic knowledge of New York consent law from watching SVU for 10+ years
It's okay for Peter to be naked and being watched by a by nympho but make a Spider-Female crawl and pose like Peter and it's disgusting.
>>71123047
she's literally a 16 year old showing her brown panties
>>71123107
They weren't brown when she put them on ;)
>>71121179
>My point is 19 is an adult. So why are all these sites acting like Gwen is 15 years old?
Smear job on Cho for not towing the SJW line
>>71123128
honestly though I wish the colorist had the balls to paint them white or something
>>71123091
>clearly anon you don't get it, men are never sexually degraded, woman are the victims and should never be he victims
You won't hear anyone complain about Grayson working out in his underwear either
>>71123091
look at those sweet bra-less titties
>>71123182
Well, yeah, she wears nothing but . . . Silk.
>>71123091
The way she's hanging upside down is incredibly sexualised. She's got her hands between her thighs, spread open, right in front of Peter. What, she just finds this the most comfortable way to sit? Splayed, on show for th male gaze?
And again in the next panel! She's laying back, her legs spread! Disgusting. And then she's just lounging there, her ass on display, up in the air as if she's in some misognistic advertisement! Whoever drew this is a shitlord and deserves to be shot at dawn. No last cigerette.
All joking aside, do the spider powers also come with the desire, compulsion and indeed, tolerance for these fucked up poses? Every spider related hero is always hanging upside down, standing on two different walls at once, or whatever. You'd think it'd be uncomfortable, but they treat it like falling back into a big comfy chair
>>71121179
>So why are all these sites acting like Gwen is 15 years old?
Which other sites? I know there's some tweets where it was clear none of them read the comics.
>>71123182
I'm actually impressed. Those are some well-drawn breasts. They have realistic weight and movement. Most artists are lazy and just draw balloons.
Just so we're clear, Robbie recolored MayDay Parker and added a hood that could have been drawn by a five year old on a character that is older than he is and is claiming ownership over it?
![Leda_-_after_Michelangelo_Buonarroti[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/YxABtSh.jpg "Leda_-_after_Michelangelo_Buonarroti[1].jpg")
Look at this disgusting piece of shit. I bet Cho drew this. We should burn it, for sexualising an underage girl, and her childhood companion, her family swan. These sick bastards. I bet she loved that swan in a totally platonic way, and some sick, misognisit cis-pig needed some jerk off material, so he painted this.
>>71123266
Well it is Sara Pichelli a female aritst, if anyone knows how to draw breasts I bet it would be a female who has them
>>71121674
>Nah, SJWs still think he's a dick and anyone who hated them was probably going to like him to begin with.
And Cho increased his support from his supporters while making his detractors look like a bunch of whiny kids
>>71123303
This is accurate.
>>71123354
That's not Pichelli, you doofus. It's Oliver Coipel.
>>71123303
Yep. There seems to be this weird view of ownership this new incoming group of creators have. CamStew is the same way about Babs.
>>71121090>tfw still hope that one day it may update
>>71123400
Oh come on it's not new. See Englehart and Mantis
>>71123395
oops sorry, I followed the link incorrectly and I apologize for my mistake
>>71123400
Eh, CamStew is nowhere near as bad as Robbie is being. CamStew got upset over an official cover (one even the artist didn't like) and rightfulyl pointed out it wasn't going to work with the tone of the book itself as well as send a message counter to the one they are aiming for with that book.
Robbie's getting all twisted up over unofficial art and now people are lying to try and make Cho look bad.
>>71123400
>>71123380
Thank you, I picked up bits and pieces and it's good to have pretty much the whole picture.
>>71123469
No, anon. Your sins will not be purged until you dress on bunny pajamas and walk in front of our 4th grade class.
>>71122118
There was another pic of him before he started at Marvel, and discovered tumblr. He looked normal as fuck.
>>71123452
I'm a bit of a newfag in the sense that I've only peripherally heard of this thing. I know he had (odd) plans for Mantis (and Swordsman II IIRC), but I can't remember the specifics.
>>71123452
Yeah but Englehart actually created Mantis, Batgirl and Gwen Stacy were created by others.
>>71123519
He's worked Mantis into a ton of shit hes written, Marvel, DC, or other
>>71123479
Yeah this whole thing is retarded because it mainly boils down to policing fanart.
>>71122774
Hell.
>>71123514
>and discovered tumblr
Tumblr. Not even once.
>>71123479
CamStew has said some other weird stuff though.
>>71123560
But he created Mantis.
>>71123303
He took a character he didn't create and slapped the look and abilities of another character he didn't create on it and now treats said character like his own child.
![tumblr_m4d16entGD1r5jtugo1_500[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/A8kO2qY.jpg "tumblr_m4d16entGD1r5jtugo1_500[1].jpg")
>>71123576
>what the fuck is this crazy shit?
>read wikipedia entry
>"The businessman suddenly discovers his penis has mutated into a gargantuan power drill
>>71122124
He is not sexy! He is a male power fantasy, you shitlord!
>>71123693
Come to think of it, wasn't Slott the one who came up with the idea of Gwen being a Spider-Woman? he had the idea in mind of Gwen wearing the green coat and regular outfit but with a Spider-Man mask.
>>71123744
>he is not sexy
Dat ass disagrees, damn.
>>71123225
Pretty much.
More or less, yeah.
And to be honest if you were superstrong and hyperflexible wouldn't you be prone to strut your stuff?
>Pete: Could I sit at the table, like a normal person. Not scuff up Luke and Jess' cheap rented apartment we're all squatting in because we're fugitives and likely fuck up whatever security deposit they worked out? Yes. But I'd rather stick to the wall with my legs wide open, with a faint outline of my dick for all to see.
>>71123756
Slott said his concept was just Gwen with spider-powers back when the single issue came out
>>71123804
Well, yeah of course I would. But unless my powers made it comfortable, and I mean, actually comfortable and not just 'meh, I guess this'll do', what would be the point?
>>71121608
>dick your major
wow dad
>>71123735
It's one of my favorite Horror Films. Think it's still on Netflix, give it a watch.
>>71123744
I heard they had to create a pouch to keep his dick out of the way for that scene, as it kept getting into the shot
>>71123876
Even her dad knows she's a slut.
>>71123963
I bet he did it on purpose. The director would say something, Jackman would pretend not to hear, and swing around fast, his dick flailing wildly, and he's all 'What? Sorry, I didn't mean to do that, silly me!'
who cares
>>71121754
walk into any mall and look in any clothing store that targets teenage girls or at the teenage girls themselves. the Cho cover is fucking tame compared to what a lot of pre-teen and teenage girls actually wear in real life
>>71123303
>>71123693
He's being ridiculous, but this is kind of interesting to think about more generally. How do the credits work on alternate versions anyway? What about a character like Iris West II who technically didn't show up until Johns Flash run but was thought up by Waid and Ross in Kingdom Come?
I guess ultimately it doesn't matter because these are company owned characters, but it's interesting.
>>71124095
Specific Alternates I believe get credited to the writer/artist that made them.
Like this is credited to Claremont and I forget the artist despite being more or less Spidey without change.
Bendis has a lot of pride in Ultimate Spidey too, so I don't think it's a foreign feeling and I don't think Robbi is wrong in feeling some kind of creatorship of her but he's sort of acting like a baby.
Hannah means Shannon? Did I miss a meeting?
>>71122202
What a pimp.
In his late 40's and still slaying 20-something pussies.
>>71124398
Bendis is rightly credited as having created the character of Ultimate Peter Parker, but I don't think he's ever been insane enough to run around trying to police fan art of anything that might kind of resemble "his creation". Mark Bagley doesn't claim that "The younger Spider-Man with the BIG EYES" is his "son".
>>71125297
Someone should spam Peter and Miles shota cheesecake and see if Bendis flips abouthis real skin deep son, Miles.
>>71121170
Edge of the Spider-Verse 2 tells us she's in college, though it's unclear how *far* into college. She's probably not old enough to drink, and may well be 18 or 19, thus technically a teenager.
I think this pretty much proves the feminists who cried about the Batgirl cover being "inappropriate for children" were bullshitting in order to push their agenda.
All these facts and they still want to paint Cho as a pedophile because he draws cheesecake on his personal blog.
>>71125926
>bullshitting in order to push their agenda
That much was obvious. Isn't that what most of their non-issues are about?
>>71122118
Oh, shit! He wasn't talking about the Gwen picture at all! He was talking about the Harley image!
>>71125867
Jason says she's around 19 in>>71121581
I don't know if that's still inappropriate to these people since she's legal but young.
>>71125926
Not really, I mean they're probably the same assholes but there's no real proof.
>>71126072
What?
>>71126129
>What?Because he's the Joker. Jeez.
>>71126156
OH, OOOOOOHHH!
Chapelle has a pretty funny joke about age and all that and it kind of hits on an important issue:
White women are considered younger and more naive by default, for better or worse. So even if Gwen is 19, people are going to go "She's practically a child!".
And that mentality is only getting worse as we infantalize millenials.
>>71126219
It's wonderful how the controversy only serves to make the Gwen creators look worse.
>>71126129
>I mean they're probably the same assholes
It's *always* the same people. The outragists number very few but they're very loud.
>>71126259
Everyone involved looks bad
>>71126259
It really doesn't. It should, but it doesn't.
Because they have the armor of "a white woman is in maybe danger somewhere"
>>71126259
Well it's only one of the creators. The writer seems to not care.
>>71126305
Unless you're a buttblasted feminist, Cho got out it looking pretty great.
>>71126342
The smart move.
>>71126219
>And that mentality is only getting worse as we infantalize millenials.
See: Literal, physical Safe Spaces.
>>71126283
I hate how they never seem to spend as much energy praising good books that could use attention. Something like Gotham Academy deserves some hype and word of mouth but doesn't get it apparently because the creators never tried to make a big deal about how progressive they were or whatever.
>>71126463
There's no controvesry to be had there.
I know this gets overlooked and yes the term has been diluted but one of the main reasons they're called social justice *Warriors* is because they're really just looking for a fight. Any fight. And once they "win", it's off to the next one.
>>71126283
But at the sametime they do that to Gamergate type shit.
>>71126259
What did LaTour do? He's been quiet.
>>71126219
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t5ZxdSXTLx8
>>71126454
>That article
I mean I guess I could get a quiet place with people you can talk to about shit. That's fucking therapy but...play-doh?
>>71126463
>but doesn't get it apparently because the creators never tried to make a big deal about how progressive they were or whatever
Eh, Cloonan has a little, but far as I can tell she doesn't spend all day on social media.
Anyone got the full version of this?
>>71126689
You know, I can see Harley trolling the internet for cheap lulz.
>>71122544
Seeing all those tweets got my jimmies rustled at first. Then I read all the replies to it and was entertained by people backpedaling and making asses of themselves
>>71122774
I'm told this is how ISIS and jihadi groups recruit as well.
>>71126689
that art is kinda shitty
>>71126342
Latour has been in the game for at least a decade. He's a professional who sees comics as going from one job to the next. Those are the people that last the longest in comics.
Rodriguez complained on twitter a couple of weeks ago that Stan Lee signed a Spider-Gwen comic, and then said "some things never change in the industry". Wait until they hand off the book to a superior artist, and watch the inevitable twitter meltdown.
>>71126841
S'okay. Nothing special face is kind of derp.
But who's the artist?
Anyone that matters or some douche on the Internet?
>>71126906
>Rodriguez complained on twitter a couple of weeks ago that Stan Lee signed a Spider-Gwen comic, and then said "some things never change in the industry"
what the fuck
>>71126906
>Rodriguez complained on twitter a couple of weeks ago that Stan Lee signed a Spider-Gwen comic,
This cant be true. Theres no way someone can be both that petty and that jealous.
>>71123165
Except they are some people who are pissy about Dick being objectified in canon.
They don't read the book, see mostly panels of Dick being half naked, and rage about the book threatening his purity and being out of character.
Wish I had made screenshots of some comments made when that issue where the horny girls chased him came out.
I'm a 'uprising' comic professional, and I have to say I feel I can never talk these things on twitter. You wouldnt believe how feminazi is the thinking on comic professionals around these days. All you can do is talk on cons with your pals that knows that all these bitching about covers stuff is nonsense, it's ridicolous.
You cant disagree with these people, because they're very vocal and you always looks bad. Either your pervert, or a sexist, or an old trend. Is though, but I want to work with superheroes (for now, I want a little fanbase before doing my own stuff), and that's the job.
>>71127051
Well to be fair he signed over his name apparently.
>>71127051
the funniest part is that Stan signed the book on top of Rodriguez's signature.
Who cares she's a fictional character
>>71127117
>and rage about the book threatening his purity and being out of character.
This is the man who slept with a broken-hearted Barbara before announcing her he was going to marry Starfire.
>>71126959
>>71127051
He was bitching about how Stan Lee signed over his signature.
>>71127117
>Anyone complaining about the perfection that is Dick
Those people need to start reading comics, he is on of the head poster boys of beefcake along with Peter Parker
>>71127051
>>71126959
Dug through his twitter to find this. Motherfucker is the biggest superfan of his own character. Jeez.
Anyways, here's the tweet in question. Looks like he's specifically angry about Lee's signature covering his own. Doesn't he realize the man is 92 YEARS OLD?
>>71127165
Just because she's fictional doesn't mean she's not being oppressed!
>>71127165
BUT THE CHILDREN
