Post futa giving men the D.
Jebus. Go back to /d/ already.
>>88379
>I swear futa isn't gay
And this is why that line is bullshit
>>89944
If you use the word "gay" to descibe homosexual male, then, this isn't gay since these men are engaging in intercours with women, who are not from the same sex, hence not homosexual.
badump
>>89930
This is not western.
>futa on male
lolgay
proceed
>>89944
This funny because if you show futa to actual gay people, they're like "oh gaaaROOOSSSS! That's not a guyyyyyy. That's a GIRL with a DICK! Dooo NOT waahAAAANnnnt!"
>>96780
I think this is my all time favorite Majalis picture. The blush, the gape, the grin, the fucking stockings and garters...
But why
>>104212
not gay when boobs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xTKkQ5VCW7g
>>100383
You can't have sex in the sauna. The blood leaving your head will make you really Dizzy.
I wish there were more non-trap male on futa.
>getting fucked by futa
I never understood this fetish why not just get pegged or finally embrace being a faggot and get a guy
>>122394
Because ur a faget
>>122529
No from looking at this thread. YOU are the faggot
>>122394
using a strap on gives no pleasure to the dominant woman, and dudes are ugly as fuck without exception
>>122586
Handjobs give no pleasure to the dominant woman either your analogy is shit and you are still a faggot, just home up to it
>>122586
But they have double sided strap ons.
>>122651
those can't produce Jizz, and aren't usually warm.
>>122586
>finds men unattractive
>masturbates to pictures which have a heavy focus on men getting fucked
>>104212
some of us like male bottoms
why would you put a dick on a girl bottom? i don't understand
>>123051
Is it possible he only likes the idea of being fucked, but not the look of the guy?
Bifag here.
Everyone of you arguing about whether or not this is gay or not are dumb.
Stop worrying about labels and bullshit, stop worrying about what gets other people hard, and just roll with whatever your own dick decides to take a stand for.
You'll be much happier, and your inane bickering won't clog up the board for those of us trying to masturbate like civilized perverts.
>>125586
I respect the choices my dick makes. But I am not the product of my cock's choices.
>>125678
You're a product of your dad cock's choices
>>126385
ba dum tsssh
>>125307
Wrong thread. Also, why is her dick wearing a beanie?
>>122394
Because people into futanari generally aren't into men. I know those who don't like it would balk at the concept, but it's really not hard to see why given this fetish revolves around dicks on women. Gay men being into that makes as much sense as straight men digging dudes with pussies.
Strap-ons are also cumbersome. They DO give pleasure to the women wielding them unlike >>122586 says, but it's generally in a narrow way.
Futanari is appealing because it's not just a toy at that point, it's a part of the woman in question. It's relatable. It's warm flesh instead of cold plastic. You know how she feels based on the simple fact there's a hardon and you know for a fact she came based on the physical result. It's also much more open to spontaneous passion than an unwieldy toy that takes time to put on and ends up not being used correctly most of the time.
If women could actually wield real dicks if they wanted to I assure you nobody would bother with strap-ons anymore. This fetish is simply that same inclination taken into the realm of unrealistic fantasy.
>>127559
So its pretty much just trannies which are pretty much dudes
>>127593
You kinda slept through high school didn't you?
>>127652
Yes, but that's irrelevant. I don't need to read all of that to know this just illustrated tranny porn.
>>127559
Except a glance at /d/ proves otherwise.
>huge cock/ball futa
>futa on male
>horsecock futa
>multidick futa
>futa bigger than male
>uncut futa
and 70% of the time, they're solo; it's not partly about the dick, it's ALL about the dick. Hell, your own picture screams that you just want to suck cocks and not feel gay.
>>127811
This
>>127811
I also agree with this guy
>>127688
Well you asked a question and got a few different answers, none of which align with your assumption. It's kind of childish to just literally ignore them and make up your mind anyway.
If it were just illustrated shemale smut then no one would bother with the futanari term to begin with. It's a loanword used to describe the unrealistic fantasy of women with dicks that have nothing to do with being transsexual since there were already terms to describe and identify the latter but not the former. Loanwords aren't adopted to fill in niches that are already filled or represent ideas that are already prevalent/popular.
You don't have to like it anon. I happen to think the other futafags around here who shove it in people's faces are incredibly annoying (partly because they do that with other fetishes of their own as well), but... what do you gain by pretending to ask a question and then rejecting the prospect of even reading an answer?
>>127811
If it were ALL about the dick then they'd be pictures of nothing but disembodied dicks. The women they're attached to is an important part of the equation I think people looking to hate on the fetish often ignore.
I don't feel gay because I don't have any interest in men. Nothing about the male aesthetic is appealing to me. I like curves and gentle features, short torsos, long legs, supple breasts, flared hips, etc. I just happen to think an aesthetically pleasing cock occasionally looks good on that too.
I get that sounds ridiculous, but to someone like me it's not an indication of sex or gender, it's just a part as being tied completely to the realm of unrealistic fantasy means that part can be disconnected from where it originates in real life without taking along any of the baggage.
It's like putting bat wings on a woman and calling her a succubus or slicing off her bottom half for a scaly fishtail for a mermaid. Neither of those things can happen in real life and my interest in succubi and mermaids doesn't indicate an attraction for bats or fish, but for those fantasy forms. Similarly I don't really have any desire to suck dick in real life either.
I get it if you can't make that disconnect in the realm of fantasy. There are things in fantasy fetishes I don't get or particularly like either, but telling someone what their fetish REALLY means when you have a negative bias while ignoring their arguments just seems silly.
>>127849
I never asked a question. I was just passing by and thought I'd sum up that paragraph. To anyone outside our little circle, that explanation won't fly. Just because you want to label to something else doesn't mean a thing. A moonbounce and a bouncycastle are the same thing.
Every damn futa thread is 1 dude shitpost "LMAO GAY" and 40 of you fall for it
Stop replying to bait and post related to the thread
>>127881
Unrealistic? There's a tranny tag on xnxx. Your fantasy is pretending futa isn't japanese for tranny.
>>127902
It's really just one dude that a few guys are poking at because he's writing a thesis on how hes not gay for liking futa
>>127889
I've actually had that explanation fly for many people curious (positively and negatively) about the fetish. It doesn't fly with people who've already made up their minds about what it is based on their own subjective views. And like I said, some people aren't able to make the disconnect between fantasy and reality for some things and there's nothing wrong with that as long as you're not using that discrepancy in views to attack someone else for their harmless unrealistic fetish and taste in smut.
And yes, your views are important because they determine what you do and don't like. But they end at the point of you trying and to tell someone else what they like and why they like it when you obviously don't. At that point you're just playing fetish police.
ITT low test beta male cuck closettedfags
>>127881
I see that "disembodied dick" argument a lot. You guys really can't come up with a better comeback, huh?
>nothing about the male aesthetic is appealing to me
>except dicks
>the quintessence of masculinity
Just because you pretend they're gender neutral, doesn't make it so. I get it if you can't make that connection in the realm of your head. I have fetishes that are embarassing too, but pretending you REALLY aren't gay is just silly.
>>88826
fucking amazing
>>127903
A tranny tag existing on Xnxx is irrelevant.
I know the term has a tie-in for transsexualism in Japan, but that also has little to do with how the word has been adopted outside of Japan. Outside audiences saw the appeal of the genre's more fantastical nature and adopted the term for the corresponding idea. There's some overlap, but by and large the term has changed as its moved across borders. It happens with every loanword at some point.
>>127906
A couple paragraphs doesn't really make a thesis. I don't know why it's bad that I'm taking time to explain myself instead of being rude or shitposting. I get angry at enough things to let the stuff I fap to become a part of that.
>>127914
You're pulling some Olympic level linguistics to explain the validity of your fetish. I like robots, that's simply it. Gears and armor plating excites me. Bam, no 3 paragraphs. You sir like trannies in a variety if flavors. Particularly the illustrated kind. Bam, no more creeping people out explaining your fetish in length
>>127920
It's not silly if I have no attraction to men. I honestly don't anon. You can't force yourself to be attracted to something you're not.
Ask yourself, would someone who thinks vaginas aesthetically pleasing but dislikes everything else about female physiology and has no inclination to take that fancy into the realm of reality be considered straight in your opinion?
In the realm of made up fantasy it doesn't matter where the part comes from. That's why you can have centaurs, mermaids, succubi, naga, minotaurs, etc. A picture of a drawn futanari has nothing to do with men for me, because that unrealistic form is its own package every bit as similar as an angel's wings belong to her and not some hypothetical bird out there in the aether missing its pair.
I don't see the cock as the quintessence of masculinity. If anything a dick and balls is the antithesis of masculinity since it's natural state is always soft, erections are wildly susceptible to stress both physical and mental and any trauma inflicted to them is utterly debilitating. That flies in the face of what traditional masculinity is meant to be. Humans are a lot more sexually dimorphic than just the plumbing between the legs.
>>127949
So what part do you have a problem with; my verbosity or the fact I don't see drawn futanari and MtF transsexuals as the same thing?
I'm sure there are people who do see them as the same thing, but they have their own reasons for liking or interpreting the fetish. You're essentially telling me that your view of this fetish supersedes mine for some arbitrary reason based on what I assume is a dislike of it.
I'm quite sure a few people who enjoy robots/mecha/cyborgs/etc have their own reasons for liking that fetish, are you going to make sure those reasons line up with yours or that their interest isn't for a reason you deem invalid?
>>127975
The sexual organs are how we tell sexes apart. It's very black and white. Unless its a vagina at the end of a penis. At that point its either fantasy, movie magic, or a freak of nature
>>127998
I don't get how explaining why I like something or why I don't see it a certain way makes me a tryhard.
I don't know how to make it any clearer that I'm not sexually attracted to men. I can't help but notice that when I ask if it's believable for someone to have an interest in drawn vaginas but not the real thing or anything else about the female body to be straight I get no answers.
My mindset isn't any different than the suspension of disbelief that allows mythological beings to exist in fantasy to begin with.
Take a step back and look at all the smut on the popular porn boards. Even with vanilla content all the bodies are idealized, all the women hairless except where it's wanted, no physical defects or deformities, etc. You're already engaging your suspension of disbelief for 90% of the content here to begin with.
Why is it so hard to understand that some people can go a bit further and they're not raving lunatics for doing so or bothering to explain themselves?
>>127995
Yes, the amount of words you deem necessary to try and disassociate a facet of one thing is alarming. It's like saying you like hot sauce but only this hot sauce that honestly tastes like the other hot sauce because of the label.
>>128036
You're rationalizing it so hard you're gay again.
>>128036
You clarified that its not the Dick people are attracted to. Why would anyone have to say they also do not find solo vaginas appealing? Although thinking about it, I do like vaginas.
>>128017
We make all sorts of classifications based on parts that exist in fantasy that wouldn't mesh with reality. Nobody labels angels as avians based on the structure of their wings. Nobody disputes the reptilian associations to naga even though describing them as ectothermic never sees relevance.
You've already given the answer to this conundrum. It's fantasy. You can take any part you want and it put it anywhere you want without it having any meaning beyond what you want it to. Nobody else is obligated to see it that way and that's precisely how people can see futanari as just "tranny porn," but it's no different than the suspension of disbelief that enables things like fantasy and science-fiction to exist in the first place.
>>128079
Okay, so futa is just illustrated trannies.
>>128065
The vagina in this case would be attached to a man.
>>128061
Explaining things makes me gay?
>>128042
You think the hot sauces taste the same so deem the separate labels unnecessary.
They don't taste the same to me so I do see a difference.
Even then some people might think they taste the same but prefer one labeling or the other for superficial reasons anyway.
>>128084
To you.
I never pretended to try and color what you view them as and any attempt at doing so would be silly. I can't change what you see things as, all I ask is that you reciprocate instead of trying to tell me what I'm into and why I'm into it.
>>128090
I may have saved some mannish looking women. Slap a vagina and tits on it and I may have saved it.
>>128094
I'm just saying your explanation is on par with the 100 year old loli descriptions used to skirt around rules on DA. If it looks exactly like a child/ tranny it is a child/tranny.
>>90559
this is correct
There can be 2 and only 2, gay or not gay, good or not good, sweet or sour, just like light and dark.
>>128098
Well again, I don't think slapping a vagina on a drawn Schwarzenegger makes a woman and in order for it to be an analogous mirror to popular forms of futanari it'd have to just either be dick, balls and vagina or simply vagina on the guy's body.
>>128113
If you choose to see them as trannies that's your prerogative.
I personally don't because of their general tendency to have developed, chimeric forms and lack of transitioning from one sex to the other.
>falling for low tier bait
>>88379
Futa isn't gay, it's just chicks with dicks
Futa on male isnt gay, it's just a dick in a guys ass
Gay porn isnt gay, ...
>>132746
Ebin post bro
>>125469
1.Because it's perverted
2. You can still suck her dick
3. Give her reach around
I guess it comes to wether you're top or bottom[spoiler]a.k.a. a faggot[/spoiler]
>>88825
sauce?
>>132983
It was just a general statement on how male on futa gets less content than any other futa-themed coupling.
>>133315
Thank god in my opinion. Male on Futa stuff is a horrible turn off for me.
My actual problem though is it getting posted here. Like, why? Just make a new thread for it.
>>122394
>2015
>believing in things like homosexuality, heterosexuality.
>not believing these things are mere social constructs
>have to give people labels or I cannot sleep at night.
Hey man, if I am a homo in your eyes that is fine. I will consider you a paedophile.
Seeing as this is a board for drawn images and they synonymous to cartoons and cartoons are for children that would only mean that you are massive pedo that wants to have sex with children.
>>89932
I swear that chick really looks like someone I wish she didn't look like. Still a good picture though.
Im doesnt care if gay. Im cares for boner inducing content. Gay away if it be, but bi seems more fitting.
>>134197
This isn't gay or bi you normie. Unless you are exclusively turned on by dicks. The main focal point of futa is the woman.
>>116683
WHERE'S THE GIANT, MANSLEY?
i don't care that it's futa, i just wish there was more /co/ related pictures.
>>95833
I'm gay as shit irl and this is about my favorite thing ever. Boyfriends have had varying opinions.
>>132990
>because it's perverted
>where_do_you_think_we_are.jpg
>>122394
It's all just a perversion or natural reproductive functions in the brain, what's the point of attaching specific labels to it?
Wanting to jizz on a girl's feet achieves absolutely nothing, in fact, if we always wanted to jizz on girl's feet all the time, we wouldn't reproduce and we would die out.
Whatever a guy has on his hard drive is none of my business as long as it's not CP and it doesn't cross into the real world.
That being said I totally want to get assfucked by a tall muscly futagirl, like all the time, always.
>>134439
I'm in the dick camp
>>127811
Yeah but it's about the mental attachment to the dick, not the dick itself most of the time.
It's about gender reversals, you know how /pol/acks are also into interracial a lot of the time? I'm just saying that the idea of a woman with a natural dick is very sexually different than just a dude.
It's very Freudian but I don't really give a fuck there's a lot of good art and somehow I developed the fetish. You're kind of a fag for caring so much though.
>>133582
Well, the picture you quoted is about half and half, given the guy is giving oral too. There's not really enough male on futa content to make a new thread for it on /aco/ without bitching swamping it while a lot of the content overlaps with this anyway. Since both you and the people who like it both admit to it having little content you don't have to worry about this thread getting swamped, you just need to be able to not get triggered by things you don't personally like.
Unless that's hard for you. You used 'like' as a useless filler word at the beginning of a sentence and that's something you often find on Tumblr so I'm not sure either way.
>>136132
Fair enough.
And ehh, there may not be as much, but in my experience there's usually at least an equal amount of either topping.
As I said though, my biggest complaint wasn't my personal dislike of the content, but rather that it's being posted in a thread about tangentially related content at best (If not the exact opposite content.)
It makes text more conversational. I did it on purpose honestly. I can easily refrain from it, but it makes the messages droll in my opinion,
>>122394
dicks are a sexual organ. Thus they are arousing. Many men find men romantically and sexually unattractive (body hair, rough skin, muscle, bone structure, voice, smell, elbows, etc.) but like cock, balls, tits, pussy, and ass. So for men who have no romantic interest in other men, and find ~99% of the male body unattractive, there is the fictional futa.
>>127688
How do you not know the difference between fiction and non-fiction? Its a pretty simple concept.
Real life = men with boobs
Not real life = chicks with dicks.
>>90559
>woman
>has a dick
Well
>>96768
shes a bitch to crabs
>>127914
InCase is GOAT
>>136931
They still aren't men
>>137818
Trannies are men anon
can everyone just shut the fuck up and fap
i'd ask to keep the transmisogyny to a minimum but we're on fucking 4chan
>>138005
>transmisogyny
This is a new word. I wish I could express my amazement. Admittedly, I hope you are joking.
>>88379
...this is the only futa that I'll ever like. Unless I find a She-Hulk and Hulk one.
>>137818
trannies don't have functioning vag and dick combo.
>>128017
Kind of, it's not the penis it's method of reproduction. A male is an individual who inserts eggs and a female is one who carries and incubates one. So what determines the sexes isn't the penis/clitoris (which are functionally the same thing) it's the ovaries/testes.
Example: A woman with a 3inch clitoris could potential use it for insertion but since she doesn't shoot sperm through it she's still a woman.
>>137831
Were. and sure, that's correct .
Futa isn't trannies though. They're neither men nor women. Therefor it isn't the same sex.
>5 futa threads on the front page
Jesus christ you fucking degenerates. Rip /aco/.
>>140988
Are*
>>127559
This guy/gal knows what they're talking about but as usual everyone just goes back to the usual "I don't understand so you're gay" statement. Good job Anon for explaining it to the ones who have an open mind and wish to understand it.
>>122394
Man I'm bisexual. I like getting fucked in the ass by dudes. But you know what? I also like this. Why don't you just not go in threads that you know you won't enjoy?
need more InCase
>>146491
>>146493
>>146491
definitely. and kami tora.
>>134666
>>132746
I've asked in /lgbt/ and no lesbian nor gay that answered liked futas, only bisexuals
>>128122
>what is bisexual
>what is lawful and chaotic
>what is bittersweet
>what is gray
3/10 for making me respond and making me loose my boner
>>138828
You are so gay.
>>159487
that comic is so fucking cute
