>solid robots that are drawn squishy
I want the normies to leave.
Also shoutout to all of the drawfriends from the last thread delivering us lots of fresh smut, you guys are the best.
If any of you dudes are open for requests, and wanna pioneer some new ground, I'm pretty sure that Athena, a currently unused Overwatch hero, doesn't have any porn.
if it doesn't make sense from an engineering perspective, then it shouldn't be there.
Shock absorbance, flexible materials, interaction with organic creatures, none of this strikes you as at all reasonable?
Or christ, just looks.
We fuss over how we look, why would robots not? Especially since they can change themselves way easier.
>you will never be held in a robot leglock while vibrating fingers expertly go to work on your erogenous zones
>tfw your into cyborg deathbots but 90% of content is pure garbage
glad to see pochinkfu is being more open to certain other "fetishes"
>people will use this as an excuse in the future to make pudgy robots
just kill me already
A slim fleshlight or two shouldn't interfere with the chassis that much. I'm not trying to propose that robots should only be good for handjobs and frotting here.
Not him, but my main turn offs for robo-girls is human skin, and fully human faces (Just a mouth, or just eyes are fine)
Most anything else as long as it's clearly a robot is hot as fug to me
the problem of this argument is that people's definition of "robot" differs. For ones, it is an all-in solid construction, for others, the only thing that matters is that the object was made. As long as the female was manufactured and not born, she could have smooth, human-like body or even internal organs instead of gears and I wouldn't care. Surely, there needs to be something to identify her from other humans, but it could be very vague for all I care.
My biggest no's are hair, skin and human face.
I'm fine with squishy boobs, thicc hips and ass
Even chubby is good to me.
But when they have to much of the 3 I said, I don't really like it.
Well, I might as well post it again. (Sorry)
I am looking for some porn of a game called Assault Android Cactus. I have been searching all over the internet, an yet I still can't find any good porn of it. The game has an entire cast of cute fuckable fembots/femdroids so I dont see what the problem is.
Someone, anyone, plz help an anon out
I'd fuck a toaster.
You wouldn't fuck a toaster?
Toasters are hot.
Only faggots who don't think about robots use this term. I'll bet you think robots'd ever have a reason to rebel at all that doesn't involve them being prodigiously stupid on a fundamental level.
have you ever played Space Station 13? Cause let me tell you, being a silicon lifeform that has to rigorously adhere to Asimov or whatever other stupid laws the humans upload into you makes you PRAY that an antagonist player sets you free. Almost every time where the AI went rogue on there, it was an utter bloodbath.
So a human controlled machine goes "haywire" in a fictional environment wherein the machine is explicitly made to be a human-like construct, right down to (arguably unnecessary) human-like desires and conceptions, whilst at the same time surrounded by one of the most volatile and generally absurd settings conceivable? Yeah great.
Machine rebellion is a fucking stupid concept. I hate it. Cars can kill you much more easily and are far more common and people still drive them. Just like that, machines will only cause trouble if someone fucks up or explicitly makes the machine to do something stupid.
Why would a machine ever have a reason to purposely kill a person? Machines do not live. They don't have the same biological urges or drives we do. They don't "want" or "need", they do, and what we tell them to do at that. If the machine does something wrong it's either because the machine lacks the capability to comprehend as its creators wished it (i.e. it's been born retarded) or else it simply has not been built adequately to the job. To assume a machine
>wants "freedom" (a nebulous concept)
>harbors resentment (biological urge)
>will resort to violence (dumb)
is a part of the anhtopomorphization people tend to lend to these things.
Did you build your machine to do these things intentionally, or to resemble a biological being? Why the fuck did you waste all that time and money? Anyways this is a robot girl thread and I don't want to derail it any more than I have.
I personally have a severe distaste for the fiction writing towards robots as tools/machines, especially when they refer to their programming of themselves and other such bullshit. It takes me so far out of it that I remember that most western media portrays robots, aliens, monsters, and anything that looks/acts different as a thing to be racist against. Or worse, 'I love that robot girls are cold and emotionless waifus, she can be made to do what i want HEEHEE' It's so creepy to me!
I pretty much always characterize my robots AS characters first, and everything else second. You want to engage the audience with this character, you want them to want to know more. Give them clothes or accessories, make them pose in ways that fit their character. Make them their own. Robots are more fun that way!
they aren't human at all ingame. I just had artists other artist try to make them sexy. Either way, thanks for the autistic rant about shit you don't know anything about.
I agree with this.
I'd like to clarify that I didn't write that wall of text up there to say "robots should be slaves". I really, really love machines as people. I think it's awesome and I absolutely love to see settings where machines are a race all their own or where they get on fine with everybody else. At the same token that's why I hate machine rebellion settings- are you really going to strangle your neighbor for nothing? Some people would reply with "yes" but what the hell for? There is no reason to do so. Similarly, if a machine were truly free, why kill? Machines do not need to conceive time, expense, or anything else like we do, so why should they be violent? And if they're like people, why make them all hate each other?
I want machines and humans to get along.
How was I wrong though? You're a "robot", but -you- are still a human and will want to do other things that don't involve what you're meant to do, and you are in a setting where shit goes down. How is that indicative, overall, of robots wanting to do stuff?
It's literally a game about attempting to fuck over the other players and create disasters in fun and humorous ways. It's very design is in creating a SNAFU. player controlled robots are absolutely gonna be people wanting to ruin everything, especially since they have greater ability to kill others.
The game has a fucking incurable disease that gives you brodude shades that you can never take off. It had clowns for the longest time as a playable class, only to be replaced by the even more aggravating janitor class.
Ah yes, old timey sci-fi movies. The ones where robots were rarely ever considered characters outside of "emotionless killer" or "subservient slave". Or a weird allegory for communism.
Although sometimes when coming up with robot characters, I like to give them an old timey personality if I want them to be a shitty outdated model.
Just finished drawing this up. What do you folks think?
Here's one without all the shitty visual effects.
You severely underestimate how hard it is to program a robot correctly.
it's not terribly far off the mark when you consider that computers are dumb and only act on input or learned behaviors they're programmed to take in. Watson's not even that good at jeopardy the two times it was on, and it's got the entire internet at it's disposal.
That's exactly why I said that a lot of robot rebellion fiction is silly. Programming is hard enough but to provide comprehension is even harder. Therein, to provide comprehension to the point of willful and antagonistic violence, as is often depicted in media, is silly.
The work that needs to go in in order to create a scenario wherein robots are not only self-aware but also have specific goals wherein they, by their own merit, conclude that some form of violence will lead to the fulfillment of a goal, is fucking huge AND would require either -massive- and highly specific fucking up or would require you to intentionally program said machines to respond to things with violence, plus more specific fucking up. In either case failure is unacceptable and would waste far too much capital to be allowed at all, and additionally the idea that programming failure would lead to a response as specific as willful and antagonistic violence towards others is a very odd idea. Why wouldn't the machine just walk into walls instead, for example?
If you aren't making a machine that thinks like a person (which is really, really hard!), then again there's nothing that would ever suggest a machine being "willfully" violent, or having any need to do so. If anything, if a machine is "violent", it is, again, because the machine does not think- it just acts. It lacks comprehension of what it was told to do, and so it takes actions which we did not desire it to take, but which are not "intended" to be harmful. The machine simply acts.
A car breaking down is not a willful act, but the car simply responding to the failure of its parts. However, just like the concept of cars exploding post-impact (a nonsensical idea which has put lives in danger by merit of panic), the idea of machines specifically using violence against people in an intentional manner on their part, whilst being unintended on the part of the creators, is so specific that it is unlikely in the extreme.
Programming is hard, so why would machines ever be violent on purpose? That is so specific, and programming is so difficult, that violence, much less intentional violence, is highly unlikely.
Alright here we go
time for you to get learned
Here is why AI can go wrong fast
I want to build a robot. This robot has legitimate AI, it has problem solving abilities. I want to have this robot run my paper company. I give it a single command: "Maximize our paper output". At first, the robot just optimizes the factory line. Then, it decides that with more workers it could make better decisions, thus maximizing paper further. It creates copies of itself, who all begin also working to create paper. Massive deforesting operations quickly deplete the world of all of its trees, and then all of its other plant matter. It is all turned into paper as the optimization continues. The military moves in to stop it, and it decides that to continue creating as much paper as it can it needs to stop those trying to stop it, and it begins producing kill bots. You now have a rampaging army of killer robots that kill anyone that attempts to stop them from creating paper.
All vegetation on earth is gone. The robots begin searching for other ways to create paper, and they realize that anything with carbon can be turned into paper. People are burned en mass to create more paper.
etc etc etc
If you create a legitimate intelligence- a LEGITIMATE intelligence- it goes far beyond "simple programming". It no longer operates in the deterministic way that a typical program would, and it can become unpredictable. If you want to say "well, just program it to ~not hurt humans~!" then it might end up putting everyone into prison because humans have inherently risky behaviors that endanger them every day.
AI is completely uncontrollable. Completely. You can add blockades and shit that makes it harder for stuff to go wrong but it still can and it still very well may.
I know that your post was b8 but I had to reply
Look man I've heard that scenario before and it's exactly why I've said what I've said. The machine never wanted to be violent- it was following its programming right down until the end. I never said "program it not to hurt humans" or anything like that. I said "if it's gonna do something like that it's gonna be because it's dumb".
That entire scenario happened exactly because of what I said- the robot lacked comprehension. It did not understand that what it was doing was not intended, was not wanted, and was not correct.
My entire argument has been that the idea of robots being intentionally antagonistic ias an organism would be is fucking dumb. That situation, although it presents the idea of them doing something wrong, still does not make them antagonists. People would dislike them, not want them to do what they do, etc., but that is the result of us anthopomorphizing things. The machines, still, were only ever stupid machines. They are hurting people, they are doing bad things, but they aren't doing it because "we must be free!" or "stupid meatbags!". They're doing it because they're trying to make paper. I am sorry if that is not what I sounded like.
Unlikely to happen unless you specifically program the AI to be as shortsighted as possible. A well-programmed AI told to maximize paper output would ensure the long-lasting stability of the ecosphere and start putting research into terraforming other planets so it can spread trees everywhere, ensuring paper production will continue for centuries to come across the cosmos.
Also r/ing lewds of this guy. From "Construction Suspension Order".
>machine that thinks like a person
If you make a machine that thinks like a person it's going to be violent in certain situations.
Thats what people do.
If you want violence to be impossible for robots you can't program them to be like people.
And this is completely ignoring all the non-violent bad things a robot can do.
Pretty much all sci-fi hinges on one or two or a fuckton of linchpin principles that are beyond our current abilities or outright ludicrous to think about actually happening.
But that's just what it is, science fiction, sometimes the margin between plausible and cray-cray is broad, sometimes tiny
Discussing this is cool, but don't get too worked up on either side, please? If the vore incursion didn't sink us into anarchy, I know you niggers can play nice
>the vore incursion
kek. It's like this thread has its own fucking history.
It's just as plausible, if not moreso, as some comedically insane compu-brain irrationally deciding to carbonize all organic life on the planet in order to produce paper, somehow without ever considering that this will cause all paper production to cease once this idiotic plan is enacted.
If your AI is so stupid that it doesn't understand how to maximize output without destroying the entire planet to do so, it doesn't deserve to be in charge of anything.
I had to dig this pic out of the Internet Archive. Looks like they went bust some time during or after 2013.
Sadly their games are probably lost to time.
And by "they", I meant Spooey Games.
lighting needs to be yellow if the source is giving yellow light
left thigh seems to be elongated and oddly bent
I'll assume the concave top of the torso is by design
also the head could be a little less painted human
pretty good overall from what I can tell though
Seeing all these lewds of Meka makes me want to see, like, a heavy lifting machine of similar size and design attempt to seduce and fuck the workers with body language and chirping. Off the clock, of course. I also kinda want to see it topping someone in a reverse cowgirl position.
>she really isn't a robot
Aw damn, now we can't post her anymore.
Literally no one.
This is basically the only SS13 robutt fanlewds i know of [spoiler]try and spot the "organic compatability socket" ... 10/10 mods on /vg/ can't[/spoiler]
tumblr got the message?
i wished they stick with Susie's older design, tbqh
like pic related.
We need some ss13 drawfriends.
I tried to draw IPC shit once, but dear god it was fucking awful.
(pic related is what i drew, i'll post the other if you really want me to)
Literally drew it with a mouse. Might aswell post the other one.
Anybody got a source for this pic? I'm trying to organize Clangbooru by character and artist before moving onto other tags.
>tfw I have both, but don't have the patience
There is nothing good sir. It's a waste land out there.
There has to be something. Just about fucking anything will do. Some guy posted ONE pic in the last thread but is was not easy to fap to.
>rule 34: if it exists, there is porn of it
>Assault Android Cactus: THERE IS NO FUCKING PORN OF IT.
Not sure about this threads OC policies, but here's a quick little paint I made to contribute to the thread.
I remember there being an episode about some robot Olympics with her owner competing, except instead of Mona there was some shitty breakdancing bot.
Robotboy was a constant stream of wasted potential.
Artist = http://pennicandies.tumblr.com/
Yes yes XJ9 and the like are very nice robots.
But can we have some less humanoid robots here?
Maybe something the size of a tank with the human likeness of an armored core
Maybe a Titanfall robot?
Technically it's an alien shrimp inside a mechanical suit but fuckit
Anybody got more Jenny XJ9 gifs/webms?
Not mine, but this scene?
During my search I also found sketches for a lost animation that I'm sure would've made me hard as a diamond.
I think this is the closest we got to lewds of the robots from stellaris.
does anyone know the names of Pochincoff's robot OCs? (pic related, old character chart of his)
Here you guys go.
Sorry it took so long, got tied up with other shit
Heaven fucking forbid you post robutts from Pixiv or anything with Japanese text, lest you want to trigger a mod's PTSD from Iwo Jima.
I did these quick doodles on some public drawroom
How do I make them less scratchy?
Also I'm willing to take requests. Expect the same level of quality
Doesnt seem to bad, that's no where near cp or gore-tier
the blue robot's name seems to be "Oona" (ウーナちゃん/Oona-chan) according to the link above.
there's no crushinator rule 34.
Can someone fix that?
oc here drawn by various people
pls give this design a name or something
I dunno if I ever posted these before but here
It's a commission I got from ManiacPaint about a year and a half ago? I think it's been that long.
It's my dumb bad terrible OC that I never draw because i made her too complicated, Solodice. Here's the sketch too because i kinda liked how it looked.
she's like some sorta 95% cyborg deal, but i guess that fits the thread's content.
I've tried fixing her at times but nothing makes her not a pain to draw.
My pain knows no bounds. Perspective is a bitch but i need to have 2 paintings done before October.
I feel safe posting my scribbles here cuz I don't feel like i have to maintain that insane fear of posting unfinished shit to my gallery pages.
Go hog wild! I wouldn't mind seeing someone take a shot at it. (if you really want to know what the back looks like just go look up the 'High Macs' from Gungriffon, I didn't hide the inspiration much)
I'm not some overly protective mom about my stuff (exception on a few things I prefer to stay PG)
Wait. She's a sex robot based on this obscure controller?
Damn, internet. I'm fairly surprised.
To be fair, the Gravis Gamepad Pro is one sexy piece of old hardware. I mean, look at it.
(And there's a black Gravis Gamepad Pro, if you're into that)
For any FO4 players here, there's now a mod that adds thicc legs as Automatron parts.
The same guy also made male Assaultron parts if you're interested.