Sissy/CD/Chastity/Trans
No diaper shit for fucks sake please.
Stop inviting casual trolls by bitching about fetishes in an OP
>>676331
>shemale faggot bitching about an underwear fetish
Can't make this shit up. Enjoy your diaper pics.
>>677354
Diapers are for urinary/fecal incontinence.
Seriously, that's what they exist for. It doesn't mean your an infant, it doesn't mean your somebody's sub it means you can't help but piss and shit yourself.
Sorry for not being a scat loving faggot anon.
anybody have The Pony Trap" #2 from lustomic
>>676331
Who makes this hot shit
>>678831
InCase
>>676356
Is there more to this?
>>680152
>>680159
>>680163
>>680165
>>680174
>>676331
Man, I hate that this thread, and this board, is basically dead.
>>681130
So you're declaring this board dead because you like diapers that much or you just super hate sissies?
Neither one of those sounds quite right to declare a whole board dead so what the fuck, guy?
>>680175
>>681185
>>677382
Do you see how, despite being correct in your assertion, you're making things worse for yourself?
>>676331
Who is the artist? Style looks familiar.
>>679244
Just one other page, the previous one. And yeah it's fucking hot.
>>676381
why is the mouse upside down?
>>681208
>lives in a glass house
>throws stones
anon...
>>681372
Haha, that makes no sense
>>680008
Hang yourself.
>>677382
Not everyone who likes diapers is into messing. Some just like it for the "cute/childish" factor, some as an off-shoot of watersports, some for humiliation through roleplayed incontinence, etc etc.
Just sayin'.
Also sorry some of my peers in such a fetish aren't respectful of the tastes of others, you'd think those who hold such niche tastes would understand that not everyone has the same tastes...but alas, many of them are juvenile and vindictive. Wish they'd stop making things worse.
>>681163
>being this summer
welcome to 4chan, where dead means that images are being posted infrequently
>>681784
No
>>680163
Sauce?
>>681814
But it's not all that infrequent.
I also think it's worth noting that at any given time half of the material to do with your fetish is probably in /d/, whatever that fetish is.
>>681215
incase
Anyone got a source for this one? Found it in a previous thread here
>>681322
Thanks!
>>683631
God damnit, it's not even drawn well, but I can't find a trace of it anywhere aside from an older /aco/ thread with no source either (and it was named image.jpg)
>>685780
Found source
oxoCandyKissesoxo
>>686492
Thanks, it's not drawn or written well but for some reason I wanted to see more for some reason
>>677382
>it means you can't help but piss and shit yourself.
Do diapers make you incontinent? No.
Do people who aren't incontinent wear diapers? Yes.
Conclusion: You are a retarded faggot. At their core, diapers are just another kind of underwear, and being into them is no worse than being into panties.
>>681208
He's not correct, though, he's just an ignorant cunt. He's been making things worse for himself, though, that's for sure.
>>681806
The only ones who are disrespectful and making things worse are those who don't accept diapers. Stop being an apologist for bigoted pieces of shit. There's no reason diapers should be an issue to anyone in this day and age.
>>681372
Back to /g/
>>688655
>Defending a fetish for a garment invented exclusively to prevent babies and toddlers from smearing their shit and piss on the floor this desperately
You're the one making things worse for your own kind.
>>689697
No, it's a fetish for a comfortable garment that people of all ages wear. Ever heard of something called adult diapers?
>>688655
HOLY shit, OP here. A faggot as all ways.
This thread derailed. I'm never posting anything like that in my main post ever again.
Fuck you diaper fucks you couldn't resist fucking up my thread. AGAIN. FUCK YOU.
>>690707
i honestly think It's because they were not to, which makes OP their enem yfor singling out their fetish, so they are autistically compelled to shit(tty diaper) post.
>>691038
>talk shit get hit
Wow that was fucking so lame. I literally made a thread that had a good amount of replies recently but then it got overun with diapers. And then when you ask for something to not be in the thread people bitch about it.
Why can't they just make their own thread instead of be a bitch about what I said? For fuck sakes. I will make a new thread. And post in it way more. Once I saw how this one went, I just said fuck it.
>>691098
It's pretty clear the one being a bitch is you. Just think of diapers as being just another kind of panties, and everyone will be happy.
>>691098
well one could have said no diaper pics please. but OP instead chose the sentence No diaper shit for fucks sake plese. one would assume taht might upset poeple and bring trolls to this thread. so OP you have done this to yourself because you are not able to think at all. Enjoy more pics in the meantime.
>>691583
Come on, most of us don't come and shit up those awful duper threads. Can you just fuck off?
>>688655
You are clearly a fuckhead.
>>688655
>stop being an apologist
Sorry, but no. You're trash and you post trash. They're not "bigoted" for having different tastes and you're no paladin in padded armor for trying to ruin others' thread with your shit just because you can't take the abuse you should expect to take from being a part of a stigmatized fetish. You do nothing but piss more people off and make them hate us diaperfags even more. You're like a white guy who gets called racist so you go and lynch some people to prove them wrong. You're a cancer and you're most likely adopted. Go mcfucking kill yourself. I'm fucking sick of the fucking drama whores in the fetish.
To everyone else, sorry for not having any pics to contribute. While I appreciate sissies, I simply don't have anything I can post here on my computer. OP should maybe just delete the thread and start anew or some shit. That guy's not gonna stop, he's someone who's worse than a furry who cries "FURSECUTION".
>>689800
I love these futa text pics. who makes these?
>>691355
Piss off. Do you go into literally every thread and post something diaper related then complain when people tell you to take it to your own thread?
>>690698
No this guy fucks up every thread, even diaper threads. Seriously, if anyone mentions them he comes in and starts whining like an insecure faggot.
>>676331
those should not all be in the same thread. Sissyfags get enough threads as it is and ruin any hope of new trap porn
>>681391
>comparing traps to diaperfags as if they're in the same league of degeneracy
>all the diaperfags bitching about not being able to post their regressive Freudian nightmares and ruin the thread
>>695302
true traps are more degenerate. is shal make a new diaper thread and directly post "no trap shit for fucks sake please." how can you idiots like this stupid shit?
>>695314
In my defense, I'm bitching about that one fucking retard posting his shit here cuz he's butthurt other people don't share his/our (I'd rather not be associated with his filth) disgusting and niche fetish. He's a fucking idiot who should be publicly castrated.
>>688655
Theres not need for a rational approach to this, fellow crinklebutt
>>681130
Are we rhyming now? Are we that bored? Have you not some sissy stuff stored and ready to share without a care?
I literally cannot delete the thread because its to old. Right now there is another sissy thread so I will just wait until that one dies and try again. I have a shit load of pics I can contribute. But refuse when some "crinklebutts" start shitting in my post. Literally. Holy fuck. This will be my last post in this thread, let's let this poor thread 404.
>>695314
There's nothing regressive or Freudian about adult diapers, nor can anything that comfortable be called a nightmare In case you didn't notice, by the way, we can post them all we want.
>>696287
Just because you don't like what we have to say doesn't mean you aren't a faggot. Also being an uncle Tom is better than being a nigger.
This thread is now dead
>>695668
>is shal make a new diaper thread and directly post "no trap shit for fucks sake please.
Please do. It will be your thread so your rules.
>>696444
>""""""""""""""""""we""""""""""""""""""
No. it's literally just you getting butthurt. Also, uncle Tom happens to be a nigger. A nigger butthurt at the idea of black people not conforming to racist stereotypes.
>>696287
Why are you posting this in a thread not intended for it? The first post asks for no diaper shit. If I wanted to see that, I'd go to a thread dedicated to that. It's the same with other fetishes I don't care about. I go to the threads that appeal to me and avoid the ones that don't.
I don't go to the ones that don't and spam my shit.
>>696876
>what is fetish overlap
>what is basic courtesy like not being a cunt singling out fetishes for no real reason
If I like this, am I gay?
>>696891
Not necessarily. It can be just a clothing fetish.
>>696891
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinsey_scale
>>696886
>basic courtesy
>being a cunt singling out fridges for no real reason
Arguing for fetish-neutral threads? Is that really how far we've come?!?
>slippery slope from gender neutral bathrooms
>no real reason
Hi friend, the reason is that I don't like diaper shit. There's a thread for it; post there. If not, make one.
Diaperfags are why we cant have nice things, I have never met one who could keep that shit to themselves
>>697252
If they could keep their shit to themselves they wouldn't be wearing a diaper.
>>697178
/aco/ is a fetish board. If you don't like fetishes, you should probably go elsewhere. Especially if it's a fetish as tame as diapers.
>>697252
>I have never met one who could keep that shit to themselves
Ever considered you wouldn't know someone is one otherwise? Logic doesn't seem to be your forte.
>>697346
They would, though, because they're comfy underwear in general.
>>697440
i met people with interests besides diapers, but like i said theycouldnt keep that to themselves, when i asked them about it most told me to accept it or buzz off.
It just shows how smart you are to assume the only diaperfags i had the displeasure with would be the ones in threads like this. Even tho i clearly said MET, as in i knew some diaper fetishists
>>697455
>most told me to accept it or buzz off.
Wow, shocker! Ever considered that's a sign you should, you know, accept it? Considering what this thread is about, you're hardly in any position to judge others. We're hardly living in the age of "don't ask, don't tell" anymore, after all.
>>697455
>when i asked them about it
Asked what? If you asked something like whether they had one, it hardly seems honest to claim they "can't keep it to themselves" when you're the one trying to coax it out of them. If your questions resembled some of the shit said in this thread... yeah, no wonder you got told to fuck off. Stuff like assuming diaperfags are into scat or babies is just as bad as people assuming gays and crossdressers are bug chasers.
What cracks me up is most of these threads barely have diaper stuff in them. But I read OP's post and thought to myself, 'self, this thread is going to contain a LOT of diaper material, because OP went looking for opposition.'
>>696891
I've decided it means I've got a bi lean. Who knows if i'll get with a dude in real life.
But apparently I'm down to get off to a sissy guy.
>>696891
it means you like guys, so you're a homosexual
just don't give a shit and don't get too invested in labels, it'll all be good
>>690731
Source? This is a cool art style
>>696287
>irrational prejudice
Okay kid. You're the one who's being irrational. Rational humans can accept that others have different tastes and understand that wearing diapers between the ages of 5 and 55 is not a normal thing to do unless you're disabled. Like, legitimately physically disabled. Also, you're replying to multiple people there. I bet you actually enjoy Hyro unironically you've got such a terrible load of shit between your ears.
>>697252
Again, sorry. I keep it to myself IRL, but online I'm not gonna be ashamed of that shit. It's 4chan, I'm posting anonymously, why would I have even a bit of shame about who I am? Sadly that's the same idea the shitposter has but he probably goes to the movies, shits himself, then announces it to the entire theater and cries when he gets thrown out.
>>697475
Exactly what I thought. I honestly wouldn't be surprised if OP is the diaperposter and just wanted to start drama. Regardless, top-tier shitposting going on in here :^)
>>697514
>probably goes to the movies, shits himself, then announces it to the entire theater and cries when he gets thrown out.
Aren't you that literal scatfag? Sounds more like something you'd do.
>>697514
>Rational humans can accept that others have different tastes
Such as... being into diapers?
>>697521
nah liking diapers is not normal but dressing up as a woman in a theater and then waving theyr penis at everyone shouting hey im a crossdresser and then crying when they get thrown out is perfectly normal.
>>697526
Well, considering that recent bathroom fiasco...
>>697524
is there a translation of this?
>>697531
i havent seen a translation of it so far. cant remember when i stumbled over the original pic.
>>697531
"I-I'm sorry! I can't hold in my poop anymore..."
And then some random noises from the rest of the diapered centipede.
>>697460
i dont care if they like it, if i would i wouldn't have dealt with those guys in the first place, what i meant is that they tried to force it on me.
>>697514
>is not a normal thing to do
Yeah, that kind of has to do with that irrational prejudice. There's no actual good reason wearing diapers in itself should be stigmatized, just a bunch of ignorant assumptions by bigots looking to put others down. Are you claiming incontinence is a physical disability, by the way? They certainly don't receive any proper support from Medicare.
>>696263
sure mr basement shitter
>>696287
Now now,
there is no need for a rational approach to this.
It seems we're surrounded by an incapable social enviorment here.
Funny seeing how we're supposed to be looked down on by adults
>>697440
Yes, /aco/ IS a fetish board-- but the entire fucking point of having threads is to divide shit up by topic.
Fucking dumbass I hadn't realized that diapers reduced your IQ to that of a baby too.
>>698163
goo goo?
MORE DIAPERS PLEASE!!!
>>698301
as you wish
>>696891
lol, nope.
do you like the masculine, ripped guys in the gay threads? or do you just like the fact you can identify with a cock on a feminine body?
google why straight men make up the futa / trap market and it explains why your brain gets confused.
:)
>>697526
that's oddly specific, are you american?
There's a thread for diapers. Take it there.
>>676331
girl here who has needed diapers my whole life, why do some of you people think they are so disgusting?
I had a surge of yay for a year or two when I discovered all the online communities about people who actually like girls like that but oddly enough on a cartoon porn fetish board i CONSTANTLY see this huge disgust towards them all the time and so many people mention that they dont want that stuff in their thread
Diapercunts have ruined this
>>698633
shut up
>>698633
Because we don't like it. It's not terribly complicated.
>>698633
Disturbingly enough, the process of potty training often entails having a pathological fear and hatred of diapers and incontinence literally beaten into one at the very beginning of childhood (Trivia: Potty training is the period of childhood where child abuse and murder is by far the most common.).
Moreover, the abusive parents who do this also force the false mantra that "diapers are just for babies" upon their children until they internalize it and go around treating others who wear diapers just like their parents treated them. This kind of prejudice went on to even influence pop psychology with bizarre myths like bedwetters being latent sociopaths (ironically, research has debunked this claim completely and found that what actually leads to sociopathy is irrational abuse and punishments during one's childhood, which says quite a bit about how bedwetters were treated for such a myth to arise).
In reality, though, needing to wear diapers is completely unrelated to age or maturity, just like wearing glasses doesn't make one a nerd. Therefore, just like how no rational individual makes fun of or looks down upon others for wearing glasses past the school playground, an adult who has an issue with diapers can hardly be said to be mature or rational.
>>699736
>Not being able to control a bodly function thats perfectly controlable is normal
>people who otherwise (99.9% of the population) is just brainwashed into controling themselves
t. Autismus Maximus
We're getting to the point that I'm thinking the janitors need to ban diapers from /aco/. You people have gotten as bad as furries.
You intentionally fuck up threads where you aren't wanted just for the sake of trolling people and then act like you're being persecuted for posting in the wrong thread.
You are every bit as bad as furries and at this point I'd like to move that we ban diapers from /aco/ until such time as those who like them learn to behave like adults.
>>699736
Dude, couple of things.
1: you're not wearing diapers because of some psychological need, you're doing it because it makes you horny.
2: even if you were wearing diapers because of some psychological need, (most) people in this thread aren't saying there's anything wrong with it. Just that you shouldn't go posting diaper shit in threads which explicitly state not to post diaper shit
3: you wanna talk about maturity? Let's talk about maturity. It takes maturity to understand that not everyone agrees with your views and that, rather than try and force them upon them, you should just accept the difference and live your life, in the process letting them live theirs.
4: you've literally read at least 10 posts conveying the same message as mine (hell, I've posted that many alone), citing valid reasoning and fact, and you're continuing to ignore said reasoning and fact in favor of your views.
Hmm... refusal to accept others' beliefs and denial of logic in favor of ones own beliefs... congrats, anon, what you have there is called a religion.
>ITT diaperfag anon founds the Cult of Diaperology, which teaches the beliefs that toilets, and the use of toilets, are immoral and condemn you to hell.
>>699788
>Who are you quoting?
>>698633
A. I don't believe you
B. They are cloth underwear intended to be filled with piss and shit. That's disgusting to basically anyone who hadn't fetishized it.
C. The reason people keep bringing it up is because the diaperfags keep shitting up everyone else's threads. It's also worth mentioning that there is a lot of sissy content with diapers in it so this was a time where it was especially important for OP to mention that he didn't want it in his thread.
>>699810
If everyone could send feedback asking for some moderation of the diaperfags who are conducting diaperraids on other /aco/ threads that'd be great.
>>699810
>constantly single out a relatively tame fetish
>get BTFO by them
>WAAAAAH BAN THEM ALL
>>699811
>1: you're not wearing diapers because of some psychological need, you're doing it because it makes you horny.
Yes, what about it? Complete non-sequitur. They (an incontinent person) asked why people overreact to diapers, and that's the explanation.
>you shouldn't go posting diaper shit in threads which explicitly state not to post diaper shit
And you shouldn't go posting threads stating not to post X shit. You don't make the rules here.
>It takes maturity to understand that not everyone agrees with your views and that, rather than try and force them upon them, you should just accept the difference and live your life, in the process letting them live theirs.
It's funny because you're the one who needs to take that advice.
>citing valid reasoning and fact
"muh negative associations" isn't valid reasoning.
>Hmm... refusal to accept others' beliefs and denial of logic in favor of ones own beliefs... congrats, anon, what you have there is called a religion.
Once again, that's describing your side.
>>699811
>cult of diaperology
based anon
>>699811
>Cult of Diaperology
Can we make this a thing? Let's make this a thing.
>>699821
There's nothing disgusting about it as long as there's not piss and shit in it at the moment. And no, you've been shitting up our threads since the beginning and accusing us of all kinds of shit. Stop trying to play the victim.
>>699835
Forced memes are the worst memes.
>>699830
>Honestly too stupid to realize that an OPs ability to dictate content of a thread should be preserved.
>Posts unrelated content to raid other threads
>Already actually committing bannable offenses.
While I'm at it, if OP doesn't dictate the content of the thread then what's the point of having threads? Seriously. You're raiding threads with unrelated content. Might as well go posting amputees and futas in your diaper threads regardless of what they're wearing.
If threads don't follow a theme whether inclusive or exclusive the board doesn't work. But please, tell me more about why YOUR fetish belongs in every single thread even when it's not related content. Please tell me why you think that's a good precedent and then I'll tell you why you're an idiot (spoiler alert: The answer is tautological. The explanation you give will serve as proof that you're an idiot)
But go ahead. Let's see how dumb you can get.
This is fucking retarded, why are people mad that specific threads are being limited to specific topics?
Should we just have only one thread that caters to every fetish possible to avoid hurt feeling?
And why are people bringing up incontinence on a fetish board as justification? Just because some people need diapers means shit all here, some people need amputations doesn't mean I should post amputee porn in every thread and expect acceptance
>>698633
>people find the prospect of shitting yourself un-erotic
Gee, I wonder what that might be about..
>>699854
>>Honestly too stupid to realize that an OPs ability to dictate content of a thread should be preserved.
An OP decides what a thread is about, though, not what isn't allowed in it. For what it's worth, I haven't posted any non-sissy-related pics. While I don't agree with the guy who spammed random diaper pics, I think pretty much all of us can see how the way the OP worded his post was asking for trouble.
>>699836
I'm going to respond to your accusations separately.
1. No I haven't. I've never posted in a diaper thread. I'm not into diapers and have no reason to go into one of your threads. I'm happy to share an image board with you if you hold yourself to the same standard as everyone else and post content in the thread it belongs. Even if you did post something wrong in a diaper thread I wouldn't be there to see it, nor would I care.
2. Yes. Yes I have accused you all of shit. The shit you're doing right the fuck now.
Behold:
>>698347
>>697991
>>697533
>>697526
>>695668
>>695854
>>691583
>>680008
These are people raiding a thread with unrelated content. This is against the rules. Yes, I am accusing you of wrongdoing because here it fucking is. There's no indication that anything with tits in those images are shemales and the men are dressed as boys but with diapers. Those are unrelated images, posted in the wrong thread, by a bunch of cunts that need to fuck off.
The people who actually wanted this thread to be a thing are the victims here, dealing with diaperfags shitting their thread up. We're not playing the victims, we quite clearly are the victims and you'd have to be a fucking retard not to see that.
>>699867
FUCKING HELL WILL SOMEONE PLEASE JUST BAN HIM AND LET'S BE DONE WITH THIS ALREADY
>>699867
And yet clearly warranted based on the fact that it's happening. I'll give you that that encouraged the troll. But we could use some moderation banning people like that. Literally the only thing stopping us from retaliating with weird unrelated porn in a diaper thread is common decency and that's not how a board should run.
>>699861
>And why are people bringing up incontinence on a fetish board as justification?
Read >>698633. She asked a general question about why people view diapers the way they do out of personal curiosity, and someone answered it. That's all there is to it.
>>699870
>I've never posted in a diaper thread.
That's good to hear, but we've definitely had shitposters accusing us of being pedophiles and other things in pretty much every thread since the beginning of /aco/. Combine that with people randomly bringing up specifically diapers as an example of what they don't want, and it's no wonder diaperfags get fed up with it. Honestly, I think the guy spamming completely irrelevant diaper pics is a moron too, but the thread was fucked from the start. Both sides are just as bad here.
>>699879
Thing is, though, it's happening because it wasn't warranted. Really, even the OP realized his mistake, so I think we should just let this thread die and let it be a lesson to us all.
I came to fap sissy not diapers, why not make your own thread or join one in progress. Plain and simple.
>>699902
If you just hit ctrl+f you'll see it's been brought up a bunch of times as though it has any real relevance to whether people want to fap to it
Even then why the fuck would you ask that in a thread that has nothing to do with it, I wouldn't go into a diaper thread and ask why women don't like me shaving my pubes
>>699912
same reason yiffags, futafags and the other assorted scum have to invade
>>699912
I don't think a single person in here is genuinely interested in making these threads a major center for diaper art, it's just everyone getting pissed at eachother and retaliating in their own ways.
>>699939
People were badmouthing diapers since the very first post here. If you're curious about the dislike for diapers, I'd imagine this looks like a better source for that info than a thread for those who like them.
>>699955
People were badmouthing diapers because they didn't want it in the thread, not because they wanted to get a nice dialogue going about the merits of diapers as a fetish
But when someone tells you to fuck off of course the best response is to be a huge cunt until they finally learn to accept you, worked really well for furries
>>700006
When people like underwear you don't, of course the best response is to start off a thread by being a huge cunt to them, worked really well for you ;^)
>>700036
Didn't start the thread, but regardless this tit for tat mentality is retarded
First of it isn't just underwear, this is a fetish that 99% of people find abhorrent. While I have no problem with you liking it you simply can't expect everyone to accept it. Stop acting like it's some innocuous thing that people are making a big deal out of. You don't see people spamming guro in every thread and acting surprised if people ask them to stop.
And one OP saying to fuck off isn't some huge injustice, and certainly doesn't warrant ruining the thread for everyone. It's one thread in the catalog you might have to see scrolling through, doesn't equate to shitting up a whole thread. This is all ignoring the fact that the fuck off was warranted, this is hardly the first time this has happened.
If you want people to not treat you like cunts then stop acting like cunts. Theres other fetishes that are equally unpopular that no one gets mad at because their fans can accept it's not for everyone and stick together
>>700087
>You don't see people spamming guro in every thread and acting surprised if people ask them to stop.
Yeah, because that's not an innocuous fetish, but one that's only allowed on /b/ and /trash/. Pretty major difference right there. Nobody's spamming diapers in "every single thread" either.
>the fact that the fuck off was warranted
Hahaha, nope.
>If you want people to not treat you like cunts then stop acting like cunts.
Once again, the one who should be following that advice is you.
>>700096
Okay because you seem at the right age for diapers let me make it real simple
You are ordering a pizza with your friends, and because of your overwhelming narcissism you get anchovies and grapes or some shit which most people but you hate
Surprise no one likes it and wonders what the fuck you're doing. Next time it's your turn to order the pizza one of the people there says not to order those weird toppings but he's kind of a dick about it
So you:
A) order those toppings anyway because fuck that one guy, this will annoy everyone else but who cares. You have hurt feelings and they should just pick it off since it's only fish and fruit anyway
B)Just do what the group wants because you're not a cunt
Of course this isn't a perfect example because you have your own pizza made just for you regardless, but humour me
>>700115
>you seem at the right age for diapers
Adult? Why, thank you.
And yeah, as long as it has ingredients they like on top of it too, there's no real reason you'd have to abstain from the ones you like entirely. To begin with, these people are complaining about the topping without even trying it, just like petulant spoiled children. Some of them don't even know that anchovies are a fish and complain about how disgusting those bugs are, because fishes eat bugs.
Where do I go to find the majority of InCase's stuff?
>>700134
No one thinks that anchovies are insects or wonder what a grape tastes like but whatever helps. Regardless you've proved my point about narcissism, everyone should be put out for your sake.
Don't pretend that we are all just unaware of how great diapers are and after having it crammed down our throat we'll love it. Everyone here has seen diaper porn, this whole argument is because it's in the thread and they have to see it. Do you think lesbians just need a good dicking too?
As you conveniently ignored me saying people with other equally obscure fetishes can just accept it. They don't feel the need to spam it where it isn't wanted and if they do end up in such places they just stop posting after being asked.
So can you just get over yourself and stop thinking that people don't want your shit out of ignorance and that this is some righteous crusade. Even if the OP is the worse person in the world can you just be the adult you apparently are and for the sake of everyone else respect that they don't like diapers.
>>700155
>everyone should be put out for your sake.
Nobody's saying you have to eat it, just that you shouldn't be whining like an entire pizza has been spoiled just because one slice of it has a topping you're not personally fond of. Be an adult and accept that some people like to mix their toppings. We don't complain about seeing a little sissy/trap-related material now and then in our threads.
>>700168
Alright now it's just a slice, I can see those goalposts disappearing over the horizon.
The thing is I presume your threads don't say "no fucking sissies" in the OP, if they did people posting that sort of stuff regardless would also be cunts. All I'm advocating for is basic empathy and courtesy.
Now heres a fun thing about threads, you can open two at once. I know thats shocking but theres more, you can even make a thread specifically about those topics combined. Isn't that fucking amazing!
you guys seem to be realy upset about someone trolling. i didnt pull out gore or something like that. we are on 4chan arent you used to some degree of trolling yet?
>>700180
>I can see those goalposts disappearing over the horizon.
How so? The issue raised here was always about there being a few sissy pics in the thread that happened to involve diapers too.
>The thing is I presume your threads don't say "no fucking sissies" in the OP, if they did people posting that sort of stuff regardless would also be cunts.
We tried stuff like that back on /d/ a few times, and lo and behold, every single time people would spam precisely what we didn't want.
>All I'm advocating for is basic empathy and courtesy.
Problem is, your side really hasn't shown itself as being very willing to do that.
>>700183
Just having a sincere argument with someone, if either of us stopped posting so would the other
Hardly the result of this epic trolling that took more effort than it's payoff
>>700179
You should be banned for derailing this thread.
>>700187
You seem to be missing the point, I'm calling for no purposely off topic posting in any threads, I don't give a fuck what it's about. As I explicitly said if the same is happening to you guys then they're also cunts.
Even then if "my side" are fucking up your threads just doing the same back is still shitty playground behaviour. Especially given that it'd be like one guy in the thread while everyone else is innocent, giving them a valid reason to tell you guys to fuck off.
Now can you kindly address my other point? If all you've got to say is this circular bullshit then by your logic I should now spam your thread.
>>700215
Which one, the combined fetish thread idea? Sure, I suppose that's a possibility,but you can't exactly spread things too thin either. Really, I personally don't intend to post in sissy threads all that much most of the time, I'm just saying there's no need to make such a big deal about one or two pics where a sissy happens to wear a diaper too. If it's a messing pic or something, though, then I definitely agree it doesn't belong.
>>700243
If someone specifically states in there post they don't want certain content in a thread why would you post besides to be malicious?
>>700243
And I would begrudgingly accept one or two pics if the OP and a large part of the thread weren't saying fuck off. But if it doesn't fit in any existing threads and can't sustain a third thread then you should probably give up or go elsewhere.
>>700256
That's the thing. Maliciousness begets maliciousness. I'd say it wouldn't have been an issue if the OP had just said something like "Thread-related fetishes only". It's when you single out fetishes or make ignorant statements about them that people get pissed.
>>700259
Why do you guys want to fuck up our thread?
We didnt do anything to you.
>>700260
Or they could be the ones to give up and fuck off. It's not an issue if nobody makes it an issue.
>>700262
But it's not malicious or ignorant, he said no diaper shit. That's hardly an unforgivable insult, just hide the thread and you'll forget it's there. But derailing a thread isn't something that goes away with a click, and people shouldn't have to ignore a shit ton of posts because some crybaby couldn't ignore one thread.
If you really can't stomach one person being impolite about not sharing your obscure fetish then maybe you should leave the board entirely.
>>700270
It's their thread they can do whatever they like, you don't have to be here no one is forcing you
Fucking hell why must everything revolve around your preferences
>>700274
Just hide the diaper pics, and you'll forget they're there.
>If you really can't stomach one person being impolite about not sharing your obscure fetish then maybe you should leave the board entirely.
Good thing it's not obscure, then.
>>700285
>Fucking hell why must everything revolve around your preferences
Irony much?
>>700281
less arguing more pictures please
op said he is upsett that there is no new stuff posted anymore.
>>700291
Holy fuck
Leave your house for once and ask around, diapers aren't up there with blondes and anal
It's a thread for a specific fetish, of course it should only contain that specific fetish. How fucking dense are you? Why should people hide your pics when they shouldn't be in the thread? By your logic I should fill the diaper thread with pics of my new couch, you can just hide it.
Please just stop being a sperg and come to grips with the fact that you are not wanted here, it says right in the OP. You aren't entitled to a place in every thread, you aren't being oppressed.
I'm starting to think that this is just part of your fetish, that you're acting retarded so you can jack off to me talking to you like you're a child
>>678550
(maybe)
>>700315
That's what it is, nobody with this suicide-tier fetish is well adjusted
>>700315
Someone's a bit upset about a harmless underwear fetish! I like how you completely missed the whole combination thing just to whine about something nobody said. If your new couch is drawn and has a drawn diapered person sitting on it, why not?
>>700333
>nobody with this suicide-tier fetish is well adjusted
Funny choice of words in a trans fetish thread.
>>700315
Just throwing this out there, diaper thread doesn't want him either.
>>700334
Combination of what?
Thing the thread is about + thing the thread is specifically not about?
My couch is just as pertinent to the thread. Are you just completely missing the point of everything I've said?
Just make a thread for diapers and sissies, bam problem solved. Then you can post them all you like and no one will have a reason to be mad.
But of course diapers are "just underwear", it's unthinkable someone wouldn't want a piss and shit receptacle in their thread. Also why isn't more hentai here, the board is adult cartoons?
>>700369
My couch is an established part of diaper play. You'd think the "underwear" would make it hard to pull things out of your ass.
There was non-diaper pics before you ruined the thread and there would have been non-diaper pics after.
Can't you just accept that people have different views then you? That everyone shouldn't be forced to put up with you because you decided you just had to be in this thread?
>>700385
>My couch is an established part of diaper play.
Yeah, in French.
>Can't you just accept that people have different views then you?
Ever heard of the word "hypocrisy"? It describes you pretty well.
>>700397
How fucked in the head are you?
How do you not comprehend the difference between posting what I want and posting what you want when the thread specifically says post only what I want? If the diaper thread said no sissies then I wouldn't post sissies there.
It seems you somehow didn't see it. The OP says no diapers, that means don't post diapers. You getting me? If you create a thread for diapers and sissies then I wont post things that don't fit into that. It's this sick system we've been using!
>>700412
And if you're that thin-skinned, it's no wonder you're trolled so easily.
>>700414
So we're finally getting the towel throw of "I was just trolling"
It works better when it isn't preceded by hours of desperately defending yourself
>>700414
Shut up you little faggot. The fact that you're backpedaling after fucking ruining a thread with your stupidity is annoying as fuck. Fuck off because everyone knows you were serious.
>>700420
Who said I was the one trolling, though? You've been getting trolled by others during this entire thread for being a squeamish whiner. You and your desperate insults getting trounced is just the cherry on top of that.
>>700420
Yeah what the fuck? This is bullshit. Bunch of babies shitting in diapers.
>>700427
Why are you talking about yourself?
>Global Rule #3 is in effect. No anthropomorphic ("furry") or grotesque ("guro") images are permitted, and all images should depict "of age" participants. Images depicting bestiality, scat, or generally seen to be "extreme" in nature are not to be uploaded.
>>700429
How am I being trolled then exactly?
People are being retarded and I'm pointing how they're being retarded, I don't care who's who in the thread. But guess I'm getting trounced by "wah they started it, everyone should be fine with diapers it's just underwear", guess I gotta step up the rhetoric.
>>700444
>How am I being trolled then exactly?
The fact that whining about diapers ended up backfiring on you completely, perhaps?
>People are being retarded
Yeah. Such as you.
>>700449
How'd it backfire? Not OP for the billionth time
And guess we've reached the point were you are gonna just repeat "your wrong" and "you've been trolled" instead of explaining how a thread that says no diapers is the place to post diapers
>>700453
This
>>700467
best post in a long time
>I understand what you want, but even if you >are in the right, you still have to make sure >not to create an invitation for people to mess >with the thread, especially when it involves >diapers since it's a very easy thing to use if >someone wants to mess with people like >what's happening in your sissy thread. Yes, >you shouldn't have to worry about what limits >you want to set for a specific thread without >retaliation, but that won't stop someone if they >decide to mess with the thread since they >don't care about you. It's an invitation to mess >with you more than it is a limitation. They only >want to see your reaction and other people's >reactions which is what they are seeing. Don't >lose your shit easily.
>>676331
Fuuuuuuck this thread is ded
>>700470
But the problem is that there are people posting that sincerely think that shit should be here anyway and will make a point of popping up next time
The only thing everyone agrees on is that OP was stirring shit
>>700474
Op didn't do anything wrong. Jesus. He or she just didn't want certain content in the thread. Also if you read the thread, Op states diapernfags fucked ops thread up before.
>>700478
Of course he didn't do anything wrong, but this is a shitty board filled with shitty people and we have to work around that
god what is wrong with you retards just post porn
>>700340
>the diapercuck thinks it can judge
kill yourself.
>m-muh diaper raids
>b-ban when????
Observe the SJW's typical behavior: trying to force out anything that hurts their fee fees, and trying to enforce arbitrary rules on a free internet image board.
>>700530
Your logic is a little wonky bud
Your saying that not wanting to have your disgusting degeneracy forced down our throats makes us SJWs?
Isn't the newest frontier for SJWs making bathrooms all inclusive, I didn't know the natural extension of that was than trying to segregate fetishes. Seems to me that you're throwing around buzzwords because you simply can't deal with people not wanting your shit here.
>>699866
>people find the prospect of shitting yourself un-erotic
>Gee, I wonder what that might be about..
theres a difference between bum and bladder incontinence, it sounds like you really have an irrational hatred of the subject and are just fucking ignorant
>>699143
What "we"? Do you think liking girls with cocks is more normal than wearing diapers?
>>699788
>Not being able to control a bodly function thats perfectly controlable is normal
I wouldnt say that its normal but wearing diapers has been completely normal to me for my whole life since not being able to decide when I piss is NORMAL TO ME
id probably post some diaper art to trigger you all but im not as juvenile as you, funnily enough considering how im apparently a literal baby who cant stop PISSING AND SHITTING!!1111 herself
>>700613
>I don't like either, I just stumbled upon your post. I think you're just salty that diaper shitting is disgusting and no one likes it.
Why would I care? I dont poop in them
>and no one likes it
Youd be surprised how many people genuinely want to PAY me for pics relating to that stuff
I thought diapers were a big deal in my early teens but after slutting it up it has became somewhat obvious to me that a big chunk of people find it cute/ like it and the other half cares more about whats inside them anyways
hence why im so surprised about the incredibly pronounced hate that losers like you seem to have for them, only enhanced by the context of how obviously disgusting you still are (look at the thread you are in)
>>700620
>It's is litterally impossible for me to conceive of opinions and experiences different from my own
>>700631
Funny that youre saying that considering that youre the ignorant child screaming with teary eyes because muh diapers is too much for you to handle
>>700565
>Hello I don't know chan culture
>>700635
>Internet wins
>Important
>>700620
You dig?
>>700620
>(look at the thread you are in)
Like I said, I'm only here because I read your comment outside of the thread while browsing the others.
Look, I know a lot of people enjoy diapers, but a lot more people find it disgusting and outright weird as fuck.
I have weird as fuck and degrading fetishes myself, but at least I can acknowledge and accept what I like is weird and disgusting.
I don't go on internet message boards telling people they're children for not liking my disgusting fetishes.
You dig?
>>700660
You're missing the point completly
>>700660
Also its your own problem if you feel inferior to others
>>700660
>You dig?
No I fucking dont, why are you acting like youre somehow in the right? OP acted like a little child
I havent posted a single diaper pic in the thread, only asked why these disgusting weirdos think a certain underwear is intolerable if dicks on girls is apparently fine and all ive gotten in response is DURR STOP SHITTING URSELF XDD
Nothing that you are saying has anything to do with whats happening in the thread
>>700671
I'm not talking about any of that and I was never present before or during the thread until >>700613
I couldn't care less about anything before what I said and the post I was originally replying to.
I'm not talking about why I think the fetish is gross or anything, I'm not talking about if it should be accepted or not.
I'm talking about why I think it's gross and why I think don't think it should be accepted.
Then here you come, insulting me every single post.
Let's talk diapers fetish wise.
Getting off to it's childish nature is creepy.
Shitting/Pissing in them for sexual pleasure is disgusting.
Wearing them for sexual pleasure in general is fucking weird.
That's all there is to it.
Just accept it.
>>700690
is trying to say to mr. Trollbait >>700671
is:
>Please feel shitty about yourself. Thank you
I did not even need to read more than 20% of your texts for this detailed analysis
Now look at my picture.
>>700697
what fucking "mr trollbait"? What was the "bait" in my post?
>>700697
I feel you're confusing multiple people with each other.
A problem with true anonymity.
I'm not trying to make you feel shitty about your fetish, I just personally think it's disgusting and you should keep it to yourself and locations where people talk about it regularly.
Also if specifically ask you not to post it, you shouldn't post it.
Please be aware that your fetish is not liked by most people and most people will shun you for what you like, now kindly fuck off you diaper loving fuck.
-Piss Lover
>>700671
>a certain underwear is intolerable
Ok, I'll take the bait
Underwear A is worn to entice sexual excitement from the majority of the population
Underwear B is more akin to a hygiene product that people wear when they are incontinent.
Underwear A is likely to have a quite a bit of of overlap with sissyfication and such, as it's considered feminine and degrading for a male to wear in a feminization way.
Underwear B is quite unlikely to have much overlap with the fetish, as it's gender neutral, and while it does degrade the participant, it's in an age related way.
Now people who like Underwear B have gotten it into their minds that they can spam their fetish onto whatever threads they like, regardless of context.
This happened quite a few times actually, resulting in OP's message in the beginning.
Now a "normal" person would see the message and go "Oh, you know what, maybe I shouldn't spam shit that other people don't like, because they don't want B, they came here for A!".
Unfortunately, some people decided that the perfectly valid complaint that people have is a bad thing, resulting in more shitposting, as seen
>>698347
>>697991
>>697533
>>697526
>>695668
>>695854
>>691583
>>680008
here
TL;DR
Some disgusting weirdos think spamming their fetish on other threads is fine, people who want their own fetishes in the thread are pissed, resulting in this shitheap of a thread.
I'm a retard/diaperfag
Diapers in non-diaper thread = bad
Diapers in diaper thread = fine
>>700453
Well, it's been established quite firmly, after all. There's not really anything left to the discussion but you raging and throwing about insults.
>>700453
Mate, not that guy, but the very essence of trolling is pretty much "merely pretending".
You get mad or frustrated for reasons, they don't.
That's it.
Even if you're not mad they'll just keep posting shit on the tier of "lol, no u r" until you stop posting.
How do you not understand this?
>>676331
Anyone have the "Are you a sissy" by Nite Q?
>>700690
>Getting off to it's childish nature is creepy.
Babyplay is a separate fetish (although it's really not that different from BDSM), so that's another discussion. An adult diaper isn't childish unless it's specifically made to be.
>Shitting/Pissing in them for sexual pleasure is disgusting.
Which goes for shitting/pissing in any other context, so obviously it's not the diaper itself that's the issue. The fact that scat isn't allowed on the board makes that a moot point in the first place, yet you keep rambling about "MUH SHIT".
>Wearing them for sexual pleasure in general is fucking weird.
It doesn't have to be. If people like you stop being bigoted pieces of shit to those who wear them, it won't be "weird" anymore.
>>700711
>I just personally think it's disgusting and you should keep it to yourself and locations where people talk about it regularly.
Just like black people should sit at the back of the bus, huh? Might not be the best idea to throw stones in glass houses, considering what you're into.
>Please be aware that your fetish is not liked by most people and most people will shun you for what you like
Nope, people who have intellects above the level of stormfags realize there's nothing to dislike or shun about a fetish as harmless as ours. Everyone whose opinion actually matters has nothing against diapers.
>>700726
>Underwear B is more akin to a hygiene product that people wear when they are incontinent.
Or for the sake of sexual excitement.
>Underwear B is quite unlikely to have much overlap with the fetish
Except that's wrong, since they're combined quite often, It's precisely that context that means some diaper pics can go in these threads. It's only getting spammed here because you decided to make an issue out of it.
>>700761
You're trying to hard.
>>700761
>Or for the sake of sexual excitement.
That's what pushes it into fetish territory moron
>since they're combined quite often
You're wrong
>It doesn't have to be. If people like you stop being bigoted pieces of shit to those who wear them, it won't be "weird" anymore.
"I don't like thing, stop"
"STOP OPPRESSING ME"
kek
>>700761
>It doesn't have to be. If people like you stop being bigoted pieces of shit to those who wear them, it won't be "weird" anymore.
Wow, no fucking shit.
If we all thought that murder was okay, it would be.
>Just like black people should sit at the back of the bus, huh?
Comparing racism to people wearing diapers for sexual pleasure? Okay.
>Nope, people who have intellects above the level of stormfags realize there's nothing to dislike or shun about a fetish as harmless as ours. Everyone whose opinion actually matters has nothing against diapers.
Literally saying you have to be smart to enjoy something as disgusting as wearing a diaper for sexual pleasure.
>Trying to justify anything
>>700761
>Except that's wrong, since they're combined quite often
So are Elephants and Ivory Poachers, but if I start a thread about Elephants and you start posting pictures of Grand Pianos - you're still being a cunt.
>Come here to fap
>Tumblr level drama
???
Isn't there any mods on /aco/? Just report these fuckers and post more traps.
>>700779
>You're wrong
It's why sissy pics containing diapers occasionally pop up in these threads now and then, though. The fetishes appeal to people for similar reasons, so it's no wonder they do.
>"I don't like thing, stop"
This is "I just want to take over the world, clearly you've got some growing up to do"-tier downplaying of the attitude towards them.
>>700784
>If we all thought that murder was okay, it would be.
>"YOUR UNDERWEAR IS LITERALLY MURDER!"
Well, hello there, Tumblr. A much more reasonable comparison would be to glasses. The entire issue here is people pretty much retaining the juvenile "glasses are for nerds, attack on sight" attitude into adulthood when it comes to diapers.
>Comparing racism to people wearing diapers for sexual pleasure? Okay.
The person you were quoting was an incontinent diaper wearer. You were telling her she was disgusting and had no place except among diaper fetishists. That's fucked up on several levels, yes.
>Literally saying you have to be smart to enjoy something as disgusting as wearing a diaper
"Above stormfags" isn't exactly setting the bar very high. But yes, if you think a clean diaper is disgusting, you clearly can't be very smart. Are you disgusted by clean empty trash bags too?
>diaperfags one again showing they can't control their autism just like they can't control their shit
>>700925
Can't control what you don't have.
>>701034
>lol
I rest my case.
i realize op couldve asked in a nicer way to not have diaper content in this thread (since diaper content tends to have its own thread anyways) but really guys? is it really necessary to bombard someone with it when he clearly said not to?
This thread is cancer
Diaper fags who posted In this thread continue to give the abdl community a bad name.
Every one shut the Fuck up and post traps
>>701164
I'll say once more that i havent posted a single diaper in the thread but id argue that if anything people like OP are giving this "community" of we like girls with dicks a bad name and just inviting exactly what they dont want into the thread since they are such close minded children
>>701111
They know it's wrong. That's why they're doing it. They like shitting up threads and they're invading this thread to shit it up. This is their express purpose and their self-appointed win condition. Acting indignant that people want a single thread without a certain fetish is just a smokescreen.
>>700748
I'm trying to masturbate and I'd like to masturbate to the comic mentioned in this post.
Someone takes a moment to stop shitposting and tell me where to find out so we can ll jerk off together.
holy shit this thread is a trainwreck.
how has this not been posted yet?
I always forget about this page
not sure if counts
>>700134
>fishes
Even his grammar is comparable to an 8 year old
>>701668
>plural: fish or fishes
>>701177
We're not telling you personally to cut that shit out you fucking autist, we're complaining about the people who ARE posting it, saying "BUT I'M NOT" doesn't matter if you're not the one we're complaining about.
Jesus fucking Christ
>>702093
Pretty sure the autist is you.
>>700324
i know i am late but can you set up a dropbox or something
lookin for first pony trap
