Futa isn't wanted but beggars and all that, but no diapers and scat.
[spoiler] Mainly no diapers [/spoiler]
As
Fucked up the op, not a great start.
This set is a bit of a stretch
Before any kinda shit show starts because of the diaper comment I want to clarify I was just making fun of that one diaper guy from a couple days ago who wouldn't fuck off because he didn't like to be compared to scat.
>>252390
Diaper people are generally really nice they just get a lot of spite.
>>252375
Source?
>>253610
Hotpocketshogun on eka's
evidently this fetish isn't too popular or wanted on this board, but where should we go instead?
I don't like aryion at all, there's too much shit (not literally, although that too).
>>256092
Threads are just super slow nowadays. It isn't surprising.
The /d/-/aco/ split basically killed same size threads.
>>256092
>not popular nor wanted
Nah, they just slow.
dumping my best ones
>>257956
>>257957
>>257961
>>257964
>>257968
with color
>>257970
>>257974
>>257976
>>257977
>>257978
/d/ mods like to haphazardly ban "western" art in vore threads.
>>252390
what's the source on this anyway, all I have is this one from the same artist
>>252453
You are that anon, aren't you?
>>260100
willudie
>>257970
Mother of fuck, I remember seeing that episode as a kid.
And now it comes back as porn when I'm older.
....I'm okay with this.
Sketchy OC.
>>261751
Excellent!
>>261716
I think this and that one episode of Cow and Chicken are what fucked me up when I was a kid.
>>261597
thanks!
>>263123
>because 7 ate 9
Ha
>>261158
ok why post the little ass pic?
>>261751
Fuggin' great.
>>266328
She know what you're into?
>>266328
Vore =/= Fat
Fat =/= Vore
>>266328
Kill yourself.
>>269271
top kek, samefag is salty
>browse eka's
>non-vore
>non-vore
>non-vore
>non-vore
for what purpose?
>>269813
>browsing Ekas
>promising preview, is actually a story
>promising preview, TASE commission
>non-vore comics that take up half a page
>non-vore writing with a vorish preview
>mspaint shit
>My Little Pony and Pokemon
My surprise when browsing pixiv and TASE was there as well, damn
>>271540
bigbig appeared in infinity as well
>>266328
Fuck off faggot. Kill yourself and delete this post.
>>271307
Eka has become such a hugbox for shit that it's sickening
>>271540
Any screencaps on that? I would love to see TASE getting assblasted
>>271307
>promising preview, is actually a story
Maybe if you weren't a moron and used the header correctly.
>>273269
The interface for that and 'latest drawings' is ass
>>271566
He showed his ass so badly on that site there, because someone gave all his paid away. they didnt delete tis thread, they Obliterated it.
>>273287
The entire site's interface is embarrassing. The new UI isn't even implemented over 1/4 of the site.
>>259964
yo source man?
>>273509
The time I saw it was very recently, they didn't give all his paid stuff, only one comic. Last thread asking for his most recent comic was also locked
>>274000
Modeseven. Older modeseven, but still modeseven.
>>271646
Nah, but a lot of pictures featuring him, especially on deviantart have small strings of comments of him getting assblasted by people hating his stupid self-insert.
>>274649
Any notable examples?
>>275347
I wish conn was a girl.
>>275412
she is though
it's her oc that's male :^)
>>252390
>make ignorant comments about other fetishes
>get told
>do it again
That's not called "making fun of", that's called "being retarded". I'd post diaper art just to spite you, but luckily for you, I don't have any pics of them combined with fetishes as disgusting as yours.
>>276017
>get told
Person was told to fuck off because they weren't wanted while still staying where they weren't wanted, that's all that happened.
>>276029
No, pretty sure the overreacting normalfags got told pretty hard by the facts. They were the ones constantly insulting diaperfags, so they deserved whatever they got.
>>275347
I usually like the stuff Conn commissions, but "realistic" same size vore always puts me off.
>>276034
Told what facts?
No one wanted the diaperfags there, the op wasn't even insulting the fetish just saying no to the fetishs he didn't want and then boom butt mad diaper fags shit up a thread.
>>276316
The fact that diapers are objectively a tame fetish. Also, you don't get to speak for everyone. In fact, opinions like yours should be ignored precisely because of their ignorance. The ones shitting up the thread were the buttmad normalfags insulting diaperfags just because they pointed out the obvious fact diapers aren't scat. What they should have done was listen, apologize for their ignorant assumption, then shut up. The same goes for you.
>>276404
Why the fuck are bringing up how tame something is on /d/2.0, this is a place full of fucking degenerates wanking it to drawings some other degenerate made.
If someone doesn't want a fetish in their thread then they say no to that fetish, you're as bad as the fags who go to futa threads complaining about all the dick.
Also an apology? Really?
>>276404
Not the same anon, and didn't see the argument, but holy shit, you sound fucking dumb.
>>276928
>Diaper
>Not related to scat
Off to a great start already I see.
>People definitely do owe them one.
Holy fuck, really? No one "owes" them anything, jesus. Do you really think they're some poor, second-class kink on 4chan? No one would say that shit about anything else, hell, not even furries come around and say that shit.
>He sounds very intelligent and completely right
>What they should have done was listen, apologize for their ignorant assumption, then shut up.
Oh boy, are we listen and believe here too?
>Apologize
>4chan
That's a laugh and a half in itself
>>276966
It's probably the same shit eating pamperchu trying to defend their shit fetish
Has any one gotten BigBig's new comic? Supposedly Its F/F though I'm not sure with him.
>>276966
>>Not related to scat
Yeah, it kind of isn't. Rubber pants were used for babies and incontinent people back in the day, and nowadays lots of people fetishize them as kinky clothing that feels good, without a single thought about babies or bodily excretions. The same goes for diapers.
>Do you really think they're some poor, second-class kink on 4chan?
No, so don't treat them like one. There's nothing wrong with it, and we're here to stay, so if you have an issue, it's in your best interests to shut up rather than get wrecked by us.
>>277889
Oh look, a diaper hater being retarded. Nothing new there, I guess. Diapers aren't a shit fetish, they're an underwear fetish, and your epic cringe maymay Pamperchu does not represent it. Now fuck off.
>>280300
Holy shit you autistic diaperfag stfu and go back to your own fucking thread. No one here gives a shit about your weak ass justifications.
Requesting
BigBigs new F/F pred/pred Comic
Vorefan's Developing Hunger comic
Vorefan's Attractive Demise
>>280357
developing hunger: 4e7bd41273228f590943d7418291c1c3
(anonfiles)
from infinity thread
looking forward attractive demise as well
>>280369
Dead link my friend.
>>280300
> used for babies and incontinent people
Ah, so they're used by people because they'd piss and shit themselves. Yeah, they really don't hold any relation at all? Man, it's not like your statement trying to justify it directly links back to people and babies wearing them because they're pissing and shitting themselves.
> so if you have an issue, it's in your best interests to shut up rather than get wrecked by us.
Pffft, holy fucking shit, anon, thanks for the Christmas present of laughter, you're truly the jolliest of us. Jesus, and here I though you were being serious, I didn't realize you were such a comedian! Also, on the off-chance you're actually being serious, if you're not a second-class kink, then what the fuck are you going on about, wanting apologies and people to not voice their opinions on your kink. Are you going to pull out your list of demands next?
>Oh look, a diaper hater being retarded. Nothing new there, I guess. Diapers aren't a shit fetish, they're an underwear fetish, and your epic cringe maymay Pamperchu does not represent it. Now fuck off.
Please, please link me to some vast archive of art where diapers have literally nothing to do with shitting, or being treated like a child that needs to shit, or any of those combinations. Please, show me the wealth of work that shows people wearing diapers just because they feel comfy. Fuck, next you're going to say that people don't like vore because of the eating, they like it because of the noises the belly makes, and that reason only.
>>280340
You sound a bit butthurt you got told. Maybe you should just shut up and accept that you're wrong if you don't care, huh?
>>280459
>that selective reading comprehension
Yeah, you're not exactly doing yourself any favors. Diaper fetishism is about as related to scat as stocking fetishism is related to filth and sweat fetishes. Stockings were made to absorb foot sweat and grime, but you'd be retarded to insinuate that stocking fetishes are related to that and not, you know, people finding them to look and feel good as clothing. Diapers are no different.
>if you're not a second-class kink, then what the fuck are you going on about, wanting apologies and people to not voice their opinions on your kink
Makes perfect sense if you think for at least a second. Don't be a dipshit singling out a fetish that's not even extreme for no good reason. It's that simple.
>Please, please link me to some vast archive of art where diapers have literally nothing to do with shitting, or being treated like a child that needs to shit, or any of those combinations
You mean pretty much the majority of diaper art outside of your le ebin /b/ cringe threads with furry and DeviantArt hypermessing crap? The fact that surveys among the AB/DL community show that the majority of people into diapers aren't into messing proves the point pretty clearly. Hell, just take a look at the diaper thread, and you'll find lots of clean diaper pics in there.
It's a basic fact that diapers are always underwear, but not always shitty, so obviously the same thing goes for diaper fetishism. You can find issue with dirty diapers for all I care, but whining about clean ones is quite hypocritical coming from someone who's into eating people of all things. You're in no position to be laughing at others, Hannibal.
>>281389
This shit better be screen capped.
Dog go back to your thread, or at least post some vore.
>>281389
>Stockings were made to absorb foot sweat and grime, but you'd be retarded to insinuate that stocking fetishes are related to that and not, you know, people finding them to look and feel good as clothing. Diapers are no different.
I went looking for this, and I didn't actually see any reports on that alleged use. What I DID see a few times, though, was that one of the big problems pantyhose had was that it retained sweat, which was a bonus feature that stockings did no have, or at least not in as high of capacity as pantyhose. Also, aside from your alleged use, they were almost always worn, by adults, to look good, as opposed to diapers which were, as you put it, used for shitting and pissing babies and shitting and pissing adults.
>Makes perfect sense if you think for at least a second. Don't be a dipshit singling out a fetish that's not even extreme for no good reason. It's that simple.
People single out fetishes all the time, and they do that especially so in vore. Why do you think there are tons of different types of vore, or vore threads where only one type of vore and predator are allowed? Hell, people even got pissed at futa because it was around so much on /d/. Pretty much every fetish will get singled out at some point, so the fact that you think your fetish getting singled out matter so much is fucking dumb. That's why people think your wanting apologies and for people to be quiet about it is fucking stupid, because it happens with just about every fetish at one point or another.
1/2
Guys, guys. Please, I know it's entertaining but think of what it probably is.
>>281389
>>281428
2/2
>You mean pretty much the majority of diaper art outside of your le ebin /b/ cringe threads with furry and DeviantArt hypermessing crap? The fact that surveys among the AB/DL community show that the majority of people into diapers aren't into messing proves the point pretty clearly. Hell, just take a look at the diaper thread, and you'll find lots of clean diaper pics in there.
I went into the thread on /aco/ since I didn't see one on /d/, and yes, only 18% of the pictures were filth related. I also didn't mark down every comment about people enjoying "messing" themselves, or wanting to "mess" themselves, but I will concede that yes, the majority of the artwork in there was clean. I have seen far more "messing" diaper art online, enough to make me typically always associate diapers with messing, but that is my personal experience, and so I'll concede that one, as perhaps you haven't seen as much as I, or the OP, possibly have.
>It's a basic fact that diapers are always underwear, but not always shitty, so obviously the same thing goes for diaper fetishism. You can find issue with dirty diapers for all I care, but whining about clean ones is quite hypocritical coming from someone who's into eating people of all things. You're in no position to be laughing at others, Hannibal.
In the end, I will almost always immediately associate diapers with shit and piss, and, while I'll admit that some might not see them like that, it is how I ( and I am sure ) many others do. I also think that someone who states that they simply do not want to see diapers of any kind should be respected, because they are not into it, and so the fact that you are complaining about someone asking not to see them is quite frankly quite stupid. As for what I enjoy, yeah, I like the act of eating, digesting, and shitting out people. That doesn't mean that I'll go into a diaper thread where the OP asks for no vore and start complaining about it's misrepresentation.
>>281451
Honestly, I'm just having a fun time replying to them. They might be a troll, or they might not, I'm just having a good time, and since I'm posting vore with every response, I don't see much of a problem with it.
>>281467
As long as the porn keeps flowing I s'pose.
>>281494
Don't worry, whenever I reply I always make sure to post relevant pictures.
>>281428
>as opposed to diapers which were, as you put it, used for shitting and pissing babies and shitting and pissing adults.
Diapers are worn by adults to look good as well, though, as evidenced by the brands specifically made for fetishists. Even more would do so if it weren't for the irrational stigma against it.
>that you think your fetish getting singled out matter so much is fucking dumb
The thing is, though, that in most cases, dislike for fetishes has its roots in a natural aversions (for example, vore creeping out people is understandable, because we're instinctually horrified at the thought of being eaten, and scat is disgusting because shit is objectively unhealthy), while diapers get a disproportionally harsh kneejerk reaction that's solely based on the factually wrong things ones surroundings tells one about them during potty training to shame one out of wearing them. When you get right down to it, being disgusted by diapers is the first step of judgemental normalfaggotry.
>as perhaps you haven't seen as much as I, or the OP, possibly have.
I've probably seen more. However, a dirty diaper is a dirty diaper, and a clean one is a clean one. If you can't help but think of dirty ones when you see clean ones, the issue isn't with the clean ones or the ones who like them.
>the fact that you are complaining about someone asking not to see them is quite frankly quite stupid.I like the act of eating people. That doesn't mean that I'll go into a diaper thread where the OP asks for no vore and start complaining about it's misrepresentation.
I think you're somewhat misunderstanding the basic issue. The issue was never them not being allowed in itself, but that the logic for them not being allowed was because it was lumped in with scat.
Equating diapers with scat is about the same as claiming that soft vore is hardcore guro and screaming shit like "GO EAT SOMEONE ELSE'S BRAINS, HANNIBAL" whenever someone says they're into soft vore. It gets tiring to hear.
>>280357
Any one have Bigbigs Comic
Or Attractive Demise Yet?
>>281935
>brands specifically made for fetishists
Yes, but you compared them to stockings, which is a fashion made for people everywhere. Latex suits are also made for fetishists, doesn't mean they're equal to normal clothing just because some people make them.
>diapers get a disproportionally harsh kneejerk reaction that's solely based on the factually wrong things ones surroundings tells one about them during potty training to shame one out of wearing them
Just like how people dislike futa despite hermaphrodites and MtF people literally exist in the world. A lot of people probably dislike diapers because of the relation to shit, piss, babying, and various other acts that many adults would find another adult doing bizarre at best. If I saw someone on the street wearing diapers I would think they were incontinent or into babying and would not want to associate myself with them, but I'd have the exact same reaction to most anyone practicing their kinks in real life as well.
> If you can't help but think of dirty ones when you see clean ones, the issue isn't with the clean ones or the ones who like them
I never said it was, I said that the relationship between the two is there to many people, despite what the people wearing the diapers might say.
>them not being allowed was because it was lumped in with scat
I'd argue that they are related in many people's eyes, and I'd say that your following example is faulty at best. You could say that vore is related guro, and I'd agree with you. They're not the exact same thing, of course, but the relationship is there, and, while wrong, I'd respect the OPs request to not include any vore in their thread. Sure, I could go in explaining how guro isn't a direct result from vore, and that it's not probably the flavour of the majority of those with the kink, but I wouldn't, as I'd know why the OP might relate the two, and I'd see no point in taking up space in their thread trying to convince them they're not.
>>282045
>Yes, but you compared them to stockings, which is a fashion made for people everywhere. Latex suits are also made for fetishists, doesn't mean they're equal to normal clothing just because some people make them.
So basically, things aren't clothes unless they're fashionable? That's a pretty bizarre definition. If they're worn for the sake of covering skin and keeping the body at the right temperature, they're clothes.
>If I saw someone on the street wearing diapers
Yeah, that'd be messed up if they were deliberately exposing them, just like exposing any other underwear would be messed up. If you just happened to see it, though, it would be literally none of your business, as it's called underwear for a reason. In case they're incontinent, you'd be a pretty awful person to not want to associate with them just over that, considering it's no different than someone needing to wear, say, glasses.
>I said that the relationship between the two is there to many people, despite what the people wearing the diapers might say.
And that's precisely why they need to be told the relationship isn't inherent, but merely something they're assuming on their own out of prejudice. If their assumptions aren't confronted and contradicted, they'll feel justified to treat people much worse than they really deserve to be.
>I'd argue that they are related in many people's eyes
The thing is, though, many people are wrong. Considering that the people who hate diapers even go into our threads to insult us, it's only fair that we call them out on their ignorance wherever it rears its head.
>>282114
>things aren't clothes unless they're fashionable?
That's not what I'm saying. You likened stockings to fetishes, and how diapers are the same. I pointed out that stockings are made as clothing for people of all ages and genders, diapers are made for a specific purpose that is not fashion. Yes, some people might adapt them for what they enjoy, but that is still a fetish, and not a fashion, much like how someone wearing all-latex would be considered fetishistic, and not simply wearing normal fashion.
>that'd be messed up if they were deliberately exposing them, you'd be a pretty awful person to not want to associate with them
I meant that if I saw someone wearing them on the street (which means it'd be pretty visible for anyone to see ) I wouldn't really want to talk to them or hang out with them, much like how I wouldn't want to be seen hanging out with someone walking their partner(s) on a leash, or someone dressed up in a fur suit. As for being an awful person, if I knew them personally and knew what they were going through, I would be fine knowing them, but if I just met them on the street, I wouldn't want to talk to them for too long, like how I wouldn't want to talk to anyone who smelled awful, or I found personally distasteful to be around.
>that's why they need to be told the relationship isn't inherent
Yes, but the relationship is there, and to tell someone it's not is to willfully mislead them, just like me saying that people only assume guro is related to vore, when actually it's something that only some people like to do or show. It still exists, and you cannot deny that.
>even go into our threads to insult us
And vore has the same things, such as many other fetishes do as well. Your kink is not unique in that respect, nor does it need protecting. Yes, it sucks that people do it, but it happens to everyone, and it is no cause to waste space and time in the threads of others protesting it. Like in most things, ignore them and they'll move on.
>>282141
And the sequel.
are you people seriously debating diapers in the vore thread fuck off
>>282218
Is there really a problem as long as I'm posting art alongside it?
>>281938
Attractive demise is for next year, at least the place where I got the other ones said so. When it's out it should be there as well
http://greenglutton.tumblr.com/
>>282141
>stockings are made as clothing for people of all ages and genders
And so are diapers. Even if it has a certain purpose for incontinent people, it's still their underwear even at the times when it's not actively being used for that purpose, and so the main function of diapers is to be underwear. Really, even if we go along the lines of diapers being a tool to make up for an impaired bodily function, that would just mean diaper fetishism is on the same level as a glasses fetish instead.
>I meant that if I saw someone wearing them on the street (which means it'd be pretty visible for anyone to see)
That's a pretty bizarre scenario, though, as they'd be covered by pants, a skirt or something unless you're dealing with an outright exhibitionist. If you just caught an accidental glimpse of it, then yes, judging them over it would be quite hypocritical, considering you were the one looking at their underwear in the first place.
>I wouldn't want to talk to them for too long, like how I wouldn't want to talk to anyone who
Anyone who wears a band-aid or contact lenses? Because wearing diapers for incontinence is the exact same as that. Their body is injured in a way they can't help, but they have a discrete and easily hidden tool that compensates for it. Ostracizing people over medical tools does make you a pretty awful person, yes.
>It still exists, and you cannot deny that.
Sure, just as the relationship between panties and scat exists because some people like panty pooping porn. At the end of the day, though, that doesn't matter in the least. Clean is clean, and dirty is dirty.
>And vore has the same things, such as many other fetishes do as well.
It's not even nearly on the same level as the vitriol we get, trust me. Just look at shit like >>277889.
>>283026
See, answers like your first one are the reason why I think you're trolling.
>And so are diapers
No, diapers are made with a specific purpose in mind. The only people who wear them aside from those that need to, are fetishists. You're basically saying that a person wearing pants is the same thing as a person wearing diapers when they have no need to be. Normal clothing, and clothing worn for fetishistic reasons is not the same. As for glasses, yes, if someone was wearing glasses solely for fetishistic reasons, then it'd be the same as diapers, not like normal clothing.
>caught an accidental glimpse you were the one looking at their underwear in the first place
I really don't think I understand your point here. I would treat them the same way I'd treat a stranger I'd noticed wearing a cat-tail butt plug, or a person in a fur suit. I'd respect their decision to do what they're doing, but I wouldn't want to stick around and talk to, as I said before, a complete stranger I met on the street.
>Anyone who wears a band-aid or contact lenses? Because wearing diapers for incontinence is the exact same as that
Holy crap, no it is not. It's one thing to have a small cut, or to have poor eye sight, it's another thing entirely to be incontinent. If you're trying to relate someone blinking a lot because their contacts are bothering them with someone farting, pissing, and/or shitting themselves, then that is pretty fucking stupid. Also, it's hardly ostracizing them over a medical tool if I also dislike the smell of piss and shit, just like how I wouldn't want to stick around (again, as I said before ) a person who reeked of musk and/or was constantly drenched in sweat or stunk of B.O.
1/2
>>283026
>>283109
2/2
> just as the relationship between panties and scat exists
Jesus shitting Christ, really? That's a massive fucking stretch. If you linked panties to wet pussies, sure, but panties were NOT created with shit and piss in mind, as opposed to diapers. You could also say that glasses are related to scat since people shit on them, it doesn't mean that the relationship is at all there to almost anyone who thinks about them. See, this is another one that makes me think you're trolling, because it's such a bizarre stretch to find anything that makes the relationship seem slightly more vague. It'd be like saying that there's a relationship between vore and tentacle porn since sometimes a tentacle monster eats people.
>It's not even nearly on the same level as the vitriol we get
Ah yes, one post about an apparent shit-eater, truly you are the hardest done by online. Every fetish gets mean comments now and then, just like how people online get mean things said to or about them from time to time. I can't recall a single other fetishist needing people to apologize for not liking their fetish, or a relationship that they've seen most likely many times before, and honestly if you can't simply let someone be, online even, without coming into their thread, wasting their posting limit, and taking up space complaining about nothing, then how do you survive on the internet? This is why I, and others, thought the special treatment you wanted was, and is, stupid, because you're no better or worse off than anyone else. You have to learn to deal with it, or decide to stop going online to places that aren't solely focused on your fetish, because I doubt anyone else really wants to see two people going back and forth in the midst of their porn.
>>276383
Sauce?
>>283322
Cownugget, Gunmouth, allofthebadthings (on Tumblr)
He's typically a furry artist though, in case that's not your thing.
I remember some multi-drawing story that involved a girl having to be eaten by a horse, then getting stuck in the horse. Anyone have that?
>>283109
>No, diapers are made with a specific purpose in mind.
In other words, they're underwear that have an extra function.
>The only people who wear them aside from those that need to, are fetishists
That's wrong, though. Plenty of people simply wear them as part of their lifestyle without feeling sexually excited by them, due to finding them to be superior to other kinds of underwear.
>if someone was wearing glasses solely for fetishistic reasons, then it'd be the same as diapers
Well, seeing as glasses are commonly known to be one of the most commonplace and inoffensive fetishes... yes, you're right there.
> I would treat them the same way I'd treat a stranger I'd noticed wearing a cat-tail butt plug, or a person in a fur suit.
The thing with those is that they're quite obviously visible, and whoever wears them in public is consciously showing them off. Diapers, on the other hand, are concealed under one's clothes. See it like this: If a girl was wearing boxer shorts, would you tell others that you looked up her skirt and saw them? Diapers aren't like pants, no. They are, however, underclothing. Each person's choice in underwear is their own business.
>I wouldn't want to stick around and talk to, as I said before, a complete stranger I met on the street.
Well, to be fair, I think many of us would rather not do that with any stranger whatsoever. What about, say, a co-worker, though?
>It's one thing to have poor eye sight, it's another thing entirely to be incontinent.
They're both medical conditions that can't be helped, and that have tools developed to help with them which were both stigmatized by some and fetishized by others. Perfectly valid comparison. If you were to dislike someone over causing accidents due to not wearing glasses or having them due to not wearing diapers, that makes sense, but to look down on people for using tools that make them function perfectly in society despite their bodily disabilities is just pointlessly malicious.
1/2?
>>283131
>You have to learn to deal with it, or decide to stop going online to places that aren't solely focused on your fetish, because I doubt anyone else really wants to see two people going back and forth in the midst of their porn.
Or... maybe people just shouldn't attack things if they can't handle others defending it? I don't know, sounds pretty obvious to me.
>>276771
Her fat on Sara's body what?
>>281535
Tsavo didn't upload this to his eka's acc yet...
>>283625
>>283651
Since this is getting too big for single posts, and I'm sure many people here don't want to see huge walls of back-and-forth, here's a link to a pastebin with my response. http://pastebin.com/DD89cvff
>>283722
The reply to your post is the last part of the pastebin response.
>devourment is still female only
cmon it's almost 2016
>>284317
Get outta here Trudeau.
Seriously though, one can dream for the future.
>>284020
That's gerp
>>284194
Casts and wheelchairs aren't clothes. Diapers are (See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Undergarments).
You say you haven't seen anyone wear them. That's no wonder, since they're underwear, not to mention people would hardly be inclined to tell someone as ignorant as you about it. You're not going out of your normal life to discover what diapers feel like, by the way - we all wore them once. If you remember that they felt good, why not keep wearing them?
And no, all I'm saying is that diapers are both clothing and medical tools at the same time, and so they can be compared to both panties and glasses.
And no, a cat tail buttplug has nothing to do with one's choice of underwear, no matter how much you repeat it. Your response to the boxer shorts should be your response to diapers as well if you're a rational human being.
Here's an interesting thing for you to consider: What if the co-worker was incontinent, but had also become a diaper fetishist to seek acceptance for his condition? That's quite common among us due to attitudes like yours.
The difference between barfing and incontinence is that there is a tool specifically made to contain the incontinent's waste matter, making it a complete non-issue if people can just get over their learned kneejerk response to diapers.
Funny you should bring up colds, as Japan actually has people wear masks when they have colds so they can go outside without infecting others. What you are doing is taking that kind of consideration for others and ridiculing them for even trying. As said before, needlessly malicious, not to mention self-centered.
How about a better definition? "Thick soft absorbent underwear for people of all ages". Those definitions you quoted are nearly a century old outdated shit proven to be incorrect by the very existence of adult diapers. If there is no piss and shit in a diaper, then the diaper has nothing to do with piss and shit. Get over yourself.
1/2
>>285583
>>285605
Please fuck off with this.
>>285583
>>285605
Here's the next link. http://pastebin.com/95n1mWCS
You know, you could always start posting your responses in a pastebin as well, so at least you aren't wasting as many posts when you reply, since, you know, you're not even posting images, which would at least compensate.
>>286666
Could you guys please take this wholly irrelevant and embarrassing conversation to email or something
I mean sure at least one of you is posting images but holy fuck, guys.
>>286695
And then of course I forget to attach an image
>>286695
>>286698
Sorry if you don't want to see this, it's why I moved my responses to pastebin. I'd hoped they'd pick up on my hints about taking up space and not posting any images, but it doesn't seem to have helped. Hopefully this doesn't continue much longer, or if it does, it is contained on pastebin or something of the sort so that it does not clutter up the thread with multiple posts not on the subject of the thread.
>>286781
>>286829
Oh my god just shut up already
>>286890
It only goes on as long as people reply to it.
>>286781
>>286829
For you. http://pastebin.com/qphpEsyA
>>286890
>>286984
Sorry guys, it's just too much fun to reply to them! I know that it sucks that they keep posting in here, and I AM sorry about that. Still, I suppose that's all that can be expected of a friend of me, Beelzebub, huh?
Allow me to post a few images to make up for some of the image-less posts going on in here.
>>287563
>>287565
>>287568
>>287573
And last one for now, hope that helped even things out a little.
>>265783
Is there more of this??
>>287668
As in a sequence? Sadly, no. The artist does do cock vore, but most of their stuff is furry, if that might bother you.
So, who is this 'all seeing eye' faggot that literally pops up on every single artists page that I like? Don't get me wrong, I don't have anything against males in vore (albeit, admittedly not preferred) but I remember hearing some really creepy shit about this one guy. Why hasn't anything been done yet?
>>287891
You don't wanna know... And as a note he started popping up in pixiv as well, damn
>>287891
The all seeing faggot is some fuck who commissions a shit load of artists to all do the same thing: eat his self insert whose resembles a neckbearded hobo or fucking them, or both. Always with a smug ass content expression and sometimes out of character for the pred.
There's supposedly stories of him harrassing the fuck out of artists who didn't want to draw things he wanted, and he would pester the hell out of them.
Even made an artist quit because he nagged her to have his self-insert fucking her persona/self-insert which was against her preferences.
>>276400
Damn it. I couldnt get this out of my head
>>287913
First of all, I like F/F NOT F/M but who cares if EYE guy is Paying artists for his stuff? So far, hes done what most of you pricks can't do. PAY artist for something. Yes yes, blah blah, rumours, rumours, they are like assholes, every one has one. ^^ Get over it. Let him continue to support artists, That is a good thing isn't it?
If he harrasses an artist, Im pretty dam sure they probably just charge him More money. Blah blah blah. ^^ " Oh I heard a rumour he bothered one into quiting" well, as we know, some artists just quit, and they probably started that BS about it so he had an excuse to quit so we wouldn't bad talk him like every one does the ones who just up and quit.
-_-
>>288032
I dont like what you said but you do have a point.
>>288032
You do have a point, but he could make a less creepy oc. See agnitnurk who also commissions a lot but nobody says nothing against him
>>288032
EYE threatens artists when they refuse to do his work. He's posted personal information including addresses and names of those he disagrees with online as a threat to them.
He isn't just an asshole. He's a cowardly man cunt who is so pathetically low in life that he has to stoop to threatening people who draw silly pictures when they won't give him what he wants.
Kagero / AllSeeingEye / John is a massive blight upon the community and it's a shame he hasn't been banned yet from the communities.
No one likes him. We know who you are John.
>>288032
Also, if you are going to threaten artists you've commissioned with posting their personal information online maybe you should remember that THEY HAVE THAT INFO TOO, you dumb shitter of wax.
>>287891
Also Anndygirl was the artist he scared into quitting vore permanently.
HungrySuccubus(Wanted to fly to her home for creepy reasons), Kego (Threatening to come over to his house for disagreeing with him), Suibelly (Posted his address/name online and told people to go get him), Green Glutton ( Harassed over text), DoubleOSnake ( Forced his characters to do things out of character), Rupie (More harassment), and I can keep going if you'd like.
>>287891
>>287892
>>287913
>>288041
>>288079
>>288080
>>288094
Aside from all the fucking creepy assholery, the actual driving away of an artist, his self-insert is also just so boringly bland. Seriously, the entire character is a guy with black hair that goes into a black beard, a white shirt, and blue pants. The only other defining feature about him is that he likes getting eaten and/or fucking people. That's it, that is literally all there is to him. It's just so bland, so...nothing. If someone has to have a self-insert, at least make them somewhat interesting, don't get every single fucking picture to be of a bland person, happily fucking someone, or happily being eaten by them.
>>288032
Firstly, nice assumption made about all of us. Get an insult in there to discredit everyone who disagrees with your opinion, or that dislikes him. Second, no one gives a shit that he pays artists for commissions, the first thing that anyone who doesn't know much about him says is how he gets endless, generic, similar commissions and then floods the site with them.
Ah, so you're okay with him harassing people then? So, him harassing people to do stuff for him they don't want to do is fine as long as he pays enough for it? Amazing defense. As for the part about who he's harassed, well, that's already disproved just a few comments down, so, nice try, but we all know it's you, John.
>>288118
i got u senpai
>>287560
>typing out a long autistic tl;dr pastebin about a fetish you obviously don't know shit about, then reporting people who are obviously more informed for replying to your bullshit
On everyone's behalf, fuck off. You're into fucking vore, you don't get to judge others for their tastes. If people want to post futa vore, diaper vore or whatever, they're perfectly within their rights to do so on here. If you don't like a pic, just hide the post.
>>288168
His second point isn't even true. He commonly uses prey-only characters in his commissions against the artist's wishes. The only reason the artist may draw them is either because they need the money or they've heard about what he does to those that shun him.
>>288179
Do you guys really believe that an artist, especcially one that does that kind of art, is going to just randomly give their Real name, real address and etc ( Entire Life ) to some random stranger for them to be harrassed, identity stolen, and etc? That sounds a little flaky there.
>>288172
Uh oh, did you finally decide to stop trying to argue your point, or are you someone else entirely? Well, in any case, do you really think I'd report them when I was having so much fun talking to them? Maybe someone else reported them because they were off-topic, against the OP's wishes, and weren't posting any art. In any case, I'm not the one who reported them, heck, I was hoping for more!
Secondly, I never judged their tastes, it all started because I said that it seemed pretty dumb of them to complain that the OP politely asked to not have any diaper stuff in their thread, and it went from there. At no point did I ever tell them not to post art that the OP asked for, and heck, I even said I wished they'd posted art alongside their replies.
In summary, I can't handle all these words they, and you, are putting in my mouth. Thank you, at least, for posting some art alongside your post.
>>288191
He's not the only retard in this community.
Try to read some stories on eka's sometime.
>>288191
Some people don't realize what information can get given away through paypal. I was in an artist's stream and asked a question about what information is seen when someone ordered a commission from them, and the person who ordered it said they saw the artist's name, address, all that personal information. Hell, people seeing that stuff through paypal was one of the reasons I was hesitant to get one for kink-related stuff.
>>288191
Any monetary transactions contain IRL info, especially via paypal.
>>288079
Actually I don't even think he cares about seeing your work, he just wants permission to use your characters which by convenience he might try to get commissioned from you.
>>288194
>In summary, I can't handle all these words
Good to see you're admitting defeat.
>>288313
And even more words are being crammed into my mouth! Good thing this is a vore thread though, so that's not really a problem. Also, nice avoiding everything I said in favor of taking one line out of context to make yourself feel better. Of course, when that was half (at best) of your argument from the start, what more could really be expected from you? I just wished you'd tried a little harder.
>>288316
Well, you clearly weren't intelligent enough to be worth any effort.
>>288762
Aww, you don't have to be so modest about your replies, we all saw the multiple post responses I got back every time. I'm sorry that you feel that you are no longer able to support your argument, but if you really don't want to argue any longer, then I'll take the conceded victory. Thank you for saying I was right the entire time!
>>288790
Sorry, maybe people would take you more seriously if you weren't claiming retarded shit like that underwear fetishism is the same thing as scat, then abusing the report system because you got BTFO by the facts.
You're the one who's wrong and unable to support your arguments, get over it.
>>288790
Dude, you derailed the thread because you just had to talk shit about other fetishes, then equated vore to guro. Literally nobody gives a shit what you think.
If your own tastes are so related to guro, kindly fuck off to /b/. At least the diaperfags were able to prove what they have is just an underwear fetish.
>>288790
Jesus christ, shut the fuck up. Is there something about diapers that makes you autistic like this? Forget vaccines, this is the new danger facing our children.
>>289072
Never said it was the same thing as scat, I said it was easy to see how people would relate the two. As for reporting him, again, I never did. I was having fun talking to him, and either he deleted his posts, or someone else reported him. As for getting over it, I could say the same to you, given that you keep replying to me.
>>289093
First, I replied to a post that the diaper person made, already derailing the thread asking for apologies. Secondly, he equated vore to guro constantly, not me. All I said was that vore could be seen as related to guro. Lastly, while we were talking about something other than vore primarily, I was always posting art alongside my posts, keeping inline with the thread, and when it became clear people didn't want to see our conversation, I moved my replies to a pastebin so that the only people that would see them would be those that went to said pastebin.
>>289243
>>289249
That's more your problem than mine, and in any case, I moved my replies off the thread and continually posted art. Sorry I enjoyed replying, eventually off-site, to poorly constructed, assumption-fuel posts made by someone who derailed the thread from the near-start because they didn't like that the OP asked to not include a certain fetish in their thread.
>>289920
Stop trying to push the blame on others and just shut up. We don't want to see a single reply from you after this other than an apology for ruining the thread by acting like an ignorant fuckwad.
>>290507
I'm just pointing out the truth. Though, you asking for an apology makes me wonder if you're the diaper guy.
Also, don't forget to post pictures alongside your posts.
>>290588
>the truth
Yeah, no.
>>290588
If the guy into diapers is still here, I would like you to know that literally none of us believe or condone what this retard says. After reading what you had to say, it became clear diapers are a pretty tame fetish all things considered, especially compared to ours (let's face it, we're into eating people).
Please accept this formal apology for our earlier ignorance, and feel free to post diaper vore as much as you want. After all, it's just a matter of what underwear they're wearing.
>>290622
Nice argument.
>>290641
See, you still seem like the diaper guy, because literally no one else but him has ever taken the idea of an apology seriously. Secondly, unless you're the OP, people shouldn't be posting diapers since he specifically asked them not to. Thirdly, if you're still trying to twist my words, I never said that diapers are the same as scat, I said it is clear how people could relate the two, especially considering 18% of the pictures alone in the last diaper thread involved piss and shit. Again, if you can't see how diapers and scat can be seen to be related, then you're saying that nearly 20% of the pictures in the last thread, as well as however many of the posters who talked about liking to "mess" themselves, are all off-topic and shouldn't be a part of that thread.
Thank you for at least posting vore.
>>290641
Apology accepted. It's good to hear that the silent majority listens to reason and agrees that I'm right.
>>290642
>18% of the pictures alone in the last diaper thread involved piss and shit.
So, less than a fifth. Even including piss, which is a completely different and far less disgusting fetish than scat. And that's not even getting into how soiling and scat are different fetishes.
So yeah, your reasoning's pretty fucked on a fundamental level. There happens to be a reason diapers are allowed, while scat isn't.
>>290712
It's fun to see how you consider one person to be indicative of the majority of posters. I guess you must be the diaper guy, only he can pat himself on the back this hard.
Oh, it's gone up to 19% of the pictures now, and, again, that's not including the posts where people mention messing themselves. In any case, my original point was that it is easy to understand why people would relate diapers and scat. Seeing as how your post is only saying that that is a small part of your community (which is something I never argued against), then are you saying you agree with me, and you can see how people could relate diapers to scat? If so, then congratulations, you took this entire thread to agree with me. If you still don't see how people could relate diapers to scat, then you're contradicting what you said before about how a portion of your community does piss and shit themselves. Heck, people in the diaper thread talk about how much they enjoy messing their diapers.
And again, no art. At least have the same level of decency you demand of others.
>>290641
Op here, don't listen to this hug box fag
I made a joke that some diaper fag which I think we all know is you couldn't take a comment that besmirched his fetish
Lo and fucking behold the thread got derailed
>>290943
Well, at least others are still posting art, so that's nice. Sorry I don't have more unbirth art to share.
>>290712
Just fuck off already, nobody here gives a shit about your fetish and all you've done is made a long retarded discussion because you were incapable of just ignoring a comment you didn't like. At least post pictures on topic if you're going to have an off topic discussion
>>290641
>>290712
>Apology
Stop it with the obvious samefaggotry.
>>290641
>>290712
Aww, does baby need his diaper changed?
>>291076
>>291088
And once again, you're misconstruing my argument, good job, ya knucklehead. I never said people should relate one thing to another, I said it's easy to see why they would relate diapers to scat, and guess what, your own community does the same thing too. People don't automatically relate panties to scat as panties were designed to serve a purpose that is not related to scat, whereas diapers were designed to serve a purpose directly related to scat. The fact that you want to rewrite a definition that has existed for centuries does not change the fact that people might relate diapers to their centuries-old purpose due to the fact that they know them to be made for their literally centuries-old purpose. Secondly, I never said anything about them deserving a harsher reaction, so, once more, stop trying to put more words in my mouth.
>>291088
Nope, that's not me, but I suppose you feel it makes it easier to dismiss the opinions and thoughts of others by ignoring them and calling them sockpuppets, while pretty blatantly using sockpuppets who sound just like you. Lastly, what is this, Listen and Believe? I didn't know you wore diapers, Anita.
>>291088
>>291095
Stop derailing the thread already
>>291133
>I never said anything about them deserving a harsher reaction, so, once more, stop trying to put more words in my mouth.
Then what are you even arguing for? You're just being contrary for the hell of it in that case. All you're saying is "people still have outdated views", as if that's anything new. Oh, and of course, baseless samefag accusations.
>>291095
Wrong, dumbass. This is why OP didn't want you around, huh?
>>291153
If you ever actually read my responses, you would see that I was arguing that it made sense that people could relate diapers with scat when they thought about them, due to the fact that since their creations, and even now, diapers were, and are, by definition, "a piece of absorbent material wrapped around a baby's bottom and between its legs to absorb and retain urine and feces" and before you say anything, yes adults can also wear them in case they are incontinent. The thing I was saying from the start is that it is entirely reasonable for a person to automatically relate diapers with scat.
As for the samefag mention, well, they all speak like you, they all hold the same viewpoints as you, and, much like you, it's the only time anyone took any idea of apologies seriously, and hell, it's one of the few times I've ever seen anyone on 4chan offer an "apology" at any point.
Lastly, at least post some art if you're going to continue to post.
>>291154
Nah, that's just because OP is a faggot.
>>291163
>The thing I was saying from the start is that it is entirely reasonable for a person to automatically relate diapers with scat.
And you were wrong. Shocking, huh?
>samefag
You were obviously wrong but refused to shut up, so others apologized in your stead. Too bad you had to ruin that, huh?
>Lastly, at least post some art if you're going to continue to post.
Sure, just don't forget to save it before you hit that button!
>>291180
>so others apologized in your stead.
People on 4chan don't apologize, stop the obvious samefag
>>291180
You never actually proved anything. Every time you replied you either ignored half of what I said, accused me of things I never said, put words in my mouth, or shifted goalposts. If you ever actually had a solid argument, you never showed it to anyone on here.
And when you say "others" you mean one person who talks just like you did, describing things the same way you did, and replied in almost the exact same way you told people to reply. Lastly, they told you to post stuff that was asked not to be posted, stuff that only you seemed interested in. Gee wiz, why do you think people are calling you out for what seems like the most blatant account of samefagging I've seen in years.
What button? You mean before you accuse me of reporting you with absolutely no proof of the fact? Again, all your argument is is more assumptions about me, nothing actually truthful. At least you had the decency to post some thread-related art.
Ignore the literal shitposter already
>>291165
You caught me
Should I apologize for it ;^)
>>291203
Any new news on the second series of this?
>>291191
>Every time you replied you either ignored half of what I said, accused me of things I never said, put words in my mouth, or shifted goalposts.
This, people, is what we call "projecting". Gems such as claiming I said that panties are medical tools and glasses are underwear just because I said diapers function as both come to mind.
>why do you think people are calling you out for what seems like the most blatant account of samefagging I've seen in years.
The plural form isn't grammatically correct there. Which happens to be why you accuse others of it.
>Again, all your argument is is more assumptions, nothing actually truthful.
Oh look, it's almost as if you're perfectly describing yourself! Again!
>>291194
It's funny because vore actually is inherently connected to shitting, since that's an unavoidable consequence of eating.
>>291212
That new series is still not finished, one page is out and colored TBB said it's almost done being funded.
I'll dump what I have now since what TBB posted is cropped shots of all these.
>>291272
Thank you kindly
