No real category, just post your absolute favorite pictures
No scat, diaper fetishes, or anything of that variety.
Been fappin to this like a man possessed
>>171393
>>171671
>Tumblr
>>Tumblr
Tumblr
How the fuck do you get that out of a 4 year old pixal girl?
>>171776
To be fair, her/his pixel art does have this weird pot belly. I find it cute, but it's understandable if you dont.
Not to mention, most of the art that gets posted in this thread/on this board comes from tumblr artists. Don't pretend like it isnt one of the biggest resources for western cartoon porn whether you like the place or not. Relax and fap dude.
>>171790
Understand that and I would go through a bad time just to fuck the shit out of her given the chance but...
Literally on the cover art
dis
or dis
is a tie
See a lot of Aka6 here
[spoiler]Get out of here Stalker![/spoiler]
>>171393
>diaper fetishes, or anything of that variety.
So no lingerie pics? Diapers are just another kind of underwear, after all.
>>175579
Nope, it's about as tame as it gets. If you're so new to the internet a fetish for thick underwear of all things disturbs you, you have no place on 4chan.
>>175659
morepls
>>175659
Sauce? I'm on mobile, can't reverse search
>>175658
So what you have an issue with, then, is ageplay and soiling. Fair enough.
>>175812
It's kind of a stretch to say that diapers are just 'thick underwear', though.
They're a portable bathroom you strap onto your privates -- their explicit purpose is to catch human waste. Poo and pee are intrinsically tied to the concept of diapers.
This is the main reason people are weirded-out by it.
I'm sort of a 'to each their own' kind of person, but OP did request that the tread not contain diapers, and I think there are valid reasons for drawing the line there.
>>177719
Plenty of people wear them without urinating or defecating in them simply for the comfort and sexual appeal. That combined with even those who do use them for that purpose wearing them as underwear the rest of the time makes it clear that the primary function of diapers is to be underwear. One of their functions is that they're absorbant, but it doesn't mean they have to be used for that.
Having an issue with wet or soiled diapers is understandable, but if there is no actual waste in it, a diaper is objectively no worse than any other kind of underwear. Being grossed out by diapers is nothing but an uninformed kneejerk reaction when you get right down to it.
>>171393
>Everyone allowed!*
>Except Blacks and Mexicans
>>178474
>>178493
See, this is the real reason nobody likes you hardcore deviants. OP makes it clear what he doesn't want posted, but you two have to butt in and "correct" him like he just criticized your religion. Even without the excuse, you already have a thread. You don't need to post your shit where it clearly isn't wanted.
>>178493
Yet you illegally crossed the border and expected everyone to be happy about it anyway...
>>178583
They also tend to steal or otherwise shit on everyone else's nice things. It's a pretty good metaphor actually.
>>178579
>hardcore deviant
Literally just an underwear fetish. Singling it out and acting as if there's anything wrong with diapers is irrational and results in negative attitudes and treatment towards people who need to wear them in real life.
You don't even have to be into diapers to get that propagating the notion that diapers are something disgusting is more harmful than just sucking it up and learning to accept them as just another perfectly good kind of underwear.
>>178583
>>178607
Sounds like normalfags like you.
>>178621
>using normalfag as an insult
>the current year
kek
>>178586
>illegally
That's funny, I don't see any rules against it on /aco/.
This fucking whore. Oooohh my.
dat muscle
>>178621
What you do not seem to grasp is, we don't want it, keep it the fuck out of these threads.
I love /aco/, great threads, lots of post and all that. But you scat loving, diaper wearing faggots ruing it.
>>178711
>I literally can't read
>>178621
>Literally just an underwear fetish.
No.
>>178586
No rule against it, you and your analogy are shit
>>178979
>I too, cannot read.
>>179014
Take your filth and go.
>>179042
>You or the subhumans who like it?
Fixed that for ya Ace. Now git, and stay git.
>>179042
We don't want you here. You do nothing but shit the place up with deviance.
>>179040
Fun fact: This fetish is a common coping mechanism among incontinent people due to the ignorance they face from normalfags like you. If you want to see less diaper fetishists, start by not making such a big fat deal of people's choices and preferences in underwear.
>>179048
>We
In case you didn't know, by the way, this is /d/ for western art.
My fave picture ever, by far. Look at this cum covered back <3
>>179068
>so new he doesn't even know how commonplace the word "normalfag" is here
Shouldn't you be getting disgusted at how people can be turned on by drawings while you're at it?
>using one of the filtered words
Yup, you're a newfag at that, even.
>/d/ is not welcome here.
The mods say otherwise.
>>179073
>>so new
You don't know how wrong you are, Slappy. I've always found "normalfag" to be idiot-speak at its lowest.
>you're a newfag at that, even
No. Very deliberate in my usage. It makes cretins like you jump up and down with unwarranted smugness. It's an odd way to get my kicks, yes, but far better than being a grotesque diaper fetishist.
>mods
That's a queer skirt to hide behind, considering how hated the mods tend to be. By associating yourself with them, bootlicker, you become even more worthy of scorn and loathing.
>>179088
>I've
Nobody cares what someone who's triggered by underwear thinks.
By the way:
>8. Complaining about 4chan (its policies, moderation, etc) on the imageboards may result in post deletion and a ban.
>>179242
my nigga
>>179116
>>179130
Man, what the fuck is your problem? It's not like you're getting ousted from the site. You have your own thread and the entirety of the board to post your fetish. Stop acting like a baby and honor the OP's wishes.
>>179425
Except they're right. If somebody makes ignorant remarks about your fetish comparing it to scat, of course you'd be pissed off. Because of people saying uninformed crap like that without being corrected, diapers are viewed with way more hatred and disgust than they reasonably should be.
>>179110
>feeding the trolls
>>178493
>>178621
>>179042
>>179110
fucking hell, what part of
>No scat, diaper fetishes, or anything of that variety.
do you not understand? just stay in your fucking generals you fucking autists.
>>175588
>u haev no plas o 4ching xdds
Get out newfag.
Rule 63 inuyasha wish there was more
>>179720
>anything of that variety
That makes no sense, though, as diapers and scat have nothing to do with eachother, not to mention scat isn't allowed outside of /b/ in the first place.
>>179760
Funny words from someone overreacting to diapers.
>>179766
>WAAAAAAHHHH
You in a nutshell.
>DIAPERS ARE LITERALLY MADE TO CONTAIN ONE'S SHIT, UNLESS YO WEAR THEM BECAUSE YOUFIND THEM SEXY.
>what is urinary incontinence
>what is people not as ignorant as you who are willing to try out unorthodox underwear
They're literally underwear. You can't whine about shit unless there's actually shit in them, retard.
>YOU'RE TOO MUCH OF A RETARD TO UNDER STAND
>UNDER STAND
Do I need to say it?
>YOU HAVE DEDICATED THREADS FOR YOUR DISGUSTING FETISH
Ah, but you see, this isn't a disgusting fetish. It's a perfectly tame and normal one that you're just going to have to live with people having.
>JUST GO TO YOUR GRANDMAS HOUSE AND ASK HER IF YOU CAN SEE HER DIAPER
Why? Lots of perfectly normal people of all ages wear them.
>JUST LEAVE THE THREAF
Okay. I won't leave the thread, though.
>>179800
If you think Diapers are a "normal" fetish, you're in straight up denial lol
>>175659
>you will never slay monsters and spend all your coin on wenches and ale
Truly, with inhabit the worst of all possible worlds.
>>175565
> retarded diaperfag's attempt at logic
another reason why you aren't welcomed here
>>178474
>the primary function of diapers is to be underwear
You see, this argument falls apart when you ask "well, why are you wearing *diapers* instead of any other underwear? The thing that makes diapers unique -the entire reason for their existence- is catching waste in those too young, ill, or old to manage it themselves. Sure, people may spend more *time* 'just wearing them,' but that doesn't make that their primary purpose. The risk of shitting yourself is the only reason to wear them over other options to begin with.
Before you say that they are about "comfort," why does no one just draw or design poofy, "comfortable" underwear? Something expressly intended to capture that "comfort" that diapers apparently offer? Why would you want to keep that connection to 'battling incontinence' or 'being too young to know better,' unless that was a key part of everything?
There just is no way around it; diapers as a fetish exist because of 1) ageplay and/or 2) scat, and I don't see any good argument around that.
>>178621
>Being disgusted by the diaper *fetish* is equivalent to bullying people who need to wear them for medical reasons
Surely I don't have to say anything else? The problem here is fairly self-evident.
>>179071
Calm is god tier. It's a shame he only updates his tumblr once every second month or so.
>>179900
Nah, I'm just more intelligent than you.
>>180036
We welcome ourselves, thank you very much.
>>180074
>"well, why are you wearing *diapers* instead of any other underwear?
Why not? They're comfortable, and the only reason not to is an irrational stigma that should be combatted.
>people may spend more *time* 'just wearing them,' but that doesn't make that their primary purpose
That's kind of the definition of a primary use, though.
>The risk of shitting yourself is the only reason to wear them over other options to begin with.
And, you know, the visual and tactile appeal.
>Before you say that they are about "comfort," why does no one just draw or design poofy, "comfortable" underwear
They do. They're called diapers.
>Why would you want to keep that connection to 'battling incontinence' or 'being too young to know better,'
There is no such connection unless you go out of your way to make one. An adult in a clean diaper is no different from an adult in clean panties.
>There just is no way around it; diapers as a fetish exist because of 1) ageplay and/or 2) scat
3) humiliation play 4) watersports, 5) medical play 6) bondage 7) because something as thick and soft as a pillow hugging your crotch while plastic as soft as silk rubs against your legs happens to be comfy as fuck
>>180078
Yeah. The problem is ignorance regarding diapers.
Let's get this thread back on track.
>>180204
There's no reason to get butthurt because people don't share your excitement when it comes to diapers. People associate diapers with waste because that's what they were created for. The amount of adults without bladder problems who wear diapers solely for comfort is very fucking small and you know it. It's usually some weird sexual kink that grosses others out.
Probably my favorite Korrasami 34
>>180204
Fuck off, already. Nobody- literally nobody- else here likes or wants to like your fetish. You have your threads, we have ours.
>>180434
>water bending love juice.
>>180453
Actually, he made me realize it's not nearly as bad of a fetish as some of you are making it out to be. So yeah, you're wrong.
>>180204
If you think you're more intelligent than me for having a dumb fetish you're in denial about, you've exceeded past a standard idiot lol.
>>180483
>lol
Oh, I don't think I am... I know.
>>180470
Samefagging won't help you, Diaperfreak.
>>180499
You keep telling yourself that, someone has to believe it lol.
>>179116
>There's nothing wrong with diapers
There is when you fetihize them.
>>179101
>By the way
Sucking modcock is an awful fetish to have.
>>179549
Boredom is a helluva drug.
>>180467
Surprised that there's not much ATLA/TLOK porn featuring that.
>>180464
>underwear
Diapers aren't underwear.
>>180500
>t-they're not as retarded as me, they must be a samefag!
Nice try.
>>180504
Not anymore wrong than fetishizing, say, panties.
>>180512
>garment worn under your outer clothes to cover your privates and rear
>not underwear
>>180544
dia·per
ˈdī(ə)pər/
noun
noun: diaper; plural noun: diapers
1.
North American
a piece of absorbent material wrapped around a baby's bottom and between its legs to absorb and retain urine and feces.
You're an idiot.
>>180614
No, but that definition is idiotic, considering people of all ages wear diapers. Here's a better one:
>A diaper (also called a nappy in South Africa, Ireland, United Kingdom, New Zealand, Australia and Zimbabwe) is a type of underwear
>>180637
>Commonly accepted dictionary definition is idiotic.
Nice bait. Go away.
>>180643
It clearly is, though, considering the mere existence of adult diapers makes the definition fundamentally flawed. It's underwear that people of all ages wear.
>>180663
>>180614
>>180544
if someone wants no redheads in their thread, then respect the rule. if someone wants no big tits, then respect that rule.
if someone doesn't want diapers and scat in their thread, than respect that rule and keep it in your own thread. is it that hard to accept this?
>>180668
When you disrespect others by singling them out and wrongly lumping them together with scat, you sure as hell won't be getting any respect for it.
>>180671
When you shitpost this much, how can you not be lumped in with scat?
>>180671
the obvious solution is to not give a fuck.
>>180694
>Whining in a thread that doesn't want his fetish.
>Everyone else is shitposting.
Take your bait and go.
>>180694
This guy is trying so hard, this is hilarious.
>>180544
Wait a fucking minute...that's Wikipedia. Let's see what an in-depth analysis gives us...
Hmmm..."Although most commonly worn by and associated with babies and children, diapers are also worn by adults for a variety of reasons. In the medical community, they are usually referred to as "adult absorbent briefs" rather than diapers, which are associated with children and may have a negative connotation. The usage of adult diapers can be a source of embarrassment, and products are often marketed under euphemisms such as incontinence pads. The most common adult users of diapers are those with medical conditions which cause them to experience urinary like bed wetting or fecal incontinence, or those who are bedridden or otherwise limited in their mobility."
Close, but no Kewpie doll. Diapers are waste-receptacles, specifically-designed for such.
>Nice try.
You were samefagging -- you forgot the cardinal rule: no one is ever convinced of anything by anyone on the Internet, *especially* on 4chan.
> fetishizing, say, panties.
Panties aren't designed to sop up piss and contain shit.
>garment worn under your outer clothes to cover your privates and rear
It's designed to sop up piss and contain shit.
Say, anon, do you have a $4000 hat?
>>180700
You're the one whining, though.
>>180705
It's especially hilarious since he's completely right.
>>180710
>Diapers are waste-receptacles, specifically-designed for such.
Nope, they're underwear that happen to have that function as well, just like it says. Needless to say, one shouldn't give a fuck about that function unless it's actually being used for it.
>You were samefagging
Keep telling yourself that. You're still wrong.
>Panties aren't designed to sop up piss and contain shit.
And yet people do that in panties too. Just like you don't judge panty fetishes by panty pooping, it's retarded to assume diaper fetishes necessarily involve dirty diapers.
>It's designed to sop up piss and contain shit.
That doesn't matter in the least, since they don't do that unless you go out of your way to use them that way. It's piss and shit that's disgusting, not diapers themselves. You're basically doing the equivalent of sperging out over stocking fetishes because you're imagining the stockings are sweaty and filthy.
Is this thread salvageable?
>>180740
The guy with the tame underwear fetish, who you're currently getting BTFO by.
I fucking love Doxy.
Ignore diaperbait, post more porn.
>>180743
>The greasy creep with the vile diaper fetish, who you've savagely BTFO
That's what I thought.
>>180752
You're a greasy creep with a fetish for vile diapers? That's disgusting. Clean diapers are the best.
>>180753
Zero effort, there, anon. D-, and report to the Principal's Office.
>>180760
Zero effort needed, after all.
>>180765
>getting this butthurt over underwear preferences of all things
I think you're the one who's mentally ill. Your irrational hatred is what's unwanted.
>>180772
>diaper underwear argument
You've already had enough fun with that game - it's time to stop now.
>calling others irrational to justify your own warped desires
In just about any other time in human history you would have been socially ostracized, locked in an asylum, attacked by others, outright executed, or some combination of these. Modern times have allowed people like you to become arrogant and demanding, as you have shown with your behavior in this thread.
Obvious bait is obvious. More porn.
>>175722
>sitting on a couch with a qt just taking turns rubbing each other off all evening
literally better than sex
>>180777
>You've already had enough fun with that game - it's time to stop now.
Yes, it's pretty clear I won, after all.
>Modern times have allowed people like you to become arrogant and demanding, as you have shown with your behavior in this thread.
On the contrary, behavior like mine where one actually thinks rationally and realizes there's really nothing wrong with diapers instead of blindly falling into groupthink and attacking others is what has allowed society to become modern. Considering you long for stone age behavior, it's pretty clear your kind is the one that's subhuman here.
Hey, OP here
Jesus fucking christ
What the hell is this, tumblr?
I mean come on I make a mild misconception about something I don't know much about and everyone decides to lose their shit.
I just wanted to enjoy some porn with people who share my interests.
It just so happens that I'm not a fan of diapers, scat, or age play.
Say what you will but I feel it all goes in hand.
And it's not like I'm going to go research something like that so I don't offend people, this is 4chan. Get over it.
Stay if you want, post your damn diaper nonsense if you want, there's really nothing to stop you.
But I would personally prefer not to see it here.
Here's some porn.
<3
>>180783
Living the dream.
Am I right?
>>180875
Incase has been putting up some good shit lately
>>180873
Nah bud
your heart was in the right place.
Just trying to uphold the purpose of the thread, I get it <3
>>175661
holy shit I love viper lol
>>179501
You sound like a furry trying to make everyone feel bad for you because you have a retarded fetish
>>179800
Gods I hope this is b8
I came here for porn and got a discussion on wether diapers are good/bad/disgusting/legit underwear/what so ever...
>boner is kill
>mood is penisve/contemplative
the weird thing is I don't even mind tho. I had some good laughes and giggles in this thread and it's kinda hilarious how you nutjobs argue about anything, even if the subject of the discussion isn't wanted in this thread. I mean where is the point in this whole website if the community using it don't follow "their own rules"?
All of you fags arguing about diapers are just pathetic. The ones arguing for diapers are, because, well obviously, you either can't read (see OP) or just don't give a single shit, which brings me back to "where's the point in all of this".
Those of you arguing against diapers are pathetic, because you are getting trolled so hard, even a blind guy could see it. Just ignore the diaperfags and everything will be just fine.
....Could we please get back to porn now?
sry for any mistakes/misspellings etc, english =/= native language and stuff
>>180921
This guy gets it
Just porn
That's all
Sakimichan needs to do more yuri stuff
>>171671
>fat frisk
>fat porn at all.
>>180911
>>le silly hat maymay xD
If you understood what the actual insult was, you'd be far-less sanguine about it,
>>180921
I'm sorry, anon.
>>180999
For what?
>>181015
For killing your boner.
>>181038
Nah, don't worry, it happens. Besides, like I said, I had some fun too.
But thanks for apologizing tho anon, that's actually pretty decent of you.
>>181051
Sorry, not everyone is as interested in hats as you.
>>181233
The only thing ruining the thread is newfags like you who call underwear fetishes subhuman.
>>181260
Look, the bait has run its course. You managed to annoy enough people into engaging with you. Bravo. You can move on now.
Aged-up characters are okay, right?
>>181301
>b-bait!
Just don't be an ignorant piece of shit, and there shouldn't be any problems.
>>181336
It's over. Shoo.
>>171394
10/10
>>171393
Based op
>>171394
This is fantastic
>>171671
this is what you get... brother killer *cums inside* now theres a ton of cum inside you... a skeleTON
>>175660
oh that freckled ginger
instant hardness
>>171393
>post your favorite shit
>just not any of the shit I don't like
>>183624
Amazing
>>183517
Once again
YEP!
An icing girl making out with a fat cinnamon roll girl. It's fucking ridiculous and I love it.
>>171393
B-but op, I love all that shit
Not strictly porn, but it makes me laugh.
>>185525
HOT
>>185525
Shocking content, even for /aco/
>>179116
Yes, there's nothing wrong with diapers, and you will not post them in this thread if you want to honor OP's will.
>>180694
The majority of the thread doesn't want fucking diapers, lol. Just make your own thread; they're free. If it's as commonly accepted as you claim, you should have zero problem finding the content you're looking for.
You're still here because you're trying to prove a point to anonymous internet users that a diaper fetish isn't weird and that people above the age of 3 wear them as normal undergarments. It's abnormal, and you refuse to budge, lol. I really don't get it
>Nope, they're underwear that happen to have that function as well, just like it says. Needless to say, one shouldn't give a fuck about that function unless it's actually being used for it.
I think I see the problem here
>>171393
>No scat, diaper fetishes, or anything of that variety.
But horsedick is A-OK!
>>171406
Why do so many artists draw bungholes that look like they're in the middle stage of prolapse?
>>187503
>i
>>187719
>>187720
>>187723
>>187724
>>187725
>>187727
>>171662
Great choice there anon. One of my favorites as well.
>>187856
>>187860
>>187864
>>171671
she doesn't look like she's having too bad a time there
>>187856
New Sarada doujin WHEN?!
>>178493
How can you even enjoy such a terrible fetish
>>180544
I can't believe it, holy shit. I did not believe that there were so.e people that were stupid and petty enough to use Wikipedia as a source to back-Yo there weird, niche fetish. Now I've seen everything.
>>187867
sauce?
>Just because diapers are made to be filled with shit and piss doesn't mean they should be associated with people that shit and piss themselves.
Wut
>>187675
You aren't convincing anybody.
>>>/trash/ is your new home.
Go.
>>187503
>But horsedick is A-OK!
What? If you mean bestiality, it's specifically-forbidden (or was last time I checked the sticky).
>>180961
>dwarven thrash metal
god that would be epic to listen
>>189368
man i love this one
Love this one
>>180891
So are My Little P[spoiler]erson[/spoilers]s alright then?
>>187133
wow. i bet she would be an absolute blast to fuck
>>190207
Goddammit, fucked up the spoiler tags!
>>181336
>ignorant piece of shit
>diaper fetishist
Ha! I get it.
>>183517
>4chan in a nutshell
>>187675
>this much denial
This is like talking to a feminist.
>>175660
I don't get it, is she futa?
>>190211
I don't fuck her
>>190817
Just a lesbian, friend.
Just a lesbian.
>>187582
Because they've never seen a real one.
>>191875
Jesus christ anon. Please just stop embarrasing yourself, its painful to watch
Nadia from Star Wars the old Republic
>>192270
There's nothing embarrassing about wrecking ignorant people in arguments. It's something to take pride in if anything.
>>188325
Sparrow
>>180492
Sauce? I recognise that character from an unfinished comic.
>>178493
Dude, it isn't even decent art. This is my biggest problem with these weird, niche fetishes. 90% of the art is fucking GARBAGE
>>194394
Or maybe you just have double standards.
>>171393
>>180464
There is, however, a pretty decent reason to be buthurt when someone decides that because someone DARED to ask that their fetish NOT be posted, they just have to go out of their way to derail the thread with their fetish. Whether or not diapers are disgusting or linked to scat/age-play, anyone posting them in this thread is an asshole.
