You should be able to solve this.
>>143400168
The answer is: Shut the fuck up and suck my cok bitch.
not another one of these threads
>>143400168
They would displace the same volume of water, regardless of mass.
Solved. It's pretty much easy read the second sentence and work from there.
>>143400168
tip to the left, the steel ball contributes nothing to the mass on the left, and
mass of ping pong+ mass of water>mass of water
also >>>/sci/
>>143400168
it wouldn't change? Weight would only matter if the steel ball sunk, right? so if the balls have the same volume there shouldn't be any change
>>143400168
They displace the same amount of water, but the ping pong ball is connected to the container, meaning it would have more weight than the steel ball, so it would tip slightly in favor of the ping pong side
>>143400260
contributes nothing to mass of right*
FACTS:
1. Kurisu is the best girl
2. Science and religion can correlate and there are many successful religious scientists that existed
not a physic master here but i think it would tip to the left. Steel ball is hung, so it makes no pressure to right side, while ping pong ball is filled with oxygen that weights a bit.
But i may be wrong.
Retard here. I think it tips to the right, since the steel ball is being suspended, it shouldn't affect the weight. The ping pong ball is held by the crane, and since a ping pong ball is less dense than water, the buoyancy force should push it upwards right? Then shouldn't it be going to the right?
The whole scale floats away into the sky.
Engineer here. It tips to the left. Because of Newton's third law, the reaction force of the string that keeps the ping pong ball in place acts downwards on the scale, thus increasing its weight a bit compared to the steel ball, whose string has no impact whatsoever in the scale.
answer here
itsboth
http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/130688/which-way-does-the-scale-tip
>>143400306
>Kurisu is the best girl
This will forever and always be the case.
It is scientifically proven.
>>143400799
We cannot get fully accurate answer
Whenever family get a boy, cycle stops, so there are always more boys than girls. Example by 6 families
1 B
2 G B
3 G G B
4 G B
5 B
6 G B
5 Girls 6 boys
But with 50/50 chance of birth, it may actually be
1 B
2 G G B
3 G G G B
4 G B
5 G B
6 G G B
so 10 girls 6 boys
I was never the best with
theory of probability so i wont do advanced math research, but this isn't fully solvable. We can just assume if this policy is worth the try.
It still exerts buoyant force on the right side you tards
Just because water is a liquid doesn't mean that it isn't effected physically by something submerged in it.
dumb
>>143401192
Build a wall
Deport illegals
Ban muslims
>>143400799
Depends. What is the population? How many children do we assume one woman can have? How many children does the average women have currently? What is the boy/girl birth ratio? This question seems kind of... incomplete.
So, Kurisu is a good character to shitpost natural philosophy with.
But which anime character is best suited to post philosophy in general with? (Cute girls preferred.)
>>143401501
Think you can assume the birth rate is 50/50 boys to girls ratio.
Don't think any of the others matter.
>>143401590
Note: I want to make images focused on problems outside of natural philosophy, like ethical or epistemological problems, but Kurisu and Professor Hakase don't quite fit, since Kurisu is merely a physics girl and Hakase just some sort of engineer.
I've had quite a hard time coming up with fitting characters, becausephilosophy in anime/manga tends to be shit.
>>143401777
>merely physics
>neuroscience major
>research career devoted to neuroscience
Physics is just a passing hobby.
>>143400208
Assuming both balls are the same size.
>>143401981
What do you think the words "same volume" mean?
>>143401889
Oh, she's a neuroscience major? The anime made me think of her as some experimental physics major, since we're only shown her teaching physics, and I played the VN only until she first shows up in Okabe's lab.
>>143400168
Left is slightly heavier, but the point of this image is that they are almost exactly the same.
>>143401206
it's nothing
>>143402035
The amount of water in the beaker.
>>143400799
>Did his plan work
I know the answer is no, but I don't know how to explain it.
>>143402075
>a steel ball of the same volume
>same volume refers to the water
>>143402146
But you said "same volume of water, regardless of mass", nowhere did you mention the balls.
>>143402193
I am not the same person.
I was referring to the size of the balls which is stated in the OP to be the same.
>>143402258
That makes more sense then.
Thank you for clarifying.
>>143400168
You should be able to solve this
>>143402118
It doesn't because it doesn't change the expected value.
At first glace, it appears to be helpful because it stops "runs" of the wrong gender. The problem is, each expected birth is still 50/50 boy/girl.
>>143401777
>natural philosophy
My God, just say science.
>ethical and epsitemological
Here are some: Why do we still use Newtonian physics when Einstein's Special Law of Relativity has proven them false?
Why is the scientific method often taught as indictivist? What are the problems with classical inductivism? Is there "a" scientific method to begin with?
What's the ultimate goal of science? Can it give us an accurate portrayal of reality or is it only tool by which we can understand it?
>>143401912
But that's forbidden love
Obligatory.
This can actually be solved if you draw additional lines. Don't believe the lies saying you can't solve it.
>>143401889
>implying neuroscience isn't just applied physics
>>143401912
Do they kiss?
>>143402422
I couldn't even solve it if she let me use trigonometry. I watch Chinese cartoons and am dumb as a box of rocks.
>>143402358
Very stupid questions
>Why do we still use Newtonian physics when Einstein's Special Law of Relativity has proven them false?
Newtonian mechanics isn't false you fucking retard.
>"special law of relativity"
>what are approximations
>what is an unnecessary waste of computational power
Stop fucking posting
>>143402469
it's impossible to solve and trig doesnt work since you dont have any side lengths
>>143400799
No. Taking it to its simplest form you will have at least 50% of the families only having boys, and of the remaining 50%, 50% of those will have 1 girl and 1 boy.
Thing is every family will have a God damn boy.
>>143400168
Place a ball in the water. Is its weight reduced? Yes, because it is being pushed up by the water. The force of buoyancy against the steel ball pushes down on the scale with a force equal to the displacement, as all the remaining weight is suspended by the string.
Therefore it tipsfedora.
>>143402543
Well at least I feel a bit better about myself.
>>143402358
>My God, just say science.
I don't like that many Anglos refer only to natural philosophy with the term "science". The concept behind the German "Wissenschaften". Latin "scientia" and the Italian "scienzia" are much more befitting for that word, which is why I avoid using the term "science" if I am only referring to natural philosophy.
>>143402553
Monty Hall Problem
>>143400168
/a/ science threads are pure torture. I still remember this one idiot trying to argue that lone atoms couldn't be ions.
>>143402553
you're supposed to change. but what anime is this from? I remember seeing it not too long ago.
>>143400168
Steel ball pushes the water a little bit. The string takes most of the weight but just a little goes to the cup. so that one is a bit heavier than the ping pong ball cup.
You can try it by just putting your finger in a cup with water in it and checking the weight with and without your finger. It makes small difference.
And yes the same applies to a cup with air in it just a lot less of a difference. Also stop posting this shit.
>>143400799
Won't work.
50% of families will have 1 boy 0 girls.
25% of families will have 1 boy 1 girl.
12.5% of families will have 1 boy 2 girls.
6.25% of families will have 1 boy 3 girls.
Etc.
No. of boys/family: 1
No. of girls/family: 0.5 + 0.25 + 0.125 + 0.0625 + ... = 1
>>143400168
Should tip to the right.
Think about it - if you were weighed in a swimming pool, you'd weigh significantly less than if you weren't in water. Where do you think that weight goes?
>>143402624
Not quite. The Monty Hall problem has only three doors. This has four so it changes up the probability a little.
>>143402531
So, are you like in Physics II or something? I always thought that physics majors/engineers being dumb was a meme, but I am astounded.
>>143402553
The door you picked originally had a 1/4 chance of being the prize. Now that she's eliminated that one door, picking either C or D should give you a 1/3 chance of getting the prize so your luck should be JUST A BIT better than if you were to stay on door A
>>143402733
I know you can't bring up any counterarguments so why even respond? You've already shown your stupidity to be painfully obvious, why even reply at all and dismiss all doubt?
>>143400260
Maybe you should go there yourself to get educated, it tips to the right.
The steel ball displaces water, hence it does affect the system.
>>143402758
Wrong, the chance changed from 1/4 to 1/2.
I love how /a/ thinks arguing semantics is 'science'.
>>143402553
Change, obviously. You're switching from a choice of 1/4 to a 1/3 choice.
>>143400799
That decree is counterproductive. A decree ordering families to have no more children after having a daughter would increase the ratio of girls to boys, because every firstborn girl guarantees no more new boys, while every boy born can potentially be matched by a girl born after him. Short of actually controlling the sex at birth this is the best policy you can enact to get the results he wants.
>>143402796
>>143402823
One of you is a liar
>>143402796
>3 doors left
>chance of getting it right is now 1/2
???
>>143402849
That decree doesn't actually do anything.
>>143402716
>>143402422
Fuck this is pissing me off, does anyone have the answer for this? I remember enough about geometry to know what to do, but I simply cannot come up with the value I need to solve the question.
>>143402796
>I didn't understand the Monty Hall problem, but I learned the answer on youtube.
>>143402924
Impossible to solve, there is no way you can solve this without at least one value from the bottom right triangle
>>143402915
But what if a family just wants to have 1 kid, or 2? or doesn't want to have ~9 girls to make up for the 50% of families that all have 1 boy?
>>143402955
I assume you mean aside from C being 20 degrees, right?
>>143401192
This is one I just couldn't fucking solve without resorting to differentials.
How the fuck are you supposed to find it using only simple geometry? Is it even possible?
>>143401192
>>143402772
http://abyss.uoregon.edu/~js/ast122/lectures/lec20.html
Here you go. Space and time are not absolute. Do you think that light is corpuscular? Do you live in the fucking 1800s?
>>143402468
With their lips
>>143400260
/sci/ is actually too stupid for this.
Also, this has been tested experimentally to erase all remaining doubt, it's not like you can check it you on youtube or anything.
>>143403031
>Space and time are not absolute.
Didn't say they were you stupid idiot. Newtonian mechanics isn't incompatible with special relativity.
>what are Wick rotations
>doesn't understand that Minkowski space of SR is diffeomorphic to 4-dimensional Euclidean space in Newtonian physics
>Do you think that light is corpuscular
Except that this isn't incorrect either you fucking retard.
>what is the photoelectric effect
>what are photons
Fucking embarrassing.
>>143402984
I didn't even notice that, but it's not helpful anyway.Also pisses me off that it is so blatantly not-to-scale.
>>143402422
>First triangle has 60 degress and 70 degrees
>The last angle is clearly more than 90 degrees
The fuck is this?
>>143402422
that loli is lying, the top left triangle's interior dimensions should equal up to 180 but the way shes labeled it is clearly wrong. The remaining angle would have to be 50 and that anlge is clearly obtuse.
My autism won't let me solve it with that sort of major issue just glaring at me.
>>143403208
>>143403294
The line should be much further down the left side but it's not like the lines need to be accurate for the math to work out.
>>143400168
The problem is both beakers have water in them. It should be urine.
>>143403110
Wait how can those 2 sides equal 19 and the last side equal 10?
>>143403124
>>what is the photoelectric effect
It ismaybe not sufficient proof that light must be quantized, actually. Or so some argue. But maybe that's just pedantry.
>>143403206
Oh thank god. I was doing the same but since it was so off scale i assumed i was doing it wrong
>>143403380
That's literally false though. The wave nature of light cannot explain the photoelectric effect at all.
>>143402999
Yeah.
>>143403110
Too lazy to do actual number crunching but mental math says square root of 532, so like 23.something?
Unless I'm completely retarded and missed something.
>>143403326
That's a range of possible values, though. No clear value has been found.
>>143402758
>>143402796
>>143402823
>>143402880
>>143402944
It's neither 1/2 nor 1/3. The actual chance is 3/8.
If you switch, you have a 1/4 chance of neither door to switch to being correct (0%) and a 3/4 chance of one of those doors to switch to being correct (50%). So the overall chance is 1/4 * 0% + 3/4 * 50% = 3/8.
If you don't switch, the chance of picking the correct door is obviously 1/4.
>>143402872
Why not both?
>>143403543
19^2 + 19^2 = 722
so sqrt(722) which is about 26.87
>>143401912
two girls can't do that!
>>143403543
>>143403631
All sides are marked with a dash, meaning they are all the same length.
x = 19
>>143403631
RIP mental math, forgot to carry a 1 and got 261 for 19^2 instead of 361 and then mathed wrong. Oh well, this is why I'm a humanities major.
>>143403778
that's not how right triangles work (hypotenuse MUST be longer than the other two sides), that is impossible, therefore if we are to take the congruence lines to be accurate this is an impossible triangle
>>143403778
x-side is marked with a crooked dash though, so it can't be trusted.
>>143400168
The left side should shift up because the ball applies upward force.
>>143402553
75% chance that your initial choice is incorrect instead of a 66% chance that your initial choice is incorrect. Obviously you switch.
>>143403829
>That's not how right triangles work in Euclidean geometry.
FTFY. Pythagorean theorem only holds in Euclidean space (in fact it's an iff statement).
>>143402543
>>143402579
>>143402955
It is possible, but hard as fuck.
You can solve it with trig, all you have to remember is that trig doesn't depend on the actual sides, but their rations, so you can assign values appropriately and becomes much easier.
You can feel worse about yourself again now.
>>143403434
I remember hearing about a paper by Scully and Lamb (I think it is *that* Lamb) that supposedly explains the photoelectric effect without photons. But apparently it is bunk.
>>143403782
I understand some of those words.
>>143403867
>>143403858
nvm I am retarded. it should tip to the left.
>>143403887
if you assigned random values to each side then you won't get a consistent answer, so that's not really solving the problem.
>>143403886
and what reason do we have to assume that problem is not dealing in Euclidean geometry
>>143403858
>>143403941
You're still retarded, it shifts to the right.
>>143403946
>and what reason do we have to assume that problem is not dealing in Euclidean geometry
The triangle doesn't fucking exist otherwise for one you stupid mong
>>143403946
Because it's impossible to have a right-angled triangle with three identical side lengths in Euclidean space.
>>143403999
or the person who made the problem doesn't know how fucking congruence lines work.
far more likely explanation
>>143403946
You obviously don't assign random values to everything, but you assign one or two values (can't remember) and derive the rest from that, the sizes obviously will change, but their ratios won't, hence their angles will not.
>>143404048
>far more likely explanation
>hey we have a problem that's consistent with this one framework but not in another
>let's just insist that the problem is posed in the latter framework and not solve it
Not only are you ignorant you're also a complete retard.
>>143404048
Just because a something is beyond your knowledge doesn't make it wrong.
All questions in these kinds of threads are meant to be tricky and misleading.
You are not cut out for maths and science.
>>143402422
nnnope. I give up.
>>143403911
The more doors added the less likely your initial choice was correct, so it's reasonable to change after any reduction in the number of doors.
Of course the more doors you add while only revealing one door the lower chances of winning no matter what so it doesn't have the enhanced results of the classic Monty Hall.
>>143404119
Yeah, but switching in the original problem didn't give a 50% chance of being wrong.
>>143402725
The principle remains the same. No matter what door you choose, a known bad door is excluded for free. That tilts the odds in such a way that it's always good to switch.
>>143404237
You still have a 75% chance that your initial choice was wrong if you don't switch.
>>143404325
I know that, but just to clarify: what I didn't get was
>instead of a 66% chance that your initial choice is incorrect
>>143402422
>>143402924
>>143403887
>>143403206
Isn't alpha simply 70 degrees?
>>143404452
It's variable w/o Trig, dumbass.
>>143404361
Why would they let you on if you didn't have a boarding pass?
>>143404372
That part refers to classic Monty Hall. Since you can't get the same certainty of choosing correctly when you start adding doors then you flip the priority to lower the chance you are wrong.
3 doors 66% chance your first choice is wrong
4 doors 75% chance your first choice is wrong
5 doors 80% chance your first choice is wrong
etc...
You guys should be able to solve this one.
>>143404490
Oh, so that's what you meant.
>>143403887
Yeah, you can't solve it from angles alone. Gotta use the angles to derive some arbitrary line segment lengths as well.
>>143404452
Nope.
>>143404361
99%.
>>143400168
As always, it tips to the right due to the buoyancy of the steel ball, while the ping pong ball does effectively nothing. (note: this assumes the steel ball is heavier than the ping pong ball which is derived from common sense).
Interesting way to think about it: imagine if the steel ball was made from something just a bit less dense than water (like ice). It would obviously float, and the string wouldn't carry weight. Now where does the weight of the ball rest on.
>>143400799
Assuming they keep fucking till they get a boy, the ratio would be 1 to 1. The possibility of having one kid would be 50%, where this kid would always be a boy. 25% chance of two kids, one boy one girl etc.
So basically there'd be an 1/2^n chance of having 1 boy and n-1 girls. Summing up both these series for n = 1 -> inf results in 1 for both of them.
But what if they don't? the series for the average amount of guys per family from 1 to m kids is 1 - 1/2^m, the average amount of girls per family would be 1 - ( m + 1) /2^m. The latter is smaller than the former for all values of m > 1, meaning that when the amount of kids a couple will have is limited by another reason than getting a boy, this will actually cause there to be more boys than girls born.
>>143404361
50%, the proof of which is left as an exercise to the reader because it's just more sequence theory.
>>143404585
Ah shit I see. I wrongly assumed AB and DE were parallel.
>>143404734
>Now where does the weight of the ball rest on.
It'll just rest on the right hand side. The scales will still tilt to the right as long as it's heavier than the ping pong ball on the left.
>>143404734
Even if you set a limit like couples only ever having 2 children it still will make no difference to the ratio of boys to girls.
Same applied the other way even if couples keep going no matter how long to get a boy the chance of a boy or girl is still 50% and will not change.
Short of drowning babies the ratio will remain the same and only the overall population will decrease.
>>143400690
>>143405044
?
>>143405044
>> ITT: smart people
>>143402422
You cant because the angle arent measured or formed correctly.
Based on the numbers 65-70 degrees
>>143401206
>The numeral "82" here is clearly visible to vieweres with normal color vision.
But I just see two different sets of brown dots.
>>143401912
By getting into a soeur relationship with each other.
>>143400168
Unchanged, assuming equal volumes of water in each beaker and that the steel ball and the ping pong ball are of equal volume as well. The scales would tip a bit on each side at first, then maintain equilibrium.
>>143402040
She mentions in both that her major is neuroscience.
>>143404509
Play super energy removal. Take away 1 energy from 1 of your pokemon (doesn't matter which) and take off venausaur's 2 energy. Also use the other energy removal to take 1 grass from pinsir.
Use gust of wind to bring venusaur in. None of his pokemon have enough energy to attack so you'll win by default when he draws the remaining 2 cards in his hand.
>>143405044
Draw a line in an S shape from C, around A, around F to D.
The rest is now obvious
Here you go, so you guys can stop spouting shit
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=stRPiifxQnM
Niggas its already balanced. Read the paragraph again. It doesn't tip at all.
>>143405301
If anything the scale tips to the steel ball because of how the pingpong ball is attached to the beaker on the left. The buoyancy would create a small pulling force.
>>143405265
Aw fuck nevermind, gonna have to use golduck to remove more energy because that cocksucker weedle could fuck you over.
>>143402982
The king will make a new law.
>>143405265
>>143405363
You'd still lose when your next turn comes up because you have no cards left in your deck.
>>143405265
He uses Venesaur's Pokemon power to transfer two grass energy from his other pokemon onto Venesaur. Retreats to Weedle, plays the grass energy he drew, and kills whichever pokemon you have out.
>>143405438
>>143405418
Aw fuck I didn't even notice you've already drawn your last card. You lose then. God damn.
>>143402422
20 maybe?
>>143405363
>>143405418
Swap in Ditto. Gust in Venesaur. Use Ditto-Saur to transfer one grass from ditto to Psyduck.
Swap in Psyduck , evolve him to Golduck, play 3rd energy on him. Use both ER's and Golduck to drain Venesaur and Pinser of grass energies.
Before attacking, Fuji Hitmonchan to put 3 cards in your deck (only 3 because you had to discard one energy for SER).
Opponent's Venesaur can get 2 energy, but can't swap into anything useful or attack itself. Your opponent draws the last 3 cards of his deck before you draw yours.
>>143405190
This. angles A and B are supposed to be the same size but angle B is visibly larger
>>143403110
>>143403369
x=19 and the triangle is suspended in a elliptical plane, as the mark indicates that all the sides are equal in length, we must then conclude that the other two angles are right angles as well and that the plane itself has a positive Gaussian curvature. If the triangle is in fact on the euclidean plane, and the notation is just awful, x=19sqrt(2)
>>143400168
As has been said, it tips to the right. But here's another way to see why:
Consider the force on the bottom of each beaker. The water level si the same in each, so the water pressure at the bottom is the same for both beakers. But the bottom of the beaker on the left has the additional upward force of the string connected to the ping pong ball. So the left side has to come up.
>>143402422
>all these faggots who care about scale
Jesus shut up. You do realize that you dont need a picture at all to be able to solve it right?even though it isnt solvable
>>143405579
Fuck, that's good. Would have never thought of that.
>>143405617
>>143405190
>I can only do math by eyeballing angles.
You're missing the fucking point.
>>143401206
Mwf no ability to see 7 colors
>cuddlefish are better than me
>>143402422
Every time until people stop bickering about it
>>143405438
>>143405514
Shuffle the hitmonchan to your deck with Fuji, draw it back with Bill, place it on bench and switch it with scyther.
>>143405774
And then deck yourself because you can't get that many prizes with only two cards in your deck (three turns).
You also have to assume luck is against you so you wouldn't draw Hitmonchan.
>>143400168
Left
>>143405764
How do you get 20 degrees for a and 110 for the other angle?
>>143405883
I drew it in CAD and used the dimension tool.
>>143404509
I play Bill and then tell my stupid friend that I win because I reached the end of my deck first.
>>143405579
I'm impressed. Your plan is perfect.
Except for the part where you lose.
His turn comes up. He draws a grass energy. He uses it and the last remaining grass energy to switch Venusaur for Weedle. He ends his turn.
Your turn comes up. You have nothing that can do 40 damage. You attack futilely. His turn comes up again. He draws a gust of wind. He uses it do put your Ditto on the field. Your Ditto copies his Weedle, reducing its HP to 40. It gets knocked out due to the damage it has already taken.
>>143405846
He's going to draw his deck empty faster than you are.
>>143400168
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ADBL7_A9qA
>>143402422
you´re doing it wrong. alpha can go from 1 to 129 degrees and you can complete the other 3 angles correctly, all the basic geometric relations will be correct. its hard because your mind is stuck with the diagram, when the diagram doesnt connect with the values. the lower part of the triangle can change drastically without changing the values from the upper part.
>>143402040
She invented memory scanning software which allows time leaping. That happens later in the VN though.
>>143406035
My bad. You still don't draw Hitmonchan though so he KO's you on the next turn.
>>143402553
Unstated assumption in the Monty hall problem:
The person opening the door knows what's behind each door and always chooses to open a door which is incorrect. This makes sense in the context of a game show (If the host could have revealed the prize, the game would end), but I didn't consider it at first.
For a ruducto as absurdium, assume there are 100 doors. You pick 1 at random (1% chance of being right) and the host opens 98 incorrect doors, leaving 1 door that you picked and one other door, which he offers to let you swap to. It's obvious to swap here, because the other door has a 99% chance of being correct.
>>143401206
>yfw rused
>>143404509
Fuck. This image and all the replies to it are making me want to pick up the Pokemon TCG video game again.
>>143405764
Can someone prove this? I'd do it but I'm in the middle of work.
>>143406455
Prove that it's correct or prove it with basic geometry?
It's correct given that if you sat down with a protractor and ruler you'd come to that conclusion.
>>143402422
>Triangle
>not 180
>>143406455
I probably can do it, but I am just too lazy so I just post the link.
https://www.duckware.com/tech/worldshardesteasygeometryproblem.html
>>143406533
I'd understand that it's correct, given that it WAS made in CAD.
I just want to know if this is actually the answer you get using trig.
>>143406350
It's a risk which may win the game
>>143406567
312211
>>143405579
You can't retreat twice during the same turn
Wait, how to you "submerge" a ping pong ball in water? Wouldnt it just float?
>>143406649
Sorry, but you can't rely on that.
For the purpose of this problem, you have to assume that he draws the card he needs and you don't draw the card you need.
The point of the problem is to find how to guarantee your victory to avoid embarrassing yourself. You have to assume chance works against you.
>>143406649
"Well, fuck, I might win" is not the same thing as "You know you'll be victorious".
>>143406741
You could back then.
The rule was changed at some point, but the time period had no rules on the amount of times you could switch.
>>143406741
That's a new rule; that magazine is old as fuck.
>>143406742
It's tied to the bottom of the beaker by a massless, volumeless string.
>>143406742
It's held by a string, anon.
>>143402658
Monogatari I believe. Sodachi's arc?
>>143400168
If their volume is the same, then the steel ball should have more mass since the other ball is plastic, so it should tilt right.
Also >>143406172
>>143404509
Swap in Hitmonchan
Gust of wind weedle
Kill weedle with special punch
Fuji ditto the liability, now have 3 cards in deck
User super energy to take 2 grass energy from pinsir, energy removal to take 1 grass from venusaur.
Thanks to retreat costs there's not enough grass energy to fuel any moves.
>>143407121
He draws a grass and puts it on Pinser. He uses Venesaur to move the grass on scyther to Pinser and kills you.
>>143407175
Oh God damnit I didn't realize that fucker could use its power from the bench.
>>143400168
Pretty sure I saw this in Physics last year. Can't remember the details but if I remember correctly the steel ball will tip the balance beam to its side.
>>143400690
The link you gave me says it tilts to the right.
>>143403778
If it was an equilateral triangle, then yes, this would work. Those have 60 degree angles though, not 90.
>>143407240
Basically both balls increase the water level, but only the ping pong ball has net upwards buoyant force.
>>143407286
...On a euclidean plane.
>>143402464
>implying physics isn't just applied mathematics
>>143402422
I usually lerk, but you guys are dumbfucks. The answer is 65. Assume the picture isn't to scale, then add the two given angles in the upper left triangle and subtract the result from 180 to get 50 degrees. Now, you should know from geometry that the opposite side has the same angle. Next, divide the triangle in half at the 50 degree angle to create a right triangle and solve for the unknown.
>>143400168
what does this have to do with anime?
>>143404509
WHAT IN THE FUCK IS THE ANSWER!?
>>143407454
>divide the triangle in half at the 50 degree angle
>create a right triangle
choose one.
>>143404509
(turn 1)
1. Mr. fuji ditto* into deck to stop yourself decking out
2. Use gust of wind on venusaur to bring it up
3. Use energy removal on scyther
4. Use super energy removal on the grass energies attached to pinsir (discard an energy from hitmonchan)
5. Attach a water energy to psyduck and evolve it into golduck
6. Retreat scyther into golduck
7. Pass your turn to your opponent
(turn 2)
8. Your opponent can't attack w/ venusaur due to not having enough grass energy in play to energy trans, so they have to retreat. since venusaur's retreat cost is 2, and your opponent only has potentially 1 grass energy left in their deck, they have to retreat into weedle and attach to it the grass energy that they presumably drew (their best possible top-deck**).
9. Your opponent attacks with poison sting. they must not flip heads on poison (you would lose if they did)
(turn 3)
10. Attach a fighting energy to golduck
11. Use hyper beam to discard an energy from weedle.
(turn 4)
12. Your opponent can't do anything now, even if they draw gust of wind, since none of their pokemon have the energy to attack to knock out one of your own.
(turn 5)
13. Pass your turn to win the game by having your opponent deck out.
(See asterisk notes in next post)
>>143400168
Assuming the volume of water displaced by both balls and string is equivalent, the scale should tip left. The mass of the ping pong ball is added to the total weight of the left scale.
>>143404509
>>143407740
*you can't mr. fuji hitmonchan, or else your opponent can gust of wind up ditto and KO it by retreating into weedle, since ditto copies weedle's 40 hp and dies
due to already having 40 damage on it. you need ditto off the field immediately, in case your opponent draws gust of wind.
**of the 2 cards left in your opponent's deck, one of them MUST be grass energy in order for your opponent to have a chance at winning after turn 1 (since they
have to attack with weedle to win). Yet, regardless of what the other card in the deck is (energy removal or gust of wind), and regardless of which order
they top-deck the 2 cards, they would still lose provided poison sting does not flip heads on poison
if GOW is drawn first: weedle can't attack on turn 2 (since they didn't draw energy), so you can retreat the pokemon that gets brought up back into golduck,
since himtonchan has the energy to retreat, and scyther needs no energy to retreat.
weedle can't attack until turn 4, and won't be able to knock golduck out provided it doesn't flip heads on poison.
if ER is drawn first: they would use it on golduck (the best move), but then they can't attack w/ weedle (since they didn't draw energy).
You can't use hyper beam on turn 3, but they can't attack golduck until turn 4 (when they draw the grass energy).
As long as they don't posion, you can win buy passing turn 5 as usual.
If GE is drawn first: plays out in like the steps above
Can't believe i was autistic enough to type that out.
>>143400168
How many problems do I have to solve before Kurisu loves me back?
>>143402422
goddamnit
I've worked it into a system of equations
Alpha is a, b is the unknown angle adjacent to it, d is the unknown angle in the same small triangle as a, and c is adjacent to d
a + b = 150
a + d = 130
b + c = 160
c + d = 140
1 1 0 0 150
1 0 0 1 130
0 1 1 0 150
0 0 1 1 140
I've completely forgotten how to row reduce by hand
Can we please come up with some new obnoxious problems, I get sick of seeing the same ones every time
>>143407740
>8. Your opponent can't attack w/ venusaur due to not having enough grass energy in play to energy trans, so they have to retreat. since venusaur's retreat cost is 2, and your opponent only has potentially 1 grass energy left in their deck, they have to retreat into weedle
And then do nothing with the grass energy card he draw.
On his next turn, he draws a gust of wind. Attach grass energy to Weedle, gust of wind to bring Hitmonchan out, you lose.
>>143407934
Make them yourself. Just look some up online. Most people don't look them up so just copy and paste, the template for the Kurisu one shouldn't be hard to find.
>>143407996
Well, fuck. There goes all my hard work. I genuinely can't think of anything else.
Not enough info. Sorry but is the concept art depicting it in a "manually" or "forced"state, or has the seesaw had time to move?
Which ball is dominant?
>>143408256
90% of balls are right dominant, but 10% are left dominant.
>>143404509
>>143407624
Are you sure you want to see page 144?
Do you honestly believe you're prepared for it?
>>143407907
inverse of the matrix doesn't exist nor can you solve anything with row opertations
>>143407436
This is easy: dropped
>>143408777
Wrong, you fell for the red earring. The answer is actually 20k sales and AOTY.
>>143400168
80° you ducking nigger
>>143408768
So my method was wrong, but that one fucker was able to do it by actually drawing it out with the info given, so this must be possible somehow.
I'm gonna go fucking crazy
>>143407763
But the ping pong ball is floaty and tries to pull the scale up.
>>143402322
Hold on, gimme a few minutes.
Those are supposed to be tensor wedges, right?
>>143408903
It is possible, but just not with that method. Use trigonometry or phantom point.
>>143407996
>>143404509
On second thought, I figured out how to accommodate for the opponent using GOW + GE on turn 4.
(turn 1)
1. Use super energy removal on the grass energies attached to pinsir (discard an energy from ditto)
2. Use gust of wind on venusaur to bring it up
3. Use energy removal on scyther
4. Mr. fuji ditto into deck to stop yourself decking out
5. Attach a water energy to psyduck and evolve it into golduck
6. Retreat scyther into golduck
7. Pass your turn to your opponent
(turn 2)
Your opponent will either:
8a. Keep Venusaur in, and not attack
8b. Retreat venusaur into weedle (they may or may not attach energy to attack, but it doesn’t matter in the end).
(turn 3)
(If 8a happened)
9a. Attach fighting energy to golduck and hyper beam.
(If 8b happened)
9b. Retreat into hitmonchan and attach fighting energy to it, then special punch to KO weedle.
(turn 4)
10. Your opponent will either have a venusaur that can only retreat, leaving the opponent’s board with no grass energies left, OR no weedle left to attack with, and only 1 grass energy remaining in hand (so neither of the other 3 pokes can attack). Either way, they can’t do anything.
(turn 5)
11. Pass your turn to win the game by having your opponent deck out.
>>143409054
>Use trigonometry
!VERBOTEN!
>phantom point
I don't know how this works
>>143409059
>9b. Retreat into hitmonchan and attach fighting energy to it
You don't have one. You already used it on Golduck.
Also
>8c. Keep Venusaur in, and not attack, but only after using its Power to put its grass energy on Scyther/Pinsir for sakekeeping
>tfw no smart girl to argue about science with
>tfw you will never feel the cold, condescending gaze of a smart girl as she quietly judges your intelligence
>>143409174
You do 8b INSTEAD of 8a. You attach the fighting energy to EITHER golduck or hitmonchan depending on what your opponent does on turn 2.
Approaching triangle answer at warp autism. Hold your heinies
>>143409218
Oh, excuse me.
But still, 8c.
>>143409174
However, you raise a good point w/ energy trans-ing the grass energies to scyther/pinsir. I don't know how to solve that.
By this point, I think this problem might actually be impossible. I've been at it for over an hour and I can't think of anything.
>tfw years of being a hikki have made me stupid as fuck
>>143405190
You can, the answer is 20º.
>>143402422
It's 90 degrees
Okay, fine, here's the answer.
No one's going to be happy with this.
>>143410299
I may be a bit dumb, can you care to explain how you found the angles for CDE? Just so I can understand it a bit better.
>>143402322
Ok, so first thing is that Y and G are manifolds, and the expression π₃(G)≃ℤ is saying that the third homotropy group of G is isomorphic to the set of integers, which means that G is either a 3-sphere, or a regular sphere.
So far, so good.
