The said object is indestructible and cannot be moved. Aka what happens when unstoppable force meets immovable object.
What would happen?
I would get dubs
The fabric of reality would probably rip.
Either that or modern physics is wrong.
>>135668103
They pass each other without any kind of interaction.
>>135668103
Loud bang, but the mosquito inbetween them still survives.
They surrender
No such thing as infinite energy.
That scenario would never happen.
>>135668103
Saitama is not an unstoppable force. Tertiary fags please stop forcing this meme.
>>135668103
He would pass through it.
>>135668103
What will happen if Saitama walk into black hole?
The idea of an immovable object doesn't work in our universe. It's not just "impossible", the idea contradicts the way that space works.
As >>135668539 points out, unstoppable force is equivalent to an object with infinite kinetic energy, so that would make it an object with infinite weight. (E = 1/2m*v² so for E to be infinite, m would have to be infinite or v would have to be c which would mean that m is infinite anyway)
>>135668953
>I can't do thought experiments because i'm too autistic to suspend my understanding of the universe to play a game
>>135669083
>Let's pretend the laws of physics don't work.
>Let's not come up with alternative laws.
>Here's a hypothetical scenario. What happens?
Nothing, because you have no physical laws to do anything.
>>135669138
>"An indestructable and immovable object collides with an extremely powerful force, what happens?"
>"hurr how does that universe work? Is wood still brown or is it green? this is important for my universe building"
Face it, you're either a retard that can't function in theories, or you're a newfag scrub thats just gotten into physics and are tryingt o shut down things you think are stupid because they don't adhere to your limited knowledge structure.
>>135669285
>with an extremely powerful force
What the fuck are you talking about?
Just a moment ago you spoke of "unstoppable". You are just shitposting, aren't you?
>>135669285
are you legitimately that stupid?
They just slide off of each other
>>135669330
The extremely powerful force is Saitama you fucking idiot, that's the whole point of the thread, to brainstorm idea's about what would happen if Saitama punched an indestructible and immovable object.
>>135668103
It would create an irony
>>135669380
>Aka what happens when unstoppable force meets immovable object.
No, you really need to set your parameters straight. There is a difference between finite and infinite.
>>135669400
my mom does my ironing desu anon
>>135668103
this is like the "can god make a stone that heavy that he can't lift it anymore?" question, its pointless to awnser since there isnt a awnserthat makes sense
>>135668103
> undestructable
>>135669443
I don't need to do shit, im not the one asking the question, i'm the one calling you out for being an autistic piece of shit that can't answer a simple question without needing to apply mathematics and physics to an imaginary scenario that most people would be able to understand and discuss without problem.
>>135669380
holy fuck
this question itself is pointless
you are "theorizing" a universe which functions with different physical laws and then don't define them.
the answers: "flower pot", "four" and "saitama becomes an immovable object and the immovable object starts accelerating with infinite energy" are all equally as right as they are wrong
this question is worthless
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9eKc5kgPVrA
the dude in the video could make the mental leap, were talking about ideas here, in math it's really fucking common to deal with shit like this from the numberphile videos I've seen.
>>135669555
Then don't bother replying you useless faggot.
>>135669589
My problem with his final answer is that if they pass each other they don't actually "meet" as in, their forces don't actually interact.
But the thread is about Saitama, so I think he would break his arm if he punched an immovable object.
Reminds me of 2008-2009 when we discussed what would happen if you drove a diamond car against a diamond wall.
Or a diamond wall intonatsuru
>>135668103
If it's a serious punch the thing will explode like everything else he punches
>>135669836
Except the thing is unbreakable and immovable.
>>135669589
>the dude in the video could make the mental leap,
The dude in the video freely defined what the things he was talking about meant and then also freely redefined the laws of physics as he went along.
If that's what you were looking for, you already got the exact same answer in >>135669138
>Nothing [happens]
>>135669860
He's one punch man he only needs one punch that's the joke
>>135668103
In the power-level ranking in the setting, Saitama is both a immovable and unstoppable object, thus it would indeed break physics.
>>135669896
It's an unbreakable and immovable object, thats the joke.
>>135669884
obviously but what's the point of philosophy?
>>135669934
One important aspect of philosophy is to be as absolutely precise as possible.
If [your definition] doesn't work within our universe, then you must clearly define what exactly you mean and how you are willing to change the laws of physics to make it work.
If you don't, you are not doing philosophy. You're just being an ass.
>>135669924
It's not unbreakable after he punches it
>>135670005
Yes it is.
>>135668103
they surrenderThen get Udon and play vidja
>>135670003
well the dude in the video explained it pretty well
>>135670066
Again, the guy in the video defined the stuff very freely.
He was just a few seconds into his "explain"ing and the immovable object was no longer immovable.
>>135670121
Because the concept of an immovable object is absurd because its going to be moving relative to something else.
>>135668103
As far as we know, he's just really powerful compared to every one around him. While we have yet to see his limits, it does not mean that they are not there.
So he'd probably break his arm.
>>135670166
Exactly. Which is why the post that started all of this was pointing out to the OP that his definitions needed refining. Because a thread can be interactive, a youtube video cannot.
It-s impossible because an immovable object and an unstoppable force need infinite mass. Such objects cannot exist in this universe. But if we disregard all that, I guess you'll get a big bang.
>>135670228
Which doesn't matter because immoavble is a descpritive word that wouldnt change anything.
>>135670293
I don't follow. What are you trying to say?
>>135670336
Not him, but let's say the object is moving with the same velocity as the expansion of the univere
>>135670336
It doesn't matter if an object is immovable or it can't be stopepd from moving, it doens't change the properties of the object. Wether its 0 m/s and can't be moved or 999,999,999,999,999,999,999 m/s and can't be stopped, it's still indestructible and will persist in doing whatever it's doing. It's a Constant, it will always be doing whatever its doing reardless of what is going on around it.
>>135670121
he talks about an impossible scenario, it's something that's interesting to discuss
>>135670400
The universe expands in all directions at the same time.
Is this immovable object expanding in all directions?
>>135670421
>It's a Constant, it will always be doing whatever its doing reardless of what is going on around it.
With that definition you have already answered (half) the question. You see how nice this is? After properly phrasing things, you don't even need to ask others any more.
>>135670468
It doesn't matter, choose a direction and go.
>>135670620
Velocity has a vector.
You meant speed, then.
>>135670238
so, what would happen if saitama where physically able to punch the universe?
>>135670693
No, i mean velocity, but with an unspecified direction, since it doesn't matter in this argument.
>>135670738
Are you saying that individual parts of the universe are not part of the universe?
>>135668103
Saitama hits Genos' love for him?
>>135670771
>No, i mean velocity, but with an unspecified direction,
Yes, that's speed.
>>135668103
>Who would win in a fight between Superman and Batman?
>>135668103
massive shockwave or something like that. The force in the punch would have to escape somewhere.
>>135670809
No, that's velocity with an unspecified direction.
>>135668103
Saitama would punch through said object.
>>135668539
Saitama's powers are as absurd as this you stupid tripfag
>>135670773
no i mean if he could step out of the universe (standing/moving in "the nothing" right next to the universe) and punch it. i hope you understand what i'm trying to say, englisch is not my first language
It would stop his punch.
Saitama is not an unstoppable force. That was never stated.
>>135668103
>You actually thought about this and decided to create an entire thread dedicated to your retarded question. Why?
inb4 baited
>>135670867
That would only change the direction that he'd be punching from.
>>135670910
>>135668103
you mean this? (sorry for 9gag)
if something is unstoppable, it's unstoppable, this is not possible irl but you can deal with it if you are not a massive faggot like that one guy here, in maths it's even common to break bunch of stuff just for fun, yes i am the one who linked that stupid video, what's your argument? well it's not a possible scenario so it's pointless, sometimes shits just fun, yo
btw fuck your opinion about philosophy, it's very common to deal with infinite numbers, impossible scenarios
>>135671130
>in maths it's even common to perfectly define what you are talking about in logical language that permits no misunderstandings.
Indeed.
>>135668476
I hate this answer. It makes no sense.
>>135671130
you're the one who's autistic here because you're asking nothing for "fun"
I mean, what the fuck kind of answer do you expect?
He breaks the unbreakable object because fuck logic and he trained really hard. Are you satisfied now, you fucking sperg?
>>135668103
He destroys and moves it. Rule of comedy>rules of physics
>>135668103
It's called The Big Bang. He's done it before. He can do it again.
>>135668151
Fool, behold mine in their glory!
>>135671938
>>135668151
Both of you are dumb check this out.
>>135668151
>>135671938
>>135673048
It's all in the wrist.
Nothing would happen.
This is the whole unstoppable sword hitting a shield that stops everything from ye old time.
He'll try Normal Punch, then Serious Punch, then finally destroy it with his secret Plot Punch technique.
>>135671082
>implying saitama isn't the sentient manifestation of a nokia
>>135670910
>>135668914
He comes out on the other side
>>135668103
Nothing moves the Blob!
ok
so
saitama gets cloned perfectly
and they both punch at full strength
who wins? saitama, or saitama?
>>135668103
Considering Saitama is not unmovable, he would be propelled away from the object
