Does objective morality exist?
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-realism/
>>28360257
not reading that garbage
>>28360287
Then why ask the question? Can't handle anything not in meme form?
>>28360304
I was trying to instigate an active discussion
>>28360319
Yeah like you're get anything interesting on /r9k/. Why not go straight to the people who actually spend a lot of time thinking about the question and read what they have said?
>"objective"
>exist
>>28360347
because I've already made up my mind and wanted to shit on dissenting opinions
No, it doesn't.
Nothing objective exists, let alone morality.
Honest question. Enlighten me what is "objective morality"? I have genuinely no fucking clue what that should be.
>>28360126
As said before, nothing objective exists. I may add that I believe that morality is even one of the most subjective things.
yes
>inb4 bunch of fedora tippers
>>28360126
No, because morality is judgement.
>subjective
>this action is wrong
>objective
>this action is
Fuck no, the only way objective morality worked as a philosophy was because of God
Not even Dostoevsky could really dig himself out of his anti God arguments even with the father zossima shit
>>28360767
>Fuck no, the only way objective morality worked as a philosophy was because of God
That doesn't work at all. The idea that the existence of God means morality can be somehow more objective than it would be without God is nonsensical.
Euthyphro's dilemma bud.
It exists only if you believe it does, but that doesn't necessarily mean one can ever find it.
Even if it did exist, what good is it without some kind of karmic system to reward right and punish wrong?
>>28360126
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lgcd6jvsCFs
>>28360126
Morality is a construct of a mind (a subject)
therefore it cannot be objective