Well...Well...Well...
What CAN you even say to refute this?
>>70004273
Let me stick my dick in your Cheerios then
>>70004273
I love buying a car with 100,000 miles on it
>Make point X
>Liberal makes unrelated dramatic analogy Y without addressing X and implied they refuted X
>Supporting Donald Trump is just like supporting the holocaust. Why do you support the Holocaust
STOP LETTING THEM DO THIS. STOP. CALL THEM UT ON IT.
>>70004273
Three words
>big
>flappy
>vagina
>>70004273
Stop fucking posting this thread you asshole.
His analogy is wrong.
It's more like if you were to put milk in your cereal, drain it, put do this 7 different times with different liquids, and then eat it. IT'S FUCKING SHITTY CEREAL!
>>70004273
>I cannot undo my past mistakes, therefore they need to be forgiven
Shit logic.
>>70004374
first post, best post
>it bothers me that there are social norms by which men and women adhere to
Sorry.
>>70004624
>not even a basic understanding of women's anatomy
Typical of a /pol/cuck, women find you vile and repulsive so you don't know shit about them.
>>70004273
Fine, no double standards. Men deserved to be shut shamed as well. Anytime a guy talks about ass, give him dirty looks.
>>70004735
heh, well said
>>70004736
>the "it stretches meme"
Yeah after a woman has a baby I bet she has a super tight pussy
>>70004831
Men should be slut shamed. Society is supposed to be in check by Men, not having all the men go be whores.
all sluts are faggots + degenerates (men+women)
fuck you, sluts
>>70004689
come and stop me bitch.
>>70004273
So that's why people hate this guy. I thought he was cool because of pic related
>>70004736
He's totally right though, unless women are diligent about doing kegels (protip:most don't even know how to keep their shit clean let alone exercise it) the more dick they take the more it stretches and calluses. But keep talking about shit you don't understand, virgin
>>70004273
>women are held to a different standard on this
by whom, exactly?
do women not care about how many other women a man has been with?
are individuals no longer permitted to set standards for their choice in partners?
fuck this idiot.
>>70004273
Women can fuck as many men as they want, but I refuse to marry a whore. So, that's my own two cents on the issue. People can say what ever they want about it but the more men a woman fucks the lower her desirability goes. It's just the way it is.
>>70004885
Except who has a dick the size of a baby
Would you want to eat a bowl of cereal 47 guys came in? John Green wouldn't mind.
>>70004885
you don't want it too tight though.
t. lots of blood
>>70004885
>Yeah after a woman has a baby I bet she has a super tight pussy
The virgin Mary did
>>70004273
>why can't more men be like John green
Sorry we all don't have a cuck fetish
>>70004736
No literally it does get flopped out. It can recover after long terms of non-use. But constant use demolishes that shit and extreme use I.e. porn stars and hookers can cause scar tissue to develop as such that it beverage returns to a tight state. Same goes for the anus.
>>70005038
Bahaha, it never gets old that there is a whole religion based on mary cucking joseph before they even fucked
Even Notch replied sad that the word cuck is being used because it looks down upon people who like the fetish
Can someone post that one /r9k/ screen cap that brilliantly refutes this. I don't have it unfortunately
>>70005116
Never not beverage. Fucking autospell.
>>70004273
This "guys who sleep with lots of girls are cool" meme needs to die. Who takes Dan Bilzerian seriously?
>>70005190
Dude, what a cuck that guy is.
>>70004273
Women are free to fuck as many men as they like
If someone personally prefers not to get on with a woman who's been with several guys, then what's wrong with that?
Its his choice, why're you forcing him to comply to societal pressure into dating a woman who's been with several guys?
I really hate Scandinavians. Nuke em all if I could. Here is the only famous swede
>>70005243
Twatter...
but then again who takes that seriously
>>70004273
fucking Cillian Murphy man...
>>70004273
Everyone should be abstinent. Your logic is backward as fuck...
>>70004273
Eating cereals does not spread STDs. It's also no an extremely intimate act between two people (unless you're weird as fuck). There is a difference between spoons being dipped into cereal and someone cumming inside them. I guarantee that if someone offered you two glasses of water and told you that one glass a bunch of random guys had cum in several hundred times (but it's totally still cleaned) and the other was just an ordinary glass, you'd choose the ordinary one.
People who fuck another person just for the physical feeling of it aren't people I want to be with. It's irresponsible and cheapens the whole thing. I don't want the girl I'm fucking to just think of it as a sort of massage.
t. guy in a long-term relationship
>>70005190
What the hell does empathy have to do with jacking off while dindus plow your wife?
>>70005329
Good God...
>>70005321
I know you let your wife fuck as many men as she likes pajeet
poo in the loo
>>70005190
>misogynistic language aimed at men
So even when you insult a man, it's hatred towards women. Good goy.
>>70004273
>Anglicans
Swede faggot is mocking us
Keep using the word cuck
>>70005190
>you are an unempathetic asshole if you aren't willing to assume another man's responsibilities
the fuck is this? am i my brother's keeper?
>>70004273
sex is like everything else
it's not healthy if you do none of it
and it's not healthy if you do too much of it
>>70005321
Don't you have a street to shit on, Pajeet?
>>70005321
Poo in the loo pajeet
>>70004273
Sex is a much more significant and personal interaction than eating cereal, it's a false equivalency
>>70004374
>>70004545
Oooh cooties. you're fags.
>>70004617
that's not what he is doing. you're straw-manning.
>>70004624
myth. virgin detected.
>>70004722
Assumes it was a mistake without showing why.
If you assume your worldview then what is the point of having any debates?
>>70004736
correct
>>70004831
If I can't be a desired chad then no one should have sex. WEW lad!
>>70004931
wew. *tips fedora*
>>70004980
factually wrong
>>70005013
Argument from cooties again
>>70005037
Another Virgin detected
>>70005036
try harder to be original. conjuring up a disgusting image is irrelevant to the analogy.
>>70005054
multiple gfs, sucessful career, wife children, money... master of his own life and destiny. does whatever he wants and doest care. Who is the KEK again? that's right YOU BITCH.
>>70005190
Guy is a bilogists, philosopher, gamer and educator... what are you? a loser on the web who uses cuck.
>>70005321
Argument from cooties again. WEW
>>70005329
He is correct though. it does stigmatizes a perfectly harmless sexual fetish.
John Green is my wife's favorite author
>your with other people are proven to have a negative impact on yourself and others
>HURR BUT WHAT IF PEOPLE WERE OBJECTS? THEN I WOULD BE ABLE TO DO ANYTHING I WANT
>>70004273
You can't get AIDS from eating two bowls of cereal.
>>70004273
easy
now, back to >>/plebbit/
>>70005504
Where does this guy spend his time, on /gif/?
>>70005756
lmao
>>70005756
https://www.reddit.com/
>>70004273
>Why do different standards exist for men than for women. It's not like childbirth is a thing lol.
>>70005413
What is a condom? what is having safe sex?
this phony concern always comes up.
Also argument from cooties.
>>70005524
MUuuh genes....
MUuuuh DNA...
If we were to follow your DNA supremacist logic of only caring for our DNA then civilization as we understand would not exist and we'd be back to bloodline monarchies and rulers. you're an idiot.
>>70005549
>sex is like EVERYTHING ELSE
wew lad. because the truth has always to be somewhere in the middle right?
fallacy of the middle ground.
>>70005504
He still comes here?
>>70006037
http://www.funnyjunk.com/
Go back to your home anon
ITT: Virgins who have absolutely no idea how a vagina works.
>hundreds of men have ejaculated inside me, their DNA now exists in my blood stream and any baby I have with you will then have this same blood marked with hundreds of other men
completelyok.jpg
>>70005190
>misogynistic language aimed at men
isn't that cuck a writer ?
doesn't he know that the word he's looking for is misandric ?
What a fucking cuck.
>>70005828
who is your wife's boyfriend's favorite author?
>>70006037
no but really
some sex is good for your health, it reduces stress and raises self esteem. only a complete fedora virgin thinks sex is unhealthy.
too much of it causes wear and tear.
>>70006190
his wife's boyfriend can't read
>>70006140
i don't think you quite understand how conception works
>>70006071
I'm sure he spends most of his time in
>>>/lgbt/ like the whole lot of you Scandinavian faggots.
I hate you all so goddamn much
>>70005756
t. my blood, not hers.
A key that opens many locks is a master key.
A lock that opens to many keys is a shitty lock.
>>70004273
People aren't cheerios. We have a natural inclination to be jealous over sex, and that IS NOT typical of a polyamorous species at all.
Some lady actually tried to convince me that it was cultural. Can you imagine that, folks? You get into a relationship with a girl at 18, and she later becomes your wife, and you have kids, then you find out one of her friends, "Bobby" used to fuck her, and not only that, but she engaged in regular gangbangs as a teen. I'm pretty sure if that wasn't enough for me to divorce her, it'd probably be after finding out that the she can't have kids, the reason being she had so many abortions that it fucked up her ovaries.
You can say "Woman's Body" all you want. But if you expect me to be cool with it, then I should have the right to have expectations as well, when it comes to relationships.
>>70006280
kek
>>70004273
I'm only marrying a virgin
>>70005756
>that's not what he is doing. you're straw-manning.
It really is. We aren't talking about the feelings of cereal, we are talking about people. There are several reasons why it is normal to dislike the fact that your significant other had sex with lots of people besides you.
>Being someone's 12th isn't special
>Clearly they are settling for me (works great with the Cheerios analogy because now that he is old and consuming massive amounts of sugar isn't recommended he settles for Cheerios)
>If they break up with me they could easily get someone else
>If they have had more sex in the past they are more likely to have an affair
>I will have to surpass the abilities of every previous partner in bed or else I will let them down or bore them
Honestly the fact that he mentions cheerios makes me think the whole quote is a parody
>I am young so I can afford to eat whatever I want/I am young I can afford to fuck whoever I want
>Now I am old and need healthier food so I will settle for Cheerios/Now I am old and I need a stable partner so I will settle for this loser
>>70004273
Because me having eaten the cereal 48 times before doesn't mean that I have an attachment or a commitment issue.
>>70004273
It's actually more like numerous men have eaten out of that cheerios bowl
>>70004273
So he thinks women are nothing more than cheerios to be used and forgotten? That seems sexist of him to make that comment.
>>70006092
Lol he looks like a retarded Tom Brady
>>70004273
Would you want to eat Cheerios after a bunch of guys used the bathroom, didn't wash their hands and then dug handfuls of cereal right out of the box?
>>70004273
It's not even fun anymore
>>70007295
Dude holy shit
>>70004273
Studies have shown women who have more sexual partners, are more likely to cheat.
Enjoy your used up whore.
>>70004273
tfw ive been told 2 girls that i look like this guy
>>70004273
>05 April Current Year
>not being a fag
Shig
>>70007346
ayyy lmao
>>70007295
>>70007346
This is what happens when you have a cuck who has nothing better to do while waiting for his gf to finish with the bull in the other room.
>>70007525
tell me about you, why do you wear the mask?
>>70005190
>misogynistic
>aimed towards men
The average number of sexual partners in one's life is 6, if i remember correctly. If anybody, male or female, has significantly more than that, that's a red flag. If you've had 60,000 penises inside you, you are not somebody i want to be around, much less touch.
>>70004273
This. This is why.
Don't even try to counter such a retarded analogy. Just show them cucks the statistics.
>>70007525
Lol, born a fucking Leaf AND you have to look like a cuck...
>>70004273
Sex with multiple partners is objectively risk taking behavior from a health standpoint and leaves the person at a higher risk for STIs, particularly if they don't bother getting screened on a regular basis.
It can also demonstrate poor decision making skills
>>70007432
They'll also be less happy the more partners they've had.
It takes seven years for the body to have replenished every cell in your body.
Which means that for those seven years it's effectively like sleeping with every person they've slept with.
>>70007572
Jokes on you, I don't have a girlfriend
>>70004273
>Do you think it matters how many people someone has slept with
Yes. Every person slept with substantially increases their likelihood of STDs or even AIDS/Ebola. Not to mention this says something about their consistency and long-term ability to maintain a relationship.
Also
>wizard status cuck
>"I don't care how many people somebody has slept with"
>"largely because I'll fuck anyone that'll have me"
>>70004273
Because women (and men) who has a lot of sex become degenerate and are not religious enough.
>>70007979
Meant the OP not you with the other response, lol.
>>70008156
>not religious enough
Religion =/= morality
>>70006037
>uh oh, people are having a discussion
>better start crying fallacies instead of presenting alternative arguments
>that'll shut 'em up
MEME THIS KEK
>>70005756
Oh god not this guy again.
>>70004689
True. OP you're beating the dead horse by posting this every single day
>>70004273
Actually the correct analogy would be eating a cheerios that has been in the mouth of 47 other people.
So let's flip this around would women prefer a guy that has a high risk of cheating, more than likely has drug or alcohol issues, high risk of having AIDS, probably kids that will need his attention at random times, and has shown that he cannot stay in a long term relationship? Or a virgin(STI FREE) that goes to church every Sunday, has a very family oriented mindset, can not only hold down a job but probably has great connections through his church family?
Of course women will go for the druggie AIDS riddled single father because they don't use LOGIC! Remember folks when arguing with a faggot or women setup a cogent logical arguement and then just start screaming about your feelings. After an hour of this claim your having menstrual cramps and walk away.
Women are not fucking cereal.
Women who only have sex when in a serious long-term relationship do so because of their future partner. She saves herself because her body is not for any man; and if she lets someone have her, he will know that it's a sign of her love and trust to him.
Don't fucking kid yourself. You don't like your woman fucking around with other guys: EXACTLY because sex means something more than putting your dick in her vagina.
This analogy is BS. I think it's disgusting when anyone sleeps with a lot of people.
It screams impulsive behavior and someone who submits to immediate gratification, and recklessness depending on how many partners and whether protection was involved.
I refuse to have sex until I am married. Many will call me a prude but that's ok. You can't turn a ho into a housewife.
Did John Green seriously just tell everyone his wife fucked 48 dudes?
>>70005756
How's your wife's son doing?
>>70004273
STD's are real. Women are disloyal.
>>70006458
Wew lad, you take memes way too seriously
>>70004273
He is right that men should be held to the same standard. Male sluts are just as degenerate.
I love these threads, it always brings out the hilariously deluded"I only sleep with pure virgins" crowd, it's some of the best bullshit I get to see slung on /pol/, hypocricy at its finest.
>>70004273
>Doesn't want to be sexist
>Compares women to cereal
Great job John
>>70005190
>misogynistic language aimed towards men
>misogynistic
>aimed towards men
What.
>>70004273
Cheerios says, "You've eaten a lot of cereals before me, so will you continue to eat lots more cereals after you've tasted me, or will you only eat Cheerios from now on?"
Most likely you'll continue trying lots more cereals. So this meme basically says Once a Loose Woman, Always a Loose Woman.
>>70005329
>swedish
>cuck
Makes sense.
>>70004273
Let's look at this analogy.
>Tried lots of cereals before.
>Now trying Cheerios.
>Will continue trying lots of other cereals.
>Tried lots of other sex partners before.
>Now trying you.
>Will continue trying lots of other sex partners.
That's fine if that's what you want, but if it's not, the previous sex partners are a clue that there will also be more in the future.
>>70009593
Beat me to it.
>>70004273
Can we get a ban on this guy, please? This thread is getting old with the reposts.
>>70004273
>wahwahwah women are held to different standards than men
Well, then start laying the blame with women, because it's not the men who decide if a woman dates a man. And if they did, I'm sure they'd keep their sisters away from mansluts.
Tbh, people should decide for themselves if they want to slut around or not. But don't come crying when someone doesn't find you attractive for it.
>>70006405
I said bloodstream
>>70004273
>beta faggot telling every one how tolerant he is about women that slept with 213 men, desperately hoping that one of the sluts that didn't fuck him back in high school will fuck him now.
Absolutely disgusting and pathetic.
>>70006037
>What is a condom? what is having safe sex?
Condoms do exist and have for an extremely long time and yet STD rates keep on going up.
http://www.cdc.gov/nchhstp/newsroom/2015/std-surveillance-report-press-release.html
People are stupid, really, really stupid.
>>70007609
>photoshop in a bong
>then draw a dick over it
Why? Pick one!
"A key that will open any lock is a master key. A lock that will open for any key is a shitty lock".
>>70010157
Sex with condoms suck. Feeling that wet pussy is the best part. Might as well jerk off instead.
It makes sense to hold men and women to different standards because it's a lot easier for women to cheat than men. The average woman could easily get online and have a dozen fucks lined up for the next week, whereas the average man could spend months just trying to get one.
So if a man has been a little slutty in the past, it's not as big a risk in a relationship as it is if a woman has been a little slutty, because of how much easier it is for the woman to resume that behavior.
If you want to test this, just try it out with your girlfriend. Both of you get on OKCupid and see how fast you can get laid. I guarantee you she will rack up a dozen while you're still waiting for your first bite. That's the imbalance in reality that justifies the imbalance in the rules for the sexes.
>>70009199
>dat comic
I prefer the original, more succinct.
>>70009135
Tits or GTFO
>>70009498
How is that hypocrisy, you think the people saying that aren't virgins as well? We're on 4chan for fucks sake.
>>70004273
Men shouldn't be held to a different standard, I agree. Premarital sex is degeneracy, period.
>>70010518
I wouldn't know that but I've heard that same thing quite often. What a horrible choice to make; less pleasure or the risk of infection.
>>70004624
BIG MEATY
C
L
A
W
S
>>70009881
this
Look,ma,I posted it again! Fuck off please.
>>70004273
Already answered this numerous times faggot, go back to plebbit. Sage
>>70010466
That is a shitty comparison.
Its all about biology. One man that fuck 1000 women will have lots of children and evolutionary he will be a winner. He doesn't need to stick around to raise them all, some of them will make it and he can just pick out one woman and a few children to focus on. See Genghis Khan.
One woman that fucks 1000 men will have the same amount of children as she could have gotten with the just one good man with prime genetics. But if she fucks 1000 men she will be a single mother with children from several different men and the children will not have the support of a steady father figure and they will be more likely to fail at life. See pic related.
TL;DR
Infinite amount of sperm cells, finite amount of egg cells.
>>70004374
Wait.... you can stick your dick in a Cheerio?
>>70010760
>>70010518
You can't avoid it either.
If you go gay and have sex without condoms you risk getting HIV... well if you have a stable partner you don't but gays cheat more than straight couples because men cheat more due to higher sex drive.
Woman aren't held to a different standard by anyone other than themselves.
A girl who sleeps around is generally thought of as a whore by women.
A man that sleeps around is generally thought of as a whore by other men.
But while men also find a used up woman gross, women find a used up man attractive.
>>70004273
Would you eat out of a ceral boil with a dozen dirty spoons in it?
Would you like to be eaten out by a dirty spoon?
>>70010939
No, it's about virtuousness. I understand how a cucked sven would have difficulties grasping that, though.
>>70011205
lock analogy is still retarded
>>70004273
more like
'Do you want this bowl of cheerios, after 47 other men have ejaculated into it?'
"No''
'Sexist!'
>>69690000
>>69000000
Fag
>Being the moral police
> Posting on 4chan
Pick one faggots
Sorry guys I'm pretty conservative but it doesn't matter if your wife or gf or whatever has has sex partners in the past.
Analogies are the most retarded autistic shit ever. It makes no sense.
Instead of arguing for women who have been fucked by dozens of men he brings up something completely unrelated to the subject.
>you think 2 + 2 is 4 lol?
>I take two table spoons of salt and I add two table spoons of sugar, I mix them up, how can you say that I made a pankake? LOL WRECKED
Grow up. It makes no fucking sense.
>imagine if 48th cheerio bag said ''I don't feel special''
No. How about you imagine that you dated a woman and then she told you that she has fucked 48 men. 48 fucking men.
How about we talk about THAT? You think that's normal? You want to date a woman who has fucked dozens of men? Fuck your analogies. Everyone using analogies should be fined for being retarded.
>>70004273
> eating one single cereal grain your entire life
liberal logic, ladies and gentlemen
>>70004273
>"Do you think it matters how many people someone has slept with?"
For men, no.
For women, it's scientifically proven that they retain genetic material from every male they've ever taken in their lives. Which means that if you ever settle down and have kids with a slut, it's not 50% you in your precious little spergling.
>>70011792
It should matter if you don't want sloppy seconds and an unstable woman that will cheat on you. A women who has had dozens of dicks is not going to be a good partner, ever.
>>70011424
I think it makes sense more in that there's an obvious explanation for why most men aren't extremely promiscuous despite sex being so enjoyable; it's difficult for them to get it. For women on the other hand it's relatively easy for them to get sex so why aren't they all extremely promiscuous? It's not like there's any impediments for them, men aren't that picky. So you have to wonder that there's maybe something off about them, why did choose this path when the majority of their peers didn't. Attention seeking or hedonism probably, neither of which are attractive traits.
>>70011424
There's essentially no retort, which is why feminists have a problem with it.
Unless you're not packing joystick between your grovelling knees, I would recommend a nice long walk off a short pier to solve that identity crisis of yours.
>>70012119
*something off about the ones that are promiscuous
>>70004273
sorry, but I prefer fresh young greens, not some old dried out cereals
>>70011856
If I dated a woman and she told me I was the 49th guy she'd slept with, I wouldn't be dating her anymore. The more men a woman has been with, the less happy she is in a relationship, the more likely she is to cheat, and the more likely that any prospective new relationship would end prematurely.
'Damaged goods' is real and anyone who argues against it is a cuckold. Also the only non-degenerate way of raising another man's child is if that man is dead. If the child is a half-breed though then there is no non-degenerate way of raising it.
>>70004374
FPBP
>>70004273
The analogy implies there are no effects on the person that ate all those 48th cereals. The implication being promiscuity has no effects on the promiscuous. Which has been shown to be false over and over. From unhappiness in marriage to likelihood of infidelity and divorce.
I guess you will ask me to spend time posting the links to those studies that have been featured on this very board hundreds of times, which I'm not going to do because you are a troll looking to waste my time.
Don't believe me. Please date and marry promiscuous women they are the best and will make you very happy.
>>70004273
there's this thing called structural integrity and the viability of the vagina and indeed a woman's worth is based entirely on the number of cocks that she's taken. the more she's had the less she's worth. this is analogous to a car's mileage.
>>70004273
Stop making this shitty thread, John. I see it every fucking day and it's always a shitshow.
>>70010519
This basically sums it up.
I like the way Jim Jeffries puts it:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pbvrGiL_s70
>humans can't be compared to animals because muh racism
>but they can be compared to cheerios because muh slut shaming
>>70004273
Men (and women) evolved to find promiscuity in women repulsive. It's hardwired and you aren't going to change it.
>>70004273
Ever heard of the phrase apples and oranges?
What about human beings and cereal?
It's not hard to grasp that a person who has been in over a dozen long term relationships isn't going to value a relationship with you as much as someone who has only been in a relationship with one other person.
Same thing goes for sexual partners.
What's he gonna do, make me have sex with roasties?
>>70004273
I only wear secondhand socks and used secondhand tooth brushes... what's the difference? Lol
>>70005756
Lurk for a few more weeks before you try to post again newfag. You're embarrassing yourself.
Does anyone have that post where someone calls him a creep for overly romanticising young teens?
>>70004273
> Eating cereal
> Catching a venereal disease
> Same thing
> Why u no be cuck like me?
>>70004885
Virgin stitch. Google it.
>>70014287
Never mind, found it myself
http://fishingboatproceeds.tumblr.com/post/121316109713/mattcatashpole-astro1995
>>70014718
What's a bet a bunch of Jimmy Saville-esque shit's going to come out about him in a couple decades time too?
>>70015115
I wouldn't be surprised. This whole thing he has going on honestly is a bit weird. I think that guy says it best, he's like the one Dad that offers to supervise pool parties. Or McConaughey's character in Dazed and Confused.
>>70015344
His response was such a deflection too they weren't saying he had abused children just that he was angling to be in a position where he could.
>>70004273
>What CAN you even say to refute this?
Stop posting this fucking picture.
>>>/trash/
>>70004273
He didn't even make an argument so there's nothing to refute. All he did is is say
>Does it matter how many people someone slept with
>No
There's no argument there. Just an inept cuck feeding other cucks the bulls cum.
>>70005756
>mass replying
>>70015429
Yeah, that just makes it weirder, that he instantly goes to defend himself against accusations, that weren't made. His writing isn't exactly anything spectacular, I'm sure there are plenty of men writing sappy young adult/ teen romance novels. It's just that, coupled with his social media presence, where he seems to go out of his way to seem approachable to teen girls.
At best he's that weird high school/ college dropout who hangs around with teens, so they look up to him as some wise older guy, despite him mostly saying pseudointellectual BS. At worst he's actually a creep preying on teenage girls.
>>70004689
Bro, I'm eating fucking cereal right now. Holy shit that's a disgusting thought.
>>70004273
So you are comparing
Eating different types of cereal
EATING
Something you literary must do to survive
To fucking every guy you just met.
If we compare it to food.
Also look at it that way, this girl have been eating candy ALL THE TIME.
She was eating ONLY candy
When she was 26 she decided that candy might not be the best for her, her health and teeth are in terrible shape.
Now she DECIDES to SETTLE for healthy food like salads cooked meals and stuff like that.
If she had the chance she wouldn't even look at it but she knows that candy won't want her and will destroy her even more.
Do you just decide that it "Doesn't matter" that she destroyed herself completely because of candy and she just settles for healthy foods?
>Well then screw you, Cheerios. I can't go into the past and un-eat all those cereals.
Well you could think about it and not eat them and really think about what you really want to eat you fucking whore
>>70004273
I prefer he cleveland show analogy
>If I offered you a new soda pop or one thats had seven penisis in which one would you prefer?
>>70004273
>calls himself a Christian
>compares sex to eating Cheerios
>>70013091
How about secondhand condoms? Secondhand dildos and fleshlights? Yeah, I thought not.
>>70004273
Only a man who is truly bothered by a woman's sexual history goes to this length of justification. Since his gf left him, then came back when he had money from book deals, and since he is no doubt a virgin, perhaps he should apply those same principles to his relationship. If men and women are to be held to the same standard, and he's had no sex, then why would he want a whore?
Why does it matter how many times I have declared bankruptcy? The past is the past, bank, you fucking misogynist. Give me that loan!
