Bernie wants to end nuclear power.
- Home
- Board: /pol/ - Politically Incorrect
- Reading: Bernie wants to end nuclear power.
http://www.motherjones.com/environment/2016/04/grist-bernie-sanders-wants-to-phase-out-nuclear-power-plants
We all agree with this, right? Nuclear reactors give out so much pollution it's killing the planet, not to mention they fail constantly like Chernobyl and Fukushima.
>>69990037
>Nuclear reactors give out so much pollution it's killing the planet
gr8 b8
>falling for the renewable jew
>>69990037
>B-but Chernobyl.
If we used nuclear power more often, we wouldn't have fucking wars every 2 years because of oil.
Make a favour to your country and kill yourself.
>>69990093
Look at those silos spitting out smog. I'm not stupid, man. Nuclear is dirty as fuck.
I swear socialists are retarded. Renewables other than hydroelectric are volatile and require a non-solar/wind base load to cover for them if the sun isn't shining and the wind isn't blowing.
Nuclear plants are the only non-carbon base load power source.
>>69990037
>nuclear
>pollution
>>69990156
>water vapor
>smog
still b8ing or genuinely retarded, maybe both
>>69990037
im seriously reconsidering voting for him.
seriously has anti-science bullshit completely taken over both parties?
does anyone else feel this feel?
>>69990037
Holy retard
Stop sliding
Chernobyl
Fukushima
Three Mile Island
>>69990037
>pollution
That's steam, you baiting faggot.
>>69990037
>We all agree with this, right? Nuclear reactors give out so much pollution it's killing the planet, not to mention they fail constantly like Chernobyl and Fukushima.
>>69990254
The Republicans want to increase NASA's budget. The Dems don't. That goes for most science actually, hilariously enough.
>>69990156
You are stupid.
That is steam.
>>69990254
>>>/reddit/
>>69990037
if bernie is going to brink oil back he's got my vote.
Nuclear power should be phased out also because it's a source of nuclear material to make bombs. Terrorists like the Bundy militia would love to get their hands on that stuff.
>>69990425
>>69990391
Not an argument. When nuclear power fails (and it does often) the results are apocalyptic.
Fukushima poisoned the entire Pacific. That's just ONE plant.
>>69990037
Nuclear power plants will soon be decomissioned anyway
Another empty promise from comrade Sanders :^)
>fail constantly
>names 2 out of 2 accidents
wew lad.
Although I must say, I always knew Bernie was a retard, but after he said he wants to ban nuclear AND FUCKING SEMITRUCKS I knew he was fucking weapons grade autistic
>>69990037
Now I really want him to die.
He must not win.
Even Shillary is better.
We need more, smaller, nuclear power plants
>>69990596
>We need more Chernobyls
No, we don't. If Cunt Carter and the media during the Three Mile Island incident had blown shit way out of proportion America would more than likely been energy independent by now. It's pseudoscientific liberal fucks like you that go on to ruin everything. It's nearly impossible to build a Nuclear reactor in this country thanks to all the regulations that have been implemented. Kike in Hell Bernfag
>>69990037
u r dumb lol
>>69990658
Hadn't
>>69990037
>Nuclear reactors give out so much pollution
Yeah, we should use coal.
>>69990037
Nuclear Engineering major here
Nuclear power is literally the only way we're not going to fuck ourselves over ~100 years down the line. Yeah global warming is a hoax, but being dependent on finite fuels that mainly come from the middle east is retarded. Also I don't understand why Green energy niggers aren't for nuclear energy when it's so fucking efficient that it's almost a fucking renewable source by itself
Hernie has once and for all revealed his utter retardation. He never had a chance, and now he's just trying to embezzle as much as he can from his donors.
>>69990037
Ironic shitposting is still shitposting anon
I can't believe what I'm hearing from /pol/
You guys support nuclear energy? What the fuck is wrong with you guys? Do you WANT cancer and mutant freak babies?
>>69990501
>Nuclear power should be phased out also because it's a source of nuclear material to make bombs.
Because making a nuke is that easy.
>Not an argument. When nuclear power fails (and it does often) the results are apocalyptic.
How about when a coal mine collapses and traps hundreds of miners? That's more casualties right there than any nuclear incident ever did. And it happens way more often.
>Fukushima poisoned the entire Pacific
>slightly raised measured radioactivity above background radioactivity
You have more risk getting cancer from having your fucking smartphone in your pocket 24/7 than by diving into the Pacific after Fukushima.
>>69990254
What the fuck made you even consider him in the first place?
Did you really think paying more taxes for shitty garbage healthcare and shit education was a good idea?
>>69990562
>living a hell-life in a degenerating society addicted to amorphous digital contacts
>not wanting to feel the bern of dark ages part deux
ishygddt
>>69990391
>>69990425
Based U-235. You are my greatest ally.
Gens IV an V are gonna btfo solar and wind so hard.
>>69990621
Chernobyl wasn't a small plant. It was also an intentional fuckup.
>"Let's see what happens when a plant fails when all our failsafes are disabled!"
>>69990206
Any actual environmentalists should be against anything but nuclear. That's not just in terms if pollution, but the actually environmental impact. To build any kind of power generation plant beyond nuclear takes up a huge amount of land. This land they use for solar farms, dams, is destroyed the fauna and local animal life displaced or killed.
You got to be the shitiest environmentalist when you are okay with hundreds of square miles of fauna and land being removed for power generation. Nuclear coal and gas have the smallest footprints.
>>69990501
>Bundy Militia
You're a fucking autist and I hope you get caught in a gang shooting. Nuclear power rarely fails and Fukushima did less damage than the BP oil spill you stupid fuck.
Daily reminder that the biggest opponents of nuclear energy are Big Oil and Coal.
Bernie probably gets funded from both of them.
In fact, 'renewables' where largely introduced by Big Oil & Coal because it would stop the progress of nuclear energy but not stop the dependence on oil, gas and coal.
>>69990868
And you think that won't happen in America?
Look what the Republicans did in Flint. They turned off the water and poisoned the residents because they were black. It's genocide. They will do again with nuclear plants.
>>69990724
Are molten salt reactors viable and can be built?
>>69990801
Burning coal for energy is sooooo much better, cancer-wise.
See that shit? As opposed to your pic in OP, THIS is smog.
>>69990724
Oil jew wants to continue selling oil. Coal Jew wants to continue selling coal. Solar Jew wants to continue selling solar. Wind jew wants to continue selling Turbines.
Even the nuclear jew wants to continue selling ceramic uranium oxide fuels rather than seeking new, modern alternatives.
As always, it's jews.
>>69990037
Explain how France isn't a post apocalyptic wasteland considering they have the most nuclear power plants on the planet, and have been using them for decades without a single accident.
>>69990658
>If Cunt Carter and the media during the Three Mile Island incident had blown shit way out of proportion
The most ironic thing is.
No one died as a result of the "disaster" but around half a dozen died on the highways while fleeing the "disaster" in a panic.
>>69990037
Two accidents in over 60 years of operation worth a damn, both easily preventable if proper safe guards had been observed does not a good argument against nuclear power make. More people die from accidents in the production of renewable energy sources then have ever died due to nuclear power.
>>69990810
>anti-war
>anti-banks
>anti-police state
other than his economic stances, which have no chance of passing a GOP controlled House, im pretty fine with this.
The current stalemate has been doing pretty good for the past 6 years.
Im just thinking realpolitik.
Not that my vote matters anyhow.
>>69991011
Coal is bad too.
Solar/Wind/Hydro only. That is the ONLY way we are going to save this planet.
>>69991011
there are more free radioisotopes in coal exhaust than come from a nuclear power plant (which is zero).
>>69990801
>Do you WANT cancer and mutant freak babies?
Maybe you're right anon, we probably would be better off without you.
I think that lefties are against nuclear because in their mind they think nuclear = nuclear bomb = war = male
>>69990206
Isn't Solar-Thermal meant to be capable of producing coal/gas/nuclear base load demands?
>>69990913
Plus exclusion zones around nuclear plants are amazing nature reservations.
>>69990951
>niggers dont pay for water
Thats the problem
>>69991014
Don't be posting gen 4 reactors maggot. They ain't even close to being built. Westinghouses ap1000 isn't even gen 3.
>>69990938
British Petroleum owns more solar patents than anyone. Shell oil owns fusion reactor patents.
Energy Jews are keeping innovation down.
>>69990968
Basically yes, the problem is the fossil fuel lobbyists and the green energy lobbyists that throw nuclear energy on the wayside by using people's irrational fear of nuclear energy.
So yes, but we'd need a really big government grant.
>>69991014
Pretty much, other than the uranium oxide thing. We can't exactly build new ones, and so we're just stuck with what we have. I want another Cold War so we can advance into the Nuclear Age 2: Electric Boogaloo
>>69991014
>lmao i'm naming something by stating each of its components to make it sound more unpleasant, this will convince them
>>69991102
>Solar/Wind/Hydro only
Hydro is the only one that is viable, and it's limited by the number of places it can be applied.
Solar and wind are absolutely shit-tier.
>>69990156
Confirmed for not knowing how nuclear reactor functions.
>>69990724
how many months before this is online?
>>69991064
Fukushima wasn't even that bad and caused minimum damage.
Well unless you get your news from Alex Jones.
The only major nuclear reactor failure was Chernobyl but that was due to the engineers working it pushing the reactor waaaay past its own safety standards to impress(rather not get taken to Gulag) Commie commissars of their glorious Communist nuclear power.
More people have died working in coal plants over the last 10 years than all deaths resulting from nuclear power over the last 50
>>69991284
Look at that evil thing.
It could turn an entire state into a radioactive crater. This is why nuclear is bad.
>>69991250
I thought there was engineering concerns over the containment chamber of the molten salt? Something about it being corrosive to most structural bodies.
>>69991224
fair call anon.
but the EROEI invested for nukes is surpassed only by hydro
>>69991178
No.
Thermal yes. But actual places where thermal can be built are far and few in the world. It isn't worth the time and investment to get thermal power research done due to the small number of actual feasible projects. Maybe Iceland and Japan. That's it.
>>69991014
DESIGNATED
DUMPING
TANK
>>69991031
refugees haven't hit critical mass yet
>>69991266
hydro is absolutely more destructive for the environment than oil.
>>69991102
>Solar
Kills birds, the production of solar panels is toxic and requires more energy than it will provide.
>Wind
Spins out of control as a result wind mills catch on fire and collapse killing people. Huge maintenance risks.
>Hydro
Literally meme energy.
>>69991064
His only argument is that when it goes bad, it's FUCKED. And guess what, shit doesn't go bad when you innovate, just look at fucking cars and how efficient they are today compared to 40 years ago, and it'll only get better, same goes for nuclear.
But socialists don't believe in science or innovation anyway, just slavery and breadlines
>>69991340
>it could turn an entire state into a radioactive crater
can we choose which state?
>>69991178
Solar-Thermal creates more energy per plant on average but it's still limited to the same meteorological factors as regular solar.
Geo-thermal however is okay. I forgot about that one. It's just limited to places that are volcanically active.
T H O R I U M
H
O
R
I
U
M
Quite surprised the Thorium shill hasn't popped in yet.
These are also powered by nuclear engines and can travel for 20 to 25 years withour refueling.
Nuclear energy will literally save all our energy problems. It will allow us to build the heaviest and biggest and largest machines and spaceships without having to worry about energy scarcity. The Greens want us to have a society based on energy scarcity which will propell us back into medieval ages. Enjoy the eco-police knocking on your door at night because you're not supposed to be on PC that late.
>>69991494
>Kills birds, the production of solar panels is toxic and requires more energy than it will provide.
Wrong on all counts.
>Spins out of control as a result wind mills catch on fire and collapse killing people. Huge maintenance risks.
Never happened before.
>Literally meme energy.
Meme = I don't like it because it makes nuclear look bad
>>69991224
Yes, due to 30 year moritorium that has only recently been lifted. Also, AP1000 is a gen III+ reactor...so no idea what you're talking about.
>>69991259
I'm not even sure what you're on about. Perhaps you missed the point of the post.
>>69991548
>>69991558
That was coincidental.
Environmentalists are stupid enough that they don't understand the cause they're championing could literally be realized if nuclear energy was deregulated.
I'll approve of nuclear when they can get energy from fusion instead of fission
Sorry guys but nuclear is a dead end. The risks are too high.
Solar/Wind/Hydro only.
http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20150402-the-worst-place-on-earth
>we're saving the planet by going for wind and solar - dumbass
Thorium when?
>>69991391
you need special alloys - hastalloy-N (nickel alloy). Not really a big problem, just something that needs to be engineered. The US actually rand different molten salt loop experiments on varying alloys, but sold them all for scrap because we're retarded.
>>69991102
>>69991266
>Hydro
>flooding areas, and displacing wildlife, or even people
>accidents leads to floods which lead to deaths
>>69991160
= technology = science = thingsidontunderstand = oppression.
On another hand, "warm sunny makes yummy energy" is a concept they're familiar with.
>>69991753
An acceptable cost for green, clean energy.
>>69991266
>>69991494
K, a) stop replying to the troll and b) all either of you had to say was that wind/solar can't produce base load power (ie the most important power demand hence why coal is still around), and while hydro IS good, it can't be used everywhere.
>>69991494
Erythema in your post is false.
>>69991806
>Nuclear
>doesn't displace anyone to build
>accidents can also happen
>somehow less acceptable
>Some nuclear plants are not safe so we should close them all
How about enforcing security? I wish they'd do that here.
>>69991806
>it's okay if people die as long as I'm happy
Literally fascism
But I'm not offended because you're just baiting
>>69991842
>a) stop replying to the troll
You can't make me.
>>69991929
>Nuclear
>fails and turns hundreds of miles of land inhabitable and blights everyone around it
>>69991082
>le antiwar Sanders meme
http://theantimedia.org/bernie-sanders-elephant-in-the-room/
http://www.counterpunch.org/2015/07/27/bernie-sanders-savior-or-seducer-of-the-anti-war-left/
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=NdHtfKZ9iy8
http://original.antiwar.com/derek_davison/2016/02/04/lets-talk-about-bernie-sanders-and-the-middle-east/
The last actual antiwar candidate we had was Ron Paul.
>>69990037
>tfw 80% nuclear
>>69990037
Wow Bernie must love oil and coal.
>>69991842
http://theconversation.com/baseload-power-is-a-myth-even-intermittent-renewables-will-work-13210
Apparently base power load is a meme
>>69991591
Meh. I have always thought of it as a genII+ . I literally have friends and family working for Westinghouse. I had professors in my engineering classes from Westinghouse and Bechtel. They referred to the ap1000 as the false gen III. The advancements brought on are barely advancements except for the new cladding. All the other stuff is just gen 2 with modern advancements because of computer modelling.
Granted it's been a while. I could be remembering wrong. Too much time in the oilfield messes up your memory.
>>69991589
>the Greens are holding us back from the glorious age of personal Metal Gears
Why live?
The French have deliberately built their reactors at positions that would drench all of Germany in radioactive dust on case of a meltdown. We wouldn't be opposed to nuclear power otherwise. However, because Europe is still a bunch of disrespectful children compared to us, we won't rest until there's not a single nuclear reactor left operating on this continent.
>>69992026
Also it needs to be said that nuclear energy is inherently radioactive.
Your TV, your lights, your computer are infected with radioactive electricity. The cancer risks are astronomical.
>>69991929
>doesn't displace anyone to build
It literally only necessitates the plant's superficy. It doesn't require flooding entire valleys.
>accidents can also happen
There are more deaths related to dam releasing water and drowning people downstream than nuclear power related.
>>69990913
We have wind farms here and they just use tiny spaces of farm land.
>>69990156
>smog
I never knew when I boiled water that I was actually producing smog
>>69990156
TOOO MUUUCH BAAAAIIIIT
>>69992114
no wonder i have to pee every ten minutes. i have electric lights in every room.
>>69992024
and for some reason this shit doesnt match his congressional record
>no on iraq war
>no on desert storm
>>69992159
Wind farms are fucking useless, I'd rather have Nuclear power.
>>69992096
You ever been to Frances spent fuel storage site? Pretty amazing stuff. Green faggots need to die out. They are the cause of western decline. Every engineer I have ever worked with loved nature. They hunted or fished(even the aspies). Let engineers do it. We understand it better.
I am an engineer in my country's organization for research into clean and renewable energy. Bernie Sanders is going full fucking retard.
>>69991494
Tidal power is meme energy you fucking retard, not hydro which is older than nuclear and is still viable in places where you can build a dam.
>>69992026
Thanks mate, we buy quite a bit of that.
>>69990037
>Hernie
>retarded
Pick two
>>69992114
Did you ever watch that tv show Utopia? The dumb vegan woman thought microwaves made your food dangerously radioactive.
>>69992159
Right Except those small wind farms maybe provide enough energy for 100 homes. Sure it's fine in the country but you can't power a city or an aluminum plant with wind power faggot. How are you going to ride your aluminum bike without aluminum?
I thought everyone knew this already?
His environmental advisers are fucking greenpeace executives.
>>69992256
>Green faggots need to die out
Sure, but third rate nations opposed to a German dominion over the European mainland also need to die out. Fuck the French. One day, we'll have the political pull to put a 1000% fine on every cent they make with those plants.
>>69992304
You're welcome Britbro, enjoy cheap, safe and clean electricity.
>>69992159
Wind farms are trash. They have low energy efficient, require too much land to be viable and this is not even considering the long terms effects of wind farms to humans (low frequency humming) and animals/fishes.
>>69992039
dude
>Renewable electricity is affordable
I stopped reading there, because renewable energie is not cheap, it's expensive like hell. the windmills require a lot of maintenance because they rust. They solar panels need to be cleaned and are expensive to make.
And that's not even taking in the backups you need for green energie. You need to have coal plants running at 100% all the time, so that if the wind stops blowing, you don't get a power shortage. Green energie is just a scam, it's just coal with a different jacket.
>>69992062
Mostly just the passive safety stuff and the oxide fuel they'll be using...fewer valves, fewer pipes, way smaller footprint, etc. It's still a PWR, so you can't really get away from that.
A PRISM fuel is a better selection for current construction ability, but I'm pretty sure they won't be legal in the US like breeders. Our laws/regulations are absolutely retarded. We'll spend 60 years trying to figure out how to protect a PWR passively and actively when we could just get rid of the risk altogether by operating a fuel at 1 atmosphere.
>>69992469
>low frequency humming
wow so spoopy
>>69992039
The bulk of that stuff (granted i haven't read the pdf on the linked page) seems to talk about the economic viability of 100% renewable energy, rather than the stability and reality of using renewables. Happy to be wrong though.
>>69990391
How can "with energy storage" be lower than "without energy storage"? Isn't having ways to store energy a good thing?
>>69992096
>>69992434
Fuck you, krautcuck. You're the last "nation" that deserves to claim dominion over Europe.
>>69992434
Im all for Germany having self determination but doing shit like that will make people invade you
>>69990254
Trump said he is for Nuclear last night on Hannity
>>69992618
It is. Why do you think folks fight so hard for wind farms to not be built in their backyard?
>>69991399
This is pretty good, but wouldn't the electricity required of the reactor severely weaken the draw for its purpose. With a lot of the electricity being required for the electrolysis and CO2 scrubbing.
>>69991727
Aren't the chinkys big on their molten salt at the moment? They're leaps and bounds ahead of everyone else I read.
>>69992661
>returned on investment
Ie storage is retardedly expensive/shit right now, so it'll hurt their profits.
>>69990037
good news
> nuclear physics STEMLORDs mad af ITT cuz theyll be out of job soon
TOP JEJ
O
P
J
E
J
>>69992532
Not that I disagree with you. You're making great points about how Windmills and Solar panels and how they're aren't a sound long-term investment but this article was providing a counterpoint to the fact that they could provide enough for a base powerload and you haven't really argued against that.
Please do finish the article though and provide your thoughts.
I don't want to live in a nuclear-powered country. That's fucking sickening.
>>69992223
>doesn't match his congressional record
>only looks at two votes
Retard
>>69990037
>he's literally a coalburner
Who else above 60% hydro?
Feels comfy, seeing as we're not going to get a fucking nuclear power station any time soon here haha.
>>69992114
either bait or dumbest post I've read all day
>>69992159
Just to replace coal alone we would need 1.3 billion wind turbines.
A standard wind turbine farm of 20 turbines takes up 1 square kilometer. That is 65 million batches of 20, or, 65 million square kilometers.
Contiguous USA has a grand total area of 7,663,941.7 square kilometers.
Green energy is for fucking idiots.
source:
http://www.windmeasurementinternational.com/wind-info/wind-energy_faq.php
and no, you can't put them closer than that as they need optimal access to the wind.
>>69990501
>american education
Why do most of americans are that stupid? Do most of you believe everything you hear in media?
trolls trolling trolls
>>69992939
Enjoy our nuclear testing fallout, kiwis.
Fukushima and Chernobyl were "no big deal" according to /pol/ but we're suffering the consequences still today.
The UK is swamped in radiation right now, which explains their genepool problem.
>>69990501
>Fukushima poisoned the entire Pacific.
no it didn't
>>69992958
Our education has been funded down to not make the minorities look bad
That and kids aren't practicing their skills doing readi go the side or looking up history themselves
>>69992023
There are smaller reactors that can be sealed off in the event of a meltdown and would only produce about 2% of the radioactivity of Fukushima
A dam will always flood land when it's build and will always flood more land when it fucks up.
>>69993055
>Fukushima and Chernobyl were "no big deal" according to /pol/ but we're suffering the consequences still today.
no we're not
>>69990037
>>69990156
Holy shit if this isn't bait
>>69990310
HOL UP
>smacks lips
[citation needed]
Every article I have read has said the GOP wants to DECREASE NASAs budget....
>>69992799
That makes sense, although it shows that they should invest in more efficient ways to store energy to become more competitive.
>>69993055
If only you knew what the natural background radiation in granitic regions was...
>>69993168
republicans love money more than anything else
being good at science = money
republicans regularly increase the government science budget by massive amounts, even black science guy admitted this and it pissed liberals off
>>69990156
this level of bait has me screaming and point a gun at my computer.
>>69993052
Prefer fallout to a country full of mudslimes. Seems like you got your karma for being disgusting french pigs for so many years.
>>69993239
this
everything is radioactive
hope you don't plan on eating a banana anytime soon
>>69993055
They are "no big deal" as absolutely any competent regulatory oversight would have stopped the disasters from occurring.
Chernobyl was a clusterfuck of Soviet incompetency and when you run a test when you turn off the cooling mechanisms in a reactor maybe, just maybe, clear it with someone who has a good technical competency of the reactor itself not just the desk jockey.
Fukushima was a colossal fuck up that can only be built on a society of that prefers back patting and favours over safety. Any fool could figure that putting backup generators at the sea floor level in a tsunami prone area is maybe a bad idea.
But my nuclear memes.
>>69993070
TY based coriolis effect. Nuclear fallout can't travel across the equator. So I guess an entire half of the pacific is just fine!
>>69992848
well green energie can create a base load, but i think that the fourth generation biofuels will do that.
wind and solar plants can be used, but there aren't that many locations with optimal conditions for them.
While everyone is talking about the basic ones, the real energie will be coming from biofuels. The only problem is the raising world population which demands more food.
>>69993295
At least we're not sheepfucker kiwis
>>69993316
They're no big deal because nothing bad even happened outside of infowars bullshit.
http://www.opb.org/news/article/scientists-say-stop-worrying-about-fukushima-radio/
Delvan Neville, a PhD candidate in Radiation Health Physics at Oregon State University, has tested dozens of samples of albacore tuna for radioactivity. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s intervention levels for cesium 134 and cesium 137 is 1200 becquerels per kilogram. The highest levels he’s seen in his albacore, of both cesium 134 and cesium 137 combined, is 1 becquerel per kilogram - a level so low that his device couldn’t pick it up until he concentrated the samples.
“That’s more than 1,000 times lower than the point where the FDA would even think about whether they need to let people eat that food still,” he said.
>>69993430
1,000 times too high.
Fukushima ruined the entire ocean.
>>69992890
>>69992223
And for the record dumbass he voted for the bill that was pushed through under Bush which has allowed the President unilateral power to bomb anywhere he wants without declaration of war nor approval from Congress as required by the Constitution.
His stance on Syria Isis and the like is no different than Clinton's wanting to bomb them and in some ways even more insane due to the ignorance of it. He wants the Saudis Turks and other gulf states to take care of it despite that little detail that is now open information that these are the nations(including the west and America) that are funding isis to destabilize Syria.
He also voted for the Iraqi sanctions which killed in excess of 500k people and supports the current Saudi invasion in Yemen which is already slated to kill hundreds of thousands of people.
He has been a staunch defender of the F35 program despite it being a massive corporate welfare scheme for Lockheed Martin this goes against both his supposed antiwar and anti corprashuns stances.
He is only "antiwar" when it is anti team red which is shown by his voting record of voting against Bush as did many Democrats but they all turned around and voted to fund the war.
>>69993414
>biofuels
The biggest meme of them all.
>>69993414
the way forward is nuclear
fuck greenpeace, they set the entire world back decades and helped fucking destroy our environment
no, seriously, fuck them
and god bless France for blowing their ship up and killing a bunch of them
seriously though
fuck them
no single entity or group has probably had as much of a negative impact on the environment as greenpeace.
>>69990037
>>69990724
"Green" energy is cheaper per kWh than both nuclear and fossil energy sources
http://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.cfm?id=19&t=3
>>69993250
I know that politics is a secret game of greed but what I really want to know is
[citation needed]
Only positive article on republicans is this article about increasing NASA's budget and that was proposed by a majority of Republicans in congress
>http://www.theverge.com/2015/12/16/10289030/nasa-budget-increase-2016-congress-funding
>>69993415
You've confused us with the Welsh. An easy mistake to make with your appalling school system.
>>69993472
fyi the ocean is full of whale cum too
blue whales release 400 gallons of sperm when they ejaculate
Fuck the cunts who keep spouting the radiation meme
You guys can't even feel radiation. How do you know that it's real?
All you know is the medical jew tells you that cancer comes from radiation.
Radiation is a bigger hoax than climate change.
Go nuclear.
>>69993627
If you're so unafraid of radiation why don't you go take a swim in Chernobyl waters?
>>69993556
No, you're sheepfuckers. Just because the Welsh are sheepfuckers as well doesn't mean you're not sheepfuckers.
>>69993472
It said the device for detecting radiation couldn't find anything unless it was concentrated in an amount that wouldn't be seen in a leak which means there was no where near enough material affecting the ocean to cause large scale damage
>>69993541
i don't see a problem with turning plankton in biofuel.
>>69990501
> When nuclear power fails (and it does often)
It did twice, shush.
>>69992661
Storage is expensive AF so solar and wind are only viable if and only if the energy they produce is immediately consumed.
Solar panels on your home being used to supplement your energy use from the grid is viable huge solar farms are not viable due to the storage issue.
Fossils fuels hydro power and nuclear don't face this storage issue because they can constantly produce energy unlike solar and wind which can produce some of the time and the rest would have to be stored for night use/non windy day use.
>>69993556
>denial
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jG6JFrWjGTE
>>69993483
>hardcore sites
>9gag
>4chan
kek
>>69990037
Why must you stupid fucking people continously try to devolve civilization? Bernie IS a moron. That's not an opinion, he's fucking stupid, and so are literally all of his stupid fucking ideas. Go kill yourself, take your marxist kike overlord with you. Please.
>>69993748
Geothermal also doesn't have storage issues.
>>69990501
>Fukushima poisoned the entire Pacific
Maybe you should look at your own coasts with all your chemicals you dump into them.
also it was a slight increase in overall background radiation. Do you live in a place with marmer? if so you are living in a place with even more background radiation
>>69993760
>An Australian couple are holidaying in New Zealand and driving along a country road between two farms they come across a farmer sexually assaulting a sheep. The driver stops, rolls his window down and says "Hey Mate! In Australia we shear those things!" to which the buggering farmer responds immediately "I ain't shearin this beauty with anyone".
>>69990156
Bait or not, the sad part is that's what many liberal cucks (especially women) actually believe.
>>69993472
>/infowars.com/
I bet you watched that video of the guy with the Geiger counter on a beach made of naturally radioactive sand and thought that was a legitimate example of "muh Fukushima".
I bet you also think that kikebook meme with the red and orange coming from Japan was a radiological graph
>>69993918
DUDE, I LIVE on the on the west coast. I have been to the beaches and seen the damage Fukushima has caused WITH MY OWN EYES.
>>69993627
Tell that to anyone who has suffer more than 3 gys of exposure.
>>69993993
Post mutated fish please.
>>69993217
As far as i know, that storage tech is literally the best that's available and storage tech is growing in relevancy and performance, hence it's inclusion
>>69994044
This fish was killed by Fukushima. Look at the radiation eating away at its flesh.
>>69993869
Geothermal isn't viable outside of a handful of places with access to volcanic activity so it isn't really worth discussing unless you live in Iceland and they have already built up a decent amount of geothermal plants.
>>69992687
If invaders step up, they'll be stamped the fuck back down. We alone are the world's strongest. Not you, not the British and certainly not the French.
>>69993993
you live in america, you have only seen the damage caused by your oil spills, or do you think that those chemicals that your government sprayed on the oil magically removed the oil? NO it made it worse
>>69993738
There's at least 1 plant every 3 weeks that gets dangerously close to melting down. It's still a risk.
>>69994173
Who is this Fukushima you speak of?
Is he the legendary fisherman?
>>69994196
2 world wars say otherwise but seriously you guys need to chil
>>69993993
Yeah. Low quality bait.
>>69994051
This just shows how inefficient and ungreen these technologies are. Lets build mines to harvest lithium and pollute huge areas so that greenies will feel better about themselves.
Why not just make hydrogen gas, store it and them burn it? You'll get like 50% efficiency. That's pretty good. And it can be a closed loop. Zero emissions.
>>69994173
damn....
>>69990037
Cleanest most efficient method of energy production is killing the planet. Wow are you a child? A retard? Go do some real research you faggot.
>>69993996
Acute radiation poisoning is not the same thing as the radiation hoax people keep meming about.
If you can feel the radiation burn then yeah you're fucked.
>>69994263
[Citation needed]
>>69994173
A single death rotting fish is.
>>69994263
proof
>>69990037
It's a coal-fired power plant on your pic, moran.
>>69994263
I'll share something with you:
Statistically, 100% of ALL nuclear power plants go critical during their exploitation.
Scary, I know.
>>69994298
I did my research. Nuclear is the most evil energy on the planet. It has destroyed countries and oceans.
>>69994196
Yes well good luck with that.
>>69994278
You needed the assistance of 50 other countries to defeat us. I'm not a fan of Hitler, but you are weak cowards with shit aim compared to us.
>>69990156
Its water vapor, you do know how these work, right?
>>69990831
They are so expensive that they are less economical than previous gen plants
>>69994263
1. Source
2. There's layers upon layers of fail-safes. Dangerously close probably means gets within the last few layers of fail-safes.
>>69994316
>>69994318
http://www.ucsusa.org/sites/default/files/attach/2016/03/Near-Misses-US-Power-Plants-2015-full-report.pdf
>>69994196
A million of them stepped up just last year and you welcomed them anus wide open.
>>69990037
We in fact need a lot more SAFE nuclear plants. Not less. The safe part is hard but doable. Sure, zero risk is impossible but the energy (clean) is badly needed.
>>69990272
3 mile island proved that American safety mechanisms can prevent a disaster. Also, if nuclear was so bad, france would be a wasteland right now.
>>69994263
You are right I heard that many plants reach criticality when they are running. That is real scary mane
Reminder that nuclear power has saved millions of lives that otherwise would have been lost due to pollution, and will continue to save millions more in the future.
Source:
http://pubs.giss.nasa.gov/abs/kh05000e.html
>>69994283
Dunno about your Hydrogen theory, but batteries have always sucked, the technology *is* a good idea (you can bet if they were 100% efficient Nuclear Power plants would use them in a heartbeat) but battery's just haven't grown like every other area of tech.
>>69994415
Actually it was the British Soviets and a bunch of resistance movements we just provided support
>>69994508
But anon, France is a waste land now
>>69990037
>>69990156
Look at all these faggots falling for your bait. Well done. Not expecting such a thing from a burger.
Straya' step up.
>>69994464
US power plants with low standards = problems.
Who would have guessed that.
Maybe enforce your regulations with fines of a bilions
>>69990037
>fail constantly
>like Chernobyl and Fukushima
>which are literally the only two that failed
>out of thousands upon thousands of plants
>>69994051
here's some ground-breaking storage technology for you m8s
>>69994654
>Officer, I didn't rob the bank all the other 364 days!
>>69994569
Hate to be one of those guys. But batteries will always be inefficient. No matter the money dumped. Storing energy and utilizing it later is difficult. Just getting energy efficiently is difficult. I can't see efficient batteries anytime in the future. At least not ones that utilize chemical reactions. Entropy is a bitch
>>69994568
things greenpeacefags don't want you to know:
nuclear power is statistically the safest form of power
more people have died from the construction of wind turbines than nuclear power has caused, and solar power panel creation causes a heavy burden on the environment.
>>69994654
fukushima was also heavily outdated and only kept online solely due to government corruption
chernobyl was soviet russia, nothing more needs said.
>>69994707
You can make the same claims about any type of power production
>>69994654
>you are statistically more likely to die from X than from Y so why are you complaining about me wanting to increase your chance of dying from Y
>>69994677
They are talking about energy storage, not the storage of waste you murican
>>69994707
yeah but its like the bank was left open with a sign to the vault on the days in which it was robbed
>>69994654
#NotAllNuclearPlants
>>69992187
But no, seriously, that's probably diabeetus go to the doctor.
>>69994825
>I don't know how to do a cost/benefit analysis
>>69994840
oh my b
i remember reading a very important paper wrt battery technology 2-3 years ago, I wonder if I could dig it up
>>69994919
Death to those who insult nuclear
>>69990218
>>69990314
>>69991281
>>69992173
>>69992180
>>69993161
>>69993289
>>69993947
>>69994427
>believing the nuclear Jew
>>69990037
Ah the retarded green lobby, how I've missed thee
T. Petroleum engineer
>>69990037
>Nuclear is bad
Make it stop.
>>69994990
every greenpeace member deserves to be executed for what they've done
I'm not joking. They should be held accountable at an international court for their crimes against humanity and our environment.
>>69994579
But you had our back USAbros and that's the main thing.
>>69990809
>How about when a coal mine collapses and traps hundreds of miners? That's more casualties right there than any nuclear incident ever did
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chernobyl_disaster
https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catastrophe_nucl%C3%A9aire_de_Tchernobyl
>>69990037
Well even if you're one of those right wing scumbags that hate the environment, you have to agree that shutting down nuclear reactors is important at a time like these, when Right Wing Fringe Extremist Groups (that have nothing to do with Islam) are constantly terrorizing the world.
It's for our safety.
>>69994747
I'm not arguing pro or con; just discussing the plot >>69990391 with >>69992661
Though, yeah, you are most likely correct. I've heard massive capacitors maybe be able to replace batteries, that some are on par right now after being not even close for ages, etc.
>>69994946
Interested
>>69994568
Also:
reminder that nuclear power is far from the only means of generating power that has created devastating disasters.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banqiao_Dam
>These dam failures killed an estimated 171,000 people;[1] 11 million people lost their homes. It also caused the sudden loss of 18 GW of power, the power output equivalent of roughly 9 very large modern coal-fired thermal power stations.
But we don't constantly hear about how hydropower leads to huge disasters.
>>69990156
>>69990037
>/pol/ WILL fall for such obvious low quality bait
>>69994825
Let me fix that for you:
>you are statistically more likely to die from X than from Y so why are you complaining about me wanting to slightly increase your chance of dying from Y, when it would dramatically decrease the chance of dying from X
>>69995084
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mining_accident#21st_century
>>69995056
What exactly have they done?
>>69994919
>Chernobyl
>31 recorded deaths
>estimated related deaths range anywhere from 4,000 to 27,000
>300,000 people displaced
>Banqiao Dam Collapse
>26,000 dead from flooding,
>145,000 dead from subsequent famine and epidemics,
>11 million homeless
#NotAllHydroPlants
>>69995224
impressive bait
>>69995224
>do exactly what the terrorists want you to do is the only solution
nice
you fucking little pussy bitch
yeah lets KILL all our progress so these camel fucking turban wearers can succeed in their mission to spread fear.
>>69995317
They are the useful idiots of the oil and coal industry
>>69990156
Nuclear fissure is dirty, fusion however is clean as fuck. But the technology isn't there yet
>>69995317
They are the peta equivalent for Energy. They think they are doing good but they are actually doing way more harm than good.
It doesn't really matter what Bernie wants, Fukushima set nuclear industry back by decades, market is all dried up.
Stupid gook motherfuckers shitting things up for everyone.
Nuclear is the future m8
>>69995306
> Accident 1: "Although no human fatalities were reported,"
>Accident 2: Twenty-nine out of thirty-one miners at the site were killed
>Accident 3: "Twenty-nine men underground died immediately"
>Accident 4: "301 people died"
And then we have chernobyl:
>"... and a future predicted total of 3940 deaths from radiation-induced cancer and leukemia"
Get educated cucky
>>69995306
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_coal_mining_accidents_in_China
>6,995 workers were killed in 4,344 Chinese coal mine accidents during 2002.
>>69995224
non-bought off right wingers love nuclear power to death(see: Trump) Nuclear power is cost effective, and a capitalist loves that term. Also, a properly run nuclear power plant has essentially zero impact on the environment so you don't have EPA on your ass. And because the safety standards are so strict, they're pretty much all 'properly ran' sans being outdated as fuck(thanks, greenpeacefags)
Trump is the only pro-nuclear candidate right now which is fucking hilarious. He's the best choice if you care about the environment.
>>69995317
they've made the entire world hate nuclear power and instead of being in a nuclear utopia we're still burning coal
they singlehandedly caused the destruction of our environment.
They are the absolute definition of useful idiots.
>>69990037
a great scapegoat to take money.
instead he could upgrade the plants like they should havbe been.
he most likely take tose dollars and let it continue as it is
>>69990037
That """pollution""" is steam.
People who think nuclear power is dangerous are absolute retards. It's safer than even hydroelectric.
>>69990156
I know this is bait, but I've always wanted to say this.
It's just water vapor, bro!
>>69990254
>im seriously reconsidering voting for him
Kill yourself
>seriously has anti-science bullshit completely taken over both parties?
There was never a time when it wasn't. 'Equality' is incompatible with evolutionary understanding.
>>69995528
See >>69995571
The list is far from exhaustive and only covers the last 15 years.
Chernobyl was 30 years ago.
>>69995350
Thanks, Přemo.
>>69990037
Well there was a radiation leak discovered in Florida at Biscayne Bay, but I am told its below the safe drinking levels for Canada and Australia.
>>69990093
>>69990037
"pollution," no.
"waste" yes
And we don't have any way to dispose of that waste. Yucca Mountain is no longer on the table and we don't have anything to replace it with. Numerous states have already said they won't approve any new nuclear plants until there's an actual solution to waste disposal.
Nuclear has a lot of benefits sure but you can't just ignore having a bunch of radioactive waste laying around with no long-term plan to store it.
Also nuclear plants can be terrorist targets, so there is some national security concern. Especially if Trump is president, given that his foreign policy virtually guarantees more terrorist attacks. Turns out slaughtering innocent civilians won't make Muslims in the Middle East love America, who knew?
>>69995528
I'm from Pennsylvania you dickwad, coal has killed far more than nuclear power has.
And I live minutes away from the 'worst' western nuclear power plant meltdown — three mile island.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Coal_mining_disasters_in_Pennsylvania
we have an entire fucking town on fire that has been burning for half a century because of coal mining
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centralia,_Pennsylvania
that alone has probably caused more people to die simply from pollution than every nuclear death combined
>>69995890
>Especially if Trump is president, given that his foreign policy virtually guarantees more terrorist attacks. Turns out slaughtering innocent civilians won't make Muslims in the Middle East love America, who knew?
obama has arguably killed more innocents than any other US president in history
trump has an anti-interventionist policy you dumbass
>>69991259
>>69991419
That's a much safer reactor, basically solves the problems most people have with current nuclear reactors
>>69995890
>make rockets
>put waste inside
>send waste to space, preferably up for a colision course with the Sun
Anyone know Trump's stance on nooklar power?
>>69995694
I agree that we should keep nuclear energy but just enjoy playing advocate of the devil.
That being said mining accidents don't put civillians who don't have anything to do with the mining at risk, it just endangers the miners while a nuclear meltdown is an huge danger for the whole population living in an big area around the reactor.
Also mining accidents wildly only occur in un-developed and not well-maintained mines, while meltdowns can occur in virtually every reactor with our present technology.
>>69995890
>you can't just ignore having a bunch of radioactive waste laying around with no long-term plan to store it.
bury it forever in the middle of straya. Nothing but dirt and abos there
problem solved
>>69995967
>obama has arguably killed more innocents than any other US president in history
lolno.
And the innocents he does kill are as collateral, he's not actually going out of his way to kill civilians on purpose the way Trump wants to.
>anti-interventionist
Is that what you call intentionally targetting and killing innocent civilians? Doesn't sound like anti-interventionist to me, sounds like he wants to start WWIII with the whole Middle East.
Stop believing the memes anon and try looking at Trump's policies for once
>>69996029
he said he loves it multiple times
>“I’m in favor of nuclear energy, very strongly in favor of nuclear energy,” Trump said. “If a plane goes down people keep flying. If you get into an auto crash people keep driving.”
wrt fukushima
>>69996029
"Donald Trump: The real estate mogul has made strong public statements supporting nuclear power, but tends to favor further development of natural gas."
Sauce: http://dailycaller.com/2016/02/20/heres-where-the-2016-candidates-stand-on-nuclear-power/#ixzz44xVH4uh0
>>69996025
Sending nuclear waste on a rocket is highly hazardous, due to the non-negligible chance of the rocket blowing up in mid air.
Nuclear waste burial sites are perfectly viable, if it was not for the NIMBY backlash.
The materials with the longest half life are the least radioactive anyway.
>>69996130
>And the innocents he does kill are as collateral
hospitals are collateral!
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/04/world/asia/afghanistan-bombing-hospital-doctors-without-borders-kunduz.html
>>69996025
>make rockets
>put waste inside
>send waste to the middle east, preferably with significant amount of explosives
Fixed that weak shit
>>69996025
Not safe or economically viable at all.
>>69996159
>>69996149
Based
>>69996130
>>69996212
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/oct/15/90-of-people-killed-by-us-drone-strikes-in-afghani/
drones have a 10% effectiveness only killing innocents 90% of the time :^)
>>69996061
And coal smog affects everyone and releases a shitload of carcinogenic stuff.
>>69996130
http://edition.cnn.com/2015/11/05/asia/afghanistan-doctors-without-borders-kunduz-hospital/
"Collateral"
>>69990156
I thought the only environmental effects it has are rasing water temp, making water more acidic, deoxygenating waters, sulfur oxide or something like that creating acid rain.
But then again that just a small part of a science lesson i had 6 years ago
>>69996326
Man. It's bait, actual Obama fags and cucks don't honestly come to /pol/ looking for discussion. If you see a Leftist opinion here, 90% of the time that shit is b8
>>69996061
So it's okay to use coal instead of nuclear, because it's only poor workers who'll pay the price?
Is this actually what leftists believe?
>>69995890
>Also nuclear plants can be terrorist targets, so there is some national security concern.
What are they going to do? Blow up the control panel? You think some dirty sandniggers know how to make a nuclear power plant melt down? How to circumvent the fucking safeties?
>Especially if Trump is president, given that his foreign policy virtually guarantees more terrorist attacks. Turns out slaughtering innocent civilians won't make Muslims in the Middle East love America, who knew?
Why would we give a fuck what some stupid faggots in the Middle East think about us? What are they going to do, and how?
>>69996384
>indianspaceagency.jpeg
>>69994406
[Citation needed]
Actually, it's not the reactors that give off the most pollution but the searching of uranium. Nuclear gives off high thermal pollution but it's contribution to air pollution is rather low. I think we should invest less in nuclear energy as a resource is due to the fact its energy yield is low.
>>69996328
That amount has been reduced to virtually neglectable amounts by our current filtering technology, the only countries having that problem are the less-developed ones who don't have it. And you can bet your ass they are not developed enough for nuclear power plants.
Also permitting every country the information of nuclear fusion is very dangerous, but that's a whole different issue.
>>69996061
it also destroys the environment you dipshit
>>69995890
>terrorist targets
it's more difficult to get inside a nuclear power plant without security than it is to get inside fort knox
>>69994636
It's actually retarded regulations that stop new much much much safer plants from being built.
>>69996455
Nice strawman you got there senpai, it put's less of the civilization at risk that's all what i'm saying.
>>69996130
anon I wouldn't bother, the retards here don't recognize history before 2008
not gonna look up the numbers but I wouldn't be surprised if W. had more in the modern era, to say nothing of y'know the 200 years before 2000 that were nothing but raping and pillaging exotic locales
like, what do these people think happened in Georgia in 1865? Sherman went around hugging and kissing people?
>>69990037
Polution?
You fucking uneducated faggot.
Pick p a fucking book.
Waste isotope is negligeable, and the reactors only churn out water vapour.
They are also super safe, as long as they pass the examinations which most do
>>69996493
>What are they going to do, and how?
is that... is that a joke?
>>69996606
since when is "fa.m" changed to "senpai" what is this shit
>>69996512
>its energy yield is low.
u wot
>>69990037
How exactly retarded are you?
>>69996061
>>69996606
> mining accidents don't put civillians who don't have anything to do with the mining at risk, it just endangers the miners
>mining accidents wildly only occur in un-developed and not well-maintained mines
What strawman
>>69996567
With the regulations they have in place, it doesn't give off that much pollution. I think they'd rather been good at preventing groundwater contamination and being safe with it. You're just scared.
>>69996512
LOW ENERGY YIELD
AMERICANS SCIENTIFICALLY ILLITERATE CONFIRMED.
>>69990809
Actually a high school kid designed one in 1979, but it would probably be easier to steal parts of fire alarms to make a-bomb than steal it.
>>69996648
So keep them in their disgusting sandnigger lands and out of our lands. Problems forever and always solved. And if they get uppity again, bomb the shit out of them.
>>69995890
We do. The high-activity waste needs to be reprocessed. Remaining Plutonium and Uranium can be reused in fuel, the remaining high-activity isotopes decay to natural radiation level in about 500-1000 years.
What many people do not understand - reprocessing is banned in many countries, including USA and Germany, on the grounds of non-proliferation and other bullshit. This artificially creates 100-fold amount of HAW and increases its lifetime to hundreds of thousands of years.
And no, this has nothing to do with transmutation, transmutation is a more advanced solution that isn't fully developed yet. Reprocessing has been in use for decades.
>>69996745
no fucking way
I live in Pennsylvania, we have abandoned mines leaking acid mine drainage fucking EVERYWHERE
>>69996512
>Nuclear has low energy yield
Simply Ebin
>>69996682
If you're looking at the external costs that go along with, such as mining uranium, transportation, and then disposing the waste, then you realize that we actually waste a lot of energy just to use it. If by itself, then it produces high energy, sure.
>>69996866
>Remaining Plutonium and Uranium can be reused in fuel,
this
'spent' nuclear 'waste' is just fuel that is deemed to be cost ineffective to keep using
shame germany destroyed their nuclear power because of a dumb bitch
>>69996808
>Actually a high school kid designed one in 1979
He didn't design a nuclear bomb you doofus, but a nuclear reactor.
Believe it or not, making a functional nuclear bomb is a lot harder than making a very basic nuclear reactor.
I blame the Simpsons entirely for an entire generation unaware of how fucking efficient and clean Nuclear Power is compared to the Simpsons.
>>69996682
given the time. A kilogram of coal burns out in hours. A kilogram of Uranium burns out in centuries
>>69996732
Those aren't strawmen, those are statements unbacked by sources, it's a big difference.
>>69996980
No, no it doesn't you idiot.
You realize you have to mine coal, right? And you need to mine exponentially more coal than uranium.
>>69996980
Eh, compared with mantaining fossil fuel extraction?
Or the energy required to mine and assemble parts for other renewables?
Nuclear energy yield completely outshadows all of those issues.
You actually fell for the fallacies and fearmongering the petrol industry jews spread to keep nuclear from completely replacing them, well done cuck
Is it stupid to think that nuclear plants built using modern technology would be much safer than ones built in the frickin 50s/60s/70s? Even those were relatively safe, seeing how many there are and how many casualties resulted from them. Fukushima was built in the 50s, and so were three mile island and Chernobyl.
>>69997279
he has no plans on building new ones you idiot
bernie's environmental advisers are greenpeace execs and he's explicitly anti-nuclear
bernie wants to decomission every active nuclear power plant in the country
>>69990037
>trusting the fossil fuel jew
>>69997168
Okay, bud. Because I'm sure finding where Uranium is just as easy as finding coal. I bet the abundance of uranium isn't lower or anything. Coal's energy isn't exactly perfect either, but I'd rather invest in different energies than nuclear. Not like we should get rid of it, but I honestly don't see it being as inefficient in the long run.
>>69996989
This. Gee I wonder why france supplies energy to almost all of europe and even the CERN research labs.
If we can get technology going that uses nuclear waste there is literally no way it can keep being dismissed as "dangerous", no matter how easily they fall for petrol industry jew lies
>>69991284
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MJpSrqitSMQ
Posting better fusion reactor.
>>69997448
Australia + Canada, our two biggest allies, have half the world's uranium supply.
>>69997528
>Gee I wonder why france supplies energy to almost all of europe and even the CERN research labs.
reminder that Germany went from exporting excess energy to importing it when they went 'green'
>>69997448
Uranium and plutonium are fucking radioactive and dense ou fucking twit, you can find it easily and prospect it like any other mineral, except you need less of it for more energy yield than any other fossil fuel
>>69997564
That's not the case I'm making. What I'm saying is, it takes a lot of energy to just start making this energy a resource. I think we should invest in more efficient and available (everywhere) energy. There's nothing to fear with this energy. I don't want to get rid of it.
>>69997779
>What I'm saying is, it takes a lot of energy to just start making this energy a resource
no
>I think we should invest in more efficient and available (everywhere) energy.
because you're an idiot
refer to
>>69992946
>>69997779
Everything has a setup cost. Nuclear Power's is less than solar or hydro.
>>69997779
The investment to yield for nuclear is one of the lowest of all the energy sources. It also creates plenty of jobs.
I like how youve ignored the posts that debunk your bullshit and have only thrown misinformed bullshit at more weakly structured older posts. Learn that strategy from SJW or some other indoctrinated group, orare you this neckdeep in jewish and corporatist bullshit.
>>69994173
>This fish was killed by Fukushima.
That fish was filleted with a knife
>>69992618
it's not spoopyness. prolonged exposure to low frequencies has adverse effects on any living organism.
>>69998369
? I'm all for invest in all different alternative energies. I'm just in favour of renewable than nonrenewable. That's all.
>>69994173
Radiation doeant eat away jack shit.
Proof that it was killed by fukushima and not the wastes that other fossil fuel producers dump into the sea?
>>69994173
That just looks like your standard rotting fish.
>>69998472
Then just burn plants instead of coal.
>>69998472
Which is why fission is the best as the base source of energy, alongside the lower yield renewables where they are most efficient, to bridge our energy dependencies to nuclear fusion
![k0tJRAQ[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/JUl13cg.jpg "k0tJRAQ[1]")
