How is going to deal with Transfags now that they've lost their one argumen

>trying to write a scientific article as a blogpost
Is there a tldr? It hurts my eyes.

The north american continent is the home of transfags.

>>69867700
>How is going to deal with Transfags
How is OP type english

>fucking newfies.

>>69867874
Brazil and Thailand have it worse though?

I guess I can't fault Thailand because it's more for business than mental degeneracy.
That's how they makes their livins.

>>69867700
It directly mentions the SRY gene which is present on the Y chromosome and is responsible for the transcription of an expression factor for MALE sexual anatomy. Failure of this gene to be transcribed causes FAILURE to produce viable sexual anatomy, and a sterile offspring. How the author ignored this and continued on their rant I cannot understand.

>>69869463
Actually if the SRY gene is faulty it causes a normal XY female who is capable of having children.
Te interest disorders where the SRY gene is normal are the ones that can't have kids

>>69867700
that is a lot of words just to say that this author is an anti science trans fetishist

Ah, the New Statesman, that bastion of objective scientific research and analysis.

Definitely not a Marxist agitator rag known for attacking every edifice of British society, nope, never anything like that.

>>69867700
That is a lot of loyalty for a hired luddite. Even though it itself mentions that all that matters are the functioning sex organs of a certain sex.

That article used a lot of words to say nothing.

The entire focus of the article is intersex individuals, not trannies. Nobody denies the existence of people who, based on their genetics and physiology, cannot be cleanly categorized into "male" or "female." But that means nothing in the case of people who identify as the opposite sex. When you feel like one sex but are actually the other sex, there's still something obviously wrong with you.