Libertarianism is the most rational political philosophy. There's simply no denying it. Why in the hell aren't you a libertarian?
This is so fucking accurate
I am.
Because I stopped smoking weed when I got a decent job.
>>55406618
>Posts rhetoric without substance
and this is why people think libertarians are retarted.
Because roads
>>55406840
>talking about substance on /pol/
>spelling retarded wrong while calling someone retarded
i am though
>>55406618
You don't really know what libertarian is, do you? It shows. It's okay. You have to be born that way. Compared to libertarians, you'll always be some measure of blue pilled. All the red pills are made by the blood of libertarians. It's literally the holy grail.
>>55406618
Roads.
/thread
>>55406618
>Libertarianism is the most rational political philosophy.
[citation needed]
Daily reminder, folks, that all claims need to have evidence.
>>55406618
Roads
>>55407518
you cant /thread your own post sheep shagger
>>55408233
I just fucking did you faggot.
/thread
Is there a difference between Libertarianism and Old School Liberalism?
>>55408401
no wonder we put the 7th state in the corner
>>55408136
private roads are better
>>55406618
Soon.
>>55406618
Because it's the teenager approach to what a rational ideology is. After all not many libertarian philosophers fought in a war or anything of the sort. Most were career academics. Literally who cares?
>>55406618
Libertarians, too smart for socialism, too stupid for anything else.
>>55408823
Statist believe the only way to combat monopolies, caused by state intervention, fight corruption, causes by state intervention, and fight indoctrination, by the state, is with MORE GOVERMENT
>>55409209
>it's the teenager approach to what a rational ideology is
Explain or this is just teenager approach to things you don't like.
>>55409209
Thomas Sowell was an ex-Korea veteran
>>55409334
>>55409379
*triggered*
because life it's too complicated and after you read a bit of history you realize that a single platform can't cover all aspects of it
>>55409334
This is what makes socialists like the Greek absolute retards. Big government ruined his country and now he thinks big government will fix it.
>>Ted
>>libertarian
>>55406618
No hope.
But I am.
>>55409653
>answering to himself
>thinking I'm a socialist
It's okay libertarianism isn't the worst.
>>55406618
Is this the greatest defender of free market principles and traditional values in the galaxy?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yeKZmIfhEJM
>>55406618
the only more rational way is nihilistic anarchism where you even have to justify less... as you don't recognize anything (authority morality property etc...) political noobs on these boards don't know the difference between political ideology and politics itself... but yes libertarians are without a doubt the most logical of the mainstream philosophies
yeah but you just would be a bit of a dick
yeah but you just would be a bit of a kunt
libertarianism worked in 1800s America particularly the wild west when there were fewer idiots and even fewer nignogs, and no mass media, and thus people had morals naturally without a state enforcing it
Because strong nation-states are needed to battle the various global manifestations of unpleasantness in the world today (economic neoliberalism, Islamic fundamentalism, etc.)
>>55410692
I like philosophy but it's better that it doesn't merge with politics.
>>55407013
Implying he didn't once have a tart and he was only recently re'tarted'
>>55407722
>[citation needed]
Daily reminder, folks, that all claims need to have evidence.
The fuck, shit like that is not really a matter of hard evidence, but rather critical thinking
you must be 12
>>55412471
I'd argue that Teddy Roosevelt era US was a solid balance of libertarian individualism and nationalism
>>55412654
Evidence isn't confined to the hard sciences. He means arguments and data.
>>55412803
I like T. Roosevelt but I'm a thorough-going nationalist. His support for the Pure Food and Drug Act and national parks would probably draw the ire of most libertarians as statist intrusions.
>>55406618
We have finally accomplished our dream and created a libertarian society.
You walk into work tomorrow. Your boss calls you into his office. He pulls out his cock and tells you to suck it or you are fired. There are no longer any government resources to sue your employer for sexual harassment. Your employer can now do and say whatever he wants and fire you for whatever reason he wants. There is also no longer any unemployment or welfare. If you get fired you will literally starve and die and so will your wife and kids.
>Why in the hell aren't you a libertarian?
Because I don't like sucking cock.
>>55406618
Human beings aren't rational, ergo any attempt to govern human societies via rationality will inevitably fail.
>>55406618
I learned about economics and stopped being 14 years old
Libertarianism is fine in theory, and probably the ideal system for the hardworking man who has no say in government, but it is far from ideal.
What would be ideal would be a period of Fascism, to set the nation on the right track and expunge the leeches and unwanted elements from society. Then a transition to a more Libertarian society can be made.
>>55406618
I am a libertarian, brother.
>>55408823
lol, I own those boots. So comfy and quick to break in.
http://raikoth.net/libertarian.html
>>55414081
In a libertarian society ,though, you could bite off his cock and hold him hostage at gun point until he hands over the company.
>Checkmate
>>55406618
vote paul now
http://drudgereport.com/now2.htm
>http://drudgereport.com/now2.htm
http://drudgereport.com/now2.htm
>http://drudgereport.com/now2.htm
http://drudgereport.com/now2.htm
Libertarianism wouldn't work
You need a government to do the shit the free market won't do
If a free market would naturally fix everything, lawless countries would be far better off than they are
Redistributing wealth keeps money flowing, and keeps the economy strong
>>55417286
Libertarianism is not anarchy.
Anarchy is not Libertarianism.
>>55417621
>Murray Rothbard
>Hans Herman Hoppe
>Jan Narverson
>Michael Heumer
Why are all those libertarian philosophers anarchist?
>>55417863
Because they aren't.
>>55406618
Fucking hell this is so true
>>55416189
Then why aren't you libertarian?
>>55406618
>Why in the hell aren't you a libertarian?
I am, I like to call myself a classical-liberal, but it's pretty much the same.
